Clin Colon Rectal Surg
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1770710
Review Article

Chemoradiation, Consolidation Chemotherapy, and Watch and Wait for Early Rectal Cancer

Carlos Cerdan-Santacruz
1   Colorectal Surgery Department, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Madrid, Spain
,
Guilherme Pagin São Julião
2   Division of Colorectal Surgery, Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz, São Paulo, Brazil
,
Bruna Borba Vailati
2   Division of Colorectal Surgery, Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz, São Paulo, Brazil
,
Rodrigo Oliva Perez
2   Division of Colorectal Surgery, Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz, São Paulo, Brazil
3   Department of Surgical Oncology, Hospital Beneficencia Portuguesa, São Paulo, Brazil
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

As watch and wait has become an attractive management alternative among patients with rectal cancer who achieve a clinical complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation, the focus of organ preservation has now shifted toward the use of this approach in patients with early rectal cancer. These patients would otherwise be treated without the use of neoadjuvant therapy for oncological reasons. The sole purpose of any neoadjuvant treatment here would be the achievement of a complete clinical response in an attempt to avoid total mesorectal excision. This has become particularly interesting after the incorporation of total neoadjuvant therapy regimens. These regimens have resulted in significantly higher rates of complete tumor regression and therefore become an interesting alternative among early rectal cancer patients where organ preservation is desired. The present review provides an overview of the currently available evidence and the preliminary experience with this rather controversial approach.



Publication History

Article published online:
11 August 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Habr-Gama A, Perez RO, Nadalin W. et al. Operative versus nonoperative treatment for stage 0 distal rectal cancer following chemoradiation therapy: long-term results. Ann Surg 2004; 240 (04) 711-717 , discussion 717–718
  • 2 Chadi SA, Malcomson L, Ensor J. et al. Factors affecting local regrowth after watch and wait for patients with a clinical complete response following chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer (InterCoRe consortium): an individual participant data meta-analysis. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018; 3 (12) 825-836
  • 3 Patel SA, Chen YH, Hornick JL. et al. Early-stage rectal cancer: clinical and pathologic prognostic markers of time to local recurrence and overall survival after resection. Dis Colon Rectum 2014; 57 (04) 449-459
  • 4 Stornes T, Wibe A, Nesbakken A, Myklebust TÅ, Endreseth BH. National early rectal cancer treatment revisited. Dis Colon Rectum 2016; 59 (07) 623-629
  • 5 Balyasnikova S, Read J, Wotherspoon A. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of high-resolution MRI as a method to predict potentially safe endoscopic and surgical planes in patients with early rectal cancer. BMJ Open Gastroenterol 2017; 4 (01) e000151
  • 6 Wada Y, Kashida H, Kudo SE, Misawa M, Ikehara N, Hamatani S. Diagnostic accuracy of pit pattern and vascular pattern analyses in colorectal lesions. Dig Endosc 2010; 22 (03) 192-199
  • 7 Cercek A, Lumish M, Sinopoli J. et al. PD-1 blockade in mismatch repair-deficient, locally advanced rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2022; 386 (25) 2363-2376
  • 8 Bach SP, Hill J, Monson JR. et al; Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery (TEM) Collaboration. A predictive model for local recurrence after transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 2009; 96 (03) 280-290
  • 9 Moran BJ, Holm T, Brannagan G. et al. The English national low rectal cancer development programme: key messages and future perspectives. Colorectal Dis 2014; 16 (03) 173-178
  • 10 Denost Q, Moreau JB, Vendrely V. et al. Intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: the risk is functional rather than oncological. A 25-year experience from Bordeaux. Colorectal Dis 2020; 22 (11) 1603-1613
  • 11 Kitaguchi D, Hasegawa H, Teramura K. et al. Comparison of postoperative anorectal function between hand-sewn and stapled anastomoses in intersphincteric resection with transanal total mesorectal excision. Br J Surg 2023; 110 (03) 375-376
  • 12 Vailati BB, São Julião GP, Habr-Gama A, Perez RO. Nonoperative management of rectal cancer: the watch and wait strategy. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2022; 31 (02) 171-182
  • 13 Garcia-Aguilar J, Renfro LA, Chow OS. et al. Organ preservation for clinical T2N0 distal rectal cancer using neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and local excision (ACOSOG Z6041): results of an open-label, single-arm, multi-institutional, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 2015; 16 (15) 1537-1546
  • 14 Habr-Gama A, São Julião GP, Fernandez LM. et al. Achieving a complete clinical response after neoadjuvant chemoradiation that does not require surgical resection: it may take longer than you think!. Dis Colon Rectum 2019; 62 (07) 802-808
  • 15 Cercek A, Roxburgh CSD, Strombom P. et al. Adoption of total neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer. JAMA Oncol 2018; 4 (06) e180071
  • 16 Habr-Gama A, Sabbaga J, Gama-Rodrigues J. et al. Watch and wait approach following extended neoadjuvant chemoradiation for distal rectal cancer: are we getting closer to anal cancer management?. Dis Colon Rectum 2013; 56 (10) 1109-1117
  • 17 Habr-Gama A, São Julião GP, Vailati BB. et al. Organ preservation in cT2N0 rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy: the impact of radiation therapy dose-escalation and consolidation chemotherapy. Ann Surg 2019; 269 (01) 102-107
  • 18 Chin RI, Roy A, Pedersen KS. et al. Clinical complete response in patients with rectal adenocarcinoma treated with short-course radiation therapy and nonoperative management. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022; 112 (03) 715-725
  • 19 Bahadoer RR, Dijkstra EA, van Etten B. et al; RAPIDO collaborative investigators. Short-course radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy before total mesorectal excision (TME) versus preoperative chemoradiotherapy, TME, and optional adjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer (RAPIDO): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2021; 22 (01) 29-42
  • 20 Dijkstra EA, Nilsson PJ, Hospers GAP. et al; and collaborative investigators. Locoregional failure during and after short-course radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy and surgery compared to long-course chemoradiotherapy and surgery - a five-year follow-up of the RAPIDO Trial. Ann Surg 2023
  • 21 van der Valk MJM, Marijnen CAM, van Etten B. et al; Collaborative investigators. Compliance and tolerability of short-course radiotherapy followed by preoperative chemotherapy and surgery for high-risk rectal cancer - results of the international randomized RAPIDO-trial. Radiother Oncol 2020; 147: 75-83
  • 22 Fokas E, Appelt A, Glynne-Jones R. et al. International consensus recommendations on key outcome measures for organ preservation after (chemo)radiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2021; 18 (12) 805-816
  • 23 Fokas E, Allgäuer M, Polat B. et al; German Rectal Cancer Study Group. Randomized phase II trial of chemoradiotherapy plus induction or consolidation chemotherapy as total neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: CAO/ARO/AIO-12. J Clin Oncol 2019; 37 (34) 3212-3222
  • 24 Garcia-Aguilar J, Patil S, Gollub MJ. et al. Organ preservation in patients with rectal adenocarcinoma treated with total neoadjuvant therapy. J Clin Oncol 2022; 40 (23) 2546-2556
  • 25 Sun R, Dai Z, Zhang Y, Lu J, Zhang Y, Xiao Y. The incidence and risk factors of low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) after sphincter-preserving surgery of rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Support Care Cancer 2021; 29 (12) 7249-7258
  • 26 Emile SH, Khan SM, Garoufalia Z. et al. When is a diverting stoma indicated after low anterior resection? A meta-analysis of randomized trials and meta-regression of the risk factors of leakage and complications in non-diverted patients. J Gastrointest Surg 2022; 26 (11) 2368-2379
  • 27 Rullier E, Rouanet P, Tuech JJ. et al. Organ preservation for rectal cancer (GRECCAR 2): a prospective, randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2017; 390 (10093): 469-479
  • 28 van der Valk MJM, Hilling DE, Bastiaannet E. et al; IWWD Consortium. Long-term outcomes of clinical complete responders after neoadjuvant treatment for rectal cancer in the International Watch & Wait Database (IWWD): an international multicentre registry study. Lancet 2018; 391 (10139): 2537-2545
  • 29 Habr-Gama A, Perez RO, Proscurshim I. et al. Interval between surgery and neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy for distal rectal cancer: does delayed surgery have an impact on outcome?. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2008; 71 (04) 1181-1188
  • 30 Fernandez LM, Figueiredo NL, Habr-Gama A. et al. Salvage surgery with organ preservation for patients with local regrowth after watch and wait: is it still possible?. Dis Colon Rectum 2020; 63 (08) 1053-1062
  • 31 Fernandez LM, São Julião GP, Figueiredo NL. et al; International Watch & Wait Database Consortium. Conditional recurrence-free survival of clinical complete responders managed by watch and wait after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer in the International Watch & Wait Database: a retrospective, international, multicentre registry study. Lancet Oncol 2021; 22 (01) 43-50
  • 32 Fernandez LM, São Julião GP, Renehan AG. et al; International Watch & Wait Database (IWWD) Consortium. The risk of distant metastases in patients with clinical complete response managed by watch and wait after neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer: the influence of local regrowth in the international watch and wait database. Dis Colon Rectum 2023; 66 (01) 41-49
  • 33 Fernandez LM, São Julião GP, Renehan AG. et al; The risk of distant metastases in patients with clinical complete response managed by watch and wait after neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer: The influence of local regrowth in the International Watch and Wait Database. Dis Colon Rectum 2023; 66: 41-49 DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000002494.