Can Pelvic Orientation Be Accurately Predicted Using One Radiographic View Alone?

Abstract

Pelvic positioning during total hip arthroplasty (THA) can affect the functional position of the acetabular component. A comprehensive understanding of pelvic orientation before THA is necessary to allow for proper cup positioning and mitigate the risks of postoperative complications. Measurements using anteroposterior (AP) radiographs have been described as an effective means of accurately predicting pelvic functional orientation. The purpose of our study was to describe the accuracy of assessing pelvic tilt using AP radiographs alone. An online survey was created and sent to a cohort of fellowship-trained adult reconstruction (AR) surgeons. The survey consisted of 65 standing AP pelvis radiographs. Participants were asked to score each radiograph as (1) anterior pelvic tilt more than 10 degrees, (2) posterior pelvic tilt more than 10 degrees, or (3) neutral. Responses were then compared with measurements of pelvic tilt made on lateral standing pelvic radiographs. Demographic data, such as country of practice, surgical volume, surgical approach, familiarity with spinopelvic mobility, and planning with spinopelvic mobility were evaluated. Categorical variables were compared using chi-squared analysis and analysis of variance. Continuous variables were assessed using unpaired, two-tailed Student's t-tests. A total of 45 surgeons completed the survey. The average correct predictive value of pelvic tilt between all surgeons was 53.2%. Of the responding surgeons, 51.2% performed greater than 100 cases per year. Fifty percent of surgeons reported that they were “not so familiar” or “somewhat familiar” with the principles of spinopelvic mobility. Also, 43.5% of surgeons reported that they did not routinely use spinopelvic mobility principles in THA planning. Pelvic orientation before THA is poorly predicted in our cohort of surveyed fellowship-trained AR surgeons with standing AP pelvis radiographs alone. Given the limited understanding of these principles within our cohort, preoperative evaluation of spinopelvic parameters with AP radiographs may require supplementation with lateral pelvic views to ensure detailed assessment and accurate preoperative planning. This is a prospective survey study and reflects level of evidence II.

Keywords

pelvic tilt - total hip arthroplasty - anteroposterior radiographs - lateral radiographs - preoperative planning

Publication History

Received: 03 February 2022

Accepted: 05 June 2022

Article published online:
26 October 2022

• References

• 1 Ike H, Dorr LD, Trasolini N, Stefl M, McKnight B, Heckmann N. Spine-pelvis-hip relationship in the functioning of a total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2018; 100 (18) 1606-1615
• 2 Lazennec JY, Rousseau MA, Rangel A. et al. Pelvis and total hip arthroplasty acetabular component orientations in sitting and standing positions: measurements reproductibility with EOS imaging system versus conventional radiographies. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2011; 97 (04) 373-380
• 3 Kanawade V, Dorr LD, Wan Z. Predictability of acetabular component angular change with postural shift from standing to sitting position. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014; 96 (12) 978-986
• 4 DelSole EM, Vigdorchik JM, Schwarzkopf R, Errico TJ, Buckland AJ. Total hip arthroplasty in the spinal deformity population: does degree of sagittal deformity affect rates of safe zone placement, instability, or revision?. J Arthroplasty 2017; 32 (06) 1910-1917
• 5 Phan D, Bederman SS, Schwarzkopf R. The influence of sagittal spinal deformity on anteversion of the acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 2015; 97-B [phone]
• 6 Lazennec J-Y, Brusson A, Rousseau M-A. Hip-spine relations and sagittal balance clinical consequences. Eur Spine J 2011; 20 (Suppl. 05) 686-698
• 7 Buckland AJ, Puvanesarajah V, Vigdorchik J. et al. Dislocation of a primary total hip arthroplasty is more common in patients with a lumbar spinal fusion. Bone Joint J 2017; 99-B [phone]
• 8 Perfetti DC, Schwarzkopf R, Buckland AJ, Paulino CB, Vigdorchik JM. Prosthetic dislocation and revision after primary total hip arthroplasty in lumbar fusion patients: a propensity score matched-pair analysis. J Arthroplasty 2017; 32 (05) 1635-1640.e1
• 9 Lembeck B, Mueller O, Reize P, Wuelker N. Pelvic tilt makes acetabular cup navigation inaccurate. Acta Orthop 2005; 76 (04) 517-523
• 10 Widmer K-H. A simplified method to determine acetabular cup anteversion from plain radiographs. J Arthroplasty 2004; 19 (03) 387-390
• 11 Pradhan R. Planar anteversion of the acetabular cup as determined from plain anteroposterior radiographs. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1999; 81 (03) 431-435
• 12 Fabeck L, Farrokh D, Tolley M, Descamps PY, Gebhart M, Delincé P. A method to measure acetabular cup anteversion after total hip replacement. Acta Orthop Belg 1999; 65 (04) 485-491
• 13 Thorén B, Sahlstedt B. Influence of pelvic position on radiographic measurements of the prosthetic acetabular component. An experimental study on a pelvic model. Acta Radiol 1990; 31 (02) 133-136
• 14 Tannast M, Murphy SB, Langlotz F, Anderson SE, Siebenrock KA. Estimation of pelvic tilt on anteroposterior X-rays–a comparison of six parameters. Skeletal Radiol 2006; 35 (03) 149-155
• 15 Kojima A, Nakagawa T, Tohkura A. Simulation of acetabular coverage of femoral head using anteroposterior pelvic radiographs. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1998; 117 (6-7): 330-336
• 16 Konishi N, Mieno T. Determination of acetabular coverage of the femoral head with use of a single anteroposterior radiograph. A new computerized technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993; 75 (09) 1318-1333 PubMed
• 17 Putnam SM, Clohisy JC, Nepple JJ. Do changes in pelvic rotation and tilt affect measurement of the anterior center edge angle on false profile radiographs? A cadaveric study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2019; 477 (05) 1066-1072
• 18 Buckland A, DelSole E, George S. et al. Sagittal pelvic orientation a comparison of two methods of measurement. Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013) 2017; 75 (04) 234-240
• 19 Blondel B, Schwab F, Patel A. et al. Sacro-femoral-pubic angle: a coronal parameter to estimate pelvic tilt. Eur Spine J 2012; 21 (04) 719-724
• 20 Lazennec JY, Charlot N, Gorin M. et al. Hip-spine relationship: a radio-anatomical study for optimization in acetabular cup positioning. Surg Radiol Anat 2004; 26 (02) 136-144
• 21 Luthringer TA, Vigdorchik JM. A preoperative workup of a “hip-spine” total hip arthroplasty patient: a simplified approach to a complex problem. J Arthroplasty 2019; 34 (7S): S57-S70
• 22 Schwarz T, Benditz A, Springorum H-R. et al. Assessment of pelvic tilt in anteroposterior radiographs by means of tilt ratios. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2018; 138 (08) 1045-1052
• 23 Lazennec JY, Riwan A, Gravez F. et al. Hip spine relationships: application to total hip arthroplasty. Hip Int 2007; 17 (Suppl. 05) S91-S104 PubMed
• 24 Lewinnek GE, Lewis JL, Tarr R, Compere CL, Zimmerman JR. Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1978; 60 (02) 217-220
• 25 Lazennec JY, Thauront F, Robbins CB, Pour AE. Acetabular and femoral anteversions in standing position are outside the proposed safe zone after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2017; 32 (11) 3550-3556
• 26 Pierrepont J, Hawdon G, Miles BP. et al. Variation in functional pelvic tilt in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 2017; 99-B [phone]
• 27 Langston J, Pierrepont J, Gu Y, Shimmin A. Risk factors for increased sagittal pelvic motion causing unfavourable orientation of the acetabular component in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 2018; 100-B [phone]
• 28 Buckland AJ, Vigdorchik J, Schwab FJ. et al. Acetabular anteversion changes due to spinal deformity correction: bridging the gap between hip and spine surgeons. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2015; 97 (23) 1913-1920