Download PDF
Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2021; 34(06): 426-430
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1735275
Review Article

Special Considerations of Anastomotic Leak in Patients with Rectal Cancer

Christy E. Cauley
1   Department of General and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
,
Matthew F. Kalady
2   Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Anastomotic leak in patients with rectal cancer has the potential to cause worse oncologic outcomes in addition to major morbidity and mortality risk of this dreaded complication. Anatomic location of the rectal cancer determines the ability to perform a restorative operation and the height of the anastomosis in relation to the anal canal. Clinical staging dictates the need for neoadjuvant treatment (such as chemotherapy and radiation) which may also contribute to anastomotic leak risk. In addition to oncologic outcomes, anastomotic leak can impact bowel function, the need for permanent stoma, and long-term quality of life. This study will discuss special considerations for anastomotic leak prevention and clinical implications of this complication in patients with rectal cancer.

Keywords

rectal cancer - anastomotic leak - function - oncologic outcome


Publication History

Article published online:
23 November 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Konishi T, Watanabe T, Kishimoto J, Nagawa H. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after surgery for colorectal cancer: results of prospective surveillance. J Am Coll Surg 2006; 202 (03) 439-444
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Bellows CF, Webber LS, Albo D, Awad S, Berger DH. Early predictors of anastomotic leaks after colectomy. Tech Coloproctol 2009; 13 (01) 41-47
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Alves A, Panis Y, Trancart D, Regimbeau JM, Pocard M, Valleur P. Factors associated with clinically significant anastomotic leakage after large bowel resection: multivariate analysis of 707 patients. World J Surg 2002; 26 (04) 499-502
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Sparreboom CL, van Groningen JT, Lingsma HF. et al; Dutch ColoRectal Audit group. Different risk factors for early and late colorectal anastomotic leakage in a nationwide audit. Dis Colon Rectum 2018; 61 (11) 1258-1266
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Terzi C, Bingul M, Arslan NC. et al. Randomized controlled trial of 8 weeks' vs 12 weeks' interval between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery for locally advanced rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 2020; 22 (03) 279-288
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Montedori A, Cirocchi R, Farinella E, Sciannameo F, Abraha I. Covering ileo- or colostomy in anterior resection for rectal carcinoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; (05) CD006878
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Fraccalvieri D, Biondo S, Saez J. et al. Management of colorectal anastomotic leakage: differences between salvage and anastomotic takedown. Am J Surg 2012; 204 (05) 671-676
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Zhang J, Haines C, Watson AJM. et al. Oral antibiotic use and risk of colorectal cancer in the United Kingdom, 1989-2012: a matched case-control study. Gut 2019; 68 (11) 1971-1978
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Gaines S, Shao C, Hyman N, Alverdy JC. Gut microbiome influences on anastomotic leak and recurrence rates following colorectal cancer surgery. Br J Surg 2018; 105 (02) e131-e141
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Trencheva K, Morrissey KP, Wells M. et al. Identifying important predictors for anastomotic leak after colon and rectal resection: prospective study on 616 patients. Ann Surg 2013; 257 (01) 108-113
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Chadi SA, Fingerhut A, Berho M. et al. Emerging trends in the etiology, prevention, and treatment of gastrointestinal anastomotic leakage. J Gastrointest Surg 2016; 20 (12) 2035-2051
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Mitchem JB, Stafford C, Francone TD. et al. What is the optimal management of an intra-operative air leak in a colorectal anastomosis?. Colorectal Dis 2018; 20 (02) O39-O45
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Lu ZR, Rajendran N, Lynch AC, Heriot AG, Warrier SK. Anastomotic leaks after restorative resections for rectal cancer compromise cancer outcomes and survival. Dis Colon Rectum 2016; 59 (03) 236-244
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Wang S, Liu J, Wang S, Zhao H, Ge S, Wang W. Adverse effects of anastomotic leakage on local recurrence and survival after curative anterior resection for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg 2017; 41 (01) 277-284
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Allaix ME, Rebecchi F, Famiglietti F, Arolfo S, Arezzo A, Morino M. Long-term oncologic outcomes following anastomotic leak after anterior resection for rectal cancer: does the leak severity matter?. Surg Endosc 2020; 34 (09) 4166-4176
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Bhoo-Pathy N, Ng C-W, Lim GC-C. et al. Financial toxicity after cancer in a setting with universal health coverage: a call for urgent action. J Oncol Pract 2019; 15 (06) e537-e546
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Kverneng Hultberg D, Svensson J, Jutesten H. et al. The impact of anastomotic leakage on long-term function after anterior resection for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 2020; 63 (05) 619-628
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Bae SU, Min BS, Kim NK. Robotic low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery for rectal cancer using the firefly technique. Yonsei Med J 2015; 56 (04) 1028-1035
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Jang JH, Kim HC, Huh JW. et al. Anastomotic leak does not impact oncologic outcomes after preoperative chemoradiotherapy and resection for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 2019; 269 (04) 678-685
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Kim MJ, Kim YS, Park SC. et al. Risk factors for permanent stoma after rectal cancer surgery with temporary ileostomy. Surgery 2016; 159 (03) 721-727
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Feddern M-L, Emmertsen KJ, Laurberg S. Quality of life with or without sphincter preservation for rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 2019; 21 (09) 1051-1057
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Downing A, Glaser AW, Finan PJ. et al. Functional outcomes and health-related quality of life after curative treatment for rectal cancer: a population-level study in England. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2019; 103 (05) 1132-1142
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar