Download PDF
J Wrist Surg
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1787179
Scientific Article

Medium-Term Patient-Reported Outcomes after Surgical Management of Perilunate Injury: A Multiinstitutional Experience

Andrew M. Gabig 
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
,
Samuel H. Payne
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
,
Adam Whitsett 
2   Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
,
Sara Kebede 
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
,
Avani A. Patel
3   Mercer University School of Medicine, Macon, Georgia
,
William Knaus
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
,
Paul Ghareeb 
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
› Author Affiliations Funding None.
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background There is a lack of consensus on the optimal treatment of perilunate injuries (PLIs). Open reduction with internal fixation with scapholunate (SL) ligament repair is recommended; however, procedures such as lunotriquetral (LT) ligament repair, carpal tunnel release (CTR), proximal row carpectomy, denervation, and arthrodesis may also be used.

Purpose The purpose of this study was to assess patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after surgical management of PLIs.

Methods A retrospective review of surgically treated PLIs at two institutions in a major metropolitan city from 2014 to 2020 was conducted. Demographics, radiographic data, and details of surgical management were reviewed. PROs were prospectively collected and analyzed.

Results Eighty-seven patients with surgically managed PLIs were identified. The average time to surgery was 4 ± 7days. Twenty-six percent of patients presented with acute median neuropathy. Thirty-seven patients provided PROs for analysis. Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation scores were 22 ± 12.9, 14.4 ± 11.3, and 37 ± 22 for pain, function, and total scores, respectively. Satisfaction was 7 ± 3 Sixteen percent of patients were unable to maintain employment due to their injury. The interval to return to work was 6.3 ± 7.7 months.

Conclusion PLIs cause significant morbidity and affect patients' ability to return to work. While open reduction with SL repair is routinely performed to treat PLIs, additional procedures may be considered. Undergoing concurrent CTR in the absence of neurological symptoms showed no differences in outcomes.

Level of Evidence Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Keywords

perilunate injury - surgical management - outcomes

Statement of Human and Animal Rights

All human and animal studies have been approved by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.


Statement of Informed Consent

All patients were informed of possible participation in compliance with local institutional review board requirements.


Investigation performed at the Emory Clinic, Atlanta, Georgia.




Publication History

Received: 04 February 2024

Accepted: 01 May 2024

Article published online:
26 June 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Mayfield JK, Johnson RP, Kilcoyne RK. Carpal dislocations: pathomechanics and progressive perilunar instability. J Hand Surg Am 1980; 5 (03) 226-241
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Herzberg G, Comtet JJ, Linscheid RL, Amadio PC, Cooney WP, Stalder J. Perilunate dislocations and fracture-dislocations: a multicenter study. J Hand Surg Am 1993; 18 (05) 768-779
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Johnson RP. The acutely injured wrist and its residuals. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1980; (149) 33-44
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Bain GI, Pallapati S, Eng K. Translunate perilunate injuries—a spectrum of this uncommon injury. J Wrist Surg 2013; 2 (01) 63-68
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Cooney WP, Bussey R, Dobyns JH, Linscheid RL. Difficult wrist fractures. Perilunate fracture-dislocations of the wrist. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1987; (214) 136-147
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Krief E, Appy-Fedida B, Rotari V, David E, Mertl P, Maes-Clavier C. Results of perilunate dislocations and perilunate fracture dislocations with a minimum 15-Year follow-up. J Hand Surg Am 2015; 40 (11) 2191-2197
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Laporte M, Michot A, Choughri H, Abi-Chahla ML, Pelissier P. [Perilunate dislocations and fracture-dislocations of the wrist, a review of 17 cases]. Article Chir Main 2012; 31 (02) 62-70
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Kazemian GH, Khak M, Ravarian B, Sarzaeem MM, Okhovatpour MA, Omrani FA. Closed K-wire fixation for the treatment of perilunate dislocation and trans-scaphoid perilunate fracture dislocations without ligamentous repair: short term follow-up. Arch Bone Jt Surg 2020; 8 (05) 633-640
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Apergis E, Maris J, Theodoratos G, Pavlakis D, Antoniou N. Perilunate dislocations and fracture-dislocations. Closed and early open reduction compared in 28 cases. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 1997; 275: 55-59
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Stanbury SJ, Elfar JC. Perilunate dislocation and perilunate fracture-dislocation. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2011; 19 (09) 554-562
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Severo AL, Lemos MB, Pereira TAP, Fajardo RDP, Maia PEC, Lech O. Trans-scaphoid perilunate fracture dislocation beyond Mayfield stage IV: a case report on a new classification proposal. Rev Bras Ortop 2017; 53 (05) 643-646
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Kremer T, Wendt M, Riedel K, Sauerbier M, Germann G, Bickert B. Open reduction for perilunate injuries–clinical outcome and patient satisfaction. J Hand Surg Am 2010; 35 (10) 1599-1606
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Griffin M, Roushdi I, Osagie L, Cerovac S, Umarji S. Patient-reported outcomes following surgically managed perilunate dislocation: outcomes after perilunate dislocation. Hand (N Y) 2016; 11 (01) 22-28
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 van der Oest MJW, Duraku LS, Artan M. et al. Perilunate injury timing and treatment options: a systematic review. J Wrist Surg 2021; 11 (02) 164-176
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Bagheri F, Taraz-Jamshidi MH, Birjandinejad A. et al. Trans-scaphoid perilunate fracture-dislocation and isolated perilunate dislocations; surgical versus nonsurgical treatment. Arch Bone Jt Surg 2013; 1 (02) 74-77
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Huish Jr EG, Vitale MA, Shin AY. Acute proximal row carpectomy to treat a transscaphoid, transtriquetral perilunate fracture dislocation: case report and review of the literature. Hand (N Y) 2013; 8 (01) 105-109
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Najarian R, Nourbakhsh A, Capo J, Tan V. Perilunate injuries. Hand (N Y) 2011; 6 (01) 1-7
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Herzberg G. Perilunate injuries, not dislocated (PLIND). J Wrist Surg 2013; 2 (04) 337-345
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Forli A, Courvoisier A, Wimsey S, Corcella D, Moutet F. Perilunate dislocations and transscaphoid perilunate fracture-dislocations: a retrospective study with minimum ten-year follow-up. J Hand Surg Am 2010; 35 (01) 62-68
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Knoll VD. Trans-scaphoid perilunate fracture dislocations: results of screw fixation of the scaphoid and lunotriquetral repair with a dorsal approach (vol 30A, pg 1145, 2005). Correction Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume 2006; 31A (02) 328
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Jones Jr DB, Kakar S. Perilunate dislocations and fracture dislocations. J Hand Surg Am 2012; 37 (10) 2168-2173
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Kural C, Tanriverdi B, Erçin E, Baca E, Yilmaz M. The surgical outcomes of trans-scaphoid perilunate fracture-dislocations. Turk J Med Sci 2020; 50 (01) 25-30
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Lameijer CM, Niezen CK, El Moumni M, van der Sluis CK. Pain, impaired functioning, poor satisfaction and diminished health status eight years following perilunate (fracture) dislocations. Disabil Rehabil 2020; 42 (06) 849-856
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Wagner ER, Bravo D, Elhassan B, Moran SL. Factors associated with improved outcomes following proximal row carpectomy: a long-term outcome study of 144 patients. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2016; 41 (05) 484-491
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Budoff JE. Treatment of acute lunate and perilunate dislocations. J Hand Surg Am 2008; 33 (08) 1424-1432
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Fisher ND, Bi AS, De Tolla JE. Perilunate dislocations: current treatment options. JBJS Rev 2022; 10 (09) e22
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Muller T, Hidalgo Diaz JJ, Pire E, Prunières G, Facca S, Liverneaux P. Treatment of acute perilunate dislocations: ORIF versus proximal row carpectomy. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2017; 103 (01) 95-99
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Dellestable A, Cheval D, Kerfant N, Stindel E, Le Nen D, Letissier H. Does total wrist denervation give reliable long-term results? Survival curve with an average follow-up of 8.2 years. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2021; 107 (05) 102967
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Hofmeister EP, Moran SL, Shin AY. Anterior and posterior interosseous neurectomy for the treatment of chronic dynamic instability of the wrist. Hand (N Y) 2006; 1 (02) 63-70
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Weinstein LP, Berger RA. Analgesic benefit, functional outcome, and patient satisfaction after partial wrist denervation. J Hand Surg Am 2002; 27 (05) 833-839
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Picart B, Laborie C, Hulet C, Malherbe M. Total wrist denervation: retrospective study of 39 wrists with 56 months' follow-up. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2019; 105 (08) 1607-1610
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar