Facial Plast Surg 2024; 40(01): 106-111
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1770764
Original Research

Nasal Sill Flap for Lip Lifting

Ilker Uyar
1   Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Izmir Katip Celebi University Medical Faculty, Izmir, Turkey
,
Ersin Aksam
1   Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Izmir Katip Celebi University Medical Faculty, Izmir, Turkey
,
Can Kopal
2   Private Practice, Kultur Mah. Sair Esref Bul. No:61 Bahar Apartmanı K:2 D:5 Alsancak/Izmir, Turkey
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Background Over the years, different techniques have been developed to reduce the number of incisions and scars in subnasal lip lifting and to increase the amount of lifting. The aim of this study was to present a new technique to hide the scars at the nasal base in subnasal lip lifting procedures and to review the literature.

Methods The file of patients who underwent subnasal lip lifting between January 2019 and January 2021 were examined. In all patients, the nasal sill flap that was designed was elevated, and the nasal sill flap that was prepared was adapted to its new location when the excision had been completed. Two different plastic surgeons evaluated the patients in the postoperative 12-month follow-ups. The scars were evaluated for vascularity, pigmentation, elasticity, thickness, and height.

Results The study included 26 patients. While 21 patients had no histories of lip lifting, five patients had had previous lip lifting history. The mean operation time was 37.11 minutes. Patients' skin types were determined as Type 3 in 18 patients and Type 4 in eight patients according to the Fitzpatrick classification. The mean follow-up period of the patients was 13.11 months. At the end of the 12-month period, the mean scar score of the patients was calculated as 11.15. The mean scar score of primary cases was 11.14, and the mean scar score of secondary cases was 11.20 (p = 0.983). There was no statistically significant difference in terms of complications among smokers (p = 0.356). The mean scar score was calculated as 12.17 in patients who had Type 3 skin and 8.88 in patients with Type 4 skin (p = 0.075).

Conclusions This technique is beneficial for patients because the scars are discrete and easier for patients to accept.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.


Informed Consent

All patients were informed of their consent.




Publication History

Article published online:
04 July 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Marques A, Brenda E. Lifting of the upper lip using a single extensive incision. Br J Plast Surg 1994; 47 (01) 50-53
  • 2 Gondes-Ulloa M. The ageing upper lip. In: Marchac D, Hueston JT. eds. Transactions of the 6th International Congress of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 1975. Paris: Masson; 1976
  • 3 Cardoso AD, Sperli AE. Rhytidoplasty of the upper lip. In: Transactions of The Fifth International Congress of Plastic And Reconstructive Surgery. Sydney, Australia: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1971: 1127-1129
  • 4 González-Ulloa M. The aging upper lip. Ann Plast Surg 1979; 2 (04) 299-303
  • 5 Austin HW. The lip lift. Plast Reconstr Surg 1986; 77 (06) 990-994
  • 6 Greenwald AE. The lip lift. Plast Reconstr Surg 1987; 79 (01) 147
  • 7 Cardim VL, dos Santos Silva A, De Faria Valle R. et al. “Double duck” nasolabial lifting. Rev Bras Cir Plást 2011; 26: 466-471
  • 8 Santanchè P, Bonarrigo C. Lifting of the upper lip: personal technique. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 113 (06) 1828-1835 , discussion 1836–1837
  • 9 Draaijers LJ, Tempelman FRH, Botman YAM. et al. The patient and observer scar assessment scale: a reliable and feasible tool for scar evaluation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 113 (07) 1960-1965 , discussion 1966–1967
  • 10 Fitzpatrick TB. Soleil et peau. [Sun and skin]. Journal de Médecine Esthétique 1975; (02) 33-34 (in French)
  • 11 Raphael P, Harris R, Harris SW. The endonasal lip lift: personal technique. Aesthet Surg J 2014; 34 (03) 457-468
  • 12 Echo A, Momoh AO, Yuksel E. The no-scar lip-lift: upper lip suspension technique. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2011; 35 (04) 617-623
  • 13 Morrison SD, Vyas KS, Motakef S. et al. Facial feminization: systematic review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 137 (06) 1759-1770
  • 14 Altman K. Facial feminization surgery: current state of the art. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2012; 41 (08) 885-894
  • 15 Bellinga RJ, Capitán L, Simon D, Tenório T. Technical and clinical considerations for facial feminization surgery with rhinoplasty and related procedures. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2017; 19 (03) 175-181
  • 16 Chen MA, Davidson TM. Scar management: prevention and treatment strategies. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005; 13 (04) 242-247
  • 17 Hardman MJ, Ashcroft GS. Estrogen, not intrinsic aging, is the major regulator of delayed human wound healing in the elderly. Genome Biol 2008; 9 (05) R80
  • 18 Shu YY, Maibach HI. Estrogen and skin: therapeutic options. Am J Clin Dermatol 2011; 12 (05) 297-311
  • 19 Foitzik K, Langan EA, Paus R. Prolactin and the skin: a dermatological perspective on an ancient pleiotropic peptide hormone. J Invest Dermatol 2009; 129 (05) 1071-1087
  • 20 Ince B, Uyar I, Dadaci M. Effect of Vitamin D Deficiency on Hypertrophic Scarring. Dermatol Surg 2019; 45 (02) 274-279
  • 21 Wang J, Hori K, Ding J. et al. Toll-like receptors expressed by dermal fibroblasts contribute to hypertrophic scarring. J Cell Physiol 2011; 226 (05) 1265-1273
  • 22 Omo-Dare P. Genetic studies on keloid. J Natl Med Assoc 1975; 67 (06) 428-432
  • 23 Ponsky D, Guyuron B. Comprehensive surgical aesthetic enhancement and rejuvenation of the perioral region. Aesthet Surg J 2011; 31 (04) 382-391