Subscribe to RSS
![](/products/assets/desktop/img/oa-logo.png)
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1716716
Magnetic Resonance Thrombus Imaging to Differentiate Acute from Chronic Portal Vein Thrombosis
Abstract
Introduction Timely diagnosis and treatment of portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is crucial to prevent morbidity and mortality. However, current imaging tests cannot always accurately differentiate acute from chronic (nonocclusive) PVT. Magnetic resonance noncontrast thrombus imaging (MR-NCTI) has been shown to accurately differentiate acute from chronic venous thrombosis at other locations and may also be of value in the diagnostic management of PVT. This study describes the first phase of the Rhea study (NTR 7061). Our aim was to select and optimize MR-NCTI sequences that would be accurate for differentiation of acute from chronic PVT.
Study Design The literature was searched for different MRI sequences for portal vein and acute thrombosis imaging. The most promising sequences were tested in a healthy volunteer followed by one patient with acute PVT and two patients with chronic PVT, all diagnosed on (repetitive) contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) venography to optimize the MR-NCTI sequences. All images were evaluated by an expert panel.
Results Several MR-NCTI sequences were identified and tested. Differentiation of acute from chronic PVT was achieved with 3D T1 TFE (three-dimensional T1 turbo field echo) and 3D T1 Dixon FFE (three-dimensional T1 fast field echo) sequences with best image quality. The expert panel was able to confirm the diagnosis of acute PVT on the combined two MR-NCTI sequences and to exclude acute PVT in the two patients with chronic PVT.
Conclusion Using 3D T1 TFE and 3D T1 Dixon FFE sequences, we were able to distinguish acute from chronic PVT. This clinical relevant finding will be elucidated in clinical studies to establish their test performance.
#
Introduction
Acute portal vein thrombosis (PVT) has a poor short- and long-term prognosis[1] and a higher mortality rate than the “usual site” venous thromboembolism, that is, acute pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Therefore, timely diagnosis and anticoagulant treatment are crucial for the patients' prognosis.[2] [3] [4] Distinguishing between a fresh thrombus, in which anticoagulant treatment is indicated, and a chronic (organized, nonresolvable) thrombus is of paramount importance for treatment decision.[5] However, currently available imaging tests are not always able to accurately differentiate acute from chronic PVT, especially when it concerns an organized nonocclusive chronic thrombus without signs of cicatrization of the affected vessel.
Magnetic resonance noncontrast thrombus imaging (MR-NCTI), also referred to as magnetic resonance direct thrombus imaging (MRDTI) in previous publications, is a noncontrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technique, which allows for direct visualization of acute thrombi.[6] This technique is based on the formation of methemoglobin in a fresh thrombus, which appears as high signal intensity on a T1-weighted MRI sequence by shortening the T1 relaxation time ([Supplementary Fig. 1]).[6] This increased signal intensity fades when the thrombus ages over a period of 3 to 6 months.[7] MR-NCTI has been shown to accurately differentiate acute from chronic DVT and to safely exclude acute recurrent ipsilateral DVT of the legs.[7] [8] [9] The diagnostic accuracy of MR-NCTI has not yet been evaluated for the diagnosis of PVT. Because imaging of abdominal veins differs in many ways from imaging of veins in the extremities, for example, artifacts from ascites and intestinal movement and gas, the MR-NCTI sequences used in the extremities need to be adjusted for optimal visualization of PVT. We set out to select and optimize MR-NCTI sequences for differentiation between acute and chronic PVT.
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/10.1055-s-00033990/202003/thumbnails/10-1055-s-0040-1716716-i200061-1.jpg)
![Zoom Image](/products/assets/desktop/css/img/icon-figure-zoom.png)
#
Materials and Methods
This study is the first phase of the Rhea study (NTR 7061), a prospective diagnostic study to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of MR-NCTI for distinguishing acute from chronic PVT. In the Rhea study, our aim is to include 70 PVT patients, including 35 patients with confirmed acute PVT (partial or occlusive), that is, acute symptoms (<2 weeks) characteristic for PVT, diagnosed with Doppler ultrasound (Doppler US), computed tomography (CT) venography, or MRI, and 35 patients with confirmed nonsymptomatic chronic PVT (partial or occlusive), that is, unchanged chronic thrombi on two serial imaging tests with an at least 3-month interval. The study protocol and its amendments were approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands, and the University of Insubria, Varese, Italy. All patients will be asked for written informed consent.
For this first phase of the Rhea study, we aimed to select and develop MR-NCTI sequences that would be accurate for differentiation of acute from chronic PVT. First, a literature search for different MRI sequences for portal vein and acute thrombosis imaging was performed. The literature search was conducted in PubMed for papers published in English and in humans on December 16, 2019 (search strategy detailed in [Supplementary Material]). Because imaging of the abdomen is hampered by intestinal movements and gas, search terms included techniques with correction for respiratory motion artifacts, good spatial and contrast resolution, and fat suppression.
The most promising sequences were adjusted for abdominal imaging and tested in a healthy volunteer using an MRI 3.0-Tesla unit (Philips Ingenia, Philips Medical Systems, Best, the Netherlands). A 55-cm receive-only body multicoil (combination of posterior and anterior coils) was used. Image assessment involved acquiring images in the coronal and axial planes with standard image reconstruction techniques. To gain knowledge of the performance of the sequence to detect fresh blood clots in addition to the visualization of the venous anatomy, two tests coagulation tubes were attached to the abdomen of the volunteer: one was filled with water (control) and one with clotted blood of a healthy volunteer, prepared and stored at room temperature at least 48 hours before each scanning session. The test sequence scan parameters were adjusted until adequate image quality of the veins with high signal intensity for thrombus in the coagulation tube was achieved.
MR-NCTI sequences showing the best image quality and contrast resolution were tested in three patients with confirmed PVT, including one patient with acute PVT and two patients with chronic PVT. Scan optimization was performed until a clear distinct signal intensity was achieved between acute and chronic PVT.
Finally, the MRI images of the three PVT patients were evaluated by an expert panel consisting of two radiologists (L.K. and M.W.) with over 20 years of experience with vascular MRI, one radiology technician (G.H.) with over 20 years of experience with vascular MRI acquisition, one internist (F.K.) with 6 years of experience, and one researcher (L.D.) with 2 years of experience with vascular MRI interpretation. The evaluation of the scans was performed and compared with the clinical presentation and the results of other imaging (Doppler US, CT venography, or MRI). The scan results were assessed for image quality, venous location, and either the presence or absence of acute thrombosis.
#
Results
Literature Search
We identified the following MRI sequences: three-dimensional T1 turbo field echo (3D T1 TFE), 3D turbo spin echo with spectral attenuated inversion recovery (3D TSE SPAIR), and T1 high-resolution isotropic volume excitation (THRIVE) and techniques: black-blood, Dixon and Principle of Selective Excitation Technique (ProSET) which could be suitable for portal vein imaging.
A 3D T1 TFE sequence was shown to be highly accurate for the diagnosis of first DVT and the differentiation of acute DVT from chronic residual vascular abnormalities in the leg.[8] [9] [10] Hence, this sequence seemed promising for the differentiation of acute from chronic PVT. Furthermore, in a pilot study, 3D T1 TFE and 3D TSE SPAIR sequences successfully confirmed the diagnosis of arm vein thrombosis when compared with ultrasonography or contrast venography.[11] The advantages of 3D TSE-SPAIR over 3D T1 TFE were a higher spatial resolution of the vessel wall and less high signal artifacts in arteries caused by inflow effects. Therefore, both 3D T1 TFE and 3D TSE SPAIR may be suitable for portal vein imaging.
THRIVE sequences may also be a promising MR-NCTI technique in PVT with potential good contrast resolution between high signal intensity of an acute thrombus and low signal intensity intravascular.[12]
The black-blood technique was successfully used to identify DVT of the leg and in cerebral vein thrombosis.[13] [14] With this technique, the signal from flowing blood is nullified and highlights static anatomy including thrombi.[15] Because of known good contrast resolution between thrombus and flowing blood, we hypothesized that combining the black-blood technique with 3D TSE SPAIR may be suitable for portal vein imaging.
Since it can be difficult to distinguish an acute thrombus from other tissues with a short T1 relaxation time, for example, fat tissue, which is present in the liver, adding a fat-suppression technique that suppresses the fat signal may help in depicting thrombosis. With this technique, selective pulses cause signal from fat to be nulled (saturated), whereas the water signal is relatively unaffected. The Dixon technique is an often-used fat suppression technique that can be used with several sequences such as T1- and T2-weighted imaging and gradient echo MRI.[16] [17] An alternative to fat suppression methods is water excitation by means of a spectral spatial pulse. With this technique, only water is excited by using section-selective composite pulses, whereas lipid spins are left in equilibrium, thereby producing no signal.[18] ProSET, a water excitation technique, was successfully used in a pregnant patient with proximal iliac vein thrombosis[19] and may therefore be applicable in portal vein imaging as well.
#
Sequence Testing and Optimization
All three selected imaging sequences (3D T1 TFE, 3D TSE SPAIR, and THRIVE), and the black-blood, Dixon, and ProSET techniques were tested in a healthy volunteer.
3D T1 TFE sequence combined with the ProSET technique and the Dixon technique added to a 3D T1 Dixon FFE showed good contrast resolution between the liver parenchyma and intrahepatic veins. Moreover, a high signal intensity was acquired from the coagulation tube ([Fig. 1]). These two sequences were thus the most promising for portal vein imaging and were evaluated in three PVT patients ([Table 1]).
Abbreviations: 3D T1 Dixon FFE, three-dimensional T1 fast field echo sequence; 3D T1 TFE, three-dimensional T1 turbo field echo; FOV, field of view.
3D TSE SPAIR, with and without the black-blood technique, and THRIVE sequence were shown to be suboptimal for abdominal direct thrombus imaging because of a high signal intensity from blood flow in splanchnic veins and intestines despite saturation slab and low image quality due to motion artifacts. These sequences were excluded for further analysis.
#
MR-NCTI Optimization in PVT Patients
3D T1 TFE and 3D T1 Dixon FFE sequences were used to evaluate one patient with acute PVT and two patients with chronic PVT ([Table 2]). 3D T1 TFE and 3D T1 Dixon FFE showed a high signal intensity in all abdominal vein segments with acute thrombosis diagnosed on CT venography ([Fig. 2]). In the two patients with chronic PVT, both sequences showed no increased signal intensity in the portal or mesenteric veins ([Fig. 3]). The expert panel was able to confirm the diagnosis of acute PVT on the combined two MR-NCTI sequences and to exclude acute PVT in the two patients with chronic thrombosis. The combination of 3D T1 TFE and 3D T1 Dixon FF was thus judged optimal for locating and differentiating acute from chronic PVT with good image quality and short scanning time (10–15 minutes).
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/10.1055-s-00033990/202003/thumbnails/10-1055-s-0040-1716716-i200061-2.jpg)
![Zoom Image](/products/assets/desktop/css/img/icon-figure-zoom.png)
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/10.1055-s-00033990/202003/thumbnails/10-1055-s-0040-1716716-i200061-3.jpg)
![Zoom Image](/products/assets/desktop/css/img/icon-figure-zoom.png)
Abbreviations: NASH, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis; PVT, portal vein thrombosis; VTE, venous thromboembolism; JAK2, janus kinase 2.
Note: Acute PVT is defined as an acute onset (<2 weeks' existent) of symptoms characteristic for PVT, diagnosed with Doppler ultrasound, computed tomography venography, or magnetic resonance imaging. Chronic PVT is defined as nonsymptomatic chronic PVT defined by unchanged chronic thrombi on two serial imaging tests with an at least 3-month interval.
#
#
Discussion
In this first phase of the Rhea study, the combination of 3D T1 TFE and 3D T1 Dixon FFE sequences was found to be the most optimal for diagnosing and differentiating acute from chronic PVT. Differentiation between acute and chronic PVT is essential as current guidelines recommend different anticoagulant strategies in patients with acute or chronic PVT, though based on (very) low level of evidence.[5] However, with currently available imaging tests, Doppler US, CT venography, and MRI, it is not always possible to accurately differentiate acute from chronic thrombosis. The diagnosis of chronic PVT can be made in cases of morphologic changes such as an atretic portal vein, inflow branches, and cavernous transformation of the portal vein, also called portal cavernoma.[20] [21] However, it may be impossible to differentiate acute from chronic PVT in the presence of an organized nonocclusive chronic PVT, without these morphological changes. Furthermore, up to 30% of the PVT cases are detected incidentally in imaging studies performed for other indications in which it is very challenging to determine whether the incidentally observed thrombosis is acute, chronic, or even an imaging artifact.[22]
MR-NCTI has been shown to be a valuable diagnostic test for the diagnosis of upper extremity DVT, pelvic vein, and cerebral vein thrombosis,[11] [14] [19] and was shown to be an accurate, simple, feasible, and reproducible diagnostic test in suspected recurrent ipsilateral DVT of the leg.[9] There are some important differences between venous thrombosis of the portal vein and that at other locations. For instance, portal vein imaging is different from imaging of veins in the extremities and brain due to the presence of ascites, gas, and bowel movements, which can hamper abdominal vein imaging. Furthermore, PVT occurs in different clinical circumstances (i.e., portal hypertension, cirrhosis) that are less relevant to typical VTE.[23]
There are only a few case reports available on noncontrast-enhanced MRI for the diagnosis of PVT using different techniques and without results on the diagnostic accuracy of MRI for PVT.[24] [25] In a study by Zirinsky et al, T1- and T2-weighted MR images of 14 patients with acute and chronic PVT on CT or ultrasonography and of 8 patients with portal hypertension but without evidence of PVT were evaluated. With MRI, (sub-)acute (<5 weeks old) thrombi appeared hyperintense relative to liver and muscle on both T1- and T2-weighted sequences, and older thrombi (2–18 months old) appeared hypertense in some patients but only on T2-weighted images. Therefore, it was suggested that chronic thrombosis may lose its relative hyperintensity on T1-weighted images and thus may be used for detecting and classification of PVT.[24] In a case series by Haddad et al, thrombosis on noncontrast-enhanced T1-weighted images appeared different depending on the age of the thrombus, with a high signal intensity in subacute splanchnic vein thrombosis (<6 weeks) and low signal intensity in more chronic (>2 months old) thrombosis.[25]
There are some limitations of this study. First, this study includes only three patients and therefore the validity of the results must be evaluated in a large cohort before we can proceed to an outcome study. Such an accuracy study is currently ongoing. Furthermore, the evaluation of MR-NTCI images by the expert panel was not blinded for other imaging studies including ultrasound and CT images. Additionally, due to the small number of patients, the interobserver agreement could not be established.
In conclusion, we were able to identify two MR-NTCI sequences, 3D T1 TFE and 3D T1 Dixon FFE, that were able to diagnose and differentiate acute from chronic PVT. With our previous experience based on imaging of DVT in the lower and upper extremities,[9] [11] [19] we believe that the image quality is sufficient to be of clinical value and initiate the clinical part of the Rhea study (NTR 7061) to establish the diagnostic accuracy of MR-NCTI for the differentiation of acute from chronic PVT. Furthermore, the interobserver agreement of these sequences for PVT imaging will be assessed.
#
#
Conflict of Interest
None declared.
Authors' Contributions
L.F.v.D., F.A.K., and L.J.M.K. had full access to all the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. L.F.v.D., F.A.K., M.E.T., W.A., S.D.M., G.R.v.H., M.V.H., M.N.L., A.I.d.S., M.N.J.M.W., Y.W., and L.J.M.K. contributed to acquisition of the data. L.F.v.D., F.A.K., and L.J.M.K. contributed to analysis and interpretation of the data. L.F.v.D., F.A.K., M.E.T., and L.J.M.K contributed to drafting of the manuscript. L.F.v.D., F.A.K., M.E.T., W.A., S.D.M., G.R.v.H., M.V.H., M.N.L., A.I.d.S., M.N.J.M.W., Y.W., and L.J.M.K. contributed to critical revision of themanuscript. L.F.v.D., F.A.K., M.E.T., W.A., S.D.M., G.R.v.H., M.V.H., M.N.L., A.I.d.S., M.N.J.M.W., Y.W., and L.J.M.K. contributed to final approval of the manuscript.
-
References
- 1 Søgaard KK, Darvalics B, Horváth-Puhó E, Sørensen HT. Survival after splanchnic vein thrombosis: a 20-year nationwide cohort study. Thromb Res 2016; 141: 1-7
- 2 Ageno W, Riva N, Schulman S. , et al. Long-term clinical outcomes of splanchnic vein thrombosis: results of an international registry. JAMA Intern Med 2015; 175 (09) 1474-1480
- 3 Plessier A, Darwish-Murad S, Hernandez-Guerra M. European Network for Vascular Disorders of the Liver (EN-Vie). , et al; Acute portal vein thrombosis unrelated to cirrhosis: a prospective multicenter follow-up study. Hepatology 2010; 51 (01) 210-218
- 4 Pettinari I, Vukotic R, Stefanescu H. BO-LIVES (BOlogna LIVEr vascular Studies). , et al; Clinical impact and safety of anticoagulants for portal vein thrombosis in cirrhosis. Am J Gastroenterol 2019; 114 (02) 258-266
- 5 Simonetto DA, Singal AK, Garcia-Tsao G, Caldwell SH, Ahn J, Kamath PS. ACG Clinical Guideline: disorders of the hepatic and mesenteric circulation. Am J Gastroenterol 2020; 115 (01) 18-40
- 6 Moody AR. Magnetic resonance direct thrombus imaging. J Thromb Haemost 2003; 1 (07) 1403-1409
- 7 Westerbeek RE, Van Rooden CJ, Tan M. , et al. Magnetic resonance direct thrombus imaging of the evolution of acute deep vein thrombosis of the leg. J Thromb Haemost 2008; 6 (07) 1087-1092
- 8 Tan M, Mol GC, van Rooden CJ. , et al. Magnetic resonance direct thrombus imaging differentiates acute recurrent ipsilateral deep vein thrombosis from residual thrombosis. Blood 2014; 124 (04) 623-627
- 9 van Dam LF, Dronkers CEA, Gautam G. , et al. Magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosis of recurrent ipsilateral deep vein thrombosis. Blood 2020; 135 (16) 1377-1385
- 10 Fraser DG, Moody AR, Morgan PS, Martel AL, Davidson I. Diagnosis of lower-limb deep venous thrombosis: a prospective blinded study of magnetic resonance direct thrombus imaging. Ann Intern Med 2002; 136 (02) 89-98
- 11 Dronkers CEA, Klok FA, van Haren GR. , et al. Diagnosing upper extremity deep vein thrombosis with non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance direct thrombus imaging: a pilot study. Thromb Res 2018; 163: 47-50
- 12 Riffel P, Attenberger UI, Kannengiesser S. , et al. Highly accelerated T1-weighted abdominal imaging using 2-dimensional controlled aliasing in parallel imaging results in higher acceleration: a comparison with generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions parallel imaging. Invest Radiol 2013; 48 (07) 554-561
- 13 Treitl KM, Treitl M, Kooijman-Kurfuerst H. , et al. Three-dimensional black-blood T1-weighted turbo spin-echo techniques for the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis in comparison with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: a pilot study. Invest Radiol 2015; 50 (06) 401-408
- 14 Yang Q, Duan J, Fan Z. , et al. Early detection and quantification of cerebral venous thrombosis by magnetic resonance black-blood thrombus imaging. Stroke 2016; 47 (02) 404-409
- 15 Xie G, Chen H, He X. , et al. Black-blood thrombus imaging (BTI): a contrast-free cardiovascular magnetic resonance approach for the diagnosis of non-acute deep vein thrombosis. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2017; 19 (01) 4
- 16 Del Grande F, Santini F, Herzka DA. , et al. Fat-suppression techniques for 3-T MR imaging of the musculoskeletal system. Radiographics 2014; 34 (01) 217-233
- 17 Guerini H, Omoumi P, Guichoux F. , et al. Fat suppression with Dixon techniques in musculoskeletal magnetic resonance imaging: a pictorial review. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2015; 19 (04) 335-347
- 18 Hauger O, Dumont E, Chateil JF, Moinard M, Diard F. Water excitation as an alternative to fat saturation in MR imaging: preliminary results in musculoskeletal imaging. Radiology 2002; 224 (03) 657-663
- 19 Dronkers CE, Srámek A, Huisman MV, Klok FA. Accurate diagnosis of iliac vein thrombosis in pregnancy with magnetic resonance direct thrombus imaging (MRDTI). BMJ Case Rep 2016; 2016: bcr2016218091
- 20 Intagliata NM, Caldwell SH, Tripodi A. Diagnosis, development, and treatment of portal vein thrombosis in patients with and without cirrhosis. Gastroenterology 2019; 156 (06) 1582-1599.e1
- 21 De Gaetano AM, Lafortune M, Patriquin H, De Franco A, Aubin B, Paradis K. Cavernous transformation of the portal vein: patterns of intrahepatic and splanchnic collateral circulation detected with Doppler sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995; 165 (05) 1151-1155
- 22 Amitrano L, Guardascione MA, Scaglione M. , et al. Prognostic factors in noncirrhotic patients with splanchnic vein thromboses. Am J Gastroenterol 2007; 102 (11) 2464-2470
- 23 Denninger MH, Chaït Y, Casadevall N. , et al. Cause of portal or hepatic venous thrombosis in adults: the role of multiple concurrent factors. Hepatology 2000; 31 (03) 587-591
- 24 Zirinsky K, Markisz JA, Rubenstein WA. , et al. MR imaging of portal venous thrombosis: correlation with CT and sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1988; 150 (02) 283-288
- 25 Haddad MC, Clark DC, Sharif HS, al Shahed M, Aideyan O, Sammak BMMR. MR, CT, and ultrasonography of splanchnic venous thrombosis. Gastrointest Radiol 1992; 17 (01) 34-40
Address for correspondence
Publication History
Received: 26 June 2020
Accepted: 04 August 2020
Article published online:
23 September 2020
© .
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Stuttgart · New York
-
References
- 1 Søgaard KK, Darvalics B, Horváth-Puhó E, Sørensen HT. Survival after splanchnic vein thrombosis: a 20-year nationwide cohort study. Thromb Res 2016; 141: 1-7
- 2 Ageno W, Riva N, Schulman S. , et al. Long-term clinical outcomes of splanchnic vein thrombosis: results of an international registry. JAMA Intern Med 2015; 175 (09) 1474-1480
- 3 Plessier A, Darwish-Murad S, Hernandez-Guerra M. European Network for Vascular Disorders of the Liver (EN-Vie). , et al; Acute portal vein thrombosis unrelated to cirrhosis: a prospective multicenter follow-up study. Hepatology 2010; 51 (01) 210-218
- 4 Pettinari I, Vukotic R, Stefanescu H. BO-LIVES (BOlogna LIVEr vascular Studies). , et al; Clinical impact and safety of anticoagulants for portal vein thrombosis in cirrhosis. Am J Gastroenterol 2019; 114 (02) 258-266
- 5 Simonetto DA, Singal AK, Garcia-Tsao G, Caldwell SH, Ahn J, Kamath PS. ACG Clinical Guideline: disorders of the hepatic and mesenteric circulation. Am J Gastroenterol 2020; 115 (01) 18-40
- 6 Moody AR. Magnetic resonance direct thrombus imaging. J Thromb Haemost 2003; 1 (07) 1403-1409
- 7 Westerbeek RE, Van Rooden CJ, Tan M. , et al. Magnetic resonance direct thrombus imaging of the evolution of acute deep vein thrombosis of the leg. J Thromb Haemost 2008; 6 (07) 1087-1092
- 8 Tan M, Mol GC, van Rooden CJ. , et al. Magnetic resonance direct thrombus imaging differentiates acute recurrent ipsilateral deep vein thrombosis from residual thrombosis. Blood 2014; 124 (04) 623-627
- 9 van Dam LF, Dronkers CEA, Gautam G. , et al. Magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosis of recurrent ipsilateral deep vein thrombosis. Blood 2020; 135 (16) 1377-1385
- 10 Fraser DG, Moody AR, Morgan PS, Martel AL, Davidson I. Diagnosis of lower-limb deep venous thrombosis: a prospective blinded study of magnetic resonance direct thrombus imaging. Ann Intern Med 2002; 136 (02) 89-98
- 11 Dronkers CEA, Klok FA, van Haren GR. , et al. Diagnosing upper extremity deep vein thrombosis with non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance direct thrombus imaging: a pilot study. Thromb Res 2018; 163: 47-50
- 12 Riffel P, Attenberger UI, Kannengiesser S. , et al. Highly accelerated T1-weighted abdominal imaging using 2-dimensional controlled aliasing in parallel imaging results in higher acceleration: a comparison with generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions parallel imaging. Invest Radiol 2013; 48 (07) 554-561
- 13 Treitl KM, Treitl M, Kooijman-Kurfuerst H. , et al. Three-dimensional black-blood T1-weighted turbo spin-echo techniques for the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis in comparison with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: a pilot study. Invest Radiol 2015; 50 (06) 401-408
- 14 Yang Q, Duan J, Fan Z. , et al. Early detection and quantification of cerebral venous thrombosis by magnetic resonance black-blood thrombus imaging. Stroke 2016; 47 (02) 404-409
- 15 Xie G, Chen H, He X. , et al. Black-blood thrombus imaging (BTI): a contrast-free cardiovascular magnetic resonance approach for the diagnosis of non-acute deep vein thrombosis. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2017; 19 (01) 4
- 16 Del Grande F, Santini F, Herzka DA. , et al. Fat-suppression techniques for 3-T MR imaging of the musculoskeletal system. Radiographics 2014; 34 (01) 217-233
- 17 Guerini H, Omoumi P, Guichoux F. , et al. Fat suppression with Dixon techniques in musculoskeletal magnetic resonance imaging: a pictorial review. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2015; 19 (04) 335-347
- 18 Hauger O, Dumont E, Chateil JF, Moinard M, Diard F. Water excitation as an alternative to fat saturation in MR imaging: preliminary results in musculoskeletal imaging. Radiology 2002; 224 (03) 657-663
- 19 Dronkers CE, Srámek A, Huisman MV, Klok FA. Accurate diagnosis of iliac vein thrombosis in pregnancy with magnetic resonance direct thrombus imaging (MRDTI). BMJ Case Rep 2016; 2016: bcr2016218091
- 20 Intagliata NM, Caldwell SH, Tripodi A. Diagnosis, development, and treatment of portal vein thrombosis in patients with and without cirrhosis. Gastroenterology 2019; 156 (06) 1582-1599.e1
- 21 De Gaetano AM, Lafortune M, Patriquin H, De Franco A, Aubin B, Paradis K. Cavernous transformation of the portal vein: patterns of intrahepatic and splanchnic collateral circulation detected with Doppler sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995; 165 (05) 1151-1155
- 22 Amitrano L, Guardascione MA, Scaglione M. , et al. Prognostic factors in noncirrhotic patients with splanchnic vein thromboses. Am J Gastroenterol 2007; 102 (11) 2464-2470
- 23 Denninger MH, Chaït Y, Casadevall N. , et al. Cause of portal or hepatic venous thrombosis in adults: the role of multiple concurrent factors. Hepatology 2000; 31 (03) 587-591
- 24 Zirinsky K, Markisz JA, Rubenstein WA. , et al. MR imaging of portal venous thrombosis: correlation with CT and sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1988; 150 (02) 283-288
- 25 Haddad MC, Clark DC, Sharif HS, al Shahed M, Aideyan O, Sammak BMMR. MR, CT, and ultrasonography of splanchnic venous thrombosis. Gastrointest Radiol 1992; 17 (01) 34-40
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/10.1055-s-00033990/202003/thumbnails/10-1055-s-0040-1716716-i200061-1.jpg)
![Zoom Image](/products/assets/desktop/css/img/icon-figure-zoom.png)
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/10.1055-s-00033990/202003/thumbnails/10-1055-s-0040-1716716-i200061-2.jpg)
![Zoom Image](/products/assets/desktop/css/img/icon-figure-zoom.png)
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/10.1055-s-00033990/202003/thumbnails/10-1055-s-0040-1716716-i200061-3.jpg)
![Zoom Image](/products/assets/desktop/css/img/icon-figure-zoom.png)