Beyond the Tip of the Blade: An Investigation of Upper Extremity Machete Injuries in Honduras

Abstract

Background Machete injuries constitute a major cause of morbidity in Honduras. In this study, we aimed to determine the incidence, initial management, surgical treatment, and follow-up patterns for machete injuries at the national public hospital in Honduras. Microsurgery in Honduras is currently in transition with limitations at multiple levels. This study aims to provide critical information to better prepare visiting surgeons and establishes a blueprint to improve microsurgical reconstruction.

Methods A retrospective chart review was performed to identify patients with machete injuries to the upper extremity (UE) who presented to the Hospital Escuela Universitario (HEU) for treatment from 2015 to 2017. Additional microsurgical data was obtained by personal communication with members of the plastic surgery department at the HEU.

Results Complete data was retrieved for 100 patients who presented to the HEU with a UE machete wound. The cohort was male dominated (93%), employed as farmers (47%), and had a mean age of 32.1 years. Violence was the most common mechanism of injury (p < 0.001). The majority of UE machete injuries involved tendon (70%), nerve (28%), and an open fracture (55%). Of the 76% of patients who were scheduled for a follow-up visit, only 25% attended. Within the last calendar year, one replantation, 10 revascularizations at the wrist and forearm level, three microvascular free tissue transfers, and 175 nerve repairs were performed.

Conclusion Management of UE machete injuries in Honduras is challenging and requires early recognition of possible injuries to multiple anatomical systems. The majority of injuries required operative intervention. Only a small percentage of patients presented for follow up. A program to streamline care starting at injury recognition up to final follow-up is currently unavailable and needs to be developed to optimize microsurgical care.

Keywords

machete - Honduras - microsurgery

Note

This work was presented at the Hand Therapy Symposium, 21st Annual Meeting in Philadelphia, PA, on March 3, 2019.

Publication History

Received: 12 April 2020

Accepted: 25 August 2020

Article published online:
08 October 2020

• References

• 1 Wiedeman JE, Zierold D, Klink BK. Machete injuries in Haiti. Mil Med 2001; 166 (11) 1023-1025
• 2 Omoke NI, Madubueze CC. Machete injuries as seen in a Nigerian teaching hospital. Injury 2010; 41 (01) 120-124
• 3 Omoke NI, Chukwu COO, Madubueze CC, Egwu AN. Traumatic extremity amputation in a Nigerian setting: patterns and challenges of care. Int Orthop 2012; 36 (03) 613-618
• 4 Howard N, Holmes WJM, Price CE, Rollinson P. Severity of upper-limb panga injuries and infection rates associated with early v. late tendon repair. S Afr J Surg 2014; 52 (01) 22-25
• 5 The World Factbook — Central Intelligence Agency. Available at: https://www.cia.gov/library/PUBLICATIONS/the-world-factbook/geos/ho.html . Accessed November 12, 2018
• 6 Ciudad Universitaria. Observatorio de la Violencia: Mortalidad y Otros. UNAH-IUDPAS. Accessed September 24, 2020 at: https://iudpas.unah.edu.hn/observatorio-de-la-violencia/boletines-del-observatorio-2
• 7 Chukwudi OA, Rowland A, Uche O. Machete-cut injuries are occurring in the maxillofacial region in Zaria, Nigeria. Niger J Clin Pract 2015; 18 (04) 569-572
• 8 Nadjem H, Bohnert M, Pollak S. Appearance of injuries caused by ma[6].chetes and unusually large knives [in German]. Arch Kriminol 1999; 204 (5-6): 163-174
• 9 Enicker B, Madiba TE. Cranial injuries secondary to assault with a machete. Injury 2014; 45 (09) 1355-1358
• 10 Donnally III CJ, Hannay W, Rapp DA, Lekic N, Dodds SD. Machete injuries to the upper extremity. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2017; 137 (12) 1615-1621
• 11 Barrera R, Aronowitz D, Badauoi C. et al. Global clinical experience of a long-term surgical mission trip. IJS Glob Health 2020; 3 (02) e13
• 12 DeCamp M, Lehmann LS, Jaeel P, Horwitch C. ACP Ethics, Professionalism and Human Rights Committee. Ethical obligations regarding short-term global health clinical experiences: an American College of Physicians Position Paper. Ann Intern Med 2018; 168 (09) 651-657
• 13 Yip KM, Tam TY, Hung LK. Multiple chop wounds in Hong Kong. An epidemiological study of an unusual injury. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1997; 116 (05) 295-298
• 14 Boulas HJ. Amputations of the fingers and hand: indications for replantation. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 1998; 6 (02) 100-105
• 15 Medling BD, Bueno Jr RA, Russell RC, Neumeister MW. Replantation outcomes. Clin Plast Surg 2007; 34 (02) 177-185 , vii–viii
• 16 Chung KC, Alderman AK. Replantation of the upper extremity: indications and outcomes. J Am Soc Surg Hand 2002; 2: 78-94
• 17 Spiegel DA, Choo S, Cherian M. et al. Quantifying surgical and anesthetic availability at primary health facilities in Mongolia. World J Surg 2011; 35 (02) 272-279
• 18 McQueen KAK. The global anesthesia crisis and continuous quality improvement. Int Anesthesiol Clin 2014; 52 (01) 109-119
• 19 Romero-Prieto F, González-Morales JC. Functional outcome after hand replantation in Guatemala. J Surg Case Rep 2017; 2017 (12) rjx243
• 20 Ngaage LM, Oni G, Buntic R, Malata CM, Buncke G. Initial management of traumatic digit amputations: a retrospective study of functional outcomes. J Reconstr Microsurg 2018; 34 (04) 250-257
• 21 Tessler O, Bartow MJ, Tremblay-Champagne MP. et al. Long-term health-related quality of life outcomes in digital replantation versus revision amputation. J Reconstr Microsurg 2017; 33 (06) 446-451
• 22 van Bekkum S, de Jong T, Zuidam M, Mureau MAM. Long-term quality of life after free flap upper extremity reconstruction for traumatic injuries. J Reconstr Microsurg 2020; 36 (03) 213-222
• 23 Daoutis NK, Gerostathopoulos N, Efstathopoulos D, Misitzis D, Bouchlis G, Anagnostou S. Major amputation of the upper extremity. Functional results after replantation/revascularization in 47 cases. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 1995; 264: 7-8