Download PDF
J Knee Surg 2023; 36(13): 1309-1315
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1755358
Original Article

Anteromedial Portal versus Transtibial Drilling Techniques for Femoral Tunnel Placement in Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Radiographic Evaluation and Functional Outcomes at 2 Years Follow-Up

Ayman Gabr 
1   Department of Orthopaedics, The University College of London Hospitals NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
,
Mohsin Khan
1   Department of Orthopaedics, The University College of London Hospitals NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
,
Sunil G. Kini
1   Department of Orthopaedics, The University College of London Hospitals NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
,
Fares Haddad
1   Department of Orthopaedics, The University College of London Hospitals NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the functional and radiographic outcomes of arthroscopic single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using either the anteromedial (AM) portal technique or transtibial (TT) technique. We identified 404 patients who underwent arthroscopic ACLR by a single surgeon between January 2006 and December 2016 at our institution. The TT portal was utilized in femoral tunnel drilling in 202 patients (TT group) while the AM portal was used in 202 patients (AM group). The mean postoperative follow-up duration was 26 months (range: 24–33 months). Postoperative radiographic femoral and tibial tunnel positions were assessed by two independent observers. Functional outcomes were evaluated with Tegner, Lysholm, and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome score (KOOS) scores. On the anteroposterior plain radiographs, the mean femoral tunnel position relative to the lateral femoral condyle was 46.8% for the AM group versus 48.6% in the TT group, respectively (p=0.003). The mean graft inclination angle was 31.9° and 22° in the AM and TT groups, respectively (p<0.0001). On the lateral radiographs, the mean femoral tunnel placement across Blumensaat's line in relation to the anterior femoral cortex was 84% in the AM group while it was 78% in the TT group (p<0.0001). At 2 years postoperatively, there were no significant differences in the mean Tegner, Lysholm, and KOOS scores between the two patient groups. The graft failure rate at 2 years follow-up was 4.5% (n=9) in the AM group while it was 2.5% (n=5) in the TT group (p=0.2). Femoral tunnel placement was more anatomical with the AM portal technique compared with the TT technique. However, there was no significant difference in postoperative functional outcomes between the two patient groups. The AM portal technique appears to have a higher graft failure rate. This might be attributed to increased graft loading in an anatomical position.

Keywords

anterior cruciate - anteromedial - transtibial - anterior cruciate ligament

Level of Evidence

Level III, retrospective review.




Publication History

Received: 30 August 2020

Accepted: 19 June 2022

Article published online:
08 September 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Gianotti SM, Marshall SW, Hume PA, Bunt L. Incidence of anterior cruciate ligament injury and other knee ligament injuries: a national population-based study. J Sci Med Sport 2009; 12 (06) 622-627
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Parkkari J, Pasanen K, Mattila VM, Kannus P, Rimpelä A. The risk for a cruciate ligament injury of the knee in adolescents and young adults: a population-based cohort study of 46 500 people with a 9 year follow-up. Br J Sports Med 2008; 42 (06) 422-426
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Cha PS, Brucker PU, West RV. et al. Arthroscopic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an anatomic approach. Arthroscopy 2005; 21 (10) 1275
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Musahl V, Plakseychuk A, VanScyoc A. et al. Varying femoral tunnels between the anatomical footprint and isometric positions: effect on kinematics of the anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knee. Am J Sports Med 2005; 33 (05) 712-718
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Sohn DH, Garrett Jr WE. Transitioning to anatomic anterior cruciate ligament graft placement. J Knee Surg 2009; 22 (02) 155-160
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Howell SM, Clark JA. Tibial tunnel placement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions and graft impingement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1992; 283 (283): 187-195
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Howell SM, Taylor MA. Failure of reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament due to impingement by the intercondylar roof. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1993; 75 (07) 1044-1055
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Carson EW, Anisko EM, Restrepo C, Panariello RA, O'Brien SJ, Warren RF. Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: etiology of failures and clinical results. J Knee Surg 2004; 17 (03) 127-132
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Diamantopoulos AP, Lorbach O, Paessler HH. Anterior cruciate ligament revision reconstruction: results in 107 patients. Am J Sports Med 2008; 36 (05) 851-860
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Marchant BG, Noyes FR, Barber-Westin SD, Fleckenstein C. Prevalence of nonanatomical graft placement in a series of failed anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Am J Sports Med 2010; 38 (10) 1987-1996
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Hosseini A, Lodhia P, Van de Velde SK. et al. Tunnel position and graft orientation in failed anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a clinical and imaging analysis. Int Orthop 2012; 36 (04) 845-852
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Kamath GV, Redfern JC, Greis PE, Burks RT. Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 2011; 39 (01) 199-217
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Pinczewski LA, Salmon LJ, Jackson WF, von Bormann RB, Haslam PG, Tashiro S. Radiological landmarks for placement of the tunnels in single-bundle reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008; 90 (02) 172-179
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Woo SL, Kanamori A, Zeminski J, Yagi M, Papageorgiou C, Fu FH. The effectiveness of reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with hamstrings and patellar tendon. A cadaveric study comparing anterior tibial and rotational loads. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002; 84 (06) 907-914
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Ristanis S, Giakas G, Papageorgiou CD, Moraiti T, Stergiou N, Georgoulis AD. The effects of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on tibial rotation during pivoting after descending stairs. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2003; 11 (06) 360-365
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Yagi M, Wong EK, Kanamori A, Debski RE, Fu FH, Woo SL. Biomechanical analysis of an anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 2002; 30 (05) 660-666
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Scopp JM, Jasper LE, Belkoff SM, Moorman III CT. The effect of oblique femoral tunnel placement on rotational constraint of the knee reconstructed using patellar tendon autografts. Arthroscopy 2004; 20 (03) 294-299
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Markolf KL, Jackson SR, McAllister DR. A comparison of 11 o'clock versus oblique femoral tunnels in the anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knee: knee kinematics during a simulated pivot test. Am J Sports Med 2010; 38 (05) 912-917
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Bedi A, Raphael B, Maderazo A, Pavlov H, Williams III RJ. Transtibial versus anteromedial portal drilling for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cadaveric study of femoral tunnel length and obliquity. Arthroscopy 2010; 26 (03) 342-350
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Steiner ME. Independent drilling of tibial and femoral tunnels in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Knee Surg 2009; 22 (02) 171-176
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Harner CD, Honkamp NJ, Ranawat AS. Anteromedial portal technique for creating the anterior cruciate ligament femoral tunnel. Arthroscopy 2008; 24 (01) 113-115
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Gavriilidis I, Motsis EK, Pakos EE, Georgoulis AD, Mitsionis G, Xenakis TA. Transtibial versus anteromedial portal of the femoral tunnel in ACL reconstruction: a cadaveric study. Knee 2008; 15 (05) 364-367
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Tudisco C, Bisicchia S. Drilling the femoral tunnel during ACL reconstruction: transtibial versus anteromedial portal techniques. Orthopedics 2012; 35 (08) e1166-e1172
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Franceschi F, Papalia R, Rizzello G, Del Buono A, Maffulli N, Denaro V. Anteromedial portal versus transtibial drilling techniques in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: any clinical relevance? A retrospective comparative study. Arthroscopy 2013; 29 (08) 1330-1337
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Chalmers PN, Mall NA, Cole BJ, Verma NN, Bush-Joseph CA, Bach Jr BR. Anteromedial versus transtibial tunnel drilling in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions: a systematic review. Arthroscopy 2013; 29 (07) 1235-1242
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Robin BN, Jani SS, Marvil SC, Reid JB, Schillhammer CK, Lubowitz JH. Advantages and disadvantages of transtibial, anteromedial portal, and outside-in femoral tunnel drilling in single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review. Arthroscopy 2015; 31 (07) 1412-1417
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Roos EM, Roos HP, Lohmander LS, Ekdahl C, Beynnon BD. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)–development of a self-administered outcome measure. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1998; 28 (02) 88-96
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Tegner Y, Lysholm J. Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1985; Sep;(198): 43-49
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Loh JC, Fukuda Y, Tsuda E, Steadman RJ, Fu FH, Woo SL. Knee stability and graft function following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparison between 11 o'clock and 10 o'clock femoral tunnel placement. 2002 Richard O'Connor Award paper. Arthroscopy 2003; 19 (03) 297-304
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Stevenson III WW, Johnson DL. “Vertical grafts”: a common reason for functional failure after ACL reconstruction. Orthopedics 2007; 30 (03) 206-209
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Amis AA. The functions of the fibre bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament in anterior drawer, rotational laxity and the pivot shift. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2012; 20 (04) 613-620
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Noh JH, Roh YH, Yang BG, Yi SR, Lee SY. Femoral tunnel position on conventional magnetic resonance imaging after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in young men: transtibial technique versus anteromedial portal technique. Arthroscopy 2013; 29 (05) 882-890
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Hussein M, van Eck CF, Cretnik A, Dinevski D, Fu FH. Prospective randomized clinical evaluation of conventional single-bundle, anatomic single-bundle, and anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: 281 cases with 3- to 5-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 2012; 40 (03) 512-520
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Rahr-Wagner L, Thillemann TM, Pedersen AB, Lind MC. Increased risk of revision after anteromedial compared with transtibial drilling of the femoral tunnel during primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: results from the Danish Knee Ligament Reconstruction Register. Arthroscopy 2013; 29 (01) 98-105
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 35 Desai N, Andernord D, Sundemo D. et al. Revision surgery in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cohort study of 17,682 patients from the Swedish National Knee Ligament Register. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2017; 25 (05) 1542-1554
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 36 Araujo PH, Asai S, Pinto M. et al. ACL graft position affects in situ graft force following ACL reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2015; 97 (21) 1767-1773
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 37 Brown Jr CH, Spalding T, Robb C. Medial portal technique for single-bundle anatomical anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Int Orthop 2013; 37 (02) 253-269
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 38 George MS. Femoral tunnel drilling from the anteromedial portal using the figure-4 position in ACL reconstruction. Orthopedics 2012; 35 (08) 674-677
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 39 Logan JS, Elliot RR, Wilson AJ. TransLateral ACL reconstruction: a technique for anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2012; 20 (07) 1289-1292
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 40 Clockaerts S, Van Haver A, Verhaegen J. et al. Transportal femoral drilling creates more horizontal ACL graft orientation compared to transtibial drilling: A 3D CT imaging study. Knee 2016; 23 (03) 412-419
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 41 Bowers AL, Bedi A, Lipman JD. et al. Comparison of anterior cruciate ligament tunnel position and graft obliquity with transtibial and anteromedial portal femoral tunnel reaming techniques using high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging. Arthroscopy 2011; 27 (11) 1511-1522
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar