Download PDF
J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2021; 82(06): 556-561
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1726112
Original Article

Long-term Radiologic and Clinical Outcomes after Three-level Contiguous Anterior Cervical Diskectomy and Fusion without Plating: A Multicentric Retrospective Study

Luca Ricciardi
1   UO di Neurochirurgia, Pia Fondazione di Culto e Religione Cardinal G. Panico, Tricase, Italy
,
Alba Scerrati
2   UOC di Neurochirurgia, Azienda Ospedaliera Sant'Anna, Dipartimento di Morfologia, Chirurgia e Medicina Sperimentale, Università di Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
,
Pasquale De Bonis
2   UOC di Neurochirurgia, Azienda Ospedaliera Sant'Anna, Dipartimento di Morfologia, Chirurgia e Medicina Sperimentale, Università di Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
,
Massimo Miscusi
3   UOC di Neurochirurgia, Azienda Ospedaliera Sant'Andrea, Sapienza, Roma, Italy
,
Sokol Trungu 
1   UO di Neurochirurgia, Pia Fondazione di Culto e Religione Cardinal G. Panico, Tricase, Italy
3   UOC di Neurochirurgia, Azienda Ospedaliera Sant'Andrea, Sapienza, Roma, Italy
,
Massimiliano Visocchi
4   UOC di Neurochirurgia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, UCSC, Roma, Italy
,
Fabio Papacci
4   UOC di Neurochirurgia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, UCSC, Roma, Italy
,
Antonino Raco
3   UOC di Neurochirurgia, Azienda Ospedaliera Sant'Andrea, Sapienza, Roma, Italy
,
Luca Proietti
5   UOC di Chirurgia Vertebrale, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, UCSC, Roma, Italy
,
Angelo Pompucci
6   UOC di Neurochirurgia, Ospedale Santa Maria Goretti, Latina, Italy
,
Alessandro Olivi
4   UOC di Neurochirurgia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, UCSC, Roma, Italy
,
Nicola Montano
4   UOC di Neurochirurgia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, UCSC, Roma, Italy
› Author Affiliations Funding None.
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background Anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion (ACDF) has been providing good surgical, clinical, and radiologic outcomes in patients suffering from cervical degenerative disk disease (DDD). However, the role of anterior plating is still debated, especially in three-level procedures. This study aimed to investigate long-term clinical and radiologic outcomes and complications after three-level contiguous ACDF without plating for cervical DDD.

Methods Two institutional databases were retrieved (January 2009–December 2014) for patients treated with three-level contiguous ACDF without plating. Minimum follow-up (FU) was 5 years. Demographical data, smoking status, implant types, Neck Disability Index (NDI), visual analog scale (VAS) for neck pain, complications, fusion rate, adjacent segment degeneration (ASD), cervical lordosis (CL), and residual segmental mobility were evaluated.

Results We enrolled 21 patients. Tantalum and carbon fiber cages were implanted, respectively, in 13 and 8 patients. The mean FU length was 5.76 ± 0.87 years. Mean NDI score was 78.29 ± 9.98% preoperatively and 8.29 ± 1.67% at last FU (p < 0.01), whereas mean VAS score decreased from 7.43 ± 1.14 preoperatively to 0.95 ± 0.95 at last FU (p < 0.01). Complications were one postoperative hematoma, one superficial wound infection, and five cases of postoperative dysphagia (recovered within 3 days). The fusion rate was 90% and ASD was reported in three (14%) cases. The mean CL was 6.33 ± 2.70 degrees preoperatively, 8.19 ± 1.97 degrees 3 months after surgery (p = 0.02), and 7.62 ± 1.96 degrees at latest FU. There was no residual mobility on every operated segment at last FU. The smoking status was an independent risk factor for nonfusion in this case series (p = 0.02).

Conclusions Three-level contiguous ACDF without plating seems to be an effective treatment for cervical DDD. Properly designed comparative clinical trials are needed to further investigate this topic.

Keywords

cervical spine - ACDF - myelopathy - spine surgery - adjacent segment disease

Ethics Approval/Consent to Participate/Consent for Publication

This investigation for publication was approved by the institutional review board (55/2019/Oss/AOUFe 03.20.2019). Data were retrieved anonymously. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.


Informed Consent

For this type of study formal consent is not required.




Publication History

Received: 18 June 2020

Accepted: 26 November 2020

Article published online:
19 May 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 Hida T, Sakai Y, Ito K. et al. Collar fixation is not mandatory after cervical laminoplasty: a randomized controlled trial. Spine 2017; 42 (05) E253-E259
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Luo W, Li Y, Zhao J, Zou Y, Gu R, Li H. Skip laminectomy compared with laminoplasty for cervical compressive myelopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World Neurosurg 2018; 120: 296-301
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Luo W, Li Y, Zhao J, Gu R, Jiang R, Lin F. Open-versus French-door laminoplasty for the treatment of cervical multilevel compressive myelopathy: a meta-analysis. World Neurosurg 2018; 117: 129-136
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Tetreault L, Palubiski LM, Kryshtalskyj M. et al. Significant predictors of outcome following surgery for the treatment of degenerative cervical myelopathy: a systematic review of the literature. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2018; 29 (01) 115-127.e35
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Tetreault LA, Karadimas S, Wilson JR. et al. The natural history of degenerative cervical myelopathy and the rate of hospitalization following spinal cord injury: an updated systematic review. Global Spine J 2017; 7 (3, Suppl): 28S-34S
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Nikolaidis I, Fouyas IP, Sandercock PA, Statham PF. Surgery for cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; (01) CD001466
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Oliver JD, Goncalves S, Kerezoudis P. et al. Comparison of outcomes for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with and without anterior plate fixation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Spine 2018; 43 (07) E413-E422
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Montano N, Ricciardi L, Olivi A. Comparison of anterior cervical decompression and fusion versus laminoplasty in the treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a meta-analysis of clinical and radiological outcomes. World Neurosurg 2019; 130: 530-536.e2
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Mostafa H, Lotfy M, Wahid M. Long-term results of multiple anterior cervical discectomy with cage fusion technique: results of multiple centre study. Open Access Maced J Med Sci 2019; 7 (17) 2824-2828
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Shi S, Liu Z-D, Li X-F, Qian L, Zhong G-B, Chen F-J. Comparison of plate-cage construct and stand-alone anchored spacer in the surgical treatment of three-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a preliminary clinical study. Spine J 2015; 15 (09) 1973-1980
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Shousha M, Ezzati A, Boehm H. Four-level anterior cervical discectomies and cage-augmented fusion with and without fixation. Eur Spine J 2012; 21 (12) 2512-2519
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Shiban E, Gapon K, Wostrack M, Meyer B, Lehmberg J. Clinical and radiological outcome after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with stand-alone empty polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2016; 158 (02) 349-355
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Shin JJ. Comparison of adjacent segment degeneration, cervical alignment, and clinical outcomes after one- and multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Neurospine 2019; 16 (03) 589-600
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Hilibrand AS, Robbins M. Adjacent segment degeneration and adjacent segment disease: the consequences of spinal fusion?. Spine J 2004; 4 (6, Suppl): 190S-194S
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Rosenbek JC, Robbins JA, Roecker EB, Coyle JL, Wood JL. A penetration-aspiration scale. Dysphagia 1996; 11 (02) 93-98
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Papacci F, Rigante L, Fernandez E, Meglio M, Montano N. Anterior cervical discectomy and interbody fusion with porous tantalum implant. Results in a series with long-term follow-up. J Clin Neurosci 2016; 33: 159-162
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Ricciardi L, Scerrati A, Olivi A, Sturiale CL, De Bonis P, Montano N. The role of cervical collar in functional restoration and fusion after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion without plating on single or double levels: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Spine J 2020; 29 (05) 955-960
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Ricciardi L, Sturiale CL, Izzo A. et al. Submandibular approach for single-stage craniovertebral junction ventral decompression and stabilization: a preliminary cadaveric study of technical feasibility. World Neurosurg 2019; 127: 206-212
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Ricciardi L, Montano N, D'Onofrio GF. et al. X-ray exposure in odontoid screwing for Anderson type II fracture: comparison between O-arm and C-arm-assisted procedures. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2020; 162 (03) 713-718
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Badhiwala JH, Ellenbogen Y, Khan O. et al. Comparison of the inpatient complications and health care costs of anterior versus posterior cervical decompression and fusion in patients with multilevel degenerative cervical myelopathy: a retrospective propensity score-matched analysis. World Neurosurg 2019
  • 21 Witiw CD, Smieliauskas F, O'Toole JE, Fehlings MG, Fessler RG. Comparison of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion to posterior cervical foraminotomy for cervical radiculopathy: utilization, costs, and adverse events 2003 to 2014. Neurosurgery 2019; 84 (02) 413-420
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Witwer BP, Trost GR. Cervical spondylosis: ventral or dorsal surgery. Neurosurgery 2007; 60 (01, Suppl 1): S130-S136
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Sun B, Shi C, Wu H. et al. Application of zero-profile spacer in the treatment of three-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy: 5-year follow-up results. Spine 2020; 45 (08) 504-511
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Ricciardi L, Stifano V, D'Arrigo S, Polli FM, Olivi A, Sturiale CL. The role of non-rigid cervical collar in pain relief and functional restoration after whiplash injury: a systematic review and a pooled analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur Spine J 2019; 28 (08) 1821-1828
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Overley SC, Merrill RK, Baird EO. et al. Is cervical bracing necessary after one- and two-level instrumented anterior cervical discectomy and fusion? A prospective randomized study. Global Spine J 2018; 8 (01) 40-46
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Scerrati A, Visani J, Norri N, Cavallo M, Giganti M, De Bonis P. Effect of external cervical orthoses on clinical and radiological outcome of patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2019; 161 (10) 2195-2200
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Fountas KN, Kapsalaki EZ, Nikolakakos LG. et al. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion associated complications. Spine 2007; 32 (21) 2310-2317
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Elsayed A, Sakr S. Fixation of multiple level anterior cervical disc using cages versus cages and plating. Egypt J Neurol Psychiat Neurosurg 2019; 55: 12
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Kulkarni AG, Hee HT, Wong HK. Solis cage (PEEK) for anterior cervical fusion: preliminary radiological results with emphasis on fusion and subsidence. Spine J 2007; 7 (02) 205-209
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Wu W-J, Jiang L-S, Liang Y, Dai L-Y. Cage subsidence does not, but cervical lordosis improvement does affect the long-term results of anterior cervical fusion with stand-alone cage for degenerative cervical disc disease: a retrospective study. Eur Spine J 2012; 21 (07) 1374-1382
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Karikari IO, Jain D, Owens TR. et al. Impact of subsidence on clinical outcomes and radiographic fusion rates in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a systematic review. J Spinal Disord Tech 2014; 27 (01) 1-10
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Park S, Lee D-H, Ha J-K. et al. How does screw migration or fracture after anterior cervical plate fixation affect the radiographic and clinical outcomes?. Clin Spine Surg 2019; 32 (09) 398-402
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Gazzeri R, Tamorri M, Faiola A, Gazzeri G. Delayed migration of a screw into the gastrointestinal tract after anterior cervical spine plating. Spine 2008; 33 (08) E268-E271
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Fountas KN, Kapsalaki EZ, Machinis T, Robinson JS. Extrusion of a screw into the gastrointestinal tract after anterior cervical spine plating. J Spinal Disord Tech 2006; 19 (03) 199-203
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar