Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-109979
Die Pankreaslinksresektion mit autologem Fibrinkleber – Anwendung eines etablierten Versiegelungskonzepts in der Pankreaschirurgie
Distal Pancreatectomy with Autologous Fibrin Sealant – Implementation of an Established Concept of Tissue Sealing in Pancreatic SurgeryPublication History
Publication Date:
08 August 2016 (online)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1ba92/1ba92a5c28c2c1aa579e71fbc240138bf4115182" alt=""
Zusammenfassung
Hintergrund: Die postoperative Pankreasfistel nach Pankreaslinksresektion ist bis heute ein ungelöstes Problem, denn unabhängig von der Verschlusstechnik entwickeln etwa 30 % der Patienten nach einer Pankreaslinksresektion eine Pankreasfistel. Erstmals wurde bei Pankreaslinksresektionen autologes Fibrin (Vivostat®) zum additiven Abdichten des Pankreasabsetzungsrands verwendet. Ziel war es, zu untersuchen, ob ein verändertes postoperatives Ergebnis vorliegt.
Patienten/Material und Methoden: Im Jahr 2015 wurde eine technische Fallserie bei 15 Patienten durchgeführt. Im Rahmen von Pankreaslinksresektionen wurde autologer Fibrinkleber auf den Pankreasabsetzungsrand appliziert.
Ergebnisse: Bei 5/15 Patienten (33 %) trat eine Pankreasfistel auf. In einem Fall trat eine Grad-A-Fistel auf (1/15, 6,7 %), während eine Grad-B-Fistel in 4/15 Fällen (26,7 %) vorlag. Bei 75 % (3/4) der Patienten mit einer Grad-B-Fistel war eine Antibiotikatherapie ausreichend. Nur bei einem Patienten war postoperativ eine CT-gesteuerte Drainagenanlage erforderlich.
Schlussfolgerung: Autologer Fibrinkleber ist unkompliziert anzuwenden und scheint gut verträglich. Postoperative Pankreasfisteln nach Pankreaslinksresektionen scheinen sich dadurch allerdings nicht vermeiden zu lassen.
Abstract
Background: Postoperative pancreatic fistulas (POPF) remain a major concern after distal pancreatectomy. Irrespective of the technique to close the pancreatic remnant, pancreatic fistulas will occur in approximately 30 % of patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy. For the first time ever, autologous fibrin sealant (Vivostat®) was used to additionally seal the pancreatic remnant after a distal pancreatectomy. The aim was to analyse whether this changes the postoperative outcome.
Patients/Material and Methods: In 2015, a technical case series was performed in 15 patients who underwent distal pancreatectomy. The pancreatic remnant was additionally sealed with autologous fibrin sealant (Vivostat®).
Results: A postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) occurred in 5/15 patients (33 %). One patient had a POPF grade A (1/15, 6.7 %), whereas a POPF grade B occurred in 4/15 patients (26.7 %). 75 % (3/4) of the patients with a POPF grade B were sufficiently treated with antibiotics, whereas a CT-guided percutaneous drainage had to be placed only in one case.
Conclusion: Autologous fibrin sealant is simple to apply and seems to be well tolerated. However, it does not seem to avoid the development of postoperative pancreatic fistulas after distal pancreatectomy.
-
Literatur
- 1 Diener MK, Seiler CM, Rossion I. et al. Efficacy of stapler versus hand-sewn closure after distal pancreatectomy (DISPACT): a randomised, controlled multicentre trial. Lancet 2011; 377: 1514-1522
- 2 Knaebel HP, Diener MK, Wente MN. et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of technique for closure of the pancreatic remnant after distal pancreatectomy. Br J Surg 2005; 92: 539-546
- 3 Meniconi RL, Caronna R, Borreca D. et al. Pancreato-jejunostomy versus hand-sewn closure of the pancreatic stump to prevent pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy: a retrospective analysis. BMC Surg 2013; 13: 23
- 4 Ramia JM, de la Plaza R, Adel F. et al. Wrapping in pancreatic surgery: a systematic review. ANZ J Surg 2014; 84: 921-924
- 5 McMillan MT, Vollmer jr. CM, Asbun HJ. et al. The characterization and prediction of ISGPF grade C fistulas following pancreatoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 2016; 20: 262-276
- 6 Pratt WB, Maithel SK, Vanounou T. et al. Clinical and economic validation of the International Study Group of Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF) classification scheme. Ann Surg 2007; 245: 443-451
- 7 Ferrone CR, Warshaw AL, Rattner DW. et al. Pancreatic fistula rates after 462 distal pancreatectomies: staplers do not decrease fistula rates. J Gastrointest Surg 2008; 12: 1691-1697
- 8 Ohwada S, Ogawa T, Tanahashi Y. et al. Fibrin glue sandwich prevents pancreatic fistula following distal pancreatectomy. World J Surg 1998; 22: 494-498
- 9 Ceppa EP, McCurdy RM, Becerra DC. et al. Does pancreatic stump closure method influence distal pancreatectomy outcomes?. J Gastrointest Surg 2015; 19: 1449-1456
- 10 Suzuki Y, Kuroda Y, Morita A. et al. Fibrin glue sealing for the prevention of pancreatic fistulas following distal pancreatectomy. Arch Surg 1995; 130: 952-955
- 11 Walters DM, Stokes JB, Adams RB. et al. Use of a falciform ligament pedicle flap to decrease pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy. Pancreas 2011; 40: 595-599
- 12 Wu CT, Xu WY, Liu L. et al. Ligamentum teres hepatis patch enhances the healing of pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2013; 12: 651-655
- 13 Carter TI, Fong ZV, Hyslop T. et al. A dual-institution randomized controlled trial of remnant closure after distal pancreatectomy: does the addition of a falciform patch and fibrin glue improve outcomes?. J Gastrointest Surg 2013; 17: 102-109
- 14 Seeliger H, Christians S, Angele MK. et al. Risk factors for surgical complications in distal pancreatectomy. Am J Surg 2010; 200: 311-317
- 15 Hackert T, Buchler MW. Management of postoperative pancreatic fistula. Chirurg 2015; 86: 519-524
- 16 Velada JL, Hollingsbee DA. Physical characteristics of Vivostat patient-derived sealant. Implications for clinical use. Eur Surg Res 2001; 33: 399-404
- 17 Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G. et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 2005; 138: 8-13
- 18 Wagner M, Gloor B, Ambuhl M. et al. Roux-en-Y drainage of the pancreatic stump decreases pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatic resection. J Gastrointest Surg 2007; 11: 303-308
- 19 Orci LA, Oldani G, Berney T. et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of fibrin sealants for patients undergoing pancreatic resection. HPB (Oxford) 2014; 16: 3-11
- 20 Cheng Y, Ye M, Xiong X. et al. Fibrin sealants for the prevention of postoperative pancreatic fistula following pancreatic surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; (02) CD009621
- 21 Belcher E, Dusmet M, Jordan S. et al. A prospective, randomized trial comparing BioGlue and Vivostat for the control of alveolar air leak. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010; 140: 32-38
- 22 Lamsa T, Jin HT, Sand J. et al. Tissue adhesives and the pancreas: biocompatibility and adhesive properties of 6 preparations. Pancreas 2008; 36: 261-266
- 23 Kjaergard HK, Velada JL, Pedersen JH. et al. Comparative kinetics of polymerisation of three fibrin sealants and influence on timing of tissue adhesion. Thromb Res 2000; 98: 221-228
- 24 Belyaev O, Munding J, Tannapfel A. et al. False-positive PET/CT after cyanoacrylate sealing of a pancreaticojejunostomy. J Gastrointest Surg 2015; 19: 984-985
- 25 Kjaergard HK, Trumbull HR. Vivostat system autologous fibrin sealant: preliminary study in elective coronary bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 1998; 66: 482-486
- 26 Belboul A, Dernevik L, Aljassim O. et al. The effect of autologous fibrin sealant (Vivostat) on morbidity after pulmonary lobectomy: a prospective randomised, blinded study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2004; 26: 1187-1191
- 27 Graziano F, Maugeri R, Basile L. et al. Aulogous fibrin sealant (Vivostat(®)) in the neurosurgical practice: Part II: Vertebro-spinal procedures. Surg Neurol Int 2016; 7 (Suppl. 03) S77-S82