Resident Education in Complex Obstetric Procedures: Are We Adequately Preparing Tomorrow's Obstetricians?

Abstract

Objectives The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) milestones for obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN) residents include obstetrical technical skills. We sought to describe resident experience with surgical obstetrics and comfort performing procedures independently postgraduation.

Study Design An anonymous 27-question e-survey was sent to OB/GYN residents in United States in March 2018, using the Council of Resident Education in Obstetrics and Gynecology coordinator listserv. Complex obstetric procedures included: forceps-assisted vaginal delivery (FAVD) and vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery (VAVD), cerclage, breech second twin, breech delivery, perineal repairs, and cesarean hysterectomy. Technical skill questions included experience as primary surgeon, comfort performing procedures independently, and for 4th year residents—comfort performing procedures postresidency. Demographic information was queried. Descriptive statistics was used to analyze responses.

Results A total of 417 residents completed the survey. Respondents were 88% female, 75% from academic programs, and 48% postgraduate year 3 and 4. Among all residents, many had been primary surgeon in operative vaginal deliveries (51% FAVD, 72% VAVD), fewer for breech vaginal delivery (21%), breech second twin (34%), cesarean hysterectomy (21%), and 4th degree repairs (37%). All 4th-year respondents stated that they would feel comfortable performing either VAVD or FAVD postresidency. Note that 17, 33, 28, and 74% would not feel comfortable performing a 4th degree repair, cesarean hysterectomy, breech second twin, and breech vaginal delivery, respectively, postresidency.

Conclusion Despite ACGME recommendations, data suggest that many graduating residents may not be comfortable with these complex procedures.

Keywords

breech - forceps - obstetric procedures - resident education

Note

This research was presented as an oral presentation at the 2019 APGO CREOG meeting in New Orleans, Louisiana, and was awarded 3rd prize for oral presentations.

Publication History

Received: 16 April 2019

Accepted: 16 May 2019

Article published online:
25 June 2019

• References

• 1 CREOG Educational Objectives: Core Curriculum in Obstetrics and Gynecology. In: Gynecology CfREiOa, ed. 11th ed. Washington, DC: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; 2016: 48
• 2 The Obstetrics and Gynecology Milestone Project. The obstetrics and gynecology milestone project. J Grad Med Educ 2014; 6 (01) (Suppl. 01) 129-143
• 3 Gupta N, Dragovic K, Trester R, Blankstein J. The changing scenario of obstetrics and gynecology residency training. J Grad Med Educ 2015; 7 (03) 401-406
• 4 Smrtka MP, Gunatilake RP, Harris B. , et al. Increase in cesarean operative time following institution of the 80-hour workweek. J Grad Med Educ 2015; 7 (03) 369-375
• 5 Eichelberger KY, Bengtson AM, Tolleson-Rinehart S, Menard MK. Training needs in operative obstetrics for maternal-fetal medicine fellows. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2015; 28 (12) 1467-1470
• 6 Propst K, Steinberg AC, O'Sullivan DM, Schimpf MO, LaSala C. Resident education in female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 2017; 23 (04) 263-266
• 7 Schimpf MO, Feldman DM, O'Sullivan DM, LaSala CA. Resident education and training in urogynecology and pelvic reconstructive surgery: a survey. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2007; 18 (06) 613-617
• 8 Dildy GA, Belfort MA, Clark SL. Obstetric forceps: a species on the brink of extinction. Obstet Gynecol 2016; 128 (03) 436-439
• 9 Easter SR, Taouk L, Schulkin J, Robinson JN. Twin vaginal delivery: innovate or abdicate. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017; 216 (05) 484-488
• 10 Minimum Numbers: Obstetrics and Gynecology. Review Committee for Obstetrics and Gynecology ed: Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education; 2018:2. Available at: https://www.acgme.org/Portals/0/PFAssets/ProgramResources/220_Ob_Gyn_Minimum_Numbers_Announcement.pdf?ver=2018-06-25-104354-993 . Accessed March 2019
• 11 Spong CY, Berghella V, Wenstrom KD, Mercer BM, Saade GR. Preventing the first cesarean delivery: summary of a joint Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Workshop. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 120 (05) 1181-1193
• 12 Rose K, Jensen K, Guo R, Afshar Y. Simulation to improve trainee skill and comfort with forceps-assisted vaginal deliveries. AJP Rep 2019; 9 (01) e6-e9
• 13 Gossett DR, Gilchrist-Scott D, Wayne DB, Gerber SE. Simulation training for forceps-assisted vaginal delivery and rates of maternal perineal trauma. Obstet Gynecol 2016; 128 (03) 429-435
• 14 Siddighi S, Kleeman SD, Baggish MS, Rooney CM, Pauls RN, Karram MM. Effects of an educational workshop on performance of fourth-degree perineal laceration repair. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 109 (2 Pt 1): 289-294
• 15 Deering S, Brown J, Hodor J, Satin AJ. Simulation training and resident performance of singleton vaginal breech delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107 (01) 86-89
• 16 Easter SR, Gardner R, Barrett J, Robinson JN, Carusi D. Simulation to improve trainee knowledge and comfort about twin vaginal birth. Obstet Gynecol 2016; 128 (Suppl. 01) 34S-39S
• 17 Stone H, Crane J, Johnston K, Craig C. Retention of vaginal breech delivery skills taught in simulation. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2018; 40 (02) 205-210