J Knee Surg 2021; 34(05): 538-545
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1697623
Original Article

The Effect of Cartilage Lesion in the Lateral Compartment of the Knee on the Surgical Outcome of Medial Open-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy

1   Arthroscopy and Joint Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
2   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
,
Chong-Hyuk Choi
1   Arthroscopy and Joint Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
2   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
,
Min Jung
1   Arthroscopy and Joint Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
2   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
,
Sang-Hoon Park
3   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
,
Dae-Young Lee
1   Arthroscopy and Joint Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
4   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Saegil Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
,
Ju-Cheol Shin
2   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
,
1   Arthroscopy and Joint Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
5   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

The aim of this study was to identify the effect of cartilage lesion in the lateral compartment of the knee on the surgical outcome of medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO). A total of 172 consecutive patients who underwent MOWHTO were evaluated retrospectively. Among the patients who underwent second-look arthroscopic assessment, 30 patients with lateral compartment cartilage lesion (group 1: ≥ grade 2 cartilage lesion according to the International Cartilage Repair Society [ICRS] grading system) and 64 patients with normal or near-normal lateral compartment cartilage (group 2: grade 0 or 1 cartilage lesion according to the ICRS grading system) were included in the analysis. Each patient was evaluated for the following variables: clinical scores, radiographic osteoarthritis grade, and comparative measurement under arthroscopy. All clinical scores were similar between the two groups preoperatively and at the time of second-look operation. Group 1 showed a significantly higher osteoarthritis grade in the lateral compartment of the knee on the 30 degree flexed posteroanterior view according to the International Knee Documentation Committee grading system preoperatively (p = 0.005) and at the time of second-look operation (p = 0.002). In regard to the comparative measurement under arthroscopy, the size of cartilage lesion on the medial compartment decreased by time in both groups (p = 0.000), whereas the size of cartilage lesion on the lateral compartment increased by time in both groups (p = 0.004). However, the degree of change in the cartilage lesion size in each compartment of the knee over time did not significantly differ between the two groups. Regarding the cartilage lesion grade in the lateral compartment, there was no statistically significant difference in the frequency of deterioration between the two groups. As a result, the presence of cartilage lesion of ICRS grade 2 or 3 in the lateral compartment of the knee, either subtle or not detected during the preoperative evaluation, would not affect the surgical outcome of MOWHTO. This is a Level IV, therapeutic case series study.

Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 27 May 2019

Accepted: 12 August 2019

Article published online:
24 September 2019

© 2019. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Fujisawa Y, Masuhara K, Shiomi S. The effect of high tibial osteotomy on osteoarthritis of the knee. An arthroscopic study of 54 knee joints. Orthop Clin North Am 1979; 10 (03) 585-608
  • 2 Hernigou P, Medevielle D, Debeyre J, Goutallier D. Proximal tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis with varus deformity. A ten to thirteen-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1987; 69 (03) 332-354
  • 3 Kumagai K, Akamatsu Y, Kobayashi H, Kusayama Y, Koshino T, Saito T. Factors affecting cartilage repair after medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2017; 25 (03) 779-784
  • 4 Schuster P, Schulz M, Mayer P, Schlumberger M, Immendoerfer M, Richter J. Open-wedge high tibial osteotomy and combined abrasion/microfracture in severe medial osteoarthritis and varus malalignment: 5-year results and arthroscopic findings after 2 years. Arthroscopy 2015; 31 (07) 1279-1288
  • 5 Brouwer RW, Huizinga MR, Duivenvoorden T. et al. Osteotomy for treating knee osteoarthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; (12) CD004019
  • 6 Coventry MB, Ilstrup DM, Wallrichs SL. Proximal tibial osteotomy. A critical long-term study of eighty-seven cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1993; 75 (02) 196-201
  • 7 Sprenger TR, Doerzbacher JF. Tibial osteotomy for the treatment of varus gonarthrosis. Survival and failure analysis to twenty-two years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003; 85 (03) 469-474
  • 8 Jung WH, Takeuchi R, Chun CW. et al. Second-look arthroscopic assessment of cartilage regeneration after medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy. Arthroscopy 2014; 30 (01) 72-79
  • 9 Kim KI, Seo MC, Song SJ, Bae DK, Kim DH, Lee SH. Change of chondral lesions and predictive factors after medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy with a locked plate system. Am J Sports Med 2017; 45 (07) 1615-1621
  • 10 Loia MC, Vanni S, Rosso F. et al. High tibial osteotomy in varus knees: indications and limits. Joints 2016; 4 (02) 98-110
  • 11 Sabzevari S, Ebrahimpour A, Roudi MK, Kachooei AR. High tibial osteotomy: a systematic review and current concept. Arch Bone Jt Surg 2016; 4 (03) 204-212
  • 12 Wright JM, Crockett HC, Slawski DP, Madsen MW, Windsor RE. High tibial osteotomy. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2005; 13 (04) 279-289
  • 13 Mina C, Garrett Jr WE, Pietrobon R, Glisson R, Higgins L. High tibial osteotomy for unloading osteochondral defects in the medial compartment of the knee. Am J Sports Med 2008; 36 (05) 949-955
  • 14 Prakash J, Song EK, Lim HA, Shin YJ, Jin C, Seon JK. High tibial osteotomy accelerates lateral compartment osteoarthritis in discoid meniscus patients. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2018; 26 (06) 1845-1850
  • 15 Lee DC, Byun SJ. High tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Relat Res 2012; 24 (02) 61-69
  • 16 Akizuki S, Shibakawa A, Takizawa T, Yamazaki I, Horiuchi H. The long-term outcome of high tibial osteotomy: a ten- to 20-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008; 90 (05) 592-596
  • 17 Brittberg M, Winalski CS. Evaluation of cartilage injuries and repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003; 85-A (Suppl. 02) 58-69
  • 18 Greco NJ, Anderson AF, Mann BJ. et al. Responsiveness of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form in comparison to the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, modified Cincinnati Knee Rating System, and Short Form 36 in patients with focal articular cartilage defects. Am J Sports Med 2010; 38 (05) 891-902
  • 19 Salaffi F, Leardini G, Canesi B. et al; GOnorthrosis and Quality Of Life Assessment (GOQOLA). Reliability and validity of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index in Italian patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2003; 11 (08) 551-560
  • 20 Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS. Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis 1957; 16 (04) 494-502
  • 21 Wright RW. ; MARS Group. Osteoarthritis classification scales: interobserver reliability and arthroscopic correlation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014; 96 (14) 1145-1151
  • 22 Miniaci A, Ballmer FT, Ballmer PM, Jakob RP. Proximal tibial osteotomy. A new fixation device. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989; (246) 250-259
  • 23 Ryu SM, Park JW, Na HD, Shon OJ. High tibial osteotomy versus unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for medial compartment arthrosis with kissing lesions in relatively young patients. Knee Surg Relat Res 2018; 30 (01) 17-22
  • 24 Bode G, von Heyden J, Pestka J. et al. Prospective 5-year survival rate data following open-wedge valgus high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2015; 23 (07) 1949-1955
  • 25 Sim J, Wright CC. The kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size requirements. Phys Ther 2005; 85 (03) 257-268.
  • 26 Koshino T, Wada S, Ara Y, Saito T. Regeneration of degenerated articular cartilage after high tibial valgus osteotomy for medial compartmental osteoarthritis of the knee. Knee 2003; 10 (03) 229-236
  • 27 Niemeyer P, Schmal H, Hauschild O, von Heyden J, Südkamp NP, Köstler W. Open-wedge osteotomy using an internal plate fixator in patients with medial-compartment gonarthritis and varus malalignment: 3-year results with regard to preoperative arthroscopic and radiographic findings. Arthroscopy 2010; 26 (12) 1607-1616
  • 28 Guettler JH, Demetropoulos CK, Yang KH, Jurist KA. Osteochondral defects in the human knee: influence of defect size on cartilage rim stress and load redistribution to surrounding cartilage. Am J Sports Med 2004; 32 (06) 1451-1458
  • 29 Davies AP, Glasgow MM. Imaging in osteoarthritis: a guide to requesting plain X-rays of the degenerate knee. Knee 2000; 7 (03) 139-143
  • 30 Ritchie JF, Al-Sarawan M, Worth R, Conry B, Gibb PA. A parallel approach: the impact of schuss radiography of the degenerate knee on clinical management. Knee 2004; 11 (04) 283-287