To compare the exposure of the craniolateral approach (CLA) with craniomedial approach (CMA) of the radius in dogs. To make general observations of each approach that may affect the ease of fracture repair.
Study Design
Six canine cadavers were used in the study to compare the exposed surface area, length, and width of radius with CLA and CMA (n = 12).
Results
The CLA exposed a larger surface area of the radius compared with the CMA (p = 0.01). The CLA of the radius had greater proximal width compared with the CMA (p = 0.01). There was no significant difference in the length of exposed radii with either approach.
Conclusion
The CLA provided greater exposure for internal fixation of the radius in dogs.
K.T.L.: concept—lead; data curation—lead; study design—lead; data analysis and interpretation—lead; revising and draft—lead. D.A.D.: concept—lead; data curation—equal; study design—lead; data analysis and interpretation—partial; revising and draft—equal. C.E.D.: concept—partial; study design—partial; revising—partial.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
References
1
Larsen LJ,
Roush JK,
McLaughlin RM.
Bone plate fixation of distal radius and ulna fractures in small- and miniature-breed dogs. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1999; 35 (03) 243-250
2
Haas B,
Reichler IM,
Montavon PM.
Use of the tubular external fixator in the treatment of distal radial and ulnar fractures in small dogs and cats. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2003; 16 (03) 132-137
3
De Arburn Parent R,
Benamou J,
Gatineau M,
Clerfond P,
Planté J.
Open reduction and cranial bone plate fixation of fractures involving the distal aspect of the radius and ulna in miniature- and toy-breed dogs: 102 cases (2008-2015). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2017; 250 (12) 1419-1426
6
Gilbert ED,
Lewis DD,
Townsend S,
Kim SE.
Comparison of two external fixator systems for fracture reduction during minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis in simulated antebrachial fractures. Vet Surg 2017; 46 (07) 971-980
7
Hudson CC,
Lewis DD,
Pozzi A.
Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis in small animals: radius and ulna fractures. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2012; 42 (05) 983-996 , vii
8
Hudson CC,
Pozzi A,
Lewis DD.
Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis: applications and techniques in dogs and cats. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2009; 22 (03) 175-182
9
Pozzi A,
Hudson CC,
Gauthier CM,
Lewis DD.
Retrospective comparison of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis and open reduction and internal fixation of radius-ulna fractures in dogs. Vet Surg 2013; 42 (01) 19-27
11
Pozzi A,
Lewis DD,
Scheuermann LM,
Castelli E,
Longo F.
A review of minimally invasive fracture stabilization in dogs and cats. Vet Surg 2021; 50 (Suppl 1, Suppl 1): O5-O16
12
Pozzi A,
Risselada M,
Winter MD.
Assessment of fracture healing after minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis or open reduction and internal fixation of coexisting radius and ulna fractures in dogs via ultrasonography and radiography. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2012; 241 (06) 744-753
13
Townsend S,
Lewis DD.
Use of the minimally invasive reduction instrumentation system for facilitating alignment and reduction when performing minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis in three dogs. Case Rep Vet Med 2018; 2018: 2976795
14
Sardinas JC,
Montavon PM.
Use of a medial bone plate for repair of radius and ulna fractures in dogs and cats: a report of 22 cases. Vet Surg 1997; 26 (02) 108-113
15
Lederer XJ,
Lewis DD.
Comparison of cranial versus medial minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis applications for the stabilization of simulated radius and ulna fractures in dog cadavers. Open Vet J 2023; 13 (05) 501-509
17
Hittmair KM,
Groessl V,
Mayrhofer E.
Radiographic and ultrasonographic diagnosis of stenosing tenosynovitis of the abductor pollicis longus muscle in dogs. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2012; 53 (02) 135-141
