Download PDF
neuroreha 2016; 08(02): 62-67
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-106150
Schwerpunkt Assessments
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Beurteilung von Assessments oder Testgütekriterien

Jan Mehrholz
1   Private Europäische Medizinische Akademie der Klinik Bavaria in Kreischa GmbH, An der Wolfsschlucht 1–2, 01731 Kreischa
,
Simone Thomas
1   Private Europäische Medizinische Akademie der Klinik Bavaria in Kreischa GmbH, An der Wolfsschlucht 1–2, 01731 Kreischa
,
Bernhard Elsner
2   SRH Hochschule für Gesundheit Gera gGmbH, Neue Str. 28–30, 07548 Gera, URL: www.srh-gesundheitshochschule.de
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
10 June 2016 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Objektivität, Reliabilität und Validität sind die bekanntesten klassischen Testgütekriterien. Was verbirgt sich dahinter, wie können sie praktisch angewandt werden und welche nicht klassischen Kriterien gibt es außerdem? Darüber gibt dieser Artikel Aufschluss.

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Casanova C, Celli BR, Barria P et al. The 6-min walk distance in healthy subjects: Reference standards from seven countries. Eur Respir J 2011; 1: 150-156
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Davis DH, Creavin ST, Yip JL et al. Montreal Cognitive Assessment for the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; CD010775
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Grimes DA, Schulz KF. An overview of clinical research: The lay of the land. Lancet 2002; 9300: 57-61
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Hagel S, Reischke J, Kesselmeier M et al. Quantifying the Hawthorne effect in hand hygiene compliance through comparing direct observation with automated hand hygiene monitoring. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2015; 8: 957-962
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Haley SM, Fragala-Pinkham MA. Interpreting change scores of tests and measures used in physical therapy. Phys Ther 2006; 5: 735-743
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Mehrholz J, Pohl M. Klinische Gehtests bei Patienten mit Hemiparese nach Schlaganfall. Z f Physiotherapeuten 2004; 9: 1628-1638
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Mehrholz J, Wagner K, Meißner D et al. Reliability of the modified Tardieu scale and the modified Ashworth scale in adult patients with severe brain injury: A comparison study. Clin Rehabil 2005; 7: 751-759
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Mehrholz J. Den Gang zuverlässig beurteilen. Zur Gehfähigkeit nach Schlaganfall: Die deutschsprachige Version der „Functional Ambulation Categories“ (FAC) – Reliabilität und konkurrente Validität. Z f Physiotherapeuten 2007; 11: 1096-1102
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Mehrholz J, Wagner K, Rutte K et al. Predictive validity and responsiveness of the Functional Ambulation Category in hemiparetic patients after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007; 10: 1314-1319
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Mehrholz J, Kugler J, Storch A et al. Treadmill training for patients with Parkinson’s disease. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015; 9 Art. No.: CD007830 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007830.pub4.
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Mehrholz J, Mückel S, Oehmichen F et al. First results about recovery of walking function in patients with intensive-care-unit-acquired muscle weakness from the General Weakness Syndrome Therapy (GymNAST) cohort study. BMJ Open 2016; 1: e008828
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Nijland RH, van Wegen EE, Harmeling-van der Wel BC et al. Accuracy of physical therapists’ early predictions of upper-limb function in hospital stroke units: The EPOS Study. Phys Ther 2013; 4: 460-469
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Roethlisberger F, Dickson W. Management and the worker: An account of a research program conducted by the Western Electric Company, Hawthorne Works, Chicago. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1939
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Rosenthal R. Experimenter effects in behavioral research. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts; 1966
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Rothstein JM. Sick and tired of reliability?. Phys Ther 2001; 2: 774-775
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Thomas J, Nelson J, Silverman S. Research methods in physical activity. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2015
    Google Scholar
  • 17 van de Port IG, Kwakkel G, Schepers VP et al. Predicting mobility outcome one year after stroke: A prospective cohort study. J Rehabil Med 2006; 4: 218-223
    Google Scholar
  • 18 van Middendorp JJ, Hosman AJ, Donders AR et al. A clinical prediction rule for ambulation outcomes after traumatic spinal cord injury: A longitudinal cohort study. Lancet 2011; 9770: 1004-1010
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Wade DT. Measurement in neurologic rehabilitation. Curr Opin Neurol 1993; 5: 778-784
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Wade DT. Evidence relating to assessment in rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil 1998; 3: 183-186
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Wade DT. Outcome measurement and rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil 1999; 2: 93-95
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Wade DT. Assessment, measurement and data collection tools. Clin Rehabil 2004; 3: 233-237
    Google Scholar