Download PDF
Methods Inf Med 2020; 59(02/03): 110-116
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1715127
Original Article for a Focus Theme: Patient Rehabilitation Techniques

Advantages and Limitations of Leap Motion from a Developers', Physical Therapists', and Patients' Perspective

Edwin Gamboa
1   Institute for Media Technology, Technische Universität Ilmenau, Ilmenau, Thüringen, Germany
,
Andres Serrato
2   Multimedia and Computer Vision Research Group, Universidad del Valle, Cali, Valle del Cauca, Colombia
,
Juan Castro
2   Multimedia and Computer Vision Research Group, Universidad del Valle, Cali, Valle del Cauca, Colombia
,
Diana Toro
2   Multimedia and Computer Vision Research Group, Universidad del Valle, Cali, Valle del Cauca, Colombia
,
Maria Trujillo
2   Multimedia and Computer Vision Research Group, Universidad del Valle, Cali, Valle del Cauca, Colombia
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background Physical rehabilitation exergames (PREGs) are suitable for motivating patients toward completing treatments. Leap Motion (LM) is a motion sensor that may be useful for developing PREGs targeted at hands and fingers rehabilitation. Therefore, knowing the advantages and limitations of LM is relevant to understand under which conditions this sensor may be suitable.

Objective In this article, we present a qualitative study to identify the main advantages and limitations of LM for PREGs.

Methods We collect data using interviews with a group of PREGs developers, physical therapy experts, and patients. We employ the thematic analysis method to analyze the collected data.

Results We found that the advantages and limitations of LM are related to (1) the role as PREG development tool that enables hand movements detection, (2) the capability to be a mobile and easy-to-use capturing technology, and (3) the contribution to add value in rehabilitation therapy by motivating physical therapists and patients to use PREGs.

Conclusion The analysis shows that LM is a suitable and cost-effective solution for developing usable PREGs for some hand and finger rehabilitation movements with a moderate development effort. However, the development maturity of LM poses limitations related to reliability and robustness, preventing the use of LM as a standalone physical rehabilitation tool. Our findings serve as guidelines for developers and physical therapists during the development and use of PREGs targeted at hands and fingers, guiding the decision-making process during feasibility analysis and design stages.

Keywords

Leap Motion advantages and limitations - physical rehabilitation exergames development - hand and finger movements - hands rehabilitation support

Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 11 November 2019

Accepted: 26 June 2020

Article published online:
30 October 2020

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Stuttgart · New York

 

  • References

  • 1 Shelton P, Scortt R. Gaming for health. J Ment Health 2015; 2 (04) 42-44
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Hernandez HA, Ye Z, Graham TCN, Fehlings D, Switzer L. Designing action-based exergames for children with cerebral palsy. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '13. ACM Press; 2013: 1261
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Burke JW, McNeill M, Charles D, Morrow P, Crosbie J, McDonough S. Serious games for upper limb rehabilitation following stroke. In: 2009 Conference in Games and Virtual Worlds for Serious Apps. IEEE; 2009: 103-110
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Brokaw EB, Eckel E, Brewer BR. Usability evaluation of a kinematics focused Kinect therapy program for individuals with stroke. Technol Health Care 2015; 23 (02) 143-151
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Sugarman H, Weisel-Eichler A, Burstin A, Brown R. Use of the Wii Fit system for the treatment of balance problems in the elderly: A feasibility study. In: 2009 Virtual Rehabilitation International Conference. IEEE; 2009: 111-116
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Ni LT, Fehlings D, Biddiss E. Design and evaluation of virtual reality-based therapy games with dual focus on therapeutic relevance and user experience for children with cerebral palsy. Games Health J 2014; 3 (03) 162-171
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Ultrapleap Ltd. API Overview — Leap Motion C# SDK v2.3 documentation. Accessed June 22, 2020 at: https://developer-archive.leapmotion.com/documentation/v2/csharp/devguide/Leap_Overview.html
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Guna J, Jakus G, Pogačnik M, Tomažič S, Sodnik J. An analysis of the precision and reliability of the leap motion sensor and its suitability for static and dynamic tracking. Sensors (Basel) 2014; 14 (02) 3702-3720
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Cikajlo I, Peterlin Potisk K. Advantages of using 3D virtual reality based training in persons with Parkinson's disease: a parallel study. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2019; 16 (01) 119
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Rechy-Ramirez EJ, Marin-Hernandez A, Rios-Figueroa HV. A human–computer interface for wrist rehabilitation: a pilot study using commercial sensors to detect wrist movements. Vis Comput 2019; 35 (01) 41-55
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Gamboa E, Ruiz C, Trujillo M. Improving Patient Motivation Towards Physical Rehabilitation Treatments with PlayTherapy Exergame. Stud Health Technol Inform 2018; 249: 140-147 . doi:10.3233/978-1-61499-868-6-140
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Gamboa E, Serrato A, Toro D, Trujillo M, Toro Ortiz D, Trujillo M. Advantages and Limitations of Developing Physical Rehabilitation Exergames (PREGs) using Leap Motion. In: Proc. REHAB 2019 Workshop, September 11 -13, 2019, Popayan, Colombia. ACM Press; 2019: 43-46 DOI: 10.1145/3364138.3364149
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Holmes DE, Charles DK, Morrow PJ, Mcclean S, Mcdonough SM. Usability and performance of Leap Motion and Oculus Rift for upper arm virtual reality stroke rehabilitation. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference On Disability, Virtual Reality and Associated Technologies. J Alt Med Res; 2016: 217-226
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Noitom Ltd. Hi5 VR GLOVE. Accessed June 22, 2020 at: https://hi5vrglove.com/
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Microsoft. Kinect for Windows. Accessed June 22, 2020 at: https://developer.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/kinect
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Technologies PMD. World class 3D depth sensing Development Kits. For everyone. Accessed June 22, 2020 at: https://pmdtec.com/picofamily
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Trejo RL, Vazquez JPG, Ramirez MLG, Corral LEV, Marquez IR. Hand goniometric measurements using leap motion. In: 2017 14th IEEE Annual Consumer Communications and Networking Conference, CCNC 2017. IEEE; 2017: 137-141
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Chophuk P, Chumpen S, Tungjitkusolmun S, Phasukkit P. Hand postures for evaluating trigger finger using leap motion controller. In: BMEiCON 2015 - 8th Biomedical Engineering International Conference. IEEE; 2016 DOI: 10.1109/BMEiCON.2015.7399560
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Gamboa E, Trujillo M. Identifying Aspects, Methods and Instruments to Evaluate Player Experience in Physical Rehabilitation Exergames. In: Proc. REHAB 2019 Workshop, September 11 -13, 2019, Popayan, Colombia. Popayan, Columbia: ACM Press; 2019:136 -139. doi:10.1145/3364138.3364166
    PubMed
  • 21 Burnard P, Gill P, Stewart K, Treasure E, Chadwick B. Analysing and presenting qualitative data. Br Dent J 2008; 204 (08) 429-432
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Technologies U. Unity Real-Time Development Platform 3D, 2D, VR and AR. Published 2019. Accessed June 22, 2020 at: https://unity.com
    PubMedGoogle Scholar