Download PDF
Semin intervent Radiol 2020; 37(05): 484-491
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1719189
Review Article

Interventional Oncology Approach to Hepatic Metastases

Cathal O'Leary
1   Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
Michael C. Soulen
1   Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
Susan Shamimi-Noori
1   Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Metastatic liver disease is one of the major causes of cancer-related morbidity and mortality. Locoregional therapies offered by interventional oncologists alleviate cancer-related morbidity and in some cases improve survival. Locoregional therapies are often palliative in nature but occasionally can be used with curative intent. This review will discuss important factors to consider prior to palliative and curative intent treatment of metastatic liver disease with locoregional therapy. These factors include those specific to the tumor, liver function, liver reserve, differences between treatment modalities, and patient-specific considerations.

Keywords

hepatic metastases - locoregional therapy - transarterial therapy - ablation - liver reserve


Publication History

Article published online:
11 December 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Benson AB, Al-Hawary MM, Arain MA. et al. NCCN Guidelines Version 4.2020 Colon Cancer Continue NCCN Guidelines Panel Disclosures. 2020
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Cummings MC, Simpson PT, Reid LE. et al. Metastatic progression of breast cancer: insights from 50 years of autopsies. J Pathol 2014; 232 (01) 23-31
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Field KM, Dow C, Michael M. Part I: Liver function in oncology: biochemistry and beyond. Lancet Oncol 2008; 9 (11) 1092-1101
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Mouli SK, Gupta R, Sheth N, Gordon AC, Lewandowski RJ. Locoregional therapies for the treatment of hepatic metastases from breast and gynecologic cancers. Semin Intervent Radiol 2018; 35 (01) 29-34
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Benson AB, Abbott DE, Abrams TA. et al. NCCN Guidelines Version 3. Hepatobiliary Cancers. 2019
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 6 Marrero JA, Kulik LM, Sirlin CB. et al. Diagnosis, staging, and management of hepatocellular carcinoma: 2018 Practice Guidance by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Hepatology 2018; 68 (02) 723-750
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Covey AM, Brown KT, Jarnagin WR. et al. Combined portal vein embolization and neoadjuvant chemotherapy as a treatment strategy for resectable hepatic colorectal metastases. Ann Surg 2008; 247 (03) 451-455
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Simoneau E, Alanazi R, Alshenaifi J. et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy does not impair liver regeneration following hepatectomy or portal vein embolization for colorectal cancer liver metastases. J Surg Oncol 2016; 113 (04) 449-455
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Wiseman JT, Guzman-Pruneda F, Xourafas D. et al. Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on the postoperative outcomes of patients undergoing liver resection for colorectal liver metastases: a population-based propensity-matched analysis. J Am Coll Surg 2019; 229 (01) 69-77.e2
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Shindoh J, Tzeng CWD, Aloia TA. et al. Optimal future liver remnant in patients treated with extensive preoperative chemotherapy for colorectal liver metastases. Ann Surg Oncol 2013; 20 (08) 2493-2500
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Abulkhir A, Limongelli P, Healey AJ. et al. Preoperative portal vein embolization for major liver resection: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg 2008; 247 (01) 49-57
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Mahnken AH, Pereira PL, De Baère T. Interventional oncologic approaches to liver metastases. Radiology 2013; 266 (02) 407-430
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Gabr A, Polineni P, Mouli SK, Riaz A, Lewandowski RJ, Salem R. Neoadjuvant radiation lobectomy as an alternative to portal vein embolization in hepatocellular carcinoma. Semin Nucl Med 2019; 49 (03) 197-203
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 de Baere T, Teriitehau C, Deschamps F. et al. Predictive factors for hypertrophy of the future remnant liver after selective portal vein embolization. Ann Surg Oncol 2010; 17 (08) 2081-2089
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Elias D, De Baere T, Roche A, , Mducreux, Leclere J, Lasser P. During liver regeneration following right portal embolization the growth rate of liver metastases is more rapid than that of the liver parenchyma. Br J Surg 1999; 86 (06) 784-788
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Collin Y, Paré A, Belblidia A. et al. Portal vein embolization does not affect the long-term survival and risk of cancer recurrence among colorectal liver metastases patients: a prospective cohort study. Int J Surg 2019; 61: 42-47
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Garlipp B, de Baere T, Damm R. et al. Left-liver hypertrophy after therapeutic right-liver radioembolization is substantial but less than after portal vein embolization. Hepatology 2014; 59 (05) 1864-1873
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Teo JY, Allen JC, Ng DC. et al. A systematic review of contralateral liver lobe hypertrophy after unilobar selective internal radiation therapy with Y90. HPB (Oxford) 2016; 18 (01) 7-12
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Gabr A, Abouchaleh N, Ali R. et al. Outcomes of surgical resection after radioembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2018; 29 (11) 1502-1510.e1
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Bösch F, Ilhan H, Pfahler V. et al. Radioembolization for neuroendocrine liver metastases is safe and effective prior to major hepatic resection. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 2020; 9 (03) 312-321
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Schadde E, Schnitzbauer AA, Tschuor C, Raptis DA, Bechstein WO, Clavien PA. Systematic review and meta-analysis of feasibility, safety, and efficacy of a novel procedure: associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 2015; 22 (09) 3109-3120
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Wong SL, Mangu PB, Choti MA. et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology 2009 clinical evidence review on radiofrequency ablation of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28 (03) 493-508
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Charnsangavej C, Clary B, Fong Y, Grothey A, Pawlik TM, Choti MA. Selection of patients for resection of hepatic colorectal metastases: expert consensus statement. Ann Surg Oncol 2006; 13 (10) 1261-1268
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Chen JX, Rose S, White SB. et al. Embolotherapy for neuroendocrine tumor liver metastases: prognostic factors for hepatic progression-free survival and overall survival. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2017; 40 (01) 69-80
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Livraghi T, Solbiati L, Meloni F, Ierace T, Goldberg SN, Gazelle GS. Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of liver metastases in potential candidates for resection: the “test-of-time approach”. Cancer 2003; 97 (12) 3027-3035
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Malhotra A, Liu DM, Talenfeld AD. Radiation segmentectomy and radiation lobectomy: a practical review of techniques. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 2019; 22 (02) 49-57
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Aitken KL, Hawkins MA. Stereotactic body radiotherapy for liver metastases. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2015; 27 (05) 307-315
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Habermehl D, Herfarth KK, Bermejo JL. et al. Single-dose radiosurgical treatment for hepatic metastases--therapeutic outcome of 138 treated lesions from a single institution. Radiat Oncol 2013; 8 (01) 175
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Lee J, Shin I-S, Yoon WS, Koom WS, Rim CH. Comparisons between radiofrequency ablation and stereotactic body radiotherapy for liver malignancies: meta-analyses and a systematic review. Radiother Oncol 2020; 145: 63-70
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Lewandowski RJ, Gabr A, Abouchaleh N. et al. Radiation segmentectomy: potential curative therapy for early hepatocellular carcinoma. Radiology 2018; 287 (03) 1050-1058
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Meiers C, Taylor A, Geller B, Toskich B. Safety and initial efficacy of radiation segmentectomy for the treatment of hepatic metastases. J Gastrointest Oncol 2018; 9 (02) 311-315
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Tsitskari M, Filippiadis D, Kostantos C. et al. The role of interventional oncology in the treatment of colorectal cancer liver metastases. Ann Gastroenterol 2019; 32 (02) 147-155
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Mulier S, Ni Y, Jamart J, Ruers T, Marchal G, Michel L. Local recurrence after hepatic radiofrequency coagulation: multivariate meta-analysis and review of contributing factors. Ann Surg 2005; 242 (02) 158-171
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Shady W, Petre EN, Gonen M. et al. Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of colorectal cancer liver metastases: factors affecting outcomes-a 10-year experience at a single center. Radiology 2016; 278 (02) 601-611
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 35 Sofocleous CT, Nascimento RG, Gonen M. et al. Radiofrequency ablation in the management of liver metastases from breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007; 189 (04) 883-889
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 36 Nakazawa T, Kokubu S, Shibuya A. et al. Radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma: correlation between local tumor progression after ablation and ablative margin. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007; 188 (02) 480-488
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 37 Wahl DR, Stenmark MH, Tao Y. et al. Outcomes after stereotactic body radiotherapy or radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2016; 34 (05) 452-459
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 38 Ohri N, Tomé WA, Méndez Romero A. et al. Local control after stereotactic body radiation therapy for liver tumors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2018; (epub ahead of print)
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 39 Høyer M, Swaminath A, Bydder S. et al. Radiotherapy for liver metastases: a review of evidence. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012; 82 (03) 1047-1057
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 40 Lu DSK, Raman SS, Limanond P. et al. Influence of large peritumoral vessels on outcome of radiofrequency ablation of liver tumors. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003; 14 (10) 1267-1274
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 41 Lu DSK, Yu NC, Raman SS. et al. Radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma: treatment success as defined by histologic examination of the explanted liver 1. Radiological Society of North America. 2005 Available at: https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2343040153
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 42 Simon CJ, Dupuy DE, Mayo-Smith WW. Microwave ablation: principles and applications. Radiographics 2005; 25 (Suppl. 01) S69-S83
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 43 Shady W, Petre EN, Do KG. et al. Percutaneous microwave versus radiofrequency ablation of colorectal liver metastases: ablation with clear margins (A0) provides the best local tumor control. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2018; 29 (02) 268-275.e1
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 44 Huo YR, Eslick GD. Microwave ablation compared to radiofrequency ablation for hepatic lesions: a meta-analysis. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2015; 26 (08) 1139-1146.e2
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 45 Kalogeridi MA, Zygogianni A, Kyrgias G. et al. Role of radiotherapy in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review. World J Hepatol 2015; 7 (01) 101-112
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 46 Foltz G. Image-guided percutaneous ablation of hepatic malignancies. Semin Intervent Radiol 2014; 31 (02) 180-186
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 47 Hamada A, Yamakado K, Nakatsuka A. et al. Radiofrequency ablation for colorectal liver metastases: prognostic factors in non-surgical candidates. Jpn J Radiol 2012; 30 (07) 567-574
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 48 Veltri A, Sacchetto P, Tosetti I, Pagano E, Fava C, Gandini G. Radiofrequency ablation of colorectal liver metastases: small size favorably predicts technique effectiveness and survival. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2008; 31 (05) 948-956
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 49 Solbiati L, Ahmed M, Cova L, Ierace T, Brioschi M, Goldberg SN. Small liver colorectal metastases treated with percutaneous radiofrequency ablation: local response rate and long-term survival with up to 10-year follow-up. Radiology 2012; 265 (03) 958-968
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 50 Jakobs TF, Hoffmann RT, Trumm C, Reiser MF, Helmberger TK. Radiofrequency ablation of colorectal liver metastases: mid-term results in 68 patients. Anticancer Res 2006; 26 1B (1B, 1b) 671-680
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 51 Ito H, Are C, Gonen M. et al. Effect of postoperative morbidity on long-term survival after hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Surg 2008; 247 (06) 994-1002
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 52 Vogl TJ, Mack MG, Balzer JO. et al. Liver metastases: neoadjuvant downsizing with transarterial chemoembolization before laser-induced thermotherapy. Radiology 2003; 229 (02) 457-464
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 53 Martin II RCG, Scoggins CR, Schreeder M. et al. Randomized controlled trial of irinotecan drug-eluting beads with simultaneous FOLFOX and bevacizumab for patients with unresectable colorectal liver-limited metastasis. Cancer 2015; 121 (20) 3649-3658
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 54 Gaba RC, Lokken RP, Hickey RM. et al; Society of Interventional Radiology Standards of Practice Committee. Quality improvement guidelines for transarterial chemoembolization and embolization of hepatic malignancy. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2017; 28 (09) 1210-1223.e3
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 55 Kress O, Wagner HJ, Wied M, Klose KJ, Arnold R, Alfke H. Transarterial chemoembolization of advanced liver metastases of neuroendocrine tumors--a retrospective single-center analysis. Digestion 2003; 68 (2-3): 94-101
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 56 Kitano M, Davidson GW, Shirley LA. et al. Transarterial chemoembolization for metastatic neuroendocrine tumors with massive hepatic tumor burden: Is the benefit worth the risk?. Ann Surg Oncol 2016; 23 (12) 4008-4015
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 57 Kamat PP, Gupta S, Ensor JE. et al. Hepatic arterial embolization and chemoembolization in the management of patients with large-volume liver metastases. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2008; 31 (02) 299-307
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 58 Klimkowski S, Baker JC, Brown DB. Red flags, pitfalls, and cautions in Y90 radiotherapy. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 2019; 22 (02) 63-69
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 59 Ho S, Lau WY, Leung TWT. et al. Tumour-to-normal uptake ratio of 90Y microspheres in hepatic cancer assessed with 99Tcm macroaggregated albumin. Br J Radiol 1997; 70 (836) 823-828
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 60 Lau WY, Kennedy AS, Kim YH. et al. Patient selection and activity planning guide for selective internal radiotherapy with yttrium-90 resin microspheres. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012; 82 (01) 401-407
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 61 Hickey R, Lewandowski RJ, Prudhomme T. et al. 90Y radioembolization of colorectal hepatic metastases using glass microspheres: safety and survival outcomes from a 531-patient multicenter study. J Nucl Med 2016; 57 (05) 665-671
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 62 Titano JJ, Kim E, Patel RS. Yttrium-90 complications: prevention and management. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 2019; 22 (02) 87-92
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 63 Kim W, Clark TWI, Baum RA, Soulen MC. Risk factors for liver abscess formation after hepatic chemoembolization. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2001; 12 (08) 965-968
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 64 Atassi B, Bangash AK, Lewandowski RJ. et al. Biliary sequelae following radioembolization with Yttrium-90 microspheres. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2008; 19 (05) 691-697
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 65 Geschwind JFH, Kaushik S, Ramsey DE, Choti MA, Fishman EK, Kobeiter H. Influence of a new prophylactic antibiotic therapy on the incidence of liver abscesses after chemoembolization treatment of liver tumors. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2002; 13 (11) 1163-1166
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 66 Khan W, Sullivan KL, McCann JW. et al. Moxifloxacin prophylaxis for chemoembolization or embolization in patients with previous biliary interventions: a pilot study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 197 (02) W343-W345
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 67 Padia SA. Y90 clinical data update: cholangiocarcinoma, neuroendocrine tumor, melanoma, and breast cancer metastatic disease. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 2019; 22 (02) 81-86
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 68 Casadaban LC, Minocha J, Bui JT, Knuttinen MG, Ray Jr CE, Gaba RC. Conventional ethiodized oil transarterial chemoembolization for treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: contemporary single-center review of clinical outcomes. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2016; 206 (03) 645-654
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 69 Poggi G, Pozzi E, Riccardi A. et al. Complications of image-guided transcatheter hepatic chemoembolization of primary and secondary tumours of the liver. Anticancer Res 2010; 30 (12) 5159-5164
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 70 Salem R, Lewandowski RJ, Kulik L. et al. Radioembolization results in longer time-to-progression and reduced toxicity compared with chemoembolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology 2011; 140 (02) 497-507.e2
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 71 Tomozawa Y, Jahangiri Y, Pathak P. et al. Long-term toxicity after transarterial radioembolization with yttrium-90 using resin microspheres for neuroendocrine tumor liver metastases. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2018; 29 (06) 858-865
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 72 Currie BM, Hoteit MA, Ben-Josef E, Nadolski GJ, Soulen MC. Radioembolization-induced chronic hepatotoxicity: a single-center cohort analysis. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2019; 30 (12) 1915-1923
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 73 Su YK, Mackey RV, Riaz A. et al. Long-term hepatotoxicity of yttrium-90 radioembolization as treatment of metastatic neuroendocrine tumor to the liver. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2017; 28 (11) 1520-1526
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 74 Boas FE, Bodei L, Sofocleous CT. Radioembolization of colorectal liver metastases: indications, technique, and outcomes. J Nucl Med 2017; 58 (Suppl. 02) 104S-111S
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 75 Lewandowski RJ, Donahue L, Chokechanachaisakul A. et al. (90) Y radiation lobectomy: outcomes following surgical resection in patients with hepatic tumors and small future liver remnant volumes. J Surg Oncol 2016; 114 (01) 99-105
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 76 Vouche M, Lewandowski RJ, Atassi R. et al. Radiation lobectomy: time-dependent analysis of future liver remnant volume in unresectable liver cancer as a bridge to resection. J Hepatol 2013; 59 (05) 1029-1036
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 77 Sandström P, Røsok BI, Sparrelid E. et al. ALPPS improves resectability compared with conventional two-stage hepatectomy in patients with advanced colorectal liver metastasis: results from a Scandinavian Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial (LIGRO Trial). Ann Surg 2018; 267 (05) 833-840
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 78 de Liguori Carino N, van Leeuwen BL, Ghaneh P, Wu A, Audisio RA, Poston GJ. Liver resection for colorectal liver metastases in older patients. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2008; 67 (03) 273-278
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 79 Livraghi T, Meloni F, Di Stasi M. et al. Sustained complete response and complications rates after radiofrequency ablation of very early hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis: Is resection still the treatment of choice?. Hepatology 2008; 47 (01) 82-89
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 80 Takaki H, Yamakado K, Nakatsuka A. et al. Frequency of and risk factors for complications after liver radiofrequency ablation under CT fluoroscopic guidance in 1500 sessions: single-center experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013; 200 (03) 658-664
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 81 Albert M, Kiefer MV, Sun W. et al. Chemoembolization of colorectal liver metastases with cisplatin, doxorubicin, mitomycin C, ethiodol, and polyvinyl alcohol. Cancer 2011; 117 (02) 343-352
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 82 Peterson JL, Vallow LA, Johnson DW. et al. Complications after 90Y microsphere radioembolization for unresectable hepatic tumors: an evaluation of 112 patients. Brachytherapy 2013; 12 (06) 573-579
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 83 Gil-Alzugaray B, Chopitea A, Iñarrairaegui M. et al. Prognostic factors and prevention of radioembolization-induced liver disease. Hepatology 2013; 57 (03) 1078-1087
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar