Download PDF
Int J Sports Med 2017; 38(02): 150-158
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-106298
Orthopedics & Biomechanics
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Innovative Video Feedback on Jump Landing Improves Landing Technique in Males

Joan Dallinga
1   Center for Human Movement Sciences, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
,
Anne Benjaminse
1   Center for Human Movement Sciences, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
2   School of Sports Studies, Hanze University of Applied Sciences, Groningen, Netherlands
,
Alli Gokeler
1   Center for Human Movement Sciences, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
,
Nelson Cortes
3   School of Recreation, Health and Tourism, George Mason University, Fairfax, United States
,
Egbert Otten
1   Center for Human Movement Sciences, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
,
Koen Lemmink
1   Center for Human Movement Sciences, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
2   School of Sports Studies, Hanze University of Applied Sciences, Groningen, Netherlands
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History



accepted after revision 30 March 2016

Publication Date:
18 July 2016 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Video feedback may be a powerful tool to change biomechanical landing patterns associated with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury risk. This study investigated the effect of video feedback on drop vertical jump (DVJ) landing strategies in team sport athletes. 59 athletes were assigned to a video feedback (VI) or control (CTRL) group. A pretest, 2 training sessions and a posttest were conducted. In both training sessions, video feedback, consisting of a video of the athlete’s contour superimposed onto an expert’s contour performing the DVJ landing task, was provided to the VI group; the CTRL group did not receive feedback. Outcomes included: kinematics and kinetics at peak knee valgus/varus moment during pre- and posttest and percentage overlap of expert and athlete during the training sessions. At posttest, males in the VI group showed greater hip flexion angles (p=0.001) and range of motion (p<0.001), smaller vertical ground reaction force, and smaller ankle dorsiflexion moment (p<0.001) compared to pretest. At posttest, males in the VI group demonstrated smaller vertical ground reaction force (p=0.031) and ankle dorsiflexion moment (p=0.001) compared to males in the CTRL group. The VI group increased percentage overlap with the expert during training sessions and from start of the first to the end of the second training session (p<0.001). Overall, video feedback was effective to modify landing strategies favorably in males. While females imitated the expert model, their landing strategy did not change significantly. While Females may need additional (verbal) feedback to benefit from video feedback.

Key words

attentional focus - knee injuries - motor learning - prevention - sex

Supplementary Material

 

  • References

  • 1 Agel J, Arendt EA, Bershadsky B. Anterior cruciate ligament injury in National Collegiate Athletic Association basketball and soccer: a 13-year review. Am J Sports Med 2005; 33: 524-531
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Alentorn-Geli E, Mendiguchía J, Samuelsson K, Musahl V, Karlsson J, Cugat R, Myer GD. Prevention of anterior cruciate ligament injuries in sports – Part I: Systematic review of risk factors in male athletes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2014; 22: 3-15
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Alentorn-Geli E, Myer GD, Silvers HJ, Samitier G, Romero D, Lázaro-Haro C, Cugat R. Prevention of non-contact anterior cruciate ligament injuries in soccer players. Part 1: Mechanisms of injury and underlying risk factors. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2009; 17: 705-729
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Benjaminse A, Gokeler A, Dowling A, Faigenbaum A, Ford K, Hewett T, Onate J, Otten E, Myer G. Optimization of the ACL injury prevention paradigm: novel feedback techniques to enhance motor learning and reduce injury risk. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2015; 45: 170-182
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Benjaminse A, Otten B, Gokeler A, Diercks RL, Lemmink KA. Motor learning strategies in basketball players and its implications for ACL injury prevention: a randomized controlled trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2015; 1-12
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Benjaminse A, Otten E. ACL injury prevention, more effective with a different way of motor learning?. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2011; 19: 622-627
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Benjaminse A, Welling W, Otten B, Gokeler A. Novel methods of instruction in ACL injury prevention programs, a systematic review. Phys Ther Sport 2014
    PubMed
  • 8 Benoit DL, Ramsey DK, Lamontagne M, Xu L, Wretenberg P, Renström P. Effect of skin movement artifact on knee kinematics during gait and cutting motions measured in vivo. Gait Posture 2006; 24: 152-164
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Beynnon BD, Vacek PM, Newell MK, Tourville TW, Smith HC, Shultz SJ, Slauterbeck JR, Johnson RJ. The effects of level of competition, sport, and sex on the incidence of first-time noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injury. Am J Sports Med 2014; 42: 1806-1812
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Buccino G, Binkofski F, Riggio L. The mirror neuron system and action recognition. Brain Lang 2004; 89: 370-376
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Calvo-Merino B, Glaser DE, Grezes J, Passingham RE, Haggard P. Action observation and acquired motor skills: an FMRI study with expert dancers. Cereb Cortex 2005; 15: 1243-1249
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Chappell JD, Limpisvasti O. Effect of a neuromuscular training program on the kinetics and kinematics of jumping tasks. Am J Sports Med 2008; 36: 1081-1086
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Chiviacowsky S, Wulf G, de Medeiros FL, Kaefer A, Tani G. Learning benefits of self-controlled knowledge of results in 10-year-old children. Res Q Exerc Sport 2008; 79: 405-410
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988: 285-288
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Cunningham JB, McCrum-Gardner E. Powereffect and sample size using GPower: practical issues for researchers and members of research ethics committees. Evidence-Based Midwifery 2007; 5: 132-136
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Devita P, Skelly WA. Effect of landing stiffness on joint kinetics and energetics in the lower extremity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1992; 24: 108-115
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Etnoyer J, Cortes N, Ringleb SI, Van Lunen BL, Onate JA. Instruction and jump-landing kinematics in college-aged female athletes over time. J Athl Train 2013; 48: 161-171
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang A, Buchner A. G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 2007; 39: 175-191
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Grooms D, Appelbaum G, Onate J. Neuroplasticity following anterior cruciate ligament injury: a framework for visual-motor training approaches in rehabilitation. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2015; 45: 381-393
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Harriss D, Atkinson G. Ethical standards in sport and exercise science research: 2014 update. Int J Sports Med 2013; 34: 1025-1028
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Herman DC, Onate JA, Weinhold PS, Guskiewicz KM, Garrett WE, Yu B, Padua DA. The effects of feedback with and without strength training on lower extremity biomechanics. Am J Sports Med 2009; 37: 1301-1308
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Hewett TE, Myer GD, Ford KR, Heidt Jr RS, Colosimo AJ, McLean SG, van den Bogert AJ, Paterno MV, Succop P. Biomechanical measures of neuromuscular control and valgus loading of the knee predict anterior cruciate ligament injury risk in female athletes: a prospective study. Am J Sports Med 2005; 33: 492-501
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Hewett TE, Myer GD, Ford KR. Anterior cruciate ligament injuries in female athletes: Part 1, mechanisms and risk factors. Am J Sports Med 2006; 34: 299-311
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Hewett TE, Stroupe AL, Nance TA, Noyes FR. Plyometric training in female athletes. Decreased impact forces and increased hamstring torques. Am J Sports Med 1996; 24: 765-773
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Kimura D. Human sex differences in cognition, fact, not predicament. Sex Evol Gender 2004; 6: 45-53
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Makaruk H, Porter J, Czaplicki A, Sadowski J, Sacewicz T. The role of attentional focus in plyometric training. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 2012; 52: 319-327
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 McCullagh P, Weiss MR, Ross D. Modeling considerations in motor skill acquisition and performance: an integrated approach. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 1989; 17: 475-514
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 McLean SG. The ACL injury enigma: we can’t prevent what we don’t understand. J Athl Train 2008; 43: 538-540
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Munro A, Herrington L. The effect of videotape augmented feedback on drop jump landing strategy: implications for anterior cruciate ligament and patellofemoral joint injury prevention. Knee 2014; 21: 891-895
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Myer GD, Ford KR, Brent JL, Hewett TE. The effects of plyometric vs. dynamic stabilization and balance training on power, balance, and landing force in female athletes. J Strength Cond Res 2006; 20: 345-353
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Myklebust G, Engebretsen L, Brækken IH, Skjølberg A, Olsen OE, Bahr R. Prevention of anterior cruciate ligament injuries in female team handball players: a prospective intervention study over three seasons. Clin J Sport Med 2003; 13: 71
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Myklebust G, Maehlum S, Holm I, Bahr R. A prospective cohort study of anterior cruciate ligament injuries in elite Norwegian team handball. Scand J Med Sci Sports 1998; 8: 149-153
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Myklebust G, Skjolberg A, Bahr R. ACL injury incidence in female handball 10 years after the Norwegian ACL prevention study: important lessons learned. Br J Sports Med 2013; 47: 476-479
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Onate JA, Guskiewicz KM, Marshall SW, Giuliani C, Yu B, Garrett WE. Instruction of jump-landing technique using videotape feedback: altering lower extremity motion patterns. Am J Sports Med 2005; 33: 831-842
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Padua DA, Marshall SW, Boling MC, Thigpen CA, Garrett WE, Beutler AI. The Landing Error Scoring System (LESS) is a valid and reliable clinical assessment tool of jump-landing biomechanics. Am J Sports Med 2009; 37: 1996-2002
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Parsons JL, Alexander MJ. Modifying spike jump landing biomechanics in female adolescent volleyball athletes using video and verbal feedback. J Strength Cond Res 2012; 26: 1076-1084
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Reinschmidt C, Van Den Bogert A, Nigg B, Lundberg A, Murphy N. Effect of skin movement on the analysis of skeletal knee joint motion during running. J Biomech 1997; 30: 729-732
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Ridderinkhof KR, Brass M. How Kinesthetic Motor Imagery works: a predictive-processing theory of visualization in sports and motor expertise. J Physiol Paris 2015; 109: 53-63
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Rizzolatti G, Fogassi L, Gallese V. Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action. Nat Rev Neurosci 2001; 2: 661-670
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Shea CH, Wulf G. Enhancing motor learning through external-focus instructions and feedback. Human Movement Science 1999; 18: 553-571
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Sugimoto D, Alentorn-Geli E, Mendiguchía J, Samuelsson K, Karlsson J, Myer GD. Biomechanical and neuromuscular characteristics of male athletes: implications for the development of anterior cruciate ligament injury prevention programs. Sports Medicine 2015; 45: 809-822
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Waldén M, Hägglund M, Magnusson H, Ekstrand J. Anterior cruciate ligament injury in elite football: a prospective three-cohort study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2011; 19: 11-19
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Walden M, Krosshaug T, Bjorneboe J, Andersen TE, Faul O, Hagglund M. Three distinct mechanisms predominate in non-contact anterior cruciate ligament injuries in male professional football players: a systematic video analysis of 39 cases. Br J Sports Med 2015; 49: 1452-1460
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Welling W, Benjaminse A, Gokeler A, Otten B. Enhanced retention of drop vertical jump landing technique: a randomized controlled trial. Human Movement Science 2016; 45: 84-95
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Wulf G. Attentional focus and motor learning: A review of 10 years of research. E-journal Bewegung und Training 2007; 1: 1-11
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Wulf G, Dufek JS. Increased jump height with an external focus due to enhanced lower extremity joint kinetics. J Mot Behav 2009; 41: 401-409
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Wulf G, Höß M, Prinz W. Instructions for motor learning: differential effects of internal versus external focus of attention. J Mot Behav 1998; 30: 169-179
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Wulf G, Schmidt RA. Variability of practice and implicit motor learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1997; 23: 987
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Wulf G, Shea C, Lewthwaite R. Motor skill learning and performance: a review of influential factors. Med Educ 2009; 44: 75-84
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Zwerver J, Bredeweg SW, van den Akker-Scheek I. Prevalence of jumper’s knee among nonelite athletes from different sports. Am J Sports Med 2011; 39: 1984-1988
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar