Zahnmedizin up2date, Inhaltsverzeichnis Zahnmedizin up2date 2016; 10(01): 43-64DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-107282 Zahnerhaltung, Prävention und Restauration Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New YorkAusarbeitung und Politur von Kompositrestaurationen Diana Wolff , Hans-Jörg Staehle , Simona Schick , Cornelia FreseArtikel empfehlen Abstract Artikel einzeln kaufen Alle Artikel dieser Rubrik Volltext Referenzen Literatur 1 Opdam NJ, van de Sande FH, Bronkhorst E et al. Longevity of posterior composite restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent Res 2014; 93: 943-949 2 Astvaldsdottir A, Dagerhamn J, van Dijken JW et al. Longevity of posterior resin composite restorations in adults — a systematic review. J Dent 2015; 43: 934-954 3 Beck F, Lettner S, Graf A et al. Survival of direct resin restorations in posterior teeth within a 19-year period (1996–2015): A meta-analysis of prospective studies. Dent Mater 2015; 31: 958-985 4 Heintze SD, Rousson V, Hickel R. Clinical effectiveness of direct anterior restorations — a meta-analysis. Dent Mater 2015; 31: 481-495 5 Frese C, Schiller P, Staehle HJ et al. Recontouring teeth and closing diastemas with direct composite buildups: a 5-year follow-up. J Dent 2013; 41: 979-985 6 Staehle HJ, Wohlrab T, Saure D et al. A 6.5-year clinical follow-up of direct resin composite buildups in the posterior dentition: Introduction of a new minimally invasive restorative method. J Dent 2015; 43: 1365-1370 7 Wolff D, Kraus T, Schach C et al. Recontouring teeth and closing diastemas with direct composite buildups: a clinical evaluation of survival and quality parameters. J Dent 2010; 38: 1001-1009 8 Staehle HJ, Wolff D, Frese C. More conservative dentistry: clinical long-term results of direct composite resin restorations. Quintessence 2015; 46: 373-380 9 Frese C, Wolff D, Staehle HJ. Proximal box elevation with resin composite and the dogma of biological width: clinical R2-technique and critical review. Oper Dent 2014; 39: 22-31 10 Jones CS, Billington RW, Pearson GJ. Interoperator variability during polishing. Quintessence Int 2006; 37: 183-190 11 Jefferies SR. Abrasive finishing and polishing in restorative dentistry: a state-of-the-art review. Dent Clin North Am 2007; 51: 379-397 12 Hellwig E, Klimek J, Attin T. Einführung in die Zahnerhaltung. München: Urban & Fischer; 2007 13 Schmidseder J, Munz T. Ästhetische Zahnmedizin. Stuttgart: Thieme; 2009 14 Frankenberger R. Adhäsiv-Fibel: Adhäsive Zahnmedizin. Wege zum klinischen Erfolg. Balingen: Spitta; 2013 15 Dickinson GL, Leinfelder KF. Assessing the long-term effect of a surface penetrating sealant. J Am Dent Assoc 1993; 124: 68-72 16 Kawai K, Leinfelder KF. Effect of surface-penetrating sealant on composite wear. Dent Mater 1993; 9: 108-113 17 Ramos RP, Chinelatti MA, Chimello DT et al. Assessing microleakage in resin composite restorations rebonded with a surface sealant and three low-viscosity resin systems. Quintessence Int 2002; 33: 450-456 18 Kumada A, Matsuka Y, Mine A et al. Influence of resin coating materials on Porphyromonas gingivalis attachment. Dent Mater J 2012; 31: 86-91 19 Zimmerli B, Koch T, Flury S et al. The influence of toothbrushing and coffee staining on different composite surface coatings. Clin Oral Investig 2012; 16: 469-479 20 Mei L, Busscher HJ, van der Mei HC et al. Influence of surface roughness on streptococcal adhesion forces to composite resins. Dent Mater 2011; 27: 770-778 21 Pereira CA, Eskelson E, Cavalli V et al. Streptococcus mutans biofilm adhesion on composite resin surfaces after different finishing and polishing techniques. Oper Dent 2011; 36: 311-317 22 Bollen CM, Lambrechts P, Quirynen M. Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: a review of the literature. Dent Mater 1997; 13: 258-269 23 Jones CS, Billington RW, Pearson GJ. The in vivo perception of roughness of restorations. Br Dent J 2004; 196: 42-45 discussion 31 24 Heintze SD, Forjanic M, Rousson V. Surface roughness and gloss of dental materials as a function of force and polishing time in vitro. Dent Mater 2006; 22: 146-165 25 Yap AU, Sau CW, Lye KW. Effects of finishing/polishing time on surface characteristics of tooth-coloured restoratives. J Oral Rehabil 1998; 25: 456-461 26 Yazici AR, Tuncer D, Antonson S et al. Effects of delayed finishing/polishing on surface roughness, hardness and gloss of tooth-coloured restorative materials. Eur J Dent 2010; 4: 50-56 27 Cenci MS, Venturini D, Pereira-Cenci T et al. The effect of polishing techniques and time on the surface characteristics and sealing ability of resin composite restorations after one-year storage. Oper Dent 2008; 33: 169-176 28 Kaminedi RR, Penumatsa NV, Priya T et al. The influence of finishing/polishing time and cooling system on surface roughness and microhardness of two different types of composite resin restorations. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent 2014; 4: 99-104 29 Jung M, Eichelberger K, Klimek J. Surface geometry of four nanofiller and one hybrid composite after one-step and multiple-step polishing. Oper Dent 2007; 32: 347-355 30 Maresca C, Pimenta LA, Heymann HO et al. Effect of finishing instrumentation on the marginal integrity of resin-based composite restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent 2010; 22: 104-112 31 St-Pierre L, Bergeron C, Qian F et al. Effect of polishing direction on the marginal adaptation of composite resin restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent 2013; 25: 125-138 32 Lang NP, Saxer CM, Burgin W et al. Marginal fit of dental restorations and the periodontium in Swiss army recruits. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 2001; 111: 538-544 33 Chen JT, Burch JG, Beck FM et al. Periodontal attachment loss associated with proximal tooth restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1987; 57: 416-420 34 Gilmore N, Sheiham A. Overhanging dental restorations and periodontal disease. J Periodontol 1971; 42: 8-12 35 Hakkarainen K, Ainamo J. Influence of overhanging posterior tooth restorations on alveolar bone height in adults. J Clin Periodontol 1980; 7: 114-120 36 Lang NP, Kiel RA, Anderhalden K. Clinical and microbiological effects of subgingival restorations with overhanging or clinically perfect margins. J Clin Periodontol 1983; 10: 563-578 37 Than A, Duguid R, McKendrick AJ. Relationship between restorations and the level of the periodontal attachment. J Clin Periodontol 1982; 9: 193-202 38 Opdam NJ, Roeters FJ, Feilzer AJ et al. A radiographic and scanning electron microscopic study of approximal margins of Class II resin composite restorations placed in vivo. J Dent 1998; 26: 319-327 39 Frankenberger R, Kramer N, Pelka M et al. Internal adaptation and overhang formation of direct Class II resin composite restorations. Clin Oral Investig 1999; 3: 208-215 40 Loomans BA, Opdam NJ, Roeters FJ et al. Restoration techniques and marginal overhang in Class II composite resin restorations. J Dent 2009; 37: 712-717 41 Loomans BA, Opdam NJ, Roeters FJ et al. Proximal marginal overhang of composite restorations in relation to placement technique of separation rings. Oper Dent 2012; 37: 21-27 42 Mullejans R, Badawi MO, Raab WH et al. An in vitro comparison of metal and transparent matrices used for bonded class II resin composite restorations. Oper Dent 2003; 28: 122-126 43 McLundie AC, Murray FD. Comparison of methods used in finishing composite resin — a scanning electron microscope study. J Prosthet Dent 1974; 31: 163-171 44 Givens EG, Gwinnett AJ, Boucher LJ. Removal of overhanging amalgam: a comparative study of three instruments. J Prosthet Dent 1984; 52: 815-820 45 Lim KC, Ong GH. Methods of proximal amalgam overhang removal — a comparison of different techniques. Ann Acad Med Singapore 1989; 18: 599-602 46 Spreafico R, Roulet JF. Posterior Esthetics with Composite Resins. In: Roulet JF, Wilson NHF, Fuzzi M, Hrsg. Advances in Operative Dentistry. Challenges of the Future. Illinois: Quintessence; 2001: 225-236 47 Kocher T, Plagmann HC. The diamond-coated sonic scaler tip. Part I: Oscillation pattern of different sonic scaler inserts. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1997; 17: 392-399 48 Blanchard JS. The periodontal curet and the ultrasonic scaler. Their effectiveness in removing overhangs from amalgam restorations. Dent Hyg 1984; 58: 450-454 49 Opdam NJ, Roeters FJ, Feilzer AJ et al. Marginal integrity and postoperative sensitivity in Class 2 resin composite restorations in vivo. J Dent 1998; 26: 555-562 50 Spinks GC, Carson RE, Hancock EB et al. An SEM study of overhang removal methods. J Periodontol 1986; 57: 632-636 51 Anami LC, Pereira CA, Guerra E et al. Morphology and bacterial colonisation of tooth/ceramic restoration interface after different cement excess removal techniques. J Dent 2012; 40: 742-749 52 Morgan M. Finishing and polishing of direct posterior resin restorations. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 2004; 16: 211-217 quiz 218 53 Kup E, Tirlet G, Attal JP. The scalpel finishing technique: a tooth-friendly way to finish dental composites in anterior teeth. Int J Esthet Dent 2015; 10: 228-245
