The “Segmental SMAS Model”: A Didactic Concept of Face and Neck Lift Anatomy

Abstract

Profound understanding of the surgical anatomy of the face and neck is the key to successful face lift surgery. The “Segmental SMAS Model” presented herein is the result of a decade-long effort in teaching fellows a logical and coherent anatomic model of face lift anatomy. The superficial musculo-aponeurotic system (SMAS) consists of segments with distinct surgical characteristics. These are determined by the presence of a deep gliding plane and/or adhesion through fibrous insertions. In this article, we define SMAS segments that are profoundly heterogeneous in their behavior and have surgical implications on the maneuvers required for a deep plane face lift. The present model introduces several novel interpretations of the surgical anatomy of the face and neck lift procedure and hopes to convey a better understanding of face lift anatomy to training surgeons.

Keywords

face lift - Segmental SMAS Model - SMAS segments - subzygomatic triangle - subzygomatic SMAS segment

Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
31. August 2020

• References

• 1 Adamson PA, Litner JA. Evolution of rhytidectomy techniques. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2005; 13 (03) 383-391
• 2 Gordon N, Adam S. Deep plane facelifting for facial rejuvenation. Facial Plast Surg 2014; 30 (04) 394-404
• 3 Mendelson BC, Freeman ME, Wu W, Huggins RJ. Surgical anatomy of the lower face: the premasseter space, the jowl, and the labiomandibular fold. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2008; 32 (02) 185-195
• 4 Rohrich RJ, Pessa JE. The fat compartments of the face: anatomy and clinical implications for cosmetic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 119 (07) 2219-2227 , discussion 2228–2231
• 5 Mitz V, Peyronie M. The superficial musculo-aponeurotic system (SMAS) in the parotid and cheek area. Plast Reconstr Surg 1976; 58 (01) 80-88
• 6 Derby BM, Codner MA. Evidence-based medicine: face lift. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 139 (01) 151e-167e
• 7 Mendelson BC. Anatomic study of the retaining ligaments of the face and applications for facial rejuvenation. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2013; 37 (03) 513-515
• 8 Kamer FM, Pieper PG. Surgical treatment of the aging neck. Facial Plast Surg 2001; 17 (02) 123-128
• 9 Baker DC. Minimal incision rhytidectomy (short scar face lift) with lateral SMASectomy: evolution and application. Aesthet Surg J 2001; 21 (01) 14-26
• 10 Hamra ST, Choucair RJ. The composite facelift. Semin Plast Surg 2002; 16 (04) 331-346
• 11 Sherris DA, Larrabee Jr WF. Anatomic considerations in rhytidectomy. Facial Plast Surg 1996; 12 (03) 215-222
• 12 Larrabee Jr WF, Henderson JL. Face lift: the anatomic basis for a safe, long-lasting procedure. Facial Plast Surg 2000; 16 (03) 239-253
• 13 Stuzin JM, Baker TJ, Gordon HL. The relationship of the superficial and deep facial fascias: relevance to rhytidectomy and aging. Plast Reconstr Surg 1992; 89 (03) 441-449 , discussion 450–451
• 14 Alsarraf R, Johnson Jr CM. The face lift: technical considerations. Facial Plast Surg 2000; 16 (03) 231-238
• 15 Kamer FM. One hundred consecutive deep plane face-lifts. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1996; 122 (01) 17-22
• 16 Cakmak O, Özücer B, Aktekin M, Özkurt FE, Al-Salman R, Emre İE. Modified composite-flap facelift combined with finger-assisted malar elevation (FAME): a cadaver study. Aesthet Surg J 2018; 38 (12) 1269-1279
• 17 Zimbler MS. Tord skoog: face-lift innovator. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2001; 3 (01) 63
• 18 Hwang K, Kim JY, Lim JH. Anatomy of the platysma muscle. J Craniofac Surg 2017; 28 (02) 539-542
• 19 Labbé D, Franco RG, Nicolas J. Platysma suspension and platysmaplasty during neck lift: anatomical study and analysis of 30 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 117 (06) 2001-2007 , discussion 2008–2010
• 20 Daane SP, Owsley JQ. Incidence of cervical branch injury with “marginal mandibular nerve pseudo-paralysis” in patients undergoing face lift. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003; 111 (07) 2414-2418
• 21 Yang HM, Kim HJ, Park HW. , et al. Revisiting the topographic anatomy of the marginal mandibular branch of facial nerve relating to the surgical approach. Aesthet Surg J 2016; 36 (09) 977-982
• 22 Gassner HG, Rafii A, Young A, Murakami C, Moe KS, Larrabee Jr WF. Surgical anatomy of the face: implications for modern face-lift techniques. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2008; 10 (01) 9-19
• 23 Fernández Dols JM, Russell JA. The Science of Facial Expression. 1st ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2017
• 24 Mendelson BC, Jacobson SR. Surgical anatomy of the midcheek: facial layers, spaces, and the midcheek segments. Clin Plast Surg 2008; 35 (03) 395-404 , discussion 393
• 25 Jacono AA, Parikh SS. The minimal access deep plane extended vertical facelift. Aesthet Surg J 2011; 31 (08) 874-890
• 26 Jacono A, Bryant LM. Extended deep plane facelift: incorporating facial retaining ligament release and composite flap shifts to maximize midface, jawline and neck rejuvenation. Clin Plast Surg 2018; 45 (04) 527-554
• 27 Tonnard P, Verpaele A. The MACS-lift short scar rhytidectomy. Aesthet Surg J 2007; 27 (02) 188-198
• 28 Hopping SB, Janjanin S, Tanna N, Joshi AS. The S-Plus lift: a short-scar, long-flap rhytidectomy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2010; 92 (07) 577-582
• 29 Fedok FG. The rejuvenation of the aged central lower face: a contemporary perspective. Facial Plast Surg 2019; 35 (02) 121-128
• 30 Rohrich RJ, Sinno S, Vaca EE. Getting better results in facelifting. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2019; 7 (06) e2270