Evaluation of Safety and Medium-Term Functional Outcomes of a Medial Fixed-Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty with Ultra-Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene

Abstract

The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the in vivo safety of a unicompartmental knee arthroplasty design with sequentially annealed cross-linked polyethylene by evaluating reoperation rate, in particular those related to excessive polyethylene wear or breakage. The secondary objective was to examine functional outcomes via standardized questionnaires. This was a 5-year institutional review board-approved prospective single-surgeon case series of the first 152 consecutive patients with symptomatic medial unicompartmental osteoarthritis implanted with a partial knee replacement between May 2010 and December 2014. Study participants were asked to complete the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthrtis Index (WOMAC) questionnaires at preoperation and 2 to 5 years postoperation. Major complications and all reoperations were recorded and we produced Kaplan–Meier survivorship curves with the end point of revision to TKA. Pre- and postoperative differences for KOOS and WOMAC were evaluated by paired t-tests. The median length of follow-up was 7.2 (0–9.72) years. Seven patients required revision surgery to TKA (4.9% of patients): four with progression of arthritis in other compartments, two for infection, and one for loosening of the femoral component and subsequent progression of pain. There were no failures of polyethylene. Survival of cohort was 99.3 and 97.9% at 2 and 5 years, respectively. Patients significantly improved (p-value < 0.001) between preoperative assessment and at 2 years, with no decline at 5 years postoperation. These preliminary midterm results with this fixed-bearing design and cross-linked polyethylene were encouraging with no catastrophic failures of polyethylene. Patient reported outcomes were significantly improved and revision rates were acceptable and lower than registry reported results.

Keywords

unicompartmental knee arthroplasty - highly cross-linked polyethylene - patient reported outcome measures - safety

Note

This study was reviewed and approved by the institutional ethics committee.

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 28. Juni 2020

Angenommen: 25. August 2020

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
27. Oktober 2020

• References

• 1 Patil S, Colwell Jr CW, Ezzet KA, D'Lima DD. Can normal knee kinematics be restored with unicompartmental knee replacement?. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005; 87 (02) 332-338
• 2 AOA. The Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry Annual Report. Accessed 2019 at: https://aoanjrr.sahmri.com/annual-reports-2019
• 3 National Joint Registry of England and Wales, Annual Report. Available at: https://www.hqip.org.uk/resource/national-joint-registry-15th-annual-report-2018/#.X2LATmgzZPY. Accessed September 25, 2018
• 4 D'Antonio JA, Manley MT, Capello WN. et al. Five-year experience with Crossfire highly cross-linked polyethylene. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005; 441 (441) 143-150
• 5 Digas G, Kärrholm J, Thanner J, Malchau H, Herberts P. Highly cross-linked polyethylene in cemented THA: randomized study of 61 hips. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003; 417 (417) 126-138
• 6 Digas G, Kärrholm J, Thanner J, Malchau H, Herberts P. The Otto Aufranc Award. Highly cross-linked polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty: randomized evaluation of penetration rate in cemented and uncemented sockets using radiostereometric analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004; (429) 6-16
• 7 Sakellariou VI, Sculco P, Poultsides L, Wright T, Sculco TP. Highly cross-linked polyethylene may not have an advantage in total knee arthroplasty. HSS J 2013; 9 (03) 264-269
• 8 Gee AO, Lee GC. Alternative bearings in total knee arthroplasty. Am J Orthop 2012; 41 (06) 280-283
• 9 Lachiewicz PF, Geyer MR. The use of highly cross-linked polyethylene in total knee arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2011; 19 (03) 143-151
• 10 Kop AM, Pabbruwe MB, Keogh C, Swarts E. Oxidation of second generation sequentially irradiated and annealed highly cross-linked X3™ polyethylene tibial bearings. J Arthroplasty 2015; 30 (10) 1842-1846
• 11 Meneghini RM, Lovro LR, Smits SA, Ireland PH. Highly cross-linked versus conventional polyethylene in posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty at a mean 5-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty 2015; 30 (10) 1736-1739
• 12 McConnell S, Kolopack P, Davis AM. The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC): a review of its utility and measurement properties. Arthritis Rheum 2001; 45 (05) 453-461
• 13 Naylor JM, Hayen A, Davidson E. et al. Minimal detectable change for mobility and patient-reported tools in people with osteoarthritis awaiting arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2014; 15 (01) 235
• 14 Parratte S, Pauly V, Aubaniac JM, Argenson JN. No long-term difference between fixed and mobile medial unicompartmental arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012; 470 (01) 61-68
• 15 Li MG, Yao F, Joss B, Ioppolo J, Nivbrant B, Wood D. Mobile vs. fixed bearing unicondylar knee arthroplasty: a randomized study on short term clinical outcomes and knee kinematics. Knee 2006; 13 (05) 365-370
• 16 Emerson Jr RH, Hansborough T, Reitman RD, Rosenfeldt W, Higgins LL. Comparison of a mobile with a fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee implant. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002; (404) 62-70
• 17 Netter J, Hermida JC, D'Alessio J, Kester M, D'Lima DD. Effect of polyethylene crosslinking and bearing design on wear of unicompartmental arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2015; 30 (08) 1430-1433
• 18 Blackwood CB. The effect of alignment on polyethylene wear in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. St. Helena, CA Stryker Orthopaedics, Mahwah, NJ: Coon Joint Replacement Institute;