Semin Reprod Med 2022; 40(01/02): 069-078
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1735891
Review Article

Adolescent Fertility Preservation: Where Do We Stand Now

1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
,
Michelle Vu
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
,
Wendy Vitek
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Adolescence is a period of flux for many body systems. While fertility potential typically increases after menarche, there are diseases where the opposite occurs and fertility preservation options need to be considered early. In cases of cancer, options vary by pubertal status and can include ovarian tissue cryopreservation, oocyte cryopreservation, sperm cryopreservation, and testicular tissue cryopreservation. Much remains to be learned about fertility and preservation options in those with differences in sexual development (DSDs); however, depending on the form of DSD, fertility preservation may not be necessary. Similarly, traditional fertility counseling in children with galactosemia may need to be changed, as data suggest that fertility rates attributed to other causes of premature ovarian insufficiency may not be as applicable to this disease. Adolescents with Turner's syndrome are at high risk for premature ovarian failure; therefore, it is important to consider options as early as possible since ovarian reserves are depleted quickly. On the other hand, transgender and gender diverse adolescents may even be able to undergo fertility preservation after starting hormone therapy. In all cases, there are additional ethical components including technical/surgical risks in childhood, offering experimental therapies without creating false hope and evaluating children's consent and assent capabilities that must be considered.



Publication History

Article published online:
22 October 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Kudesia R, Talib HJ. Fertility counseling for adolescents. Pediatr Ann 2019; 48 (02) e86-e91
  • 2 American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts and Figures 2021. Atlanta, Georgia: American Cancer Society; 2021
  • 3 Green DM, Kawashima T, Stovall M. et al. Fertility of male survivors of childhood cancer: a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28 (02) 332-339
  • 4 Wasilewski-Masker K, Seidel KD, Leisenring W. et al. Male infertility in long-term survivors of pediatric cancer: a report from the childhood cancer survivor study. J Cancer Surviv 2014; 8 (03) 437-447
  • 5 Crawshaw M. Psychosocial oncofertility issues faced by adolescents and young adults over their lifetime: a review of the research. Hum Fertil (Camb) 2013; 16 (01) 59-63
  • 6 Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Electronic address: asrm@asrm.org. Fertility preservation in patients undergoing gonadotoxic therapy or gonadectomy: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2019; 112 (06) 1022-1033
  • 7 Johnson RH, Kroon L. Optimizing fertility preservation practices for adolescent and young adult cancer patients. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2013; 11 (01) 71-77
  • 8 Burns KC, Hoefgen H, Strine A, Dasgupta R. Fertility preservation options in pediatric and adolescent patients with cancer. Cancer 2018; 124 (09) 1867-1876
  • 9 Lotz L, Dittrich R, Hoffmann I, Beckmann MW. Ovarian tissue transplantation: experience from Germany and worldwide efficacy. Clin Med Insights Reprod Health 2019; 13: 1179558119867357
  • 10 Klipstein S, Fallat ME, Savelli S. Committee on Bioethics, Section on Hematology/Oncology, Section on Surgery. Fertility preservation for pediatric and adolescent patients with cancer: medical and ethical considerations. Pediatrics 2020; 145 (03) 145
  • 11 Loren AW, Mangu PB, Beck LN. et al; American Society of Clinical Oncology. Fertility preservation for patients with cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol 2013; 31 (19) 2500-2510
  • 12 Rodriguez-Wallberg KA, Marklund A, Lundberg F. et al. A prospective study of women and girls undergoing fertility preservation due to oncologic and non-oncologic indications in Sweden-trends in patients' choices and benefit of the chosen methods after long-term follow up. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2019; 98 (05) 604-615
  • 13 Oktay K, Harvey BE, Partridge AH. et al. Fertility preservation in patients with cancer: ASCO clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol 2018; 36 (19) 1994-2001
  • 14 DiNofia AM, Wang X, Yannekis G. et al. Analysis of semen parameters in a young cohort of cancer patients. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2017; 64 (02) 381-386
  • 15 Berookhim BM, Mulhall JP. Outcomes of operative sperm retrieval strategies for fertility preservation among males scheduled to undergo cancer treatment. Fertil Steril 2014; 101 (03) 805-811
  • 16 Feinberg J. The child's right to an open future. In: Aiken W, LaFollette H. eds. Whose Child? Children's Rights, Parental Authority, and State Power. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield; 1980: 124-153
  • 17 Witchel SF. Disorders of sex development. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2018; 48: 90-102
  • 18 Kalra R, Cameron M, Stern C. Female fertility preservation in DSD. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 2019; 33 (03) 101289
  • 19 Schultz BAH, Roberts S, Rodgers A, Ataya K. Pregnancy in true hermaphrodites and all male offspring to date. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 113 (2, Pt 2): 534-536
  • 20 Finlayson C, Fritsch MK, Johnson EK. et al. Presence of germ cells in disorders of sex development: implications for fertility potential and preservation. J Urol 2017; 197 (3, Pt 2): 937-943
  • 21 Campo-Engelstein L, Chen D, Baratz AB, Johnson EK, Finlayson C. The ethics of fertility preservation for pediatric patients with differences (disorders) of sex development. J Endocr Soc 2017; 1 (06) 638-645
  • 22 Deebel NA, Galdon G, Zarandi NP. et al. Age-related presence of spermatogonia in patients with Klinefelter syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 2020; 26 (01) 58-72
  • 23 Corona G, Pizzocaro A, Lanfranco F. et al; Klinefelter ItaliaN Group (KING). Sperm recovery and ICSI outcomes in Klinefelter syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 2017; 23 (03) 265-275
  • 24 Acién P, Acién M. Disorders of sex development: classification, review, and impact on fertility. J Clin Med 2020; 9 (11) 9
  • 25 Franik S, Hoeijmakers Y, D'Hauwers K. et al. Klinefelter syndrome and fertility: sperm preservation should not be offered to children with Klinefelter syndrome. Hum Reprod 2016; 31 (09) 1952-1959
  • 26 Masterson III TA, Nassau DE, Ramasamy R. A clinical algorithm for management of fertility in adolescents with the Klinefelter syndrome. Curr Opin Urol 2020; 30 (03) 324-327
  • 27 Tartaglia NR, Howell S, Sutherland A, Wilson R, Wilson L. A review of trisomy X (47,XXX). Orphanet J Rare Dis 2010; 5: 8
  • 28 Brännström M. Uterus transplantation and beyond. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2017; 28 (05) 70
  • 29 Claahsen-van der Grinten HL, Stikkelbroeck NM, Sweep CG, Hermus AR, Otten BJ. Fertility in patients with congenital adrenal hyperplasia. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 2006; 19 (05) 677-685
  • 30 Mongan NP, Tadokoro-Cuccaro R, Bunch T, Hughes IA. Androgen insensitivity syndrome. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 2015; 29 (04) 569-580
  • 31 Sultan C, Philibert P, Gaspari L. et al. Androgen insensitivity syndrome. In: New MI, Lekarev O, Parsa A, Yuen TT. O'Malley BW, Hammer GD, eds. Genetic Steroid Disorders. San Diego: Academic Press; 2014: 225-237
  • 32 Gottlieb B, Trifiro MA. Androgen insensitivity syndrome. In: Adam MP, Ardinger HH, Pagon RA. et al, eds. GeneReviews® [Internet]. Seattle, WA: University of Washington; 1993-2021
  • 33 Batista RL, Costa EMF, Rodrigues AS. et al. Androgen insensitivity syndrome: a review. Arch Endocrinol Metab 2018; 62 (02) 227-235
  • 34 Islam R, Lane S, Williams SA, Becker CM, Conway GS, Creighton SM. Establishing reproductive potential and advances in fertility preservation techniques for XY individuals with differences in sex development. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2019; 91 (02) 237-244
  • 35 Hadziselimovic F, Hadziselimovic NO, Demougin P, Oakeley EJ. Testicular gene expression in cryptorchid boys at risk of azoospermia. Sex Dev 2011; 5 (02) 49-59
  • 36 Finney EL, Johnson EK, Chen D. et al. Gonadal tissue cryopreservation for a girl with partial androgen insensitivity syndrome. J Endocr Soc 2019; 3 (05) 887-891
  • 37 Carmina E. Mild androgen phenotypes. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 2006; 20 (02) 207-220
  • 38 Yong EL, Ng SC, Roy AC, Yun G, Ratnam SS. Pregnancy after hormonal correction of severe spermatogenic defect due to mutation in androgen receptor gene. Lancet 1994; 344 (8925): 826-827
  • 39 Tordjman KM, Yaron M, Berkovitz A, Botchan A, Sultan C, Lumbroso S. Fertility after high-dose testosterone and intracytoplasmic sperm injection in a patient with androgen insensitivity syndrome with a previously unreported androgen receptor mutation. Andrologia 2014; 46 (06) 703-706
  • 40 Guercio G, Costanzo M, Grinspon RP, Rey RA. Fertility issues in disorders of sex development. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 2015; 44 (04) 867-881
  • 41 Reindollar RH. Turner syndrome: contemporary thoughts and reproductive issues. Semin Reprod Med 2011; 29 (04) 342-352
  • 42 Davenport ML. Approach to the patient with Turner syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2010; 95 (04) 1487-1495
  • 43 Ye M, Yeh J, Kosteria I, Li L. Progress in fertility preservation strategies in Turner syndrome. Front Med (Lausanne) 2020; 7: 3
  • 44 Singh RP, Carr DH. The anatomy and histology of XO human embryos and fetuses. Anat Rec 1966; 155 (03) 369-383
  • 45 Reynaud K, Cortvrindt R, Verlinde F, De Schepper J, Bourgain C, Smitz J. Number of ovarian follicles in human fetuses with the 45,X karyotype. Fertil Steril 2004; 81 (04) 1112-1119
  • 46 Modi DN, Sane S, Bhartiya D. Accelerated germ cell apoptosis in sex chromosome aneuploid fetal human gonads. Mol Hum Reprod 2003; 9 (04) 219-225
  • 47 Hreinsson JG, Otala M, Fridström M. et al. Follicles are found in the ovaries of adolescent girls with Turner's syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2002; 87 (08) 3618-3623
  • 48 Grynberg M, Bidet M, Benard J. et al. Fertility preservation in Turner syndrome. Fertil Steril 2016; 105 (01) 13-19
  • 49 Oktay K, Bedoschi G, Berkowitz K. et al. Fertility preservation in women with Turner syndrome: a comprehensive review and practical guidelines. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2016; 29 (05) 409-416
  • 50 Pasquino AM, Passeri F, Pucarelli I, Segni M, Municchi G. Italian Study Group for Turner's Syndrome. Spontaneous pubertal development in Turner's syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1997; 82 (06) 1810-1813
  • 51 Broer SL, Broekmans FJ, Laven JS, Fauser BC. Anti-Müllerian hormone: ovarian reserve testing and its potential clinical implications. Hum Reprod Update 2014; 20 (05) 688-701
  • 52 Visser JA, Hokken-Koelega AC, Zandwijken GR, Limacher A, Ranke MB, Flück CE. Anti-Müllerian hormone levels in girls and adolescents with Turner syndrome are related to karyotype, pubertal development and growth hormone treatment. Hum Reprod 2013; 28 (07) 1899-1907
  • 53 Mortensen KH, Rohde MD, Uldbjerg N, Gravholt CH. Repeated spontaneous pregnancies in 45,X Turner syndrome. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 115 (2, Pt 2): 446-449
  • 54 Vergier J, Bottin P, Saias J, Reynaud R, Guillemain C, Courbiere B. Fertility preservation in Turner syndrome: karyotype does not predict ovarian response to stimulation. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2019; 91 (05) 646-651
  • 55 Martel RA, Blakemore JK, Fino ME. The use of oocyte cryopreservation (OC) for fertility preservation (FP) in girls with sex chromosome disorders (SCD): a case series describing outcomes. Fertil Steril 2020; 114: e84
  • 56 Oktay K, Bedoschi G. Oocyte cryopreservation for fertility preservation in postpubertal female children at risk for premature ovarian failure due to accelerated follicle loss in Turner syndrome or cancer treatments. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2014; 27 (06) 342-346
  • 57 Oktay K, Rodriguez-Wallberg KA, Sahin G. Fertility preservation by ovarian stimulation and oocyte cryopreservation in a 14-year-old adolescent with Turner syndrome mosaicism and impending premature ovarian failure. Fertil Steril 2010; 94 (02) 753.e15-753.e19
  • 58 Huang JY, Tulandi T, Holzer H. et al. Cryopreservation of ovarian tissue and in vitro matured oocytes in a female with mosaic Turner syndrome: case report. Hum Reprod 2008; 23 (02) 336-339
  • 59 Balen AH, Harris SE, Chambers EL, Picton HM. Conservation of fertility and oocyte genetics in a young woman with mosaic Turner syndrome. BJOG 2010; 117 (02) 238-242
  • 60 Kavoussi SK, Fisseha S, Smith YR, Smith GD, Christman GM, Gago LA. Oocyte cryopreservation in a woman with mosaic Turner syndrome: a case report. J Reprod Med 2008; 53 (03) 223-226
  • 61 Talaulikar VS, Conway GS, Pimblett A, Davies MC. Outcome of ovarian stimulation for oocyte cryopreservation in women with Turner syndrome. Fertil Steril 2019; 111 (03) 505-509
  • 62 Peek R, Schleedoorn M, Smeets D. et al. Ovarian follicles of young patients with Turner's syndrome contain normal oocytes but monosomic 45,X granulosa cells. Hum Reprod 2019; 34 (09) 1686-1696
  • 63 Mamsen LS, Charkiewicz K, Anderson RA. et al. Characterization of follicles in girls and young women with Turner syndrome who underwent ovarian tissue cryopreservation. Fertil Steril 2019; 111 (06) 1217-1225.e3
  • 64 Borgström B, Hreinsson J, Rasmussen C. et al. Fertility preservation in girls with turner syndrome: prognostic signs of the presence of ovarian follicles. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2009; 94 (01) 74-80
  • 65 Roness H, Meirow D. Fertility preservation: follicle reserve loss in ovarian tissue transplantation. Reproduction 2019; 158 (05) F35-F44
  • 66 Wong KM, Mastenbroek S, Repping S. Cryopreservation of human embryos and its contribution to in vitro fertilization success rates. Fertil Steril 2014; 102 (01) 19-26
  • 67 Fridovich-Keil JL, Gubbels CS, Spencer JB, Sanders RD, Land JA, Rubio-Gozalbo E. Ovarian function in girls and women with GALT-deficiency galactosemia. J Inherit Metab Dis 2011; 34 (02) 357-366
  • 68 Thakur M, Feldman G, Puscheck EE. Primary ovarian insufficiency in classic galactosemia: current understanding and future research opportunities. J Assist Reprod Genet 2018; 35 (01) 3-16
  • 69 Knauff EA, Richardus R, Eijkemans MJ. et al. Heterozygosity for the classical galactosemia mutation does not affect ovarian reserve and menopausal age. Reprod Sci 2007; 14 (08) 780-785
  • 70 Sanders RD, Spencer JB, Epstein MP. et al. Biomarkers of ovarian function in girls and women with classic galactosemia. Fertil Steril 2009; 92 (01) 344-351
  • 71 Gubbels CS, Land JA, Evers JL. et al. Primary ovarian insufficiency in classic galactosemia: role of FSH dysfunction and timing of the lesion. J Inherit Metab Dis 2013; 36 (01) 29-34
  • 72 Rubio-Gozalbo ME, Gubbels CS, Bakker JA, Menheere PP, Wodzig WK, Land JA. Gonadal function in male and female patients with classic galactosemia. Hum Reprod Update 2010; 16 (02) 177-188
  • 73 Mamsen LS, Kelsey TW, Ernst E, Macklon KT, Lund AM, Andersen CY. Cryopreservation of ovarian tissue may be considered in young girls with galactosemia. J Assist Reprod Genet 2018; 35 (07) 1209-1217
  • 74 van Erven B, Gubbels CS, van Golde RJ. et al. Fertility preservation in female classic galactosemia patients. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2013; 8: 107
  • 75 Van der Ven H, Liebenthron J, Beckmann M. et al; FertiPROTEKT Network. Ninety-five orthotopic transplantations in 74 women of ovarian tissue after cytotoxic treatment in a fertility preservation network: tissue activity, pregnancy and delivery rates. Hum Reprod 2016; 31 (09) 2031-2041
  • 76 van Erven B, Berry GT, Cassiman D. et al. Fertility in adult women with classic galactosemia and primary ovarian insufficiency. Fertil Steril 2017; 108 (01) 168-174
  • 77 Herman JL, Flores AR, Brown TN, Wilson BD, Conron KJ. Age of Individuals Who Identify as Transgender in the United States. The Williams Institute; 2017
  • 78 Strang JF, Jarin J, Call D. et al. Transgender youth fertility attitudes questionnaire: measure development in nonautistic and autistic transgender youth and their parents. J Adolesc Health 2018; 62 (02) 128-135
  • 79 Moravek MB. Fertility preservation options for transgender and gender-nonconforming individuals. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2019; 31 (03) 170-176
  • 80 Mayhew AC, Gomez-Lobo V. Fertility options for the transgender and gender nonbinary patient. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2020; 105 (10) 3335-3345
  • 81 Moravek MB, Kinnear HM, George J. et al. Impact of exogenous testosterone on reproduction in transgender men. Endocrinology 2020; 161 (03) 161
  • 82 Amir H, Oren A, Klochendler Frishman E. et al. Oocyte retrieval outcomes among adolescent transgender males. J Assist Reprod Genet 2020; 37 (07) 1737-1744
  • 83 Armuand G, Dhejne C, Olofsson JI, Rodriguez-Wallberg KA. Transgender men's experiences of fertility preservation: a qualitative study. Hum Reprod 2017; 32 (02) 383-390
  • 84 Leung A, Sakkas D, Pang S, Thornton K, Resetkova N. Assisted reproductive technology outcomes in female-to-male transgender patients compared with cisgender patients: a new frontier in reproductive medicine. Fertil Steril 2019; 112 (05) 858-865
  • 85 Amir H, Yaish I, Samara N, Hasson J, Groutz A, Azem F. Ovarian stimulation outcomes among transgender men compared with fertile cisgender women. J Assist Reprod Genet 2020; 37 (10) 2463-2472
  • 86 de Nie I, Meißner A, Kostelijk EH. et al. Impaired semen quality in trans women: prevalence and determinants. Hum Reprod 2020; 35 (07) 1529-1536
  • 87 Adeleye AJ, Reid G, Kao CN, Mok-Lin E, Smith JF. Semen parameters among transgender women with a history of hormonal treatment. Urology 2019; 124: 136-141
  • 88 Johnson EK, Finlayson C, Rowell EE. et al. Fertility preservation for pediatric patients: current state and future possibilities. J Urol 2017; 198 (01) 186-194
  • 89 Forges T, Monnier P, Leheup B. et al. Ovarian tissue cryopreservation and subsequent spontaneous pregnancies in a patient with classic galactosemia. Fertil Steril 2011; 95 (01) 290.e1-290.e3