Download PDF
J Knee Surg 2020; 33(04): 410-416
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1677812
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Revision Single-Stage Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using an Anterolateral Tibial Tunnel

Sohrab Keyhani
1   Department of Knee Surgery and Sports Medicine, Akhtar Orthopedic Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
,
Behzad Hanafizadeh
2   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Akhtar Orthopedic Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
,
René Verdonk
3   Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
,
Mohammadreza Minator Sajjadi
4   Research Development Unit, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Taleghani Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
,
Mehran Soleymanha
5   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Orthopaedic Research Center, Poursina Hospital, School of Medicine, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran
› Author Affiliations
Funding None.
Further Information

Publication History

12 September 2018

16 December 2018

Publication Date:
06 February 2019 (online)

   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is a technically demanding enterprise. Management of widened or previously malpositioned tunnels is challenging and often requires innovative approaches. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the function and clinical results of revision single-stage ACL surgery using an anterolateral tibial tunnel (ALTT). A consecutive series of knees with arthroscopic ACL revision surgery were analyzed prospectively between April 2012 and September 2015. Among the 93 patients presented with revision ACL reconstruction, 25 patients met the study inclusion criteria for the ALTT technique and were followed up for a minimum of 2 years (range: 24–51 months). The clinical results were evaluated by means of the Lysholm score, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, and Tegner activity level scale, and the knee stability was assessed by the Lachman test, pivot shift test, and anterior drawer test. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the index knee before the surgery and 2 years after revision surgery was assessed. The mean IKDC subjective score, mean Tegner activity level scale, and mean Lysholm score significantly improved in all study participants. This study showed that ACL revision surgery with ALTT can reliably restore stability and provide fair functional outcomes in patients with ACL retear. One could expect acceptable lateral tibial tunnel length compared with medial tibial tunnel in classic ACL revision, intact bony surround, and good graft fixation. This technique is clinically relevant in that making an anterolateral tunnel in one-stage ACL revision surgery had a good subjective result with low complication rate in midterm follow-up.

Keywords

anterior cruciate ligament - revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction - anterolateral tibial tunnel - single-stage

Ethical Approval

This study was approved by the Akhtar Hospital Research Ethic Committee in Tehran, Iran (No. 759).


Authors' Contributions

Developing the original idea and the protocol: S. K.


Definition of intellectual content: S. K.


Contribution to the development of the protocol: B. H. and M. M. S.


Study supervision and preparation of the manuscript: R. V.


Preparation and drafting of the manuscript: M. S.


Note

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.


 

  • References

  • 1 Wright RW, Magnussen RA, Dunn WR, Spindler KP. Ipsilateral graft and contralateral ACL rupture at five years or more following ACL reconstruction: a systematic review. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011; 93 (12) 1159-1165
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Liechti DJ, Chahla J, Dean CS. , et al. Outcomes and risk factors of rerevision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review. Arthroscopy 2016; 32 (10) 2151-2159
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Van der Bracht H, Verhelst L, Goubau Y, Fieuws S, Verdonk P, Bellemans J. The lateral tibial tunnel in revision anterior cruciate ligament surgery: a biomechanical study of a new technique. Arthroscopy 2012; 28 (06) 818-826
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Wright RW, Huston LJ, Spindler KP. , et al; MARS Group. Descriptive epidemiology of the Multicenter ACL Revision Study (MARS) cohort. Am J Sports Med 2010; 38 (10) 1979-1986
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 de Beus A, Koch JE, Hirschmann A, Hirschmann MT. How to evaluate bone tunnel widening after ACL reconstruction - a critical review. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J 2017; 7 (02) 230-239
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Stolarz M, Ficek K, Binkowski M, Wróbel Z. Bone tunnel enlargement following hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comprehensive review. Phys Sportsmed 2017; 45 (01) 31-40
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Wilson TC, Kantaras A, Atay A, Johnson DL. Tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament surgery. Am J Sports Med 2004; 32 (02) 543-549
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Webster KE, Feller JA, Hameister KA. Bone tunnel enlargement following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomised comparison of hamstring and patellar tendon grafts with 2-year follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2001; 9 (02) 86-91
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Sabat D, Kundu K, Arora S, Kumar V. Tunnel widening after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective randomized computed tomography--based study comparing 2 different femoral fixation methods for hamstring graft. Arthroscopy 2011; 27 (06) 776-783
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Crawford SN, Waterman BR, Lubowitz JH. Long-term failure of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 2013; 29 (09) 1566-1571
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Rizer M, Foremny GB, Rush III A. , et al. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction tunnel size: causes of tunnel enlargement and implications for single versus two-stage revision reconstruction. Skeletal Radiol 2017; 46 (02) 161-169
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Carlisle JC, Parker RD, Matava MJ. Technical considerations in revision anterior cruciate ligament surgery. J Knee Surg 2007; 20 (04) 312-322
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Kamath GV, Redfern JC, Greis PE, Burks RT. Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 2011; 39 (01) 199-217
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Denti M, Lo Vetere D, Bait C, Schönhuber H, Melegati G, Volpi P. Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: causes of failure, surgical technique, and clinical results. Am J Sports Med 2008; 36 (10) 1896-1902
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Mayr R, Rosenberger R, Agraharam D, Smekal V, El Attal R. Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an update. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2012; 132 (09) 1299-1313
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 MARS Group. Meniscal and articular cartilage predictors of clinical outcome after revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 2016; 44 (07) 1671-1679
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Osti L, Buda M, Osti R, Massari L, Maffulli N. Preoperative planning for ACL revision surgery. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev 2017; 25 (01) 19-29
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Nebelung W, Becker R, Merkel M, Röpke M. Bone tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with semitendinosus tendon using Endobutton fixation on the femoral side. Arthroscopy 1998; 14 (08) 810-815
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Buller LT, Best MJ, Baraga MG, Kaplan LD. Trends in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the United States. Orthop J Sports Med 2014; 3 (01) 2325967114563664
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Bach Jr BR. Revision anterior cruciate ligament surgery. Arthroscopy 2003; 19 (Suppl 1): 14-29
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Werner BC, Gilmore CJ, Hamann JC. , et al. Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: results of a single-stage approach using allograft dowel bone grafting for femoral defects. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2016; 24 (08) 581-587
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Kraeutler MJ, Welton KL, McCarty EC, Bravman JT. Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2017; 99 (19) 1689-1696
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Cheatham SA, Johnson DL. Anticipating problems unique to revision ACL surgery. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev 2013; 21 (02) 129-134
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Kobayashi M, Nakagawa Y, Suzuki T, Okudaira S, Nakamura T. A retrospective review of bone tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendons fixed with a metal round cannulated interference screw in the femur. Arthroscopy 2006; 22 (10) 1093-1099
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar