Download PDF
J Pediatr Intensive Care 2019; 08(02): 108-112
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1675193
Case Report
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Apnea Threshold in Pediatric Brain Death: A Case with Variable Results Across Serial Examinations

Tina Sosa
1   Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
,
Zachary Berrens
2   Division of Critical Care Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
,
Susan Conway
2   Division of Critical Care Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
,
Erika L. Stalets
2   Division of Critical Care Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
› Author Affiliations Funding None.
Further Information

Publication History

20 May 2018

08 September 2018

Publication Date:
06 November 2018 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Consensus guidelines currently exist for the evaluation of pediatric patients with suspected brain death. The guidelines include the requirement for two consistent examinations separated by an observation period and a threshold of 60 mm Hg for PaCO2 during apnea testing. We present a patient who met all prerequisites to perform brain death examination but had variability in examinations during apnea testing. We discuss our strategy in managing these unexpected findings, including the importance of open and ongoing communication with the family, and the implications for current guidelines for the determination of brain death in pediatric patients.

Keywords

Pediatric - brain death - apnea
 

  • References

  • 1 Bioethics TPsCo. Controversies in the Determination of Death: A White Paper by the President's Council on Bioethics. 2008. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10822/559343 . Accessed January 25, 2018
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Nakagawa TA, Ashwal S, Mathur M. , et al; Society of Critical Care Medicine; Section on Critical Care and Section on Neurology of the American Academy of Pediatrics; Child Neurology Society. Guidelines for the determination of brain death in infants and children: an update of the 1987 Task Force recommendations. Crit Care Med 2011; 39 (09) 2139-2155
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Wijdicks EF, Varelas PN, Gronseth GS, Greer DM. ; American Academy of Neurology. Evidence-based guideline update: determining brain death in adults: report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 2010; 74 (23) 1911-1918
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Brilli RJ, Bigos D. Altered apnea threshold in a child with suspected brain death. J Child Neurol 1995; 10 (03) 245-246
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Vardis R, Pollack MM. Increased apnea threshold in a pediatric patient with suspected brain death. Crit Care Med 1998; 26 (11) 1917-1919
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Hansen G, Joffe AR. Confounding brain stem function during pediatric brain death determination: two case reports. J Child Neurol 2017; 32 (07) 676-679
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Haun SE, Tobias JD, Deshpande JK. Apnoea testing in the determination of brain death: is it reliable?. Clin Intensive Care 1991; 2 (03) 182-184
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Wijdicks EF, Smith WS. Brain death in children: why does it have to be so complicated?. Ann Neurol 2012; 71 (04) 442-443
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Joffe AR, Kolski H, Duff J, deCaen ARA. A 10-month-old infant with reversible findings of brain death. Pediatr Neurol 2009; 41 (05) 378-382
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Okamoto K, Sugimoto T. Return of spontaneous respiration in an infant who fulfilled current criteria to determine brain death. Pediatrics 1995; 96 (3 Pt 1): 518-520
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Lewis A, Bernat JL, Blosser S. , et al. An interdisciplinary response to contemporary concerns about brain death determination. Neurology 2018; 90 (09) 423-426
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Jones AH, Dizon ZB, October TW. Investigation of public perception of brain death using the Internet. Chest 2018; 154 (02) 286-292
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Snodgrass SR. The evolution of brain death. Pediatr Neurol 2014; 51 (04) 478-480
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Smith M. Brain death: the United kingdom perspective. Semin Neurol 2015; 35 (02) 145-151
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Wijdicks EF. Brain death worldwide: accepted fact but no global consensus in diagnostic criteria. Neurology 2002; 58 (01) 20-25
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Wahlster S, Wijdicks EF, Patel PV. , et al. Brain death declaration: practices and perceptions worldwide. Neurology 2015; 84 (18) 1870-1879
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Citerio G, Crippa IA, Bronco A, Vargiolu A, Smith M. Variability in brain death determination in europe: looking for a solution. Neurocrit Care 2014; 21 (03) 376-382
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Mathur M, Petersen L, Stadtler M. , et al. Variability in pediatric brain death determination and documentation in southern California. Pediatrics 2008; 121 (05) 988-993
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Greer DM, Wang HH, Robinson JD, Varelas PN, Henderson GV, Wijdicks EF. Variability of brain death policies in the United States. JAMA Neurol 2016; 73 (02) 213-218
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Shemie SD, Baker A. Uniformity in brain death criteria. Semin Neurol 2015; 35 (02) 162-168
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Smith M. Brain death: time for an international consensus. Br J Anaesth 2012; 108 (Suppl. 01) i6-i9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 United States. President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research. Defining death: a report on the medical, legal and ethical issues in the determination of death. 1981. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10822/559345 . Accessed January 25, 2018
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Wijdicks EF. The case against confirmatory tests for determining brain death in adults. Neurology 2010; 75 (01) 77-83
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Joffe AR, Anton NR, Duff JP. The apnea test: rationale, confounders, and criticism. J Child Neurol 2010; 25 (11) 1435-1443
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Outwater KM, Rockoff MA. Apnea testing to confirm brain death in children. Crit Care Med 1984; 12 (04) 357-358
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Rowland TW, Donnelly JH, Jackson AH. Apnea documentation for determination of brain death in children. Pediatrics 1984; 74 (04) 505-508
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Riviello Jr JJ, Sapin JI, Brown LW, Truex Jr RC, Grover WD. Hypoxemia and hemodynamic changes during the hypercarbia stimulation test. Pediatr Neurol 1988; 4 (04) 213-218
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Paret G, Barzilay Z. Apnea testing in suspected brain dead children--physiological and mathematical modelling. Intensive Care Med 1995; 21 (03) 247-252
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Schafer JA, Caronna JJ. Duration of apnea needed to confirm brain death. Neurology 1978; 28 (07) 661-666
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Coimbra CG. Implications of ischemic penumbra for the diagnosis of brain death. Braz J Med Biol Res 1999; 32 (12) 1479-1487
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Shewmon DA. False-positive diagnosis of brain death following the pediatric guidelines: case report and discussion. J Child Neurol 2017; 32 (14) 1104-1117
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Truog RD, Miller FG. Changing the conversation about brain death. Am J Bioeth 2014; 14 (08) 9-14
    PubMedGoogle Scholar