Download PDF
Eur J Pediatr Surg
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1791257
Original Article

European Reference Network eUROGEN Guidelines on the Management of Anorectal Malformations, Part II: Treatment

Ophelia Aubert 
1   Department of Pediatric Surgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
,
Willemijn F. E. Irvine
2   Department of Evidence Based Medicine and Methodology, Qualicura Healthcare Support Agency, Breda, The Netherlands
,
Dalia Aminoff
3   AIMAR-Associazione Italiana Malformazioni AnoRettali, Rome, Italy
,
Ivo de Blaauw 
4   Department of Pediatric Surgery, Radboudumc Amalia Children's Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
,
Salvatore Cascio
5   Department of Pediatric Surgery, School of Medicine, University College Dublin and Children's Health Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
,
Célia Cretolle
6   Department of Pediatric Surgery, Urology, and Transplantation, Hôpital Necker Enfants Malades, APHP, Université de Paris Cité - National Rare Disease Center MAREP, Paris, France
,
Barbara Daniela Iacobelli
7   Department of the Fetus-Newborn-Infant, Ospedale Bambin Gesù - Medical and Surgical, Rome, Italy
,
Konstantinos Mantzios
2   Department of Evidence Based Medicine and Methodology, Qualicura Healthcare Support Agency, Breda, The Netherlands
,
Paola Midrio
8   Pediatric Surgery Unit, Cà Foncello Hospital, Treviso, Veneto, Italy
,
Marc Miserez
9   Department of Abdominal Surgery, UZ Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium
,
Sabine Sarnacki
6   Department of Pediatric Surgery, Urology, and Transplantation, Hôpital Necker Enfants Malades, APHP, Université de Paris Cité - National Rare Disease Center MAREP, Paris, France
,
Eberhard Schmiedeke 
10   Department of Pediatric Surgery and Urology, Centre for Child and Youth Health, Klinikum Bremen-Mitte, Bremen, Germany
,
Nicole Schwarzer
11   Selfhelp Organization for Parents and Patients Born with Anorectal Malformations—SoMA e.V., Munich, Germany
,
Cornelius Sloots
12   Department of Pediatric Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
,
Pernilla Stenström 
13   Department of Pediatrics, Clinical Sciences Lund University, Skane University Hospital Lund, Lund, Sweden
,
Martin Lacher   *
14   Department of Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
,
Jan-Hendrik Gosemann   *
14   Department of Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
› Author Affiliations Funding This study was supported by the European Union.
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Introduction Anorectal malformations (ARMs) are rare birth defects affecting the anorectum and oftentimes the genitourinary region. The management of ARM patients is complex and requires highly specialized surgical and medical care. The European Reference Network eUROGEN for rare and complex urogenital conditions aimed to develop comprehensive guidelines for the management of ARM applicable on a European level.

Methods The Dutch Quality Standard for ARM served as the basis for the development of guidelines. Literature was searched in Medline, Embase, and Cochrane. The ADAPTE method was utilized to incorporate the newest available evidence. A panel of 15 experts from seven European countries assessed currency, acceptability, and applicability of recommendations. Recommendations from the Dutch Quality Standard were adapted, adopted, or rejected and recommendations were formed considering the current evidence, expert opinion, and the European context.

Results Surgical and medical treatment of ARM, postoperative instructions, toilet training, and management of fecal and urinary incontinence were addressed. Seven new studies were identified. The panel adapted 23 recommendations, adopted 3, and developed 8 de novo. The overall level of newly found evidence was considered low.

Conclusion Treatment of ARM patients requires a multidisciplinary team and expertise about anatomical and surgical aspects of the disease, as well as long-term follow-up. This guideline offers recommendations for surgical and medical treatment of ARM and associated complications, according to the best available evidence and applicable on a European level.

Keywords

ARM - guidelines - quality standard - evidence-based - consensus

Collaboration

This work was performed in collaboration with experts involved in ERN ERNICA, EUPSA, and Qualicura.


* These authors contributed equally.


Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 14 August 2024

Accepted: 27 August 2024

Article published online:
19 September 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 Levitt MA, Peña A. Anorectal malformations. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2007; 2 (01) 33
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 van der Steeg HJ, Schmiedeke E, Bagolan P. et al. European consensus meeting of ARM-Net members concerning diagnosis and early management of newborns with anorectal malformations. Tech Coloproctol 2015; 19 (03) 181-185
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Peña A, Devries PA. Posterior sagittal anorectoplasty: important technical considerations and new applications. J Pediatr Surg 1982; 17 (06) 796-811
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Georgeson KE, Inge TH, Albanese CT. Laparoscopically assisted anorectal pull-through for high imperforate anus–a new technique. J Pediatr Surg 2000; 35 (06) 927-930 , discussion 930–931
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Okada A, Kamata S, Imura K. et al. Anterior sagittal anorectoplasty for rectovestibular and anovestibular fistula. J Pediatr Surg 1992; 27 (01) 85-88
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Kwaliteitsstandaarden Zeldzame Aandoeningen. Kwaliteitsstandaard Anorectale Malformatie. Accessed June 17, 2024 at: https://vsop.nl/media/zorgstandaard/kwaliteidsstandaard-anorectale-malformatie/
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 The ADAPTE Collaboration. The ADAPTE Process: Resource Toolkit for Guideline Adaptation. Version 2.0. 2010 . Accessed September 5, 2024 at: http://www.g-i-n.net
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Brouwers MC, Kho ME, Browman GP. et al; AGREE Next Steps Consortium. AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care. CMAJ 2010; 182 (18) E839-E842
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Kubota M, Osuga Y, Kato K. et al. Treatment guidelines for persistent cloaca, cloacal exstrophy, and Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Häuser syndrome for the appropriate transitional care of patients. Surg Today 2019; 49 (12) 985-1002
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Shirota C, Suzuki K, Uchida H. et al. Investigation of the feasibility and safety of single-stage anorectoplasty in neonates with anovestibular fistula. Pediatr Surg Int 2018; 34 (10) 1117-1120
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Amerstorfer EE, Schmiedeke E, Samuk I. et al; Arm-Net Consortium. Clinical differentiation between a normal anus, anterior anus, congenital anal stenosis, and perineal fistula: definitions and consequences-the ARM-Net Consortium Consensus. Children (Basel) 2022; 9 (06) 831
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Lauriti G, Di Renzo D, Lelli Chiesa P, Zani A, Pierro A. One-stage repair of anorectal malformations in females with vestibular fistula: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatr Surg Int 2019; 35 (01) 77-85
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Ahmad H, Skeritt C, Halleran DR. et al. Are routine postoperative dilations necessary after primary posterior sagittal anorectoplasty? A randomized controlled trial. J Pediatr Surg 2021; 56 (08) 1449-1453
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Gupta A, Agarwala S, Sreenivas V, Srinivas M, Bhatnagar V. Primary definitive procedure versus conventional three-staged procedure for the management of low-type anorectal malformation in females: a randomized controlled trial. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg 2017; 22 (02) 87-91
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Wood RJ, Halleran DR, Ahmad H. et al. Assessing the benefit of reoperations in patients who suffer from fecal incontinence after repair of their anorectal malformation. J Pediatr Surg 2020; 55 (10) 2159-2165
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Youssef F, Arbash G, Puligandla PS, Baird RJ. Loop versus divided colostomy for the management of anorectal malformations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pediatr Surg 2017; 52 (05) 783-790
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Mullassery D, Iacona R, Cross K. et al. Loop colostomies are safe in anorectal malformations. J Pediatr Surg 2018; 53 (11) 2170-2173
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Karlsen RA, Hoel AT, Gjone H, Bjørnland K. Nurses' experiences with anal dilatations in babies with anorectal malformations - a focus group interview study. J Pediatr Surg 2023; 58 (10) 1929-1934
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Diseth TH. Dissociation following traumatic medical treatment procedures in childhood: a longitudinal follow-up. Dev Psychopathol 2006; 18 (01) 233-251
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Diseth TH, Egeland T, Emblem R. Effects of anal invasive treatment and incontinence on mental health and psychosocial functioning of adolescents with Hirschsprung's disease and low anorectal anomalies. J Pediatr Surg 1998; 33 (03) 468-475
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Jenetzky E, Reckin S, Schmiedeke E. et al. Practice of dilatation after surgical correction in anorectal malformations. Pediatr Surg Int 2012; 28 (11) 1095-1099
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Märzheuser S, Karsten K, Rothe K. Improvements in incontinence with self-management in patients with anorectal malformations. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2016; 26 (02) 186-191
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Hoel AT, Teig CJ, Lindam A, Øresland T, Bjørnland K. Evaluation of a group-based patient education program promoting self-management in adults with hirschsprung disease and anorectal malformations. J Pediatr Surg 2023; 58 (12) 2332-2336
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar