Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1679890
Temporal Bone Paraganglioma: Hearing Outcomes and Rehabilitation
Publication History
05 June 2018
31 December 2018
Publication Date:
14 February 2019 (online)
Abstract
Despite numerous advancements in the treatment of skull base tumors, the management of jugular paragangliomas remains controversial and nuanced. Contemporary treatment objectives focus not only on achieving durable tumor control but also on maximizing post-treatment quality of life. While this philosophy places appropriate attention on limiting cranial neuropathies, less discussed morbidities such as hearing loss can have a profound impact on quality of life outcomes. The objective of this retrospective review is to provide a comprehensive review of hearing outcomes following the treatment of tympanojugular paragangliomas. A particular focus is placed on the variable audiologic outcomes as it relates to disease pathology, extent of disease, as well as chosen treatment modality. This review underscores the importance of considering treatment-related effects on hearing.
-
References
- 1 Rosenwaser H. Carotid body tumor of the middle ear and mastoid. Arch Otolaryngol 1945; 41 (01) 64-67
- 2 Cheesman AD, Kelly AM. Rehabilitation after treatment for jugular foramen lesions. Skull Base 2009; 19 (01) 99-108
- 3 Neskey DM, Hatoum G, Modh R. , et al. Outcomes after surgical resection of head and neck paragangliomas: a review of 61 patients. Skull Base 2011; 21 (03) 171-176
- 4 Tufarelli D, Meli A, Alesii A. , et al. Quality of life after acoustic neuroma surgery. Otol Neurotol 2006; 27 (03) 403-409
- 5 Patnaik U, Prasad SC, Medina M. , et al. Long term surgical and hearing outcomes in the management of tympanomastoid paragangliomas. Am J Otolaryngol 2015; 36 (03) 382-389
- 6 Forest III JA, Jackson CG, McGrew BM. Long-term control of surgically treated glomus tympanicum tumors. Otol Neurotol 2001; 22 (02) 232-236
- 7 Liscak R, Urgosik D, Chytka T. , et al. Leksell Gamma Knife radiosurgery of the jugulotympanic glomus tumor: long-term results. J Neurosurg 2014; 121 (Suppl): 198-202
- 8 Sanna M, Jain Y, De Donato G, , Rohit, Lauda L, Taibah A. Management of jugular paragangliomas: the Gruppo Otologico experience. Otol Neurotol 2004; 25 (05) 797-804
- 9 House WF, Hitselberger WE. The transcochlear approach to the skull base. Arch Otolaryngol 1976; 102 (06) 334-342
- 10 Fisch U. Infratemporal fossa approach to tumours of the temporal bone and base of the skull. J Laryngol Otol 1978; 92 (11) 949-967
- 11 Jackson CG, Haynes DS, Walker PA, Glasscock III MEIII, Storper IS, Josey AF. Hearing conservation in surgery for glomus jugulare tumors. Am J Otol 1996; 17 (03) 425-437
- 12 Jereczek-Fossa BA, Zarowski A, Milani F, Orecchia R. Radiotherapy-induced ear toxicity. Cancer Treat Rev 2003; 29 (05) 417-430
- 13 Patel NS, Link MJ, Driscoll CLW, Pollock BE, Lohse CM, Carlson ML. Hearing outcomes after stereotactic radiosurgery for jugular paraganglioma. Otol Neurotol 2018; 39 (01) 99-105
- 14 Dobberpuhl MR, Maxwell S, Feddock J, St Clair W, Bush ML. Treatment outcomes for single modality management of glomus jugulare tumors with stereotactic radiosurgery. Otol Neurotol 2016; 37 (09) 1406-1410
- 15 Selivanova O, Gouveris H, Mann W. Cochlear implantation after surgery for bilateral jugular foramen paragangliomas: a case report. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2009; 266 (03) 463-464
- 16 Pisa J, Sulkers J, Butler JB, West M, Hochman JB. Stereotactic radiosurgery does not appear to impact cochlear implant performance in patients with neurofibromatosis type II. J Radiosurg SBRT 2017; 5 (01) 63-71
- 17 Costello MS, Golub JS, Barrord JV, Pater L, Pensak ML, Samy RN. Cochlear implantation after radiation therapy for acoustic neuroma. J Radiosurg SBRT 2016; 4 (01) 69-74
- 18 Medina MdelM, Piccirillo E, D'orazio F, Bacciu A, Guida M, Sanna M. Cochlear implantation in irradiated tympanojugular paraganglioma. Int J Audiol 2015; 54 (12) 987-990
- 19 Crane BT, Gottschalk B, Kraut M, Aygun N, Niparko JK. Magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 T after cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol 2010; 31 (08) 1215-1220