Diabetologie und Stoffwechsel 2021; 16(S 01): S52
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1727466
07. Diabeteskomplikationen/Begleiterkrankungen

Cardiovascular and kidney implications of the initial response in estimated glomerular filtration rate to sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibition with empagliflozin: the ‘eGFR dip’ in EMPA-REG OUTCOME

BJ Kraus
1   University Hospital Würzburg, Department of Internal Medicine I, Würzburg, Germany
,
MR Weir
2   University of Maryland School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Baltimore, MD, United States
,
GL Bakris
3   University of Chicago Medicine, Am. Heart Assoc. Comprehensive Hypertension Center, Department of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States
,
M Mattheus
4   Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co.KG, Department Biostatistics and Data Sciences, Ingelheim, Germany
,
DZI Cherney
5   University of Toronto, University Health Network, Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine and Department of Physiology, Toronto, ON, Canada
,
N Sattar
6   University of Glasgow, Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, Glasgow, United Kingdom
,
HJL Heerspink
7   University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Groningen, Netherlands
,
I Ritter
8   Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Patient Safety & Pharmacovigilance, Ingelheim, Germany
,
M von Eynatten
9   Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, CardioMetabolism & Respiratory, Ingelheim, Germany
,
B Zinman
10   University of Toronto, Mount Sinai Hospital, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
,
SE Inzucchi
11   Yale University School of Medicine, Section of Endocrinology, New Haven, CT, United States
,
C Wanner
1   University Hospital Würzburg, Department of Internal Medicine I, Würzburg, Germany
,
A Koitka-Webe
› Author Affiliations
 
 

    Background Empagliflozin (EMPA) reduces cardiovascular and kidney risk in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and cardiovascular disease (CVD). EMPA induces an initial ‘dip’ in mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR).

    Methods 6,668 Participants of EMPA-REG OUTCOME treated with EMPA 10mg, 25mg or placebo (PBO) and eGFR available were categorised by initial percentage eGFR change from baseline at week 4. Impact of an ‘eGFR dip’ >10% on risk reduction with EMPA for CV and kidney outcomes was assessed in a Cox regression landmark analysis adjusting for such ‘eGFR dip’.

    Results ‘eGFR dip’ of >10% from baseline at Week 4 occurred in 28.3% participants on EMPA versus 13.4% on PBO; an eGFR decline of >30% in 1.4% and 0.9%, respectively. Odds ratio [OR; 95% CI] for an ‘eGFR dip’ with EMPA vs. PBO was 2.7 [2.3–3.0]. Diuretic use and/or higher KDIGO risk category at baseline were predictive of an ‘eGFR dip’ in EMPA vs. PBO. ‘eGFR dip’ did not affect risk reduction for CV death, hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) or the primary kidney outcome. Adverse events, especially acute renal failure rates, were lower or similar in EMPA vs. PBO, regardless of baseline predictive factors for an ‘eGFR dip’.

    Conclusion T2D patients with more advanced kidney disease and/or on diuretic therapy at baseline were more likely to have an initial ‘eGFR dip’ >10% with EMPA. EMPA treatment was safe and associated with improved CV death, HHF and kidney outcomes, regardless of baseline predictive factors or such initial ‘eGFR dip’.


    #

    Interessenskonflikt

    BJK has received grant support from the IZKF Wuerzburg and honoraria from BI.

    MRW reports being a scientific advisor for Bayer, Relypsa, Janssen, BI, AZ, Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD), Sanofi, Vifor, Akebia, and Boston Scientific; he holds the following grants: U01DK116095, R01HL132372, R01HL127422, R01DK066013, U01DK1061022.

    GLB is a member of scientific advisory boards or consultant for Merck, Janssen, NN, AZ, BI, Bayer, Relypsa, Reata, and steering committee member for Janssen, Bayer (principal investigator-kidney outcome trial).

    MM, IR, and AK-W are employees of BI, the manufacturer of empagliflozin.

    DZIC has received honoraria from BI, EL, Merck, AZ, Sanofi, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Abbvie, Janssen, Bayer, Prometic, BMS, and NN and has received operational funding for clinical trials from BI, EL, Merck, Janssen, Sanofi, AZ and NN.

    NS has received financial support from Amgen, BI, Eli Lilly (EL), Napp, NN, Pfizer, and Sanofi.

    HJLH has consultancy agreements with the following companies: AbbVie, Astellas, AZ, BI, Janssen, Fresenius and Merck, and has a policy of honoraria going to his employer.

    MvE was employed by BI at the time of this analysis, and is now an employee of Nestlé Health Science, Epalinges, Switzerland.

    BZ has received grant support from BI, AZ, and NN, and consulting fees from AZ, BI, EL, Janssen, Merck, NN, and Sanofi Aventis.

    SEI has consulted for Janssen, vTv Therapeutics and Alere, served on Clinical Trial Steering/Executive Committees for Boehringer Ingelheim (BI), AstraZeneca (AZ), Novo Nordisk (NN), Sanofi/Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Daiichi-Sankyo, and Eisai and served on Data Monitoring Committees for Intarcia Therapeutics, Inc.

    CW reports honoraria from AZ, Bayer, BI, EL, Mitsubishi, and MSD.

    Publication History

    Article published online:
    06 May 2021

    © 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

    Georg Thieme Verlag KG
    Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany