Am J Perinatol 2022; 39(04): 416-424
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1717068
Original Article

Decision to Incision and Risk for Fetal Acidemia, Low Apgar Scores, and Hypoxic Ischemic Encephalopathy

Sabine Bousleiman
1   Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York City, New York
,
Dwight J. Rouse
2   Division of Research, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women and Infants Hospital, Warren Alpert Medical School at Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
,
Cynthia Gyamfi-Bannerman
1   Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York City, New York
,
Yongmei Huang
1   Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York City, New York
,
Mary E. D'Alton
1   Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York City, New York
,
Zainab Siddiq
1   Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York City, New York
,
Jason D. Wright
1   Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York City, New York
,
Alexander M. Friedman
1   Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York City, New York
› Institutsangaben
Funding A.M.F. is supported by a career development award (K08HD082287) from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health.

Abstract

Objective This study aimed to assess risk for fetal acidemia, low Apgar scores, and hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy based on decision-to-incision time interval in the setting of emergency cesarean delivery.

Study Design This unplanned secondary analysis of the Maternal–Fetal Medicine Units prospective observational cesarean registry dataset evaluated risk for hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy, umbilical cord pH ≤7.0, and Apgar score ≤4 at 5 minutes based on decision-to-incision time for emergency cesarean deliveries. Cesarean occurring for nonreassuring fetal heart rate monitoring, bleeding previa, nonreassuring antepartum testing, placental abruption, or cord prolapse was classified as emergent. Decision-to-incision time was categorized as <10 minutes, 10 to <20 minutes, 20 to <30 minutes, 30 to <50 minutes, or ≥50 minutes. As secondary outcomes umbilical cord pH ≤7.1, umbilical artery pH ≤7.0, and Apgar score ≤5 at 5 minutes were analyzed.

Results Of 5,784 women included in the primary analysis, 12.4% had a decision-to-incision interval ≤10 minutes, 20.2% 11 to 20 minutes, 14.9% 21 to 30 minutes, 18.2% 31 to 50 minutes, and 16.5% >50 minutes. Risk for umbilical cord pH ≤7.0 was highest at ≤10 and 11 to 20 minutes (10.2 and 7.9%, respectively), and lowest at 21 to 30 minutes (3.9%), 31 to 50 minutes (3.9%), and >50 minutes (3.5%) (p < 0.01). Risk for Apgar scores ≤4 at 5 minutes was also higher with decision-to-incision intervals ≤10 and 11 to 20 minutes (4.3 and 4.4%, respectively) compared with intervals of 21 to 30 minutes (1.7%), 31 to 50 minutes (2.1%), and >50 minutes (2.0%) (p < 0.01). Hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy occurred in 1.5 and 1.0% of women with decision-to-incision intervals of ≤10 and 11 to 20 minutes compared with 0.3 and 0.5% for women with decision-to-incision intervals of 21 to 30 minutes and 31 to 50 minutes (p = 0.04). Risk for secondary outcomes was also higher with shorter decision-to-incision intervals.

Conclusion Shorter decision-to-incision times were associated with increased risk for adverse outcomes in the setting of emergency cesarean.

Key Points

  • Shorter intervals likely occur with higher risk cases.

  • Shorter intervals were associated with higher neonatal risk.

  • Shorter intervals were associated with low cord pH.

Supplementary Material



Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 10. Juli 2020

Angenommen: 02. August 2020

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
21. September 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Standards for obstetric-gynecologic services. In: American College of Obstetrics and Gynecologists Committee on Professional Standards. 7th ed.. Washington, DC: 1989
  • 2 National Collaborating Centre for Women's and Children's Health (UK). RCOG Press. Available at: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg132/evidence/full-guideline-pdf-184810861. Accessed November, 2011
  • 3 American Academy of Pediatrics ACoOaG. Guidelines for perinatal care. Available at: http://simponline.it/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/GuidelinesforPerinatalCare.pdf. Accessed 2002
  • 4 de Regt RH, Marks K, Joseph DL, Malmgren JA. Time from decision to incision for cesarean deliveries at a community hospital. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 113 (03) 625-629
  • 5 Nageotte MP, Vander Wal B. Achievement of the 30-minute standard in obstetrics-can it be done?. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 206 (02) 104-107
  • 6 Myers RE. Two patterns of perinatal brain damage and their conditions of occurrence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1972; 112 (02) 246-276
  • 7 Boehm FH. Decision to incision: time to reconsider. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 206 (02) 97-98
  • 8 Grobman WA, Bailit J, Sandoval G. et al; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units (MFMU) Network. The association of decision-to-incision time for cesarean delivery with maternal and neonatal outcomes. Am J Perinatol 2018; 35 (03) 247-253
  • 9 Tolcher MC, Johnson RL, El-Nashar SA, West CP. Decision-to-incision time and neonatal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 123 (03) 536-548
  • 10 Bloom SL, Leveno KJ, Spong CY. et al; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Decision-to-incision times and maternal and infant outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 108 (01) 6-11
  • 11 Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ. et al; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 2004; 351 (25) 2581-2589
  • 12 Breslin N, Vander Haar E, Friedman AM, Duffy C, Gyamfi-Bannerman C. Impact of timing of delivery on maternal and neonatal outcomes for women after three previous caesarean deliveries; a secondary analysis of the caesarean section registry. BJOG 2019; 126 (08) 1008-1013
  • 13 Tita AT, Lai Y, Landon MB. et al; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network (MFMU). Timing of elective repeat cesarean delivery at term and maternal perioperative outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 117 (2 Pt 1): 280-286