Download PDF
Am J Perinatol 2023; 40(05): 546-556
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1729889
Original Article

Rural Residence and Factors Associated with Attendance at the Second High-Risk Infant Follow-up Clinic Visit for Very Low Birth Weight Infants in California

Martha G. Fuller 
1   Hahn School of Nursing and Health Science, University of San Diego, San Diego, California
,
Tianyao Lu
2   Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
3   California Perinatal Quality of Care Collaborative, Stanford, California
,
Erika E. Gray
2   Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
3   California Perinatal Quality of Care Collaborative, Stanford, California
,
Maria A. L. Jocson
4   Department of Health Care Services, California Children's Services, Integrated Systems of Care, Sacramento, California
,
Mary K. Barger
1   Hahn School of Nursing and Health Science, University of San Diego, San Diego, California
,
Mihoko Bennett
2   Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
3   California Perinatal Quality of Care Collaborative, Stanford, California
,
Henry C. Lee
2   Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
3   California Perinatal Quality of Care Collaborative, Stanford, California
,
Susan R. Hintz
2   Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
3   California Perinatal Quality of Care Collaborative, Stanford, California
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective This study was aimed to determine factors associated with attendance at the second high-risk infant follow-up (HRIF) visit (V2) by 20 months of corrected age after a successful first visit (V1), and the impact of rural residence on attendance rates in a statewide population of very low birth weight (VLBW; <1,500 g) infants.

Study Design Data linked from the California Perinatal Quality of Care Collaborative (CPQCC) Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) database and CPQCC-California Children's Services (CCS) HRIF database. Multivariable logistic regression evaluated independent associations of sociodemographic, maternal, family, neonatal clinical, and individual HRIF program differences (factors) with successful V2 in VLBW infants born in 2010 to 2012.

Results Of 7,295 eligible VLBW infants, 75% (5,475) attended V2. Sociodemographic factors independently associated with nonattendance included maternal race of Black (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.5–0.75), public insurance (aOR = 0.79; 95% CI: 0.69–0.91), and rural residence (aOR = 0.74; 95% CI: 0.61–0.9). Factors identified at V1that were associated with V2 attendance included attending V1 within the recommended window (aOR = 2.34; 95% CI: 1.99–2.75) and early intervention enrollment (aOR = 1.39; 95% CI: 1.12–1.61). Neonatal factors associated with attendance included birth weight ≤750 g (aOR = 1.83; 95% CI: 1.48–2.5). There were significant program differences with risk-adjusted rates ranging from 43.7 to 99.7%.

Conclusion Sociodemographic disparities and HRIF program factors are associated with decreased attendance at V2 among VLBW infants. These findings highlight opportunities for quality and process improvement interventions starting in the NICU and continuing through transition to home and community to assure participation in HRIF.

Key Points

  • Only 75% of VLBW infants attended the second HRIF visit.

  • Those less likely to attend were Black or had rural residence.

  • Infants in early intervention or attending first visit within recommended ages were more likely to attend.

Keywords

neurodevelopmental - premature - disparity

Disclosure

The findings and conclusions in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views or opinions of the California Department of Health Care Services or the California Health and Human Services Agency.




Publication History

Received: 12 December 2020

Accepted: 29 March 2021

Article published online:
27 May 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Hollanders JJ, Schaëfer N, van der Pal SM, Oosterlaan J, Rotteveel J, Finken MJJ. on behalf of the Dutch POPS-19 Collaborative Study Group. Long-term neurodevelopmental and functional outcomes of infants born very preterm and/or with a very low birth weight. Neonatology 2019; 115 (04) 310-319
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Rogers EE, Hintz SR. Early neurodevelopmental outcomes of extremely preterm infants. Semin Perinatol 2016; 40 (08) 497-509
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 McGowan EC, Vohr BR. Neurodevelopmental follow-up of preterm infants: what is new?. Pediatr Clin North Am 2019; 66 (02) 509-523
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Goldstein RF, Malcolm WF. Care of the neonatal intensive care unit graduate after discharge. Pediatr Clin North Am 2019; 66 (02) 489-508
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Fetus and Newborn. Hospital discharge of the high-risk neonate. Pediatrics 2008; 122 (05) 1119-1126
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Spittle A, Orton J, Anderson PJ, Boyd R, Doyle LW. Early developmental intervention programmes provided post hospital discharge to prevent motor and cognitive impairment in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; (11) CD005495
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Harmon SL, Conaway M, Sinkin RA, Blackman JA. Factors associated with neonatal intensive care follow-up appointment compliance. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 2013; 52 (05) 389-396
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Hintz SR, Gould JB, Bennett MV. et al. Factors associated with successful first high-risk infant clinic visit for very low birth weight infants in California. J Pediatr 2019; 210: 91-98.e1
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Kuppala VS, Tabangin M, Haberman B, Steichen J, Yolton K. Current state of high-risk infant follow-up care in the United States: results of a national survey of academic follow-up programs. J Perinatol 2012; 32 (04) 293-298
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Orton JL, McGinley JL, Fox LM, Spittle AJ. Challenges of neurodevelopmental follow-up for extremely preterm infants at two years. Early Hum Dev 2015; 91 (12) 689-694
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Ballantyne M, Stevens B, Guttmann A, Willan AR, Rosenbaum P. Transition to neonatal follow-up programs: is attendance a problem?. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs 2012; 26 (01) 90-98
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Ballantyne M, Stevens B, Guttmann A, Willan AR, Rosenbaum P. Maternal and infant predictors of attendance at neonatal follow-up programmes. Child Care Health Dev 2014; 40 (02) 250-258
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Tang BG, Lee HC, Gray EE, Gould JB, Hintz SR. Programmatic and administrative barriers to high-risk infant follow-up care. Am J Perinatol 2018; 35 (10) 940-945
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Woodward LJ, Hüppi PS. Neurodevelopmental follow-up. In: Volpe JJ, Inder TE, Darras BT. et al, eds. Volpe's Neurology of the Newborn. 6th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2018: 255-272
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Amjad S, MacDonald I, Chambers T. et al. Social determinants of health and adverse maternal and birth outcomes in adolescent pregnancies: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2019; 33 (01) 88-99
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Amjad S, Chandra S, Osornio-Vargas A, Voaklander D, Ospina MB. Maternal area of residence, socioeconomic status, and risk of adverse maternal and birth outcomes in adolescent mothers. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2019; 41 (12) 1752-1759
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Lisonkova S, Haslam MD, Dahlgren L, Chen I, Synnes AR, Lim KI. Maternal morbidity and perinatal outcomes among women in rural versus urban areas. CMAJ 2016; 188 (17-18): E456-E465
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Auger N, Authier MA, Martinez J, Daniel M. The association between rural-urban continuum, maternal education and adverse birth outcomes in Québec, Canada. J Rural Health 2009; 25 (04) 342-351
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Farmer JE, Clark MJ, Sherman A, Marien WE, Selva TJ. Comprehensive primary care for children with special health care needs in rural areas. Pediatrics 2005; 116 (03) 649-656
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 California Perinatal Quality of Care Collaborative. What is HRIF? Accessed May 11, 2021 at: https://www.cpqcc.org/follow/what-hrif
    PubMed
  • 21 Hintz SR, Gould JB, Bennett MV. et al. Referral of very low birth weight infants to high-risk follow-up at neonatal intensive care unit discharge varies widely across California. J Pediatr 2015; 166 (02) 289-295
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Lee HC, Gould JB. Factors influencing breast milk versus formula feeding at discharge for very low birth weight infants in California. J Pediatr 2009; 155 (05) 657-62.e1 , 2
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Bennett KJ, Borders TF, Holmes GM, Kozhimannil KB, Ziller E. What is rural? Challenges and implications of definitions that inadequately encompass rural people and places. Health Aff (Millwood) 2019; 38 (12) 1985-1992
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 California Department of Health Care Services. California Children's Services Whole Child Model. Accessed May 11, 2021 at: https://www.dhcs.ca.gov/services/ccs/Pages/CCSWholeChildModel.aspx
    PubMed
  • 25 OSHPD. Healthcare Workforce Clearinghouse: Annual Report to the Legislature. Available at: April 15, 2021 at: https://oshpd.ca.gov/workforce-capacity/workforce-data/
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Swearingen C, Simpson P, Cabacungan E, Cohen S. Social disparities negatively impact neonatal follow-up clinic attendance of premature infants discharged from the neonatal intensive care unit. J Perinatol 2020; 40 (05) 790-797
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 McManus BM, Richardson Z, Schenkman M. et al. Child characteristics and early intervention referral and receipt of services: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Pediatr 2020; 20 (01) 84
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Pai VV, Kan P, Bennett M, Carmichael SL, Lee HC, Hintz SR. Improved referral of very low birthweight infants to high-risk infant follow-up in California. J Pediatr 2020; 216: 101-108.e1
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Feinberg E, Silverstein M, Donahue S, Bliss R. The impact of race on participation in part C early intervention services. J Dev Behav Pediatr 2011; 32 (04) 284-291
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Schnierle J, Christian-Brathwaite N, Louisias M. Implicit bias: what every pediatrician should know about the effect of bias on health and future directions. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care 2019; 49 (02) 34-44
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Glazer KB, Sofaer S, Balbierz A, Wang E, Howell EA. Perinatal care experiences among racially and ethnically diverse mothers whose infants required a NICU stay. J Perinatol 2021; 41 (03) 413-421
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Liu J, Parker MG, Lu T. et al. Racial and ethnic disparities in human milk intake at neonatal intensive care unit discharge among very low birth weight infants in California. J Pediatr 2020; 218: 49-56.e3
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Burchinal M, Vernon-Feagans L, Cox M. Key Family Life Project Investigators. Cumulative social risk, parenting, and infant development in rural low-income communities. Parent Sci Pract 2008; 8 (01) 41-69
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Amer R, Moddemann D, Seshia M. et al; Canadian Neonatal Network and Canadian Neonatal Follow-up Network Investigators. Neurodevelopmental outcomes of infants born at <29 weeks of gestation admitted to canadian neonatal intensive care units based on location of birth. J Pediatr 2018; 196: 31-37.e1
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Zablotsky B, Black LI. Prevalence of children aged 3–17 years with developmental disabilities, by urbanicity: United States, 2015–2018. Natl Health Stat Report 2020; 139: 1-7
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Douthit N, Kiv S, Dwolatzky T, Biswas S. Exposing some important barriers to health care access in the rural USA. Public Health 2015; 129 (06) 611-620
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Gessert C, Waring S, Bailey-Davis L, Conway P, Roberts M, VanWormer J. Rural definition of health: a systematic literature review. BMC Public Health 2015; 15: 378-378
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Cheong JLY, Doyle LW. An update on pulmonary and neurodevelopmental outcomes of bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Semin Perinatol 2018; 42 (07) 478-484
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Tin W, Fritz S, Wariyar U, Hey E. Outcome of very preterm birth: children reviewed with ease at 2 years differ from those followed up with difficulty. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 1998; 79 (02) F83-F87
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Drewek R, Mirea L, Adelson PD. Lead time to appointment and no-show rates for new and follow-up patients in an ambulatory clinic. Health Care Manag (Frederick) 2017; 36 (01) 4-9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Chaudhry SB, Siegfried E, Sheikh UA, Simonetta C, Butala N, Armbrecht E. Improving nonattendance rates among pediatric patients with Medicaid or private insurance. J Am Acad Dermatol 2019; 81 (02) 412-416
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Brady JM, Pouppirt N, Bernbaum J. et al. Why do children with severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia not attend neonatal follow-up care? Parental views of barriers. Acta Paediatr 2018; 107 (06) 996-1002
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Menon DU, Belcher HME. COVID-19 pandemic health disparities and pediatric health care-the promise of telehealth. JAMA Pediatr 2021; 175 (04) 345-346
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Lemmon ME, Chapman I, Malcolm W. et al. Beyond the first wave: consequences of COVID-19 on high-risk infants and families. Am J Perinatol 2020; 37 (12) 1283-1288
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Internet/broadband fact sheet. Accessed April 15, 2021 at: https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/fact-sheet/internet-broadband/
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Nagata JM. Rapid scale-up of telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic and implications for subspecialty care in rural areas. J Rural Health 2021; 37 (01) 145
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar