Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1743225
Management of Pathologic Fractures around the Knee: Part 2—Proximal Tibia
Funding None.Abstract
Metastatic disease affecting the proximal tibia is rarer than disease affecting the femur; however, it presents unique challenges that the orthopaedic surgeon must address to ensure successful outcomes and return the patient to an ambulatory status. The essential workup for evaluating and treating these patients is addressed briefly in this review as a summary of the information is provided in part 1 of this series. Part 2 of this series will focus on the surgical treatment of these lesions, which can be complex and is not as well described in the literature. Procedures ranging from open reduction internal fixation with cement augmentation to complex endoprosthetic reconstruction can be employed to address proximal tibia metastatic disease. An awareness of these various treatment modalities allows the orthopaedic surgeon to plan the most effective operation for the patients under their care.
Publication History
Received: 02 December 2021
Accepted: 06 January 2022
Article published online:
18 February 2022
© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 Kelly CM, Wilkins RM, Eckardt JJ, Ward WG. Treatment of metastatic disease of the tibia. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003; ;(415, Suppl): S219-S229
- 2 Leeson MC, Makley JT, Carter JR. Metastatic skeletal disease distal to the elbow and knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1986; (206) 94-99
- 3 Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin 2020; 70 (01) 7-30
- 4 Engh GA. Classification of bone defects. In: Scuderi GR, Tria AJ. eds. Surgical Techniques in Total Knee Arthroplasty. New York, NY: Springer; 2002
- 5 De Geeter K, Reynders P, Samson I, Broos PL. Metastatic fractures of the tibia. Acta Orthop Belg 2001; 67 (01) 54-59
- 6 Piccioli A, Maccauro G, Scaramuzzo L, Graci C, Spinelli MS. Surgical treatment of impending and pathological fractures of tibia. Injury 2013; 44 (08) 1092-1096
- 7 Phisitkul P, McKinley TO, Nepola JV, Marsh JL. Complications of locking plate fixation in complex proximal tibia injuries. J Orthop Trauma 2007; 21 (02) 83-91
- 8 Peindl RD, Zura RD, Vincent A, Coley ER, Bosse MJ, Sims SH. Unstable proximal extraarticular tibia fractures: a biomechanical evaluation of four methods of fixation. J Orthop Trauma 2004; 18 (08) 540-545
- 9 Lee S-M, Oh C-W, Oh J-K. et al. Biomechanical analysis of operative methods in the treatment of extra-articular fracture of the proximal tibia. Clin Orthop Surg 2014; 6 (03) 312-317
- 10 Mueller CA, Eingartner C, Schreitmueller E. et al. Primary stability of various forms of osteosynthesis in the treatment of fractures of the proximal tibia. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005; 87 (03) 426-432
- 11 Laflamme GY, Heimlich D, Stephen D, Kreder HJ, Whyne CM. Proximal tibial fracture stability with intramedullary nail fixation using oblique interlocking screws. J Orthop Trauma 2003; 17 (07) 496-502
- 12 Roth SE, Kreder H, Stephen D, Whyne CM. Biomechanical stability of intramedullary nailed high proximal third tibial fractures with cement augmented proximal screws. J Orthop Trauma 2005; 19 (07) 457-461
- 13 Johnson JD, Wyles CC, Perry KI, Yuan BJ, Rose PS, Houdek MT. Outcomes of knee arthroplasty for primary treatment of pathologic peri-articular fractures of the distal femur and proximal tibia. Int Orthop 2020; 44 (01) 187-193
- 14 Albergo JI, Gaston CL, Aponte-Tinao LA. et al. Proximal tibia reconstruction after bone tumor resection: are survivorship and outcomes of endoprosthetic replacement and osteoarticular allograft similar?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2017; 475 (03) 676-682
- 15 Pala E, Trovarelli G, Calabrò T, Angelini A, Abati CN, Ruggieri P. Survival of modern knee tumor megaprostheses: failures, functional results, and a comparative statistical analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015; 473 (03) 891-899
- 16 Shimose S, Sugita T, Kubo T, Matsuo T, Ochi M. Reconstructed patellar tendon length after proximal tibia prosthetic replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005; 439 (439) 176-180
- 17 Bickels J, Wittig JC, Kollender Y. et al. Reconstruction of the extensor mechanism after proximal tibia endoprosthetic replacement. J Arthroplasty 2001; 16 (07) 856-862
- 18 Malawer MM, Price WM. Gastrocnemius transposition flap in conjunction with limb-sparing surgery for primary bone sarcomas around the knee. Plast Reconstr Surg 1984; 73 (05) 741-750
- 19 Cipriano CA, Dalton J, McDonald DJ. Does patellar tendon repair with gastrocnemius flap augmentation effectively restore active extension after proximal tibial sarcoma resection?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2019; 477 (03) 584-593
- 20 Jentzsch T, Erschbamer M, Seeli F, Fuchs B. Extensor function after medial gastrocnemius flap reconstruction of the proximal tibia. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013; 471 (07) 2333-2339
- 21 Liu B, Tan JC, Wang HL, Wu Z, Yuan ZC, Wei CY. The role of mesh technology with tumor prosthesis reconstruction to reconstruct the extensor mechanism of knee joint after resection of proximal tibial tumors. J Orthop Surg Res 2019; 14 (01) 64
- 22 Ichikawa J, Matsumoto S, Shimoji T, Ae K, Tanizawa T, Gokita T. A new technique using mesh for extensor reconstruction after proximal tibial resection. Knee 2015; 22 (06) 659-663