Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2024; 28(04): 490-504
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1779246

Pediatric Foot: Development, Variants, and Related Pathology

Daniel F. Morgan
1   Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
2   Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
,
1   Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
2   Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
,
1   Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
2   Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Pediatric foot development throughout childhood and adolescence can present a diagnostic dilemma for radiologists because imaging appearances may be confused with pathology. Understanding pediatric foot development and anatomical variants, such as accessory ossification centers, is essential to interpret musculoskeletal imaging in children correctly, particularly because many of these variants are incidental but others can be symptomatic. We first briefly review foot embryology. After describing common accessory ossification centers of the foot, we explain the different patterns of foot maturation with attention to irregular ossification and bone marrow development. Common pediatric foot variants and pathology are described, such as tarsal coalitions and fifth metatarsal base fractures. We also discuss pediatric foot alignment and various childhood foot alignment deformities.

Supplementary Material



Publication History

Article published online:
29 July 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 O'Rahilly R, Gardner E. The timing and sequence of events in the development of the limbs in the human embryo. Anat Embryol (Berl) 1975; 148 (01) 1-23
  • 2 Brand RA. 50 years ago in CORR: The skeletal development of the foot Ronan O'Rahilly MD, Ernest Gardner MD, and DJ Gray PhD CORR 1960;16:7–14. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010; 468 (04) 1188-1189
  • 3 O'Rahilly R, Gardner E, Gray DJ. The ectodermal thickening and ridge in the limbs of staged human embryos. Development 1956; 4 (03) 254-264
  • 4 Kuhns LR, Finnstrom O. New standards of ossification of the newborn. Radiology 1976; 119 (03) 655-660
  • 5 Hubbard AM, Meyer JS, Davidson RS, Mahboubi S, Harty MP. Relationship between the ossification center and cartilaginous anlage in the normal hindfoot in children: study with MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1993; 161 (04) 849-853
  • 6 Murphy RF, Van Nortwick SS, Jones R, Mooney III JF. Evaluation and management of common accessory ossicles of the foot and ankle in children and adolescents. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2021; 29 (07) e312-e321
  • 7 Karasick D, Schweitzer ME. The os trigonum syndrome: imaging features. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996; 166 (01) 125-129
  • 8 Heyer JH, Rose DJ. Os trigonum excision in dancers via an open posteromedial approach. Foot Ankle Int 2017; 38 (01) 27-35
  • 9 Brigido MK, Fessell DP, Jacobson JA. et al. Radiography and US of os peroneum fractures and associated peroneal tendon injuries: initial experience. Radiology 2005; 237 (01) 235-241
  • 10 Ersen O, Akyildiz F, Ozyurek S, Sivrioglu AK. Os calcaneus secundarius mimicking fracture. BMJ Case Rep 2013; 2013: bcr2013009954
  • 11 van Aswegen T, Low R, Pass B. Os intermetatarseum: an analysis of morphology and case reports of fracture. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2020; 64 (06) 794-799
  • 12 Petrera M, Dwyer T, Ogilvie-Harris DJ. A rare cause of foot pain with golf swing: symptomatic os vesalianum pedis-a case report. Sports Health 2013; 5 (04) 357-359
  • 13 Sims AL, Kurup HV. Painful sesamoid of the great toe. World J Orthop 2014; 5 (02) 146-150
  • 14 West EY, Jaramillo D. Imaging of osteochondrosis. Pediatr Radiol 2019; 49 (12) 1610-1616
  • 15 Laor T, Jaramillo D. MR imaging insights into skeletal maturation: what is normal?. Radiology 2009; 250 (01) 28-38
  • 16 Shabshin N, Schweitzer ME, Morrison WB, Carrino JA, Keller MS, Grissom LE. High-signal T2 changes of the bone marrow of the foot and ankle in children: red marrow or traumatic changes?. Pediatr Radiol 2006; 36 (07) 670-676
  • 17 Gupta N, Sharma K, Bansal I, Kumar Y, Hayashi D. Kickboxing power hour: case report of fifth metatarsal apophysitis (Iselin disease) and its magnetic resonance imaging features. Transl Pediatr 2017; 6 (02) 98-101
  • 18 Cheung CN, Lui TH. Proximal fifth metatarsal fractures: anatomy, classification, treatment and complications. Arch Trauma Res 2016; 5 (04) e33298
  • 19 Dameron Jr TB. Fractures of the proximal fifth metatarsal: selecting the best treatment option. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 1995; 3 (02) 110-114
  • 20 Chloros GD, Kakos CD, Tastsidis IK, Giannoudis VP, Panteli M, Giannoudis PV. Fifth metatarsal fractures: an update on management, complications, and outcomes. EFORT Open Rev 2022; 7 (01) 13-25
  • 21 Kane JM, Sandrowski K, Saffel H, Albanese A, Raikin SM, Pedowitz DI. The epidemiology of fifth metatarsal fracture. Foot Ankle Spec 2015; 8 (05) 354-359
  • 22 Kishan TV, Mekala A, Bonala N, Sri Pavani B. Iselin's disease: traction apophysitis of the fifth metatarsal base, a rare cause of lateral foot pain. Med J Armed Forces India 2016; 72 (03) 299-301
  • 23 Hoffman DF, Nazarian LN, Smith J. Enthesopathy of the lateral cord of the plantar fascia. J Ultrasound Med 2014; 33 (09) 1711-1716
  • 24 Conway JJ, Cowell HR. Tarsal coalition: clinical significance and roentgenographic demonstration. Radiology 1969; 92 (04) 799-811
  • 25 Crim JR, Kjeldsberg KM. Radiographic diagnosis of tarsal coalition. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004; 182 (02) 323-328
  • 26 Wechsler RJ, Schweitzer ME, Deely DM, Horn BD, Pizzutillo PD. Tarsal coalition: depiction and characterization with CT and MR imaging. Radiology 1994; 193 (02) 447-452
  • 27 Newman JS, Newberg AH. Congenital tarsal coalition: multimodality evaluation with emphasis on CT and MR imaging. Radiographics 2000; 20 (02) 321-332 ; quiz 526–527, 532
  • 28 Berkeley R, Tennant S, Saifuddin A. Multimodality imaging of the paediatric flatfoot. Skeletal Radiol 2021; 50 (11) 2133-2149
  • 29 Nalaboff KM, Schweitzer ME. MRI of tarsal coalition: frequency, distribution, and innovative signs. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis 2008; 66 (01) 14-21
  • 30 Rühli FJ, Solomon LB, Henneberg M. High prevalence of tarsal coalitions and tarsal joint variants in a recent cadaver sample and its possible significance. Clin Anat 2003; 16 (05) 411-415
  • 31 Lawrence DA, Rolen MF, Haims AH, Zayour Z, Moukaddam HA. Tarsal coalitions: radiographic, CT, and MR imaging findings. HSS J 2014; 10 (02) 153-166
  • 32 Stormont DM, Peterson HA. The relative incidence of tarsal coalition. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1983; (181) 28-36
  • 33 Emery KH, Bisset III GS, Johnson ND, Nunan PJ. Tarsal coalition: a blinded comparison of MRI and CT. Pediatr Radiol 1998; 28 (08) 612-616
  • 34 Oestreich AE, Mize WA, Crawford AH, Morgan Jr RC. The “anteater nose”: a direct sign of calcaneonavicular coalition on the lateral radiograph. J Pediatr Orthop 1987; 7 (06) 709-711
  • 35 Crim J. Imaging of tarsal coalition. Radiol Clin North Am 2008; 46 (06) 1017-1026 , vi
  • 36 Lateur LM, Van Hoe LR, Van Ghillewe KV, Gryspeerdt SS, Baert AL, Dereymaeker GE. Subtalar coalition: diagnosis with the C sign on lateral radiographs of the ankle. Radiology 1994; 193 (03) 847-851
  • 37 Scranton Jr PE. Treatment of symptomatic talocalcaneal coalition. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1987; 69 (04) 533-539
  • 38 Downey MS. Tarsal coalitions. A surgical classification. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 1991; 81 (04) 187-197
  • 39 Thapa MM, Pruthi S, Chew FS. Radiographic assessment of pediatric foot alignment: review. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010; 194 (6, Suppl): S51-S58
  • 40 Hammer MR, Deepa RP. The foot and ankle: congenital and developmental conditions. In: Stein-Wexler R, Wootton-Gorges SL, Ozonoff MD. eds. Pediatric Orthopedic Imaging. New York, NY: Springer; 2015: 463-516
  • 41 Laor T, Jaramillo D, Oestreich AE. Musculoskeletal system. In: Kirks DR, Griscom NT. eds. Practical Pediatric Imaging: Diagnostic Radiology of Infants and Children. 3rd ed.. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1998: 327-510
  • 42 Vanderwilde R, Staheli LT, Chew DE, Malagon V. Measurements on radiographs of the foot in normal infants and children. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1988; 70 (03) 407-415
  • 43 Smythe T, Rotenberg S, Lavy C. The global birth prevalence of clubfoot: a systematic review and meta-analysis. EClinicalMedicine 2023; 63: 102178
  • 44 Khanshour AM, Kidane YH, Kozlitina J. et al. Genetic association and characterization of FSTL5 in isolated clubfoot. Hum Mol Genet 2021; 29 (22) 3717-3728
  • 45 López-Carrero E, Castillo-López JM, Medina-Alcantara M, Domínguez-Maldonado G, Garcia-Paya I, Jiménez-Cebrián AM. Effectiveness of the Ponseti method in the treatment of clubfoot: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2023; 20 (04) 3714
  • 46 Richards BS, Faulks S, Razi O, Moualeu A, Jo CH. Nonoperatively corrected clubfoot at age 2 years: radiographs are not helpful in predicting future relapse. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2017; 99 (02) 155-160
  • 47 Aurell Y, Andriesse H, Johansson A, Jonsson K. Ultrasound assessment of early clubfoot treatment: a comparison of the Ponseti method and a modified Copenhagen method. J Pediatr Orthop B 2005; 14 (05) 347-357
  • 48 Chami M, Daoud A, Maestro M, Lagrange AS, Geoffray A. Ultrasound contribution in the analysis of the newborn and infant normal and clubfoot: a preliminary study. Pediatr Radiol 1996; 26 (04) 298-302
  • 49 Shiels II WE, Coley BD, Kean J, Adler BH. Focused dynamic sonographic examination of the congenital clubfoot. Pediatr Radiol 2007; 37 (11) 1118-1124
  • 50 Nahle IS, Miron MC, Grimard G, Abu Zeid A, Glavas PP. Ultrasound measurements in clubfoot treated with the Ponseti method and risk factors for recurrence: A retrospective study. J Child Orthop 2022; 16 (01) 46-54
  • 51 Miller M, Dobbs MB. Congenital vertical talus: etiology and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2015; 23 (10) 604-611
  • 52 Hamanishi C. Congenital vertical talus: classification with 69 cases and new measurement system. J Pediatr Orthop 1984; 4 (03) 318-326
  • 53 Eberhardt O, Fernandez FF, Wirth T. The talar axis-first metatarsal base angle in CVT treatment: a comparison of idiopathic and non-idiopathic cases treated with the Dobbs method. J Child Orthop 2012; 6 (06) 491-496
  • 54 Bouchard M. An algorithmic approach to the congenital vertical talus. Journal of the Pediatric Society of North America. 2022; 4 (01) 1-16
  • 55 Supakul N, Loder RT, Karmazyn B. Dynamic US study in the evaluation of infants with vertical or oblique talus deformities. Pediatr Radiol 2013; 43 (03) 376-380
  • 56 Miron MC, Grimard G. Ultrasound evaluation of foot deformities in infants. Pediatr Radiol 2016; 46 (02) 193-209 ; quiz 190–192
  • 57 Day J, Murray RS, Dance S, Peagler CL, Tabaie S. Congenital vertical talus: an updated review. Cureus 2023; 15 (09) e45867
  • 58 Inarejos Clemente EJ, Aparisi Gómez MP, Catala March J, Restrepo R. Ankle and foot deformities in children. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2023; 27 (03) 367-377
  • 59 Vergillos Luna M, Khal AA, Milliken KA, Solla F, Rampal V. Pediatric flatfoot: is there a need for surgical referral?. J Clin Med 2023; 12 (11) 3809
  • 60 Pfeiffer M, Kotz R, Ledl T, Hauser G, Sluga M. Prevalence of flat foot in preschool-aged children. Pediatrics 2006; 118 (02) 634-639
  • 61 Bourdet C, Seringe R, Adamsbaum C, Glorion C, Wicart P. Flatfoot in children and adolescents. Analysis of imaging findings and therapeutic implications. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2013; 99 (01) 80-87