PDF herunterladen
Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2018; 143(14): 1039-1049
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-110020
CME-Fortbildung
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Volumenmanagement bei Sepsis und septischer Schock

Fluid Resuscitation and Management in Patients with Sepsis and Septic Shock
Matthias Kochanek
,
Boris Böll
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
13. Juli 2018 (online)

Auch verfügbar auf
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Sepsis and septic shock are common diseases with high mortality rates. Although volume therapy has been a central component of sepsis therapy for decades, the choice of optimal fluid and fluid intake is unclear. This paper summarizes findings on pathophysiology, clinical trial results, and current recommendations for optimal volume and fluid management in sepsis.

Sepsis und septischer Schock sind häufige Krankheitsbilder mit unverändert hoher Mortalität. Obwohl die Volumentherapie seit Jahrzehnten zentraler Bestandteil der Sepsistherapie ist, ist die Wahl der optimalen Flüssigkeit und Menge der Flüssigkeitszufuhr ungeklärt. Dieser Beitrag fasst Erkenntnisse zur Pathophysiologie, Ergebnisse klinischer Studien und aktuelle Empfehlungen zum optimalen Volumen- und Flüssigkeitsmanagement bei Sepsis zusammen.

Schlüsselwörter

Sepsis - Flüssigkeitsmanagement - septischer Schock - Organdysfunktion

Key words

sepsis - fluid management - septic shock - organ dysfunction
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW. et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA 2016; 315: 801-810 . doi:10.1001/jama.2016.0287
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 2 Vincent JL, Martin GS, Levy MM. qSOFA does not replace SIRS in the definition of sepsis. Crit Care 2016; 20: 210 . doi:10.1186/s13054-016-1389-z
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 3 Martin GS, Mannino DM, Eaton S. et al. The epidemiology of sepsis in the United States from 1979 through 2000. N Engl J Med 2003; 348: 1546-1554 . doi:10.1056/NEJMoa022139
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 4 Vincent JL, Sakr Y, Sprung CL. et al. Sepsis in European intensive care units: Results of the SOAP study. Crit Care Med 2006; 34: 344-353 . doi:10.1097/01.CCM.0000194725.48928.3A
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 5 Fleischmann C, Thomas-Rueddel DO, Hartmann M. et al. Hospital incidence and mortality rates of sepsis. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2016; 113: 159-166 . doi:10.3238/arztebl.2016.0159
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 6 Thijs LG, Schneider AJ, Groeneveld AB. The haemodynamics of septic shock. Intensive Care Med 1990; 16 (03) S182-S186
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 7 Kakihana Y, Ito T, Nakahara M. et al. Sepsis-induced myocardial dysfunction: pathophysiology and management. J Intensive Care 2016; 4: 22 . doi:10.1186/s40560-016-0148-1
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 8 Russell JA, Rush B, Boyd J. Pathophysiology of septic shock. Crit Care Clin 2018; 34: 43-61 . doi:10.1016/j.ccc.2017.08.005
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 9 Cobb JP, Danner RL. Nitric oxide and septic shock. JAMA 1996; 275: 1192-1196
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 10 Zardi EM, Zardi DM, Dobrina A. et al. Prostacyclin in sepsis: a systematic review. Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat 2007; 83: 1-24 . doi:10.1016/j.prostaglandins.2006.12.004
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 11 Bernard GR, Wheeler AP, Russell JA. et al. The effects of ibuprofen on the physiology and survival of patients with sepsis. N Engl J Med 1997; 336: 912-918 . doi:10.1056/NEJM199703273361303
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 12 Wagner K, Wachter U, Vogt JA. et al. Adrenomedullin binding improves catecholamine responsiveness and kidney function in resuscitated murine septic shock. Intensive Care Med Exp 2013; 1: 21 . doi:10.1186/2197-425X-1-2
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 13 Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S. et al. Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 1368-1377 . doi:10.1056/NEJMoa010307
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 14 Lilly CM. The ProCESS Trial – A new era of sepsis management. N Engl J Med 2014; 370: 1750-1751 . doi:10.1056/NEJMe1402564
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 15 Maitland K, Kiguli S, Opoka RO. et al. Mortality after fluid bolus in African children with severe infection. N Engl J Med 2011; 364: 2483-2495 . doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1101549
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 16 Byrne L, Van Haren F. Fluid resuscitation in human sepsis: Time to rewrite history?. Ann Intensive Care 2017; 7: 4 . doi:10.1186/s13613-016-0231-8
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 17 Rhodes A, Evans LE, Alhazzani W. et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016. Intensive Care Med 2017; 43: 304-377 . doi:10.1007/s00134-017-4683-6
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 18 Marx G. S3-Leitlinie Intravasale Volumentherapie beim Erwachsenen. 2014 AWMF Registernummer 001–020. Im Internet: http://www.awmf.org/leitlinien/detail/ll/001-020.html ; Stand: 05.06.2018
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 19 Monnet X, Marik PE, Teboul JL. Prediction of fluid responsiveness: an update. Ann Intensive Care 2016; 6: 111 . doi:10.1186/s13613-016-0216-7
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 20 Marik PE, Cavallazzi R. Does the central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? An updated meta-analysis and a plea for some common sense. Crit Care Med 2013; 41: 1774-1781 . doi:10.1097/CCM.0b013e31828a25fd
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 21 Rhodes A, Evans LE, Alhazzani W. et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016. Crit Care Med 2017; 45: 486-552 . doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000002255
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 22 Cecconi M, De Backer D, Antonelli M. et al. Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med 2014; 40: 1795-1815 . doi:10.1007/s00134-014-3525-z
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 23 Saugel B, Huber W, Nierhaus A. et al. Advanced hemodynamic management in patients with septic shock. Biomed Res Int 2016; 2016: 8268569 . doi:10.1155/2016/8268569
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 24 Raghunathan K, Shaw A, Nathanson B. et al. Association between the choice of IV crystalloid and in-hospital mortality among critically ill adults with sepsis*. Crit Care Med 2014; 42: 1585-1591 . doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000000305
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 25 Semler MW, Self WH, Wanderer JP. et al. Balanced crystalloids versus saline in critically ill adults. N Engl J Med 2018; 378: 829-839 . doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1711584
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 26 Finfer S, Bellomo R, Boyce N. et al. A comparison of albumin and saline for fluid resuscitation in the intensive care unit. N Engl J Med 2004; 350: 2247-2256 . doi:10.1056/NEJMoa040232
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 27 Patel A, Laffan MA, Waheed U. et al. Randomised trials of human albumin for adults with sepsis: systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of all-cause mortality. BMJ 2014; 349: g4561 . doi:10.1136/bmj.g4561
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 28 Perel P, Roberts I, Ker K. Colloids versus crystalloids for fluid resuscitation in critically ill patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 2: CD000567 . doi:10.1002/14651858.CD000567.pub6
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 29 Jiang L, Jiang S, Zhang M. et al. Albumin versus other fluids for fluid resuscitation in patients with sepsis: a meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 2014; 9: e114666 . doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0114666
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 30 Ferrer R, Mateu X, Maseda E. et al. Non-oncotic properties of albumin. A multidisciplinary vision about the implications for critically ill patients. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol 2018; 11: 125-137 . doi:10.1080/17512433.2018.1412827
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 31 Semler MW, Rice TW. Sepsis resuscitation: fluid choice and dose. Clin Chest Med 2016; 37: 241-250 . doi:10.1016/j.ccm.2016.01.007
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 32 Moeller C, Fleischmann C, Thomas-Rueddel D. et al. How safe is gelatin? A systematic review and meta-analysis of gelatin-containing plasma expanders vs crystalloids and albumin. J Crit Care 2016; 35: 75-83 . doi:10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.04.011
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 33 Yealy DM, Kellum JA, Huang DT. et al. A randomized trial of protocol-based care for early septic shock. N Engl J Med 2014; 370: 1683-1693 . doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1401602
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 34 Mouncey PR, Osborn TM, Power GS. et al. Trial of early, goal-directed resuscitation for septic shock. N Engl J Med 2015; 372: 1301-1311 . doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1500896
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 35 Peake SL. ARISE Investigators, ANZICS Clinical Trials Group. et al. Goal-directed resuscitation for patients with early septic shock. N Engl J Med 2014; 371: 1496-1506 . doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1404380
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 36 Vignon P, Repesse X, Bégot E. et al. Comparison of echocardiographic indices used to predict fluid responsiveness in ventilated patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2017; 195: 1022-1032 . doi:10.1164/rccm.201604-0844OC
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar