Beurteilung von Assessments oder Testgütekriterien

Zusammenfassung

Objektivität, Reliabilität und Validität sind die bekanntesten klassischen Testgütekriterien. Was verbirgt sich dahinter, wie können sie praktisch angewandt werden und welche nicht klassischen Kriterien gibt es außerdem? Darüber gibt dieser Artikel Aufschluss.

• Literatur

• 1 Casanova C, Celli BR, Barria P et al. The 6-min walk distance in healthy subjects: Reference standards from seven countries. Eur Respir J 2011; 1: 150-156
• 2 Davis DH, Creavin ST, Yip JL et al. Montreal Cognitive Assessment for the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; CD010775
• 3 Grimes DA, Schulz KF. An overview of clinical research: The lay of the land. Lancet 2002; 9300: 57-61
• 4 Hagel S, Reischke J, Kesselmeier M et al. Quantifying the Hawthorne effect in hand hygiene compliance through comparing direct observation with automated hand hygiene monitoring. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2015; 8: 957-962
• 5 Haley SM, Fragala-Pinkham MA. Interpreting change scores of tests and measures used in physical therapy. Phys Ther 2006; 5: 735-743
• 6 Mehrholz J, Pohl M. Klinische Gehtests bei Patienten mit Hemiparese nach Schlaganfall. Z f Physiotherapeuten 2004; 9: 1628-1638
• 7 Mehrholz J, Wagner K, Meißner D et al. Reliability of the modified Tardieu scale and the modified Ashworth scale in adult patients with severe brain injury: A comparison study. Clin Rehabil 2005; 7: 751-759
• 8 Mehrholz J. Den Gang zuverlässig beurteilen. Zur Gehfähigkeit nach Schlaganfall: Die deutschsprachige Version der „Functional Ambulation Categories“ (FAC) – Reliabilität und konkurrente Validität. Z f Physiotherapeuten 2007; 11: 1096-1102
• 9 Mehrholz J, Wagner K, Rutte K et al. Predictive validity and responsiveness of the Functional Ambulation Category in hemiparetic patients after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007; 10: 1314-1319
• 10 Mehrholz J, Kugler J, Storch A et al. Treadmill training for patients with Parkinson’s disease. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015; 9 Art. No.: CD007830
• 11 Mehrholz J, Mückel S, Oehmichen F et al. First results about recovery of walking function in patients with intensive-care-unit-acquired muscle weakness from the General Weakness Syndrome Therapy (GymNAST) cohort study. BMJ Open 2016; 1: e008828
• 12 Nijland RH, van Wegen EE, Harmeling-van der Wel BC et al. Accuracy of physical therapists’ early predictions of upper-limb function in hospital stroke units: The EPOS Study. Phys Ther 2013; 4: 460-469
• 13 Roethlisberger F, Dickson W. Management and the worker: An account of a research program conducted by the Western Electric Company, Hawthorne Works, Chicago. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1939
• 14 Rosenthal R. Experimenter effects in behavioral research. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts; 1966
• 15 Rothstein JM. Sick and tired of reliability?. Phys Ther 2001; 2: 774-775
• 16 Thomas J, Nelson J, Silverman S. Research methods in physical activity. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2015
• 17 van de Port IG, Kwakkel G, Schepers VP et al. Predicting mobility outcome one year after stroke: A prospective cohort study. J Rehabil Med 2006; 4: 218-223
• 18 van Middendorp JJ, Hosman AJ, Donders AR et al. A clinical prediction rule for ambulation outcomes after traumatic spinal cord injury: A longitudinal cohort study. Lancet 2011; 9770: 1004-1010
• 19 Wade DT. Measurement in neurologic rehabilitation. Curr Opin Neurol 1993; 5: 778-784
• 20 Wade DT. Evidence relating to assessment in rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil 1998; 3: 183-186
• 21 Wade DT. Outcome measurement and rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil 1999; 2: 93-95
• 22 Wade DT. Assessment, measurement and data collection tools. Clin Rehabil 2004; 3: 233-237