PDF herunterladen
Semin Plast Surg 2023; 37(04): 253-264
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1776298
Review Article

Craniofacial Distraction Osteogenesis

Heather R. Burns
1   Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
2   Division of Plastic Surgery, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas
,
Daniel S. Wang
2   Division of Plastic Surgery, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas
,
Amjed Abu-Ghname
1   Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
2   Division of Plastic Surgery, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas
,
Robert F. Dempsey
1   Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
› Institutsangaben Funding None.
› Weitere Informationen
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Distraction osteogenesis (DO) of the craniofacial skeleton has become an effective technique for the treatment of both nonsyndromic and syndromic conditions. The advent of craniofacial DO has allowed for earlier intervention in pediatric patients with less complication risk and morbidity compared to traditional techniques. In this review, we will discuss current application and technique for craniofacial DO by anatomical region and explore future applications in craniofacial surgery.

Keywords

pediatric plastic surgery - distraction osteogenesis - craniofacial distraction


Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
16. November 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Cherkashin A. Distraction osteogenesis: origins and evolution. Distraction Osteogenesis Tissue Eng 1998; 34: 1-35
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Al-Namnam NMN, Hariri F, Rahman ZAA. Distraction osteogenesis in the surgical management of syndromic craniosynostosis: a comprehensive review of published papers. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2018; 56 (05) 353-366
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Garrigues GE, Ledford C, Fitch RD. Ilizarov: the man, the myth, the method. An orthopaedic inspiration. Duke Orthop J. 2013; 3 (01) 104-107
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Hopper RA, Ettinger RE, Purnell CA, Dover MS, Pereira AR, Tunçbilek G. Thirty years later: what has craniofacial distraction osteogenesis surgery replaced?. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020; 145 (06) 1073e-1088e
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Mundinger GS, Rehim SA, Johnson III O. et al. Distraction osteogenesis for surgical treatment of craniosynostosis: a systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 138 (03) 657-669
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Meling TR, Høgevold HE, Due-Tønnessen BJ, Skjelbred P. Comparison of perioperative morbidity after LeFort III and monobloc distraction osteogenesis. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011; 49 (02) 131-134
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Ilizarov GA. The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues. Part I. The influence of stability of fixation and soft-tissue preservation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989; (238) 249-281
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Ai-Aql ZS, Alagl AS, Graves DT, Gerstenfeld LC, Einhorn TA. Molecular mechanisms controlling bone formation during fracture healing and distraction osteogenesis. J Dent Res 2008; 87 (02) 107-118
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Natu SS, Ali I, Alam S, Giri KY, Agarwal A, Kulkarni VA. The biology of distraction osteogenesis for correction of mandibular and craniomaxillofacial defects: a review. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2014; 11 (01) 16-26
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Sato M, Ochi T, Nakase T. et al. Mechanical tension-stress induces expression of bone morphogenetic protein (BMP)-2 and BMP-4, but not BMP-6, BMP-7, and GDF-5 mRNA, during distraction osteogenesis. J Bone Miner Res 1999; 14 (07) 1084-1095
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Swennen G, Schliephake H, Dempf R, Schierle H, Malevez C. Craniofacial distraction osteogenesis: a review of the literature: part 1—clinical studies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2001; 30 (02) 89-103
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Erverdi N, Motro M. Principles of distraction osteogenesis. In: Erverdi N, Motro M. eds. Alveolar Distraction Osteogenesis: ArchWise Appliance and Technique. Berlin: Springer International Publishing; 2015: 19-29
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Hollier Jr LHJ, Higuera S, Stal S, Taylor TD. Distraction rate and latency: factors in the outcome of pediatric mandibular distraction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 117 (07) 2333-2336
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Yu JC, Fearon J, Havlik RJ, Buchman SR, Polley JW. Distraction osteogenesis of the craniofacial skeleton. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 114 (01) 1E-20E
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Sandhaus H, Johnson MD. Distraction osteogenesis in craniosynostosis. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2021; 29 (04) 304-313
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Kamil M, Oyoshi T, Komasaku S, Kuroki S, Higa N, Yoshimoto K. Fronto-orbital advancement and posterior cranial vault expansion using distraction osteogenesis in patients with multiple craniosynostosis. J Craniofac Surg 2021; 32 (05) 1882-1885
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Cinalli G, Spennato P, Sainte-Rose C. et al. Chiari malformation in craniosynostosis. Childs Nerv Syst 2005; 21 (10) 889-901
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Humphries LS, Zapatero ZD, Vu GH. et al. Ten years of posterior cranial vault expansion by means of distraction osteogenesis: an update and critical evaluation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2022; 150 (02) 379-391
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Steinbacher DM, Skirpan J, Puchała J, Bartlett SP. Expansion of the posterior cranial vault using distraction osteogenesis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 127 (02) 792-801
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Shen W, Cui J, Chen J, Yi J, Kong L, Sun B. Treatment of syndromic craniosynostosis by anterior and posterior vault distraction osteogenesis (A-PVDO). J Craniofac Surg 2022; 33 (02) 654-656
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Pandey S, Reddy GS, Chug A, Dixit A. Posterior cranial vault distraction osteogenesis: a systematic review. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res 2022; 12 (06) 823-832
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Nowinski D, Di Rocco F, Renier D, SainteRose C, Leikola J, Arnaud E. Posterior cranial vault expansion in the treatment of craniosynostosis. Comparison of current techniques. Childs Nerv Syst 2012; 28 (09) 1537-1544
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Hassan AM, Chappell AG, Murthy N, Stoehr JR, Alden T, Gosain AK. Posterior cranial vault distraction (PCVD): common complication rates and strategies of prevention and management. J Craniofac Surg 2021; 32 (01) 62-66
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Swanson JW, Samra F, Bauder A, Mitchell BT, Taylor JA, Bartlett SP. An algorithm for managing syndromic craniosynostosis using posterior vault distraction osteogenesis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 137 (05) 829e-841e
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Ferry AM, Dibbs RP, Sarrami SM. et al. Pediatric fronto-orbital skull reconstruction. Facial Plast Surg 2021; 37 (06) 771-780
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Bhadkamkar MA, Albright SB, Wolfswinkel EM, Bollo R, Buchanan EP. Posterior cranial vault distraction in the treatment of shunt-induced craniosynostosis. J Craniofac Surg 2015; 26 (01) e70-e72
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Serlo WS, Ylikontiola LP, Lähdesluoma N. et al. Posterior cranial vault distraction osteogenesis in craniosynostosis: estimated increases in intracranial volume. Childs Nerv Syst 2011; 27 (04) 627-633
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Derderian CA, Wink JD, McGrath JL, Collinsworth A, Bartlett SP, Taylor JA. Volumetric changes in cranial vault expansion: comparison of fronto-orbital advancement and posterior cranial vault distraction osteogenesis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 135 (06) 1665-1672
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Lin LO, Zhang RS, Hoppe IC. et al. Onset and resolution of Chiari malformations and hydrocephalus in syndromic craniosynostosis following posterior vault distraction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2019; 144 (04) 932-940
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Komuro Y, Shimizu A, Shimoji K, Miyajima M, Arai H. Posterior cranial vault distraction osteogenesis with barrel stave osteotomy in the treatment of craniosynostosis. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2015; 55 (08) 617-623
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 A New Technique for Posterior Distraction in Craniosynostosis: The Double-Door Technique. Accessed August 7, 2023 at: https://oce.ovid.com/article/00001665-201606000-00028/PDF
    PubMed
  • 32 Wiberg A, Magdum S, Richards PG, Jayamohan J, Wall SA, Johnson D. Posterior calvarial distraction in craniosynostosis - an evolving technique. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2012; 40 (08) 799-806
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Nowinski D, Saiepour D, Leikola J, Messo E, Nilsson P, Enblad P. Posterior cranial vault expansion performed with rapid distraction and time-reduced consolidation in infants with syndromic craniosynostosis. Childs Nerv Syst 2011; 27 (11) 1999-2003
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Maurice SM, Gachiani JM. Posterior cranial vault distraction with resorbable distraction devices. J Craniofac Surg 2014; 25 (04) 1249-1251
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Paternoster G, Haber SE, Khonsari RH, James S, Arnaud E. Craniosynostosis: monobloc distraction with internal device and its variant for infants with severe syndromic craniosynostosis. Clin Plast Surg 2021; 48 (03) 497-506
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Bradley JP, Gabbay JS, Taub PJ. et al. Monobloc advancement by distraction osteogenesis decreases morbidity and relapse. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 118 (07) 1585-1597
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Park H, Min J, Choi JW, Ra YS. Facial and cranial symmetry after one-piece fronto-orbital advancement with distraction for isolated unilateral coronal synostosis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2023; 151 (06) 1275-1284
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Long-Term Results Following Fronto-Orbital Reconstruction in Nonsyndromic Unicoronal Synostosis. Accessed August 17, 2023 at: https://oce.ovid.com/article/00006534-200805000-00030/PDF
    PubMed
  • 39 Cobb ARM, Boavida P, Docherty R. et al. Monobloc and bipartition in craniofacial surgery. J Craniofac Surg 2013; 24 (01) 242-246
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Ortiz-Monasterio F, del Campo AF, Carrillo A. Advancement of the orbits and the midface in one piece, combined with frontal repositioning, for the correction of Crouzon's deformities. Plast Reconstr Surg 1978; 61 (04) 507-516
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Witherow H, Dunaway D, Evans R. et al. Functional outcomes in monobloc advancement by distraction using the rigid external distractor device. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 121 (04) 1311-1322
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Visser R, Ruff CF, Angullia F. et al. Evaluating the efficacy of monobloc distraction in the Crouzon-Pfeiffer craniofacial deformity using geometric morphometrics. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 139 (02) 477e-487e
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Dunaway DJ, Britto JA, Abela C, Evans RD, Jeelani NUO. Complications of frontofacial advancement. Childs Nerv Syst 2012; 28 (09) 1571-1576
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Glover CD, Fernandez AM, Huang H. et al; Pediatric Craniofacial Collaborative Group. Perioperative outcomes and management in midface advancement surgery: a multicenter observational descriptive study from the Pediatric Craniofacial Collaborative Group. Paediatr Anaesth 2018; 28 (08) 710-718
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Barrientos S, Miller J. Anterior cranial vault reconstruction with distraction for primary and secondary craniosynostosis repair. J Craniofac Surg 2019; 30 (02) e109-e112
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Dunaway DJ, Budden C, Ong J, James G, Jeelani NUO. Monobloc distraction and facial bipartition distraction with external devices. Clin Plast Surg 2021; 48 (03) 507-519
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Raposo-Amaral CE, Vieira PH, Denadai R, Ghizoni E, Raposo-Amaral CA. Treating syndromic craniosynostosis with monobloc facial bipartition and internal distractor devices: destigmatizing the syndromic face. Clin Plast Surg 2021; 48 (03) 521-529
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Calluaud G, Pare A, Kulker D, Listrat A, Laure B. Computer-assisted frontofacial monobloc advancement and facial bipartition for Pfeiffer syndrome: surgical technique. World Neurosurg 2022; 161: 97-102
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 McCarthy JG, Stelnicki EJ, Mehrara BJ, Longaker MT. Distraction osteogenesis of the craniofacial skeleton. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001; 107 (07) 1812-1827
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Konofaos P, Wallace RD. Distraction osteogenesis in craniofacial surgery: past, present, and future. J Craniofac Surg 2021; 32 (Suppl. 03) 1221-1228
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Shen W, Cui J, Chen J, Ji Y, Kong L. Internal distraction osteogenesis with piezosurgery oblique osteotomy of supraorbital margin of frontal bone for the treatment of unilateral coronal synostosis. Ann Plast Surg 2017; 78 (05) 511-515
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Gibreel W, Wlodarczyk JR, Wolfswinkel EM, Yen S, Urata MM, Hammoudeh JA. Cleft lip and palate: Le Fort I distraction using an internal device. Clin Plast Surg 2021; 48 (03) 407-417
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Phillips JH, George AK, Tompson B. Le Fort III osteotomy or distraction osteogenesis imperfecta: your choice. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 117 (04) 1255-1260
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Tahiri Y, Taylor J. An update on midface advancement using Le Fort II and III distraction osteogenesis. Semin Plast Surg 2014; 28 (04) 184-192
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Thongdee P, Samman N. Stability of maxillary surgical movement in unilateral cleft lip and palate with preceding alveolar bone grafting. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2005; 42 (06) 664-674
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Chua HDP, Hägg MB, Cheung LK. Cleft maxillary distraction versus orthognathic surgery: which one is more stable in 5 years?. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010; 109 (06) 803-814
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Dibbs RP, Ferry AM, Sarrami SM, Abu-Ghname A, Dempsey RF, Buchanan EP. Distraction osteogenesis: mandible and maxilla. Facial Plast Surg 2021; 37 (06) 751-758
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Yu H, Dai J, Wang X, Zhang W, Shen SG. Le Fort II midfacial distraction combined with orthognathic surgery in the treatment of nasomaxillary hypoplasia. J Craniofac Surg 2014; 25 (03) e241-e244
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Richardson S, Krishna S, Khandeparker RV. A comprehensive management protocol to treat cleft maxillary hypoplasia. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2018; 46 (02) 356-361
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Saltaji H, Altalibi M, Major MP. et al. Le Fort III distraction osteogenesis versus conventional Le Fort III osteotomy in correction of syndromic midfacial hypoplasia: a systematic review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014; 72 (05) 959-972
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Holmes AD, Wright GW, Meara JG, Heggie AA, Probert TC. LeFort III internal distraction in syndromic craniosynostosis. J Craniofac Surg 2002; 13 (02) 262-272
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Combs PD, Harshbarger III RJ. Le fort I maxillary advancement using distraction osteogenesis. Semin Plast Surg 2014; 28 (04) 193-198
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 63 Mittermiller PA, Flores RL, Staffenberg DA. Craniosynostosis: Le Fort III distraction osteogenesis. Clin Plast Surg 2021; 48 (03) 473-485
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 64 Robertson KJ, Mendez BM, Bruce WJ, McDonnell BD, Chiodo MV, Patel PA. Le Fort III distraction with internal vs external distractors: a cephalometric analysis. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2018; 55 (05) 721-727
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 65 Shetye PR, Davidson EH, Sorkin M, Grayson BH, McCarthy JG. Evaluation of three surgical techniques for advancement of the midface in growing children with syndromic craniosynostosis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 126 (03) 982-994
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 66 Yuan Z, He S, Jiang T, Xie Q, Zhou N, Huang X. Augmented reality hologram combined with pre-bent distractor enhanced the accuracy of distraction vector transfer in maxillary distraction osteogenesis, a study based on 3D printed phantoms. Front Surg 2022; 9: 1018030
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 67 Kolstad CK, Senders CW, Rubinstein BK, Tollefson TT. Mandibular distraction osteogenesis: at what age to proceed. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2011; 75 (11) 1380-1384
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 68 McCarthy JG, Stelnicki EJ, Grayson BH. Distraction osteogenesis of the mandible: a ten-year experience. Semin Orthod 1999; 5 (01) 3-8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 69 Scott AR, Tibesar RJ, Lander TA, Sampson DE, Sidman JD. Mandibular distraction osteogenesis in infants younger than 3 months. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2011; 13 (03) 173-179
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 70 Al-Moraissi EA, Ellis III E. Bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy versus distraction osteogenesis for advancement of the retrognathic mandible. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015; 73 (08) 1564-1574
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 71 Schreuder WH, Jansma J, Bierman MWJ, Vissink A. Distraction osteogenesis versus bilateral sagittal split osteotomy for advancement of the retrognathic mandible: a review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007; 36 (02) 103-110
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 72 van Strijen PJ, Breuning KH, Becking AG, Tuinzing DB. Stability after distraction osteogenesis to lengthen the mandible: results in 50 patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004; 62 (03) 304-307
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 73 Breik O, Tivey D, Umapathysivam K, Anderson P. Does the rate of distraction or type of distractor affect the outcome of mandibular distraction in children with micrognathia?. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016; 74 (07) 1441-1453
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 74 Zhang RS, Hoppe IC, Taylor JA, Bartlett SP. Surgical management and outcomes of Pierre Robin sequence: a comparison of mandibular distraction osteogenesis and tongue-lip adhesion. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 142 (02) 480-509
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 75 Mofid MM, Manson PN, Robertson BC, Tufaro AP, Elias JJ, Vander Kolk CA. Craniofacial distraction osteogenesis: a review of 3278 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001; 108 (05) 1103-1114 , discussion 1115–1117
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 76 Chocron Y, Barone N, Zammit D, Gilardino MS. Efficacy and complications of mandibular distraction osteogenesis for airway obstruction in the Robin sequence population: a comprehensive literature review. J Craniofac Surg 2022; 33 (06) 1739-1744
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 77 Peacock ZS, Salcines A, Troulis MJ, Kaban LB. Long-term effects of distraction osteogenesis of the mandible. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2018; 76 (07) 1512-1523
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 78 Breik O, Tivey D, Umapathysivam K, Anderson P. Mandibular distraction osteogenesis for the management of upper airway obstruction in children with micrognathia: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2016; 45 (06) 769-782
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 79 Vendittelli BL, Dec W, Warren SM, Garfinkle JS, Grayson BH, McCarthy JG. The importance of vector selection in preoperative planning of bilateral mandibular distraction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 122 (04) 1144-1153
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 80 Franco PB, Farrell BB. Inverted L osteotomy: a new approach via intraoral access through the advances of virtual surgical planning and custom fixation. Oral Maxillofac Surg Cases 2016; 2 (01) 1-9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 81 Peacock ZS, Tricomi BJ, Faquin WC. et al. Bilateral automated continuous distraction osteogenesis in a design model: proof of principle. J Craniofac Surg 2015; 26 (08) 2320-2324
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 82 Wiltfang J, Kessler P, Merten HA, Neukam FW. Continuous and intermittent bone distraction using a microhydraulic cylinder: an experimental study in minipigs. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2001; 39 (01) 2-7
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 83 Kang SH, Tak HJ, Park HW, Kim JU, Lee SH. Fully-customized distraction assembly for maxillofacial distraction osteogenesis: a novel device and its experimental accuracy verification. Head Face Med 2020; 16 (01) 31
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 84 Park H, Oh S, Ra YS, Choi JW. Accelerated cranial distraction protocol for one-piece fronto-orbital distraction osteogenesis without bandeau in patients with craniosynostosis. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2022; 50 (07) 550-554
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 85 Van den Bempt M, Vinayahalingam S, Han MD, Bergé SJ, Xi T. The role of muscular traction in the occurrence of skeletal relapse after advancement bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO): a systematic review. Orthod Craniofac Res 2022; 25 (01) 1-13
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 86 Humphries LS, Swanson JW, Bartlett SP, Taylor JA. Craniosynostosis: posterior cranial vault remodeling. Clin Plast Surg 2021; 48 (03) 455-471
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 87 Greives MR, Ware BW, Tian AG, Taylor JA, Pollack IF, Losee JE. Complications in posterior cranial vault distraction. Ann Plast Surg 2016; 76 (02) 211-215
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 88 Kamel GN, Wong A, Segal RM. et al. A single-center retrospective review of perioperative complications and reoperation rates between open cranial vault remodeling and distraction osteogenesis for unilateral coronal craniosynostosis. J Craniofac Surg 2021; 32 (07) 2373-2378
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 89 Hoppe IC, Taylor JA. A cohort study of strabismus rates following correction of the unicoronal craniosynostosis deformity: conventional bilateral fronto-orbital advancement versus fronto-orbital distraction osteogenesis. J Craniofac Surg 2021; 32 (07) 2362-2365
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 90 Abraham P, Brandel MG, Dalle Ore CL. et al. Predictors of postoperative complications of craniosynostosis repair in the national inpatient sample. Ann Plast Surg 2018; 80 (5S, Suppl 5): S261-S266
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 91 Moran I, Virdee S, Sharp I, Sulh J. Postoperative complications following LeFort 1 maxillary advancement surgery in cleft palate patients: a 5-year retrospective study. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2018; 55 (02) 231-237
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 92 Knackstedt R, Bassiri Gharb B, Papay F, Rampazzo A. Comparison of complication rate between LeFort III and monobloc advancement with or without distraction osteogenesis. J Craniofac Surg 2018; 29 (01) 144-148
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 93 Carlson KJ, Bharadwaj SR, Dougherty WM, Dobratz EJ. Early adverse events following pediatric mandibular advancement: analysis of the ACS NSQIP-Pediatric database. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2022; 59 (09) 1176-1184
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 94 Master DL, Hanson PR, Gosain AK. Complications of mandibular distraction osteogenesis. J Craniofac Surg 2010; 21 (05) 1565-1570
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 95 Purnell CA, Evans M, Massenburg BB. et al. LeFort II distraction with zygomatic repositioning versus LeFort III distraction: a comparison of surgical outcomes and complications. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2021; 49 (10) 905-913
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar