ERN eUROGEN Guidelines on the Management of Anorectal Malformations, Part IV: Organization of Care and Communication between Providers

Abstract

Introduction Being born with an anorectal malformation (ARM) can have profound and lifelong implications for patients and parents. Organization of care and communication between health care providers is an overlooked area of patient care. The European Reference Network eUROGEN for rare and complex urogenital conditions assembled a panel of experts to address these challenges and develop comprehensive guidelines for the management of ARM.

Methods The Dutch Quality Standard for ARM served as the basis for the development of guidelines. Literature was searched in Medline, Embase, and Cochrane. The ADAPTE method was utilized to incorporate the newest available evidence. A panel of 15 experts from seven European countries assessed currency, acceptability, and applicability of recommendations. Recommendations from the Dutch Quality Standard were adapted, adopted, or rejected and recommendations were formed considering all available evidence, expert consensus, and the European context.

Results Aspects pertaining to organization of care, patient/parent/health care provider communication, and referral and collaboration between providers caring for ARM patients were assessed. Two new studies were identified. In total, the panel adapted 12 recommendations, adopted 7, and developed 2 de novo. The overall level of newly found evidence was considered low and most recommendations were based on expert opinion.

Conclusion Collaborative care and organization of care are gaining importance in the field of ARM. This guideline gives practical guidance on how to achieve better communication and collaboration between all involved parties, applicable at the European level.

Keywords

ARM - collaborative care - communication

Collaboration

This work was performed in collaboration with experts involved in ERN ERNICA, EUPSA, and Qualicura.

^* Nicole Schwarzer and Jan-Hendrik Gosemann contributed equally to this article.

Publication History

Received: 14 August 2024

Accepted: 27 August 2024

Article published online:
11 October 2024

• References

• 1 Levitt MA, Peña A. Anorectal malformations. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2007; 2 (01) 33
• 2 Choueiki JM, Sales S, Callicott S. et al. Is collaborative care the future of medicine? Lessons learned from the care of children with colorectal conditions. Children (Basel) 2024; 11 (05) 570
• 3 Bjoersum-Meyer T, Kaalby L, Lund L. et al. Long-term functional urinary and sexual outcomes in patients with anorectal malformations-a systematic review. Eur Urol Open Sci 2021; 25: 29-38
• 4 Danielson J, Karlbom U, Graf W, Wester T. Outcome in adults with anorectal malformations in relation to modern classification - Which patients do we need to follow beyond childhood?. J Pediatr Surg 2017; 52 (03) 463-468
• 5 Rigueros Springford L, Connor MJ, Jones K, Kapetanakis VV, Giuliani S. Prevalence of active long-term problems in patients with anorectal malformations: a systematic review. Dis Colon Rectum 2016; 59 (06) 570-580
• 6 Durkin N, Davenport M. Centralization of pediatric surgical procedures in the United Kingdom. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2017; 27 (05) 416-421
• 7 Wijnen MHWA, Hulscher JBF. Centralization of pediatric surgical care in the Netherlands: lessons learned. J Pediatr Surg 2022; 57 (02) 178-181
• 8 Hukkinen M, Kerola A, Lohi J. et al. Treatment Policy and liver histopathology predict biliary atresia outcomes: results after national centralization and protocol biopsies. J Am Coll Surg 2018; 226 (01) 46-57.e1
• 9 Kwaliteitsstandaarden Zeldzame Aandoeningen. Kwaliteitsstandaard Anorectale Malformatie. Accessed June 17, 2024 at: https://vsop.nl/media/zorgstandaard/kwaliteidsstandaard-anorectale-malformatie/
• 10 The ADAPTE Collaboration. The ADAPTE Process: Resource Toolkit for Guideline Adaptation. Version 2.0. 2010. Available at at: http://www.g-i-n.net
• 11 Brouwers MC, Kho ME, Browman GP. et al; AGREE Next Steps Consortium. AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care. CMAJ 2010; 182 (18) E839-E842
• 12 Kastenberg ZJ, Wall N, Malhotra N. et al. The effect of multidisciplinary colorectal center development on short-term hospital readmissions for patients with anorectal malformations or Hirschsprung disease. J Pediatr Surg 2020; 55 (03) 541-544
• 13 Lacher M, Barthlen W, Eckoldt F. et al. Operative volume of newborn surgery in German University hospitals: high volume versus low volume centers. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2022; 32 (05) 391-398
• 14 Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EV. et al. Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 2002; 346 (15) 1128-1137
• 15 Amini N, Spolverato G, Kim Y, Pawlik TM. Trends in hospital volume and failure to rescue for pancreatic surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 2015; 19 (09) 1581-1592
• 16 Peiffer SE, Mehl SC, Powell P, Lee TC, Keswani SG, King A. Treatment facility case volume and disparities in outcomes of congenital diaphragmatic hernia cases. J Pediatr Surg 2024; 59 (05) 825-831
• 17 Schmiedeke E, Schaefer S, Aminoff D, Schwarzer N, Jenetzky E. Non-financial conflicts of interest: contribution to a surgical dilemma by the European Reference Networks for Rare Diseases. Pediatr Surg Int 2019; 35 (09) 999-1004
• 18 Wilms M, Jenetzky E, Märzheuser S, Busse R, Nimptsch U. Treatment of anorectal malformations in German hospitals: analysis of National Hospital Discharge Data from 2016 to 2021. . Eur J Pediatr Surg 2024
• 19 Oomen MWN, Hoekstra LT, Bakx R, Heij HA. Learning curves for pediatric laparoscopy: how many operations are enough? The Amsterdam experience with laparoscopic pyloromyotomy. Surg Endosc 2010; 24 (08) 1829-1833
• 20 Hruza M, Weiss HO, Pini G. et al. Complications in 2200 consecutive laparoscopic radical prostatectomies: standardised evaluation and analysis of learning curves. Eur Urol 2010; 58 (05) 733-741