Semin intervent Radiol 2023; 40(02): 247-252
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1768679
Back to Basics

Understanding the Basics of Commonly Used Catheters in Interventional Radiology

Ramzy C. Khabbaz
1   Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
,
Kovas Polikaitis
1   Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
,
Matthew M. Niemeyer
1   Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
› Author Affiliations

The field of interventional radiology (IR) continues to grow necessitating the development of a rapidly expanding variety of tools and devices. Given the scope of the interventional armamentarium, it is essential that trainees be intimately familiar with the basic tools at their disposal and understand the appropriate situations in which to deploy them. In addition to operator's comfort, thorough knowledge of the “back table” is a known factor in mitigating poor outcomes.[1] [2] Despite this, there is a general paucity of resources detailing the variety of options and use cases available for various vascular catheters. Apart from special-use models, a majority of physician familiarity with catheters is obtained on the job. Herein, we aim to provide a “big-picture” view of vascular catheters used in day-to-day practice.



Publication History

Article published online:
16 June 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Higgins MCSS, Herpy JP. Medical error, adverse events, and complications in interventional radiology: liability or opportunity?. Radiology 2021; 298 (02) 275-283
  • 2 Morbi AH, Hamady MS, Riga CV. et al. Reducing error and improving efficiency during vascular interventional radiology: implementation of a preprocedural team rehearsal. Radiology 2012; 264 (02) 473-483
  • 3 Seldinger SI. Catheter replacement of the needle in percutaneous arteriography; a new technique. Acta Radiol 1953; 39 (05) 368-376
  • 4 Higgs ZC, Macafee DA, Braithwaite BD, Maxwell-Armstrong CA. The Seldinger technique: 50 years on. Lancet 2005; 366 (9494): 1407-140
  • 5 Payne MM. Charles Theodore Dotter. The father of intervention. Tex Heart Inst J 2001; 28 (01) 28-38
  • 6 Friedman SG. Charles Dotter and the fiftieth anniversary of endovascular surgery. J Vasc Surg 2015; 61 (02) 556-558
  • 7 Kaufman JA, Lee MJ. Vascular and Interventional Radiology: The Requisites. 2nd ed.. Elsevier/Saunders; 2014
  • 8 Kessel D, Robertson I. Interventional Radiology: A Survival Guide. 4th ed.. Elsevier; 2017. :vi, 411pp
  • 9 Athanasoulis CA. Vascular radiology: looking into the past to learn about the future. Radiology 2001; 218 (02) 317-322
  • 10 Lin CJ, Blanc R, Clarençon F. et al. Overlying fluoroscopy and preacquired CT angiography for road-mapping in cerebral angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010; 31 (03) 494-495
  • 11 Sousa JE, Costa MA, Tuzcu EM, Yadav JS, Ellis S. New frontiers in interventional cardiology. Circulation 2005; 111 (05) 671-681
  • 12 Andrews RT. Contrast peripheral phlebography and pulmonary angiography for diagnosis of thromboembolism. Circulation 2004; 109 (12, Suppl 1): I22-I27
  • 13 Benenati JF, Becker GJ, Mail JT, Holden RW. Digital subtraction venography in central venous obstruction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1986; 147 (04) 685-688
  • 14 Hilbish TF, Morrow AG. Why selective angiography? Technic and applications in the preoperative evaluation of patients with congenital and acquired heart disease. Radiology 1958; 71 (05) 683-694
  • 15 Ayella R. An ideal catheter: the simple curve. Vasc Surg 1975; 9 (03) 147-150
  • 16 Beranbaum ER, Abrams RM. Versatile catheter tip for selective angiography. Radiology 1966; 86 (01) 132-134
  • 17 Smith DC, Simmons CR. The quick aortic turn: a rapid method for reformation of the Simmons sidewinder catheter. Radiology 1985; 155 (01) 247-248
  • 18 Arepally A, Chomas J, Kraitchman D, Hong K. Quantification and reduction of reflux during embolotherapy using an antireflux catheter and tantalum microspheres: ex vivo analysis. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2013; 24 (04) 575-580
  • 19 Isaacson AJ, Hartman TS, Bagla S, Burke CT. Initial experience with balloon-occlusion prostatic artery embolization. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2018; 29 (01) 85-89
  • 20 Pasciak AS, McElmurray JH, Bourgeois AC, Heidel RE, Bradley YC. The impact of an antireflux catheter on target volume particulate distribution in liver-directed embolotherapy: a pilot study. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2015; 26 (05) 660-669
  • 21 Weiss CR, Fu Y, Beh C. et al. Bariatric arterial embolization with calibrated radiopaque microspheres and an antireflux catheter suppresses weight gain and appetite-stimulating hormones in swine. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2020; 31 (09) 1483-1491
  • 22 Boeken T, Gautier A, Moussa N. et al. Impact of anatomy type of prostatic artery on the number of catheters needed for prostatic artery embolization. Diagn Interv Imaging 2021; 102 (03) 147-152
  • 23 Hoffmann JC, Minkin J, Primiano N, Yun J, Eweka A. Use of a steerable microcatheter during superselective angiography: impact on radiation exposure and procedural efficiency. CVIR Endovasc 2019; 2 (01) 35
  • 24 Soyama T, Yoshida D, Sakuhara Y, Morita R, Abo D, Kudo K. The steerable microcatheter: a new device for selective catheterisation. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2017; 40 (06) 947-952