Temporal trends and variability of colonoscopy performance in gastroenterology practice

• References

• 1 Kaminski MF, Regula J, Kraszewska E et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. N Engl J Med 2010; 362: 1795-1803
• 2 Corley DA, Jensen CD, Marks AR et al. Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death. N Engl J Med 2014; 370: 1298-1306
• 3 Rutter MD, Rees CJ. Quality in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Endoscopy 2014; 46: 526-528
• 4 Cotton PB. Quality endoscopists and quality endoscopy units. J Interv Gastroenterol 2011; 1: 83-87
• 5 Rees CJ, Rajasekhar PT, Rutter MD et al. Quality in colonoscopy: European perspectives and practice. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014; 8: 29-47
• 6 Rembacken B, Hassan C, Riemann JF et al. Quality in screening colonoscopy: position statement of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE). Endoscopy 2012; 44: 957-968
• 7 Barclay RL, Vicari JJ, Doughty AS et al. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med 2006; 355: 2533-2541
• 8 Rajasekhar PT, Rutter MD, Bramble MG et al. Achieving high quality colonoscopy: using graphical representation to measure performance and reset standards. Color Dis 2012; 14: 1538-1545
• 9 Bowles CJ, Leicester R, Romaya C et al. A prospective study of colonoscopy practice in the UK today: are we adequately prepared for national colorectal cancer screening tomorrow?. Gut 2004; 53: 277-283
• 10 Gavin DR, Valori RM, Anderson JT et al. The national colonoscopy audit: a nationwide assessment of the quality and safety of colonoscopy in the UK. Gut 2013; 62: 242-249
• 11 Lee TJ, Rutter MD, Blanks RG et al. Colonoscopy quality measures: experience from the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme. Gut 2012; 61: 1050-1057
• 12 Hernandez LV, Deas TM, Catalano MF et al. Longitudinal assessment of colonoscopy quality indicators: a report from the Gastroenterology Practice Management Group. Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 80: 835-841
• 13 Le Clercq CMC, Mooi RJ, Winkens B et al. Temporal trends and variability of colonoscopy performance in a gastroenterology practice. Endoscopy 2016; 48: 248-255
• 14 Do A, Weinberg J, Kakkar A et al. Reliability of adenoma detection rate is based on procedural volume. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 77: 376-380
• 15 Kaminski MF, Anderson J, Valori R et al. Leadership training to improve adenoma detection rate in screening colonoscopy: a randomised trial. Gut 2015;
• 16 Boersma T, van Wieren M, Olde Reuver of Briel A et al. Protocol for the authorization and auditing of colonoscopy centres and endoscopists: National Screening Programme for Bowel Cancer. The Netherlands: National Institute for Public Health and the Environment. Available from: 2012 http://www.rivm.nl/dsresource?objectid=rivmp:247328 &type=org&disposition=inline
• 17 Brenner H, Altenhofen L, Kretschmann J et al. Trends in adenoma detection rates during the first 10 years of the German Screening Colonoscopy Program. Gastroenterology 2015; 149: 356-366.e1
• 18 Rex DK, Schoenfeld PS, Cohen J et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2015; 110: 72-90
• 19 Valori R, Barton R. British Society of Gastroenterology. Quality and Safety Indicators for Endoscopy. London: Joint Advisory Group on GI Endoscopy. Available from: 2007 http://www.thejag.org.uk/downloads\Unit Resources\BSG Quality and Safety Indicators.pdf
• 20 Rutter MD, Senore C, Bisschops R et al. The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Quality Improvement Initiative: developing performance measures. Endoscopy 2016; 48: 81-89
• 21 Rajasekhar PT, Rees CJ, Bramble MG et al. A multicenter pragmatic study of an evidence-based intervention to improve adenoma detection: the Quality Improvement in Colonoscopy (QIC) study. Endoscopy 2015; 47: 217-224
• 22 Coe SG, Crook JE, Diehl NN et al. An endoscopic quality improvement program improves detection of colorectal adenomas. Am J Gastroenterol 2013; 108: 219-226