Download PDF
J Reconstr Microsurg
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1787266
Original Article

Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction can be Performed Safely in Patients with Obesity

Max L. Silverstein
1   Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
,
Sarah Sorice-Virk
1   Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
,
Derrick C. Wan
1   Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
,
Arash Momeni
1   Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
› Author Affiliations Funding None.
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background Numerous studies have shown that obesity is a risk factor for postoperative complications following breast reconstruction. Hence, obesity has traditionally been considered a relative contraindication to microsurgical breast reconstruction. In this study, we investigated the impact of obesity on outcomes following microsurgical breast reconstruction.

Methods A retrospective analysis of 200 consecutive patients who underwent microsurgical breast reconstruction with free abdominal flaps was performed. Subjects were divided into Nonobese (body mass index [BMI] < 30 kg/m2) and Obese (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2) cohorts. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate differences in patient characteristics, complication rates, and efficiency metrics between the two groups.

Results Of the 200 subjects included in the study, 128 were Nonobese, 72 were Obese. The prevalence of diabetes (3.9 vs. 16.9%, p = 0.002) and hypertension (14.7 vs. 39.4%, p < 0.001) were significantly greater in the Obese cohort. Among unilateral reconstructions, postoperative length of stay (LOS) was longer among Obese patients (3.1 vs. 3.6 days, p = 0.016). Seroma occurred more frequently in Obese patients following bilateral reconstruction (5.7 vs. 0.0%, p = 0.047). Otherwise, there were no significant differences in complication rates between the groups. On multivariate analysis, BMI was not independently associated with complications, LOS, or operative time.

Conclusion The improvements in clinical and patient-reported outcomes that have been associated with postmastectomy breast reconstruction do not exclude obese women. This study indicates that microsurgical breast reconstruction can be performed safely and efficiently in patients with obesity.

Keywords

breast reconstruction - microsurgery - obesity


Publication History

Received: 02 February 2024

Accepted: 15 April 2024

Article published online:
30 May 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Bovet P, Chiolero A, Gedeon J. Health effects of overweight and obesity in 195 countries. N Engl J Med 2017; 377 (15) 1495-1496
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Calle EE, Thun MJ, Petrelli JM, Rodriguez C, Heath Jr CW. Body-mass index and mortality in a prospective cohort of U.S. adults. N Engl J Med 1999; 341 (15) 1097-1105
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Wormser D, Kaptoge S, Di Angelantonio E. et al; Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration. Separate and combined associations of body-mass index and abdominal adiposity with cardiovascular disease: collaborative analysis of 58 prospective studies. Lancet 2011; 377 (9771) 1085-1095
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Lauby-Secretan B, Scoccianti C, Loomis D, Grosse Y, Bianchini F, Straif K. International Agency for Research on Cancer Handbook Working Group. Body fatness and cancer–viewpoint of the IARC Working Group. N Engl J Med 2016; 375 (08) 794-798
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Manson JE, Colditz GA, Stampfer MJ. et al. A prospective study of obesity and risk of coronary heart disease in women. N Engl J Med 1990; 322 (13) 882-889
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Mokdad AH, Ford ES, Bowman BA. et al. Prevalence of obesity, diabetes, and obesity-related health risk factors, 2001. JAMA 2003; 289 (01) 76-79
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Singh GM, Danaei G, Farzadfar F. et al; Global Burden of Metabolic Risk Factors of Chronic Diseases Collaborating Group; Asia-Pacific Cohort Studies Collaboration (APCSC), Diabetes Epidemiology: Collaborative analysis of Diagnostic criteria in Europe (DECODE), Emerging Risk Factor Collaboration (ERFC), Prospective Studies Collaboration (PSC). The age-specific quantitative effects of metabolic risk factors on cardiovascular diseases and diabetes: a pooled analysis. PLoS One 2013; 8 (07) e65174
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Van Gaal LF, Mertens IL, De Block CE. Mechanisms linking obesity with cardiovascular disease. Nature 2006; 444 (7121) 875-880
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Morimoto LM, White E, Chen Z. et al. Obesity, body size, and risk of postmenopausal breast cancer: the Women's Health Initiative (United States). Cancer Causes Control 2002; 13 (08) 741-751
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Picon-Ruiz M, Morata-Tarifa C, Valle-Goffin JJ, Friedman ER, Slingerland JM. Obesity and adverse breast cancer risk and outcome: mechanistic insights and strategies for intervention. CA Cancer J Clin 2017; 67 (05) 378-397
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Tjeertes EK, Hoeks SE, Beks SB, Valentijn TM, Hoofwijk AG, Stolker RJ. Obesity–a risk factor for postoperative complications in general surgery?. BMC Anesthesiol 2015; 15: 112
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Bigarella LG, Ballardin AC, Couto LS. et al. The impact of obesity on plastic surgery outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aesthet Surg J 2022; 42 (07) 795-807
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Kroll SS, Netscher DT. Complications of TRAM flap breast reconstruction in obese patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 1989; 84 (06) 886-892
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Schaverien MV, Mcculley SJ. Effect of obesity on outcomes of free autologous breast reconstruction: a meta-analysis. Microsurgery 2014; 34 (06) 484-497
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Chang DW, Wang B, Robb GL. et al. Effect of obesity on flap and donor-site complications in free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 105 (05) 1640-1648
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Rossetto LA, Abla LE, Vidal R. et al. Factors associated with hernia and bulge formation at the donor site of the pedicled TRAM flap. Eur J Plast Surg 2010; 33 (04) 203-208
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Spear SL, Ducic I, Cuoco F, Taylor N. Effect of obesity on flap and donor-site complications in pedicled TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 119 (03) 788-795
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Jandali S, Nelson JA, Sonnad SS. et al. Breast reconstruction with free tissue transfer from the abdomen in the morbidly obese. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 127 (06) 2206-2213
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Seidenstuecker K, Munder B, Mahajan AL, Richrath P, Behrendt P, Andree C. Morbidity of microsurgical breast reconstruction in patients with comorbid conditions. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 127 (03) 1086-1092
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Scheflan M, Dinner MI. The transverse abdominal island flap: part I. Indications, contraindications, results, and complications. Ann Plast Surg 1983; 10 (01) 24-35
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Nelson JA, Fischer JP, Yan C. et al. The impact of obesity on abdominal wall function after free autologous breast reconstruction. Microsurgery 2014; 34 (05) 352-360
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Srinivasa DR, Clemens MW, Qi J. et al. Obesity and breast reconstruction: complications and patient-reported outcomes in a multicenter, prospective study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020; 145 (03) 481e-490e
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Moran SL, Serletti JM. Outcome comparison between free and pedicled TRAM flap breast reconstruction in the obese patient. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001; 108 (07) 1954-1960 , discussion 1961–1962
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Garvey PB, Buchel EW, Pockaj BA, Gray RJ, Samson TD. The deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for breast reconstruction in overweight and obese patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 115 (02) 447-457
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Patterson CW, Palines PA, Bartow MJ. et al. Stratification of surgical risk in DIEP breast reconstruction based on classification of obesity. J Reconstr Microsurg 2022; 38 (01) 1-9
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Momeni A, Ahdoot MA, Kim RY, Leroux E, Galaiya DJ, Lee GK. Should we continue to consider obesity a relative contraindication for autologous microsurgical breast reconstruction?. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2012; 65 (04) 420-425
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 O'Neill AC, Sebastiampillai S, Zhong T, Hofer SOP. Increasing body mass index increases complications but not failure rates in microvascular breast reconstruction: a retrospective cohort study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2019; 72 (09) 1518-1524
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Baker JL, Mailey B, Tokin CA, Blair SL, Wallace AM. Postmastectomy reconstruction is associated with improved survival in patients with invasive breast cancer: a single-institution study. Am Surg 2013; 79 (10) 977-981
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Dauplat J, Kwiatkowski F, Rouanet P. et al; STIC-RMI Working Group. Quality of life after mastectomy with or without immediate breast reconstruction. Br J Surg 2017; 104 (09) 1197-1206
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Metcalfe KA, Semple J, Quan ML. et al. Changes in psychosocial functioning 1 year after mastectomy alone, delayed breast reconstruction, or immediate breast reconstruction. Ann Surg Oncol 2012; 19 (01) 233-241
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Rosson GD, Shridharani SM, Magarakis M. et al. Quality of life before reconstructive breast surgery: a preoperative comparison of patients with immediate, delayed, and major revision reconstruction. Microsurgery 2013; 33 (04) 253-258
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Siqueira HFF, Teixeira JLA, Lessa Filho RDS. et al. Patient satisfaction and quality of life in breast reconstruction: assessment of outcomes of immediate, delayed, and nonreconstruction. BMC Res Notes 2020; 13 (01) 223
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Nelson JA, Sobti N, Patel A. et al. The impact of obesity on patient-reported outcomes following autologous breast reconstruction. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 27 (06) 1877-1888
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Velazquez C, Siska RC, Pestana IA. Breast reconstruction completion in the obese: does reconstruction technique make a difference in its achievement?. J Reconstr Microsurg 2021; 37 (09) 720-727
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Klement KA, Hijjawi JB, LoGiudice JA, Alghoul M, Omesiete-Adejare P. Microsurgical breast reconstruction in the obese: a better option than tissue expander/implant reconstruction?. Plast Reconstr Surg 2019; 144 (03) 539-546
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Adult Obesity Facts. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2023 . Accessed March 27, 2023 at: https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/data/adult.html
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Lese I, Biedermann R, Constantinescu M, Grobbelaar AO, Olariu R. Predicting risk factors that lead to free flap failure and vascular compromise: a single unit experience with 565 free tissue transfers. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2021; 74 (03) 512-522
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Farsaei S, Khalili H, Farboud ES. Potential role of statins on wound healing: review of the literature. Int Wound J 2012; 9 (03) 238-247
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Bogachkov YY, Chen L, Le Master E. et al. LDL induces cholesterol loading and inhibits endothelial proliferation and angiogenesis in Matrigels: correlation with impaired angiogenesis during wound healing. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2020; 318 (04) C762-C776
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Graf R, de Araujo LR, Rippel R, Neto LG, Pace DT, Cruz GA. Lipoabdominoplasty: liposuction with reduced undermining and traditional abdominal skin flap resection. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2006; 30 (01) 1-8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Saldanha OR, De Souza Pinto EB, Mattos Jr WN. et al. Lipoabdominoplasty with selective and safe undermining. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2003; 27 (04) 322-327
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Avelar JM. Abdominoplasty without panniculus undermining and resection: analysis and 3-year follow-up of 97 consecutive cases. Aesthet Surg J 2002; 22 (01) 16-25
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Lakatta AC, Steppe C, Teotia SS, Haddock NT. Reduction in seroma rate following deep inferior epigastric perforator flap with umbilectomy utilizing progressive tension sutures. J Reconstr Microsurg 2024; 40 (02) 118-122
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Wan DC, Tseng CY, Anderson-Dam J, Dalio AL, Crisera CA, Festekjian JH. Inclusion of mesh in donor-site repair of free TRAM and muscle-sparing free TRAM flaps yields rates of abdominal complications comparable to those of DIEP flap reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 126 (02) 367-374
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Chang EI, Chang EI, Soto-Miranda MA. et al. Comprehensive analysis of donor-site morbidity in abdominally based free flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 132 (06) 1383-1391
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Pierpont YN, Dinh TP, Salas RE. et al. Obesity and surgical wound healing: a current review. ISRN Obes 2014; 2014: 638936
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Kraft CT, Molina BJ, Skoracki RJ. Polypropylene mesh complications in the sublay position after abdominally based breast reconstruction: Les complications des treillis de polypropylène en sous-couche après une reconstruction mammaire par voie abdominale. Plast Surg (Oakv) 2021; 29 (01) 16-20
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Ricci JA, Kamali P, Becherer BE. et al. Umbilical necrosis rates after abdominal-based microsurgical breast reconstruction. J Surg Res 2017; 215: 257-263
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Haddock NT, Kelling JA, Teotia SS. Neoumbilicus after selective excision in deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020; 146 (05) 548e-551e
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Haddock NT, Steppe C, Teotia SS. Aesthetic evaluation and validation: umbilicus reconstruction after DIEP flap. J Reconstr Microsurg 2023
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Andersen ES, Weintraub C, Reuter Muñoz KD. et al. The impact of preoperative breast volume on development of mastectomy skin flap necrosis in immediate breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2022; 88 (5, Suppl 5): S403-S409
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Abedi N, Ho AL, Knox A. et al. Predictors of mastectomy flap necrosis in patients undergoing immediate breast reconstruction: a review of 718 patients. Ann Plast Surg 2016; 76 (06) 629-634
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Sue GR, Lee GK. Mastectomy skin necrosis after breast reconstruction: a comparative analysis between autologous reconstruction and implant-based reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2018; 80 (5S, Suppl 5): S285-S287
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Lu Wang M, Valenti AB, Thomas G, Huang H, Cohen LE, Otterburn DM. A comparative analysis of risk factors for breast skin necrosis following autologous versus device-based breast reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 2023; 39 (04) 288-294
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Pittelkow E, DeBrock W, Christopher L. et al. Advantages of the delayed-immediate microsurgical breast reconstruction: extending the choice. J Reconstr Microsurg 2022; 38 (07) 579-584
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Yoon AP, Qi J, Brown DL. et al. Outcomes of immediate versus delayed breast reconstruction: results of a multicenter prospective study. Breast 2018; 37: 72-79
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Fischer JP, Sieber B, Nelson JA. et al. Comprehensive outcome and cost analysis of free tissue transfer for breast reconstruction: an experience with 1303 flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 131 (02) 195-203
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Ochoa O, Chrysopoulo M, Nastala C, Ledoux P, Pisano S. Abdominal wall stability and flap complications after deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction: does body mass index make a difference? Analysis of 418 patients and 639 flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 130 (01) 21e-33e
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Goltsman D, Warrier S, Mak C, Spillane A, Ascherman JA. Association between body mass index and adverse surgical outcomes of implant-based breast reconstruction: a prospective cohort study of 5,545 breast reconstructions. Ann Breast Surg 2021;6. Doi: 10.21037/abs-21-2
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Haddock NT, Teotia SS. Efficient DIEP flap: bilateral breast reconstruction in less than four hours. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2021; 9 (09) e3801
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Haddock NT, Dumestre DO, Teotia SS. Efficiency in DIEP flap breast reconstruction: the real benefit of computed tomographic angiography imaging. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020; 146 (04) 719-723
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Temple-Oberle C, Shea-Budgell MA, Tan M. et al; ERAS Society. Consensus review of optimal perioperative care in breast reconstruction: Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Society recommendations. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 139 (05) 1056e-1071e
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 63 Soteropulos CE, Tang SYQ, Poore SO. Enhanced recovery after surgery in breast reconstruction: a systematic review. J Reconstr Microsurg 2019; 35 (09) 695-704
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 64 Offodile II AC, Gu C, Boukovalas S. et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways in breast reconstruction: systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2019; 173 (01) 65-77
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 65 Haddock NT, Garza R, Boyle CE, Teotia SS. Observations from implementation of the ERAS protocol after DIEP flap breast reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 2022; 38 (06) 506-510
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar