Download PDF
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2017; 234(01): 117-122
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-115944
Übersicht
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Die historische Entwicklung der Small-Incision-Lentikel-Extraktions-OP (SMILE)

Historical Overview of the Clinical Development of the Small Incision Lenticule Extraction Surgery (SMILE)
M. Blum
1   Klinik für Augenheilkunde, Helios Klinikum Erfurt GmbH
,
K. S. Kunert
1   Klinik für Augenheilkunde, Helios Klinikum Erfurt GmbH
,
W. Sekundo
2   Klinik für Augenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg GmbH, Standort Marburg
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

eingereicht 17 August 2016

akzeptiert 22 August 2016

Publication Date:
30 January 2017 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Durch die Einführung der Femtosekundenlaser in die klinische Augenheilkunde wurde in der refraktiven Chirurgie ein deutlicher Qualitätsfortschritt erzielt. Erstmals ist es mit dem SMILE-Verfahren (SMILE: Small-Incision-Lentikel-Extraktion) möglich, die Korrektur im Stroma der Hornhaut nur mit einem Laser ohne Anheben eines Flaps durchzuführen. Der Übersichtsartikel zeigt die schrittweise Entwicklung bis zu diesem mittlerweile international etablierten Verfahren.

Abstract

The clinical use of femtosecond lasers has led to significant progress in the quality of refractive surgery. SMILE femtosecond laser surgery (SMILE: Small Incision Lenticule Extraction) permits the first one step intrastromal laser procedure without a flap. This article describes the gradual development of this surgery during the last ten years.

Schlüsselwörter

Femtosekundenlaser - refraktive Chirurgie - Lentikel-Extraktion - SMILE

Key words

femtosecond laser - refractive surgery - lenticule extraction - SMILE
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Barraquer JI. The history and evolution of keratomileusis. Int Ophthalmol Clin 1996; 36: 1-7
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Ibrahim O, Waring GO, Salah T. et al. Automated in situ keratomileusis for myopia. J Refract Surg 1995; 11: 431-441
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Wiegand W, Krusenberg B, Kroll P. Keratomileusis in situ bei hochgradiger Myopie. Erste Ergebnisse. Ophthalmologe 1995; 92: 402-409
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Stern D, Schoenlein RW, Puliafito CA. Corneal ablation by nanosecond, picoseconds, and femtosecond lasers at 532 and 625 nm. Arch Ophthalmol 1989; 107: 567-592
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Ito M, Quantock AJ, Malhan S. et al. Picosecond laser in situ keratomileusis with a 1053-nm Nd:YFL laser. J Refract Surg 1996; 12: 721-728
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Krueger RR, Juhasz T, Gualano A. et al. The picosecond laser for nonmechanical laser in situ keratomileusis. J Refract Surg 1998; 14: 467-469
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Kurtz RM, Horvath C, Liu HH. et al. Lamellar refractive surgery with scanned intrastromal picoseconds and femtosecond laser pulses in animal eyes. J Refract Surg 1998; 14: 541-548
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Heisterkamp A, Mamon T, Kermani O. et al. Intrastromal refractive surgery with ultrashort laser pulses: in vivo study on the rabbit eye. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2003; 241: 511-517
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Ratkay-Traub I, Ferincz IE, Juhasz T. et al. First clinical results with the femtosecond neodymium-glass laser in refractive surgery. J Refract Surg 2003; 19: 94-103
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Nordan LT, Slade SG, Baker RN. Femtosecond laser flap creation for laser in situ keratomileusis: six-months follow-up of the initial US clinical series. J Refract Surg 2003; 19: 8-14
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Kezirian GM, Stonecipher KG. Comparison of the IntraLase femtosecond laser and mechanical microkeratome for laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 2004; 30: 804-811
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Durrie DS, Kezirian GM. Femtosecond laser versus mechanical keratome flaps in wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis: prospective contralateral eye study. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005; 31: 120-126
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Tran DB, Sarayba MA, Bor Z. et al. Randomized prospective clinical study comparing induced aberrations with IntraLase and Hansatome flap creation in fellow eyes: potential impact on wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005; 31: 97-105
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Vetter JM, Holzer MP, Teping C. et al. Intraocular pressure during corneal flap preparation: comparison among four femtosecond lasers in porcine eyes. J Refract Surg 2011; 27: 427-433
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Vetter JM, Faust M, Gericke A. et al. Intraocular pressure measurements during flap preparation using 2 femtosecond lasers and 1 microkeratome in human donor eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg 2012; 38: 2011-2018
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Sekundo W, Gertnere J, Bertelmann T. et al. One-year refractive results, contrast sensitivity, high-order aberrations and complications after myopic small-incision lenticule extraction (ReLEx SMILE). Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2014; 252: 837-843
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Reviglio VE, Kuo IC, Gramajo L. et al. Acute rhegmatogenous retinal detachment immediately following laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 2007; 33: 536-539
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Blum M, Kunert K, Gille A. et al. LASIK for myopia using the Zeiss VisuMax femtosecond laser and MEL80 excimer laser. J Refract Surg 2009; 25: 350-356
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Sekundo W, Kunert K, Russmann C. et al. First efficacy and safety study of femtosecond lenticule extraction for the correction of myopia: six-month results. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008; 34: 1513-1520
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Blum M, Kunert K, Schröder M. et al. Femtosecond lenticule extraction for the correction of myopia: 6-month results. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2010; 248: 1019-1027
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Blum M, Kunert KS, Engelbrecht C. et al. Femtosekunden-Lentikel-Extraktion (FLEx) – Ergebnisse nach 12 Monaten bei myopem Astigmatismus. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 2010; 227: 961-965
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Blum M, Flach A, Kunert KS. et al. Five-year results of refractive lenticule extraction. J Cataract Refract Surg 2014; 40: 1425-1429
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Shah R, Shah S. Effect of scanning patterns on the results of femtosecond laser lenticule extraction refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 2011; 37: 1636-1647
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Sekundo W, Kunert K, Blum M. Small incision corneal refractive surgery using the small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) procedure for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism: results of a 6 months prospective study. Br J Ophthalmol 2011; 95: 335-339
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Shah R, Shah S, Segupta S. Results of small incision lenticule extraction: all-in-one femtosecond laser refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 2011; 37: 127-137
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Hjortdal JO, Vestergaard AH, Ivarsen A. et al. Predictors for the outcome of small-incision lenticule extraction for myopia. J Refract Surg 2012; 28: 865-871
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Kamiya K, Shimizu K, Igarashi A. et al. Visual and refractive outcomes of femtosecond lenticule extraction and small-incision lenticule extraction for myopia. Am J Ophthalmol 2014; 157: 128-134
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Kunert KS, Blum M, Duncker GI. et al. Surface quality of human corneal lenticules after femtosecond laser surgery for myopia comparing different laser parameters. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2011; 249: 1417-1424
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Heichelt J, Blum M, Duncker GI. et al. Surface quality of porcine corneal lenticules after Femtosecond Lenticule Extraction. Ophthalmic Res 2011; 46: 107-112
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Gobbe M. Accuracy and reproducibility of cap thickness in small incision lenticule extraction. J Refract Surg 2013; 29: 810-815
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Ozgurhan EB, Agca A, Bozkurt E. et al. Accuracy and precision of cap thickness in small incision lenticule extraction. Clin Ophthalmol 2013; 7: 923-926
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Ivarsen A, Asp S, Hjortdal J. Safety and complications of more than 1500 small-incision lenticule extraction procedures. Ophthalmology 2014; 121: 822-828
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Blum M, Täubig K, Gruhn C. et al. Five-year results of Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (ReLEx SMILE). Br J Ophthalmol 2016; 100: 1192-1195
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Blum M, Kunert KS, Voßmerbäumer U. et al. Femtosecond lenticule extraction (ReLEx) for correction of hyperopia – first results. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2013; 251: 349-355
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Sekundo W, Reinstein DZ, Blum M. Improved lenticule shape for hyperopic femtosecond lenticule extraction (ReLEx FLEx): a pilot study. Lasers Med Sci 2016; 31: 659-664
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar