Download PDF
J Knee Surg 2021; 34(11): 1243-1252
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1702164
Original Article

Anatomical Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Hamstring Tendon Autografts: A Comparative Study of Three Different Techniques

Zhenxing Wen
1   Department of Orthopaedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China
2   The College of Clinical Medicine, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China
,
Hua Zhang
1   Department of Orthopaedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China
,
Wenlong Yan
1   Department of Orthopaedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China
,
Sheikh Ibrahimrashid Mohamed
1   Department of Orthopaedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China
2   The College of Clinical Medicine, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China
3   Department of Orthopaedics, Webuye County Hospital, Webuye, Kenya
,
Pei Zhao
1   Department of Orthopaedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China
,
Xiao Huang
1   Department of Orthopaedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China
,
Zijie Xu
1   Department of Orthopaedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China
2   The College of Clinical Medicine, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China
,
Jian Zhang
1   Department of Orthopaedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China
,
Aiguo Zhou
1   Department of Orthopaedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China
› Author Affiliations Funding None.
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

The ideal procedure for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is one that can achieve anatomical restoration for a better ACL function. This retrospective comparative study was conducted to evaluate the objective and subjective clinical results of the conventional single-bundle femoral round (SBR) tunnel technique, the single-bundle femoral oval (SBO) tunnel technique, and the double-bundle (DB) surgical technique for anatomical ACL reconstruction with hamstring tendon autografts. Patients who underwent the SBO, SBR, and DB ACL reconstructions from January 2016 to August 2017 were included in this study. A total of 163 patients underwent different surgical techniques; 41 patients underwent the SBO procedure, 78 patients received SBR, and the remaining 44 patients underwent the DB procedure. The Lachman's test, pivot-shift test, Lysholm's score, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, and Tegner's score were compared among groups postoperatively. KT-1000 was used to measure the anterior laxity of the knee. Magnetic resonance imaging was used to compare the ACL graft maturity. Second-look arthroscopy was conducted to compare the graft status and synovial coverage. Significant differences among groups were found with respect to the Lysholm's score, Tegner's score, and IKDC score. Patients in the SBO and DB groups acquired higher functional scores than the SBR group. More patients with positive pivot-shift test were observed in the SBR group than other groups at 12- and 24-month postoperative follow-ups. The postoperative KT-1000 was better in the SBO and DB groups than in the SBR group. The mean signal/noise quotient (SNQ) of the SBO group was 2.70 ± 0.92, significantly lower than 3.58 ± 1.21 of the SBR group. Despite a higher proportion of patients with grade B or C synovial coverage and partial graft injury found in the SBR group, there were no significant differences among the groups. The SBO and DB technique achieved better clinical results than the SBR technique. The SBO technique was indeed an ideal surgical procedure for ACL reconstruction provided that the shortcoming of DB technique must be taken into account. This is a Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Keywords

anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction - single bundle - double bundle - oval tunnel - hamstring tendon autografts

Ethical Approval

This study was approved by the ethics committee of our institution (ID: 2016–178). Informed consent was obtained from all participants.




Publication History

Received: 05 September 2019

Accepted: 07 January 2020

Article published online:
05 May 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Kaeding CC, Léger-St-Jean B, Magnussen RA. Epidemiology and diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament injuries. Clin Sports Med 2017; 36 (01) 1-8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Sepúlveda F, Sánchez L, Amy E, Micheo W. Anterior cruciate ligament injury: return to play, function and long-term considerations. Curr Sports Med Rep 2017; 16 (03) 172-178
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 McLean SG, Mallett KF, Arruda EM. Deconstructing the anterior cruciate ligament: what we know and do not know about function, material properties, and injury mechanics. J Biomech Eng 2015; 137 (02) 020906
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Monk AP, Davies LJ, Hopewell S, Harris K, Beard DJ, Price AJ. Surgical versus conservative interventions for treating anterior cruciate ligament injuries. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 4: CD011166
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Markatos K, Kaseta MK, Lallos SN, Korres DS, Efstathopoulos N. The anatomy of the ACL and its importance in ACL reconstruction. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2013; 23 (07) 747-752
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Śmigielski R, Zdanowicz U, Drwięga M, Ciszek B, Williams A. The anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament and its relevance to the technique of reconstruction. Bone Joint J 2016; 98-B (08) 1020-1026
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Buoncristiani AM, Tjoumakaris FP, Starman JS, Ferretti M, Fu FH. Anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 2006; 22 (09) 1000-1006
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Musahl V, Bedi A, Citak M, O'Loughlin P, Choi D, Pearle AD. Effect of single-bundle and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions on pivot-shift kinematics in anterior cruciate ligament- and meniscus-deficient knees. Am J Sports Med 2011; 39 (02) 289-295
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Yucens M, Aydemir AN. ; M Y. Trends in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the last decade: a web-based analysis. J Knee Surg 2019; 32 (06) 519-524
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Fu FH, van Eck CF, Tashman S, Irrgang JJ, Moreland MS. Anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a changing paradigm. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2015; 23 (03) 640-648
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Kato Y, Hoshino Y, Ingham SJ, Fu FH. Anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Orthop Sci 2010; 15 (02) 269-276
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Mascarenhas R, Cvetanovich GL, Sayegh ET. et al. Does double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction improve postoperative knee stability compared with single-bundle techniques? a systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses. Arthroscopy 2015; 31 (06) 1185-1196
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Maeyama A, Hoshino Y, Kato Y. et al. Anatomic double bundle ACL reconstruction outperforms any types of single bundle ACL reconstructions in controlling dynamic rotational laxity. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2018; 26 (05) 1414-1419
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 El-Sherief FAH, Aldahshan WA, Wahd YE. et al. Double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is better than single-bundle reconstruction in terms of objective assessment but not in terms of subjective score. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2018; 26 (08) 2395-2400
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Adravanti P, Dini F, de Girolamo L, Cattani M, Rosa MA. Single-bundle versus double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective randomized controlled trial with 6-year follow-up. J Knee Surg 2017; 30 (09) 898-904
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Karikis I, Desai N, Sernert N, Rostgard-Christensen L, Kartus J. Comparison of anatomic double- and single-bundle techniques for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendon autografts: a prospective randomized study with 5-year clinical and radiographic follow-up. Am J Sports Med 2016; 44 (05) 1225-1236
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Yagi M, Wong EK, Kanamori A, Debski RE, Fu FH, Woo SL. Biomechanical analysis of an anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 2002; 30 (05) 660-666
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Ahn JH, Lee SH. Anterior cruciate ligament double-bundle reconstruction with hamstring tendon autografts. Arthroscopy 2007; 23 (01) 109.e1-109.e4
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Harner CD, Poehling GG. Double bundle or double trouble?. Arthroscopy 2004; 20 (10) 1013-1014
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Siebold R. Observations on bone tunnel enlargement after double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 2007; 23 (03) 291-298
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Śmigielski R, Zdanowicz U, Drwięga M, Ciszek B, Ciszkowska-Łysoń B, Siebold R. Ribbon like appearance of the midsubstance fibres of the anterior cruciate ligament close to its femoral insertion site: a cadaveric study including 111 knees. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2015; 23 (11) 3143-3150
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Mochizuki T, Fujishiro H, Nimura A. et al. Anatomic and histologic analysis of the mid-substance and fan-like extension fibres of the anterior cruciate ligament during knee motion, with special reference to the femoral attachment. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2014; 22 (02) 336-344
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Petersen W, Forkel P, Achtnich A, Metzlaff S, Zantop T. Technique of anatomical footprint reconstruction of the ACL with oval tunnels and medial portal aimers. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2013; 133 (06) 827-833
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Nakase J, Toratani T, Kosaka M. et al. Technique of anatomical single bundle ACL reconstruction with rounded rectangle femoral dilator. Knee 2016; 23 (01) 91-96
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Noh JH, Yang BG, Roh YH, Kim SW, Kim W. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using 4-strand hamstring autograft: conventional single-bundle technique versus oval-footprint technique. Arthroscopy 2011; 27 (11) 1502-1510
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Petersen W, Zantop T. Anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament with regard to its two bundles. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007; 454 (454) 35-47
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Ahldén M, Sernert N, Karlsson J, Kartus J. A prospective randomized study comparing double- and single-bundle techniques for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 2013; 41 (11) 2484-2491
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Xu Y, Ao YF, Wang JQ, Cui GQ. Prospective randomized comparison of anatomic single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2014; 22 (02) 308-316
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Tegner Y, Lysholm J. Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1985; (198) 43-49
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Hefti F, Müller W, Jakob RP, Stäubli HU. Evaluation of knee ligament injuries with the IKDC form. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 1993; 1 (3,4): 226-234
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Briggs KK, Lysholm J, Tegner Y, Rodkey WG, Kocher MS, Steadman JR. The reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Lysholm score and Tegner activity scale for anterior cruciate ligament injuries of the knee: 25 years later. Am J Sports Med 2009; 37 (05) 890-897
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Daniel DM, Malcom LL, Losse G, Stone ML, Sachs R, Burks R. Instrumented measurement of anterior laxity of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1985; 67 (05) 720-726
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Sajovic M, Strahovnik A, Dernovsek MZ, Skaza K. Quality of life and clinical outcome comparison of semitendinosus and gracilis tendon versus patellar tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an 11-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Am J Sports Med 2011; 39 (10) 2161-2169
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Katz JW, Fingeroth RJ. The diagnostic accuracy of ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament comparing the Lachman test, the anterior drawer sign, and the pivot shift test in acute and chronic knee injuries. Am J Sports Med 1986; 14 (01) 88-91
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Tanaka Y, Yonetani Y, Shiozaki Y. et al. MRI analysis of single-, double-, and triple-bundle anterior cruciate ligament grafts. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2014; 22 (07) 1541-1548
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Ma Y, Murawski CD, Rahnemai-Azar AA, Maldjian C, Lynch AD, Fu FH. Graft maturity of the reconstructed anterior cruciate ligament 6 months postoperatively: a magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of quadriceps tendon with bone block and hamstring tendon autografts. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2015; 23 (03) 661-668
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Kondo E, Yasuda K. Second-look arthroscopic evaluations of anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: relation with postoperative knee stability. Arthroscopy 2007; 23 (11) 1198-1209
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Herbort M, Lenschow S, Fu FH, Petersen W, Zantop T. ACL mismatch reconstructions: influence of different tunnel placement strategies in single-bundle ACL reconstructions on the knee kinematics. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2010; 18 (11) 1551-1558
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Yasuda K, Kondo E, Ichiyama H, Tanabe Y, Tohyama H. Clinical evaluation of anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction procedure using hamstring tendon grafts: comparisons among 3 different procedures. Arthroscopy 2006; 22 (03) 240-251
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Kraeutler MJ, Wolsky RM, Vidal AF, Bravman JT. Anatomy and biomechanics of the native and reconstructed anterior cruciate ligament: surgical implications. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2017; 99 (05) 438-445
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Hussein M, van Eck CF, Cretnik A, Dinevski D, Fu FH. Individualized anterior cruciate ligament surgery: a prospective study comparing anatomic single- and double-bundle reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 2012; 40 (08) 1781-1788
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Kang HJ, Wang XJ, Wu CJ, Cao JH, Yu DH, Zheng ZM. Single-bundle modified patellar tendon versus double-bundle tibialis anterior allograft ACL reconstruction: a prospective randomized study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2015; 23 (08) 2244-2249
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Oshima T, Nakase J, Numata H, Takata Y, Tsuchiya H. The cross-sectional shape of the fourfold semitendinosus tendon is oval, not round. J Exp Orthop 2016; 3 (01) 28
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Brand Jr JC, Pienkowski D, Steenlage E, Hamilton D, Johnson DL, Caborn DN. Interference screw fixation strength of a quadrupled hamstring tendon graft is directly related to bone mineral density and insertion torque. Am J Sports Med 2000; 28 (05) 705-710
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 van Eck CF, Lesniak BP, Schreiber VM, Fu FH. Anatomic single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction flowchart. Arthroscopy 2010; 26 (02) 258-268
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Karlsson J, Irrgang JJ, van Eck CF, Samuelsson K, Mejia HA, Fu FH. Anatomic single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, part 2: clinical application of surgical technique. Am J Sports Med 2011; 39 (09) 2016-2026
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Sasaki N, Ishibashi Y, Tsuda E. et al. The femoral insertion of the anterior cruciate ligament: discrepancy between macroscopic and histological observations. Arthroscopy 2012; 28 (08) 1135-1146
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Siebold R, Schuhmacher P, Fernandez F. et al. Flat midsubstance of the anterior cruciate ligament with tibial “C”-shaped insertion site. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2015; 23 (11) 3136-3142
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar