Download PDF
Semin intervent Radiol 2024; 41(05): 444-454
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1791720
Review Article

Bone Biopsies: Practical Considerations and Technical Tips

Andrew E. Williams
1   Department of Radiology, University of Chicago School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
,
Jessie W. Ho
2   Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
,
Narayan Sundaram
1   Department of Radiology, University of Chicago School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Percutaneous image-guided needle biopsies are a safe and minimally invasive method of obtaining tissue of bone lesions. Radiologists are an integral part of a multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach to patient care in obtaining tissue for both pathologic diagnosis and advanced genetic/molecular testing. By utilizing image guidance, radiologists can target bone lesions with a very low complication rate. This review will discuss our approach to image-guided biopsies of bone lesions. Radiologists should be familiar with patient selection and imaging workup prior to performing biopsies, as well as the importance of coordinating the biopsy approach and sampling with the patient's clinical team. Management of bleeding and thrombotic risk in patients undergoing bone biopsies is also an important preprocedural consideration and will be discussed. The majority of bone biopsies are performed utilizing moderate sedation for patient analgesia and comfort, but close attention should be paid to patient comorbidities and potential interacting medications. Although computed tomography guidance remains the mainstay of image-guided biopsy, there are some circumstances in which ultrasound or fluoroscopic guidance may be beneficial. New advances in powered drill technology have made tissue sampling of bone lesions particularly sclerotic bone lesions both safer and faster with increased tissue yield. Finally, we will discuss image-guided biopsy of difficult anatomic regions that require special techniques to yield tissue safely.

Keywords

bone biopsy - computed tomography - ultrasonography - bone neoplasm - interventional radiology

Permissions

None required.




Publication History

Article published online:
10 December 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Tomasian A, Hillen TJ, Jennings JW. Bone biopsies: what radiologists need to know. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2020; 215 (03) 523-533
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Marshall D, Laberge JM, Firetag B, Miller T, Kerlan RK. The changing face of percutaneous image-guided biopsy: molecular profiling and genomic analysis in current practice. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2013; 24 (08) 1094-1103
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Huang AJ, Kattapuram SV. Musculoskeletal neoplasms: biopsy and intervention. Radiol Clin North Am 2011; 49 (06) 1287-1305 , vii
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Spinnato P, Colangeli M, Rinaldi R, Ponti F. Percutaneous CT-guided bone biopsies: indications, feasibility and diagnostic yield in the different skeletal sites-from the skull to the toe. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13 (14) 2350
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Kubo T, Furuta T, Johan MP, Sakuda T, Ochi M, Adachi N. A meta-analysis supports core needle biopsy by radiologists for better histological diagnosis in soft tissue and bone sarcomas. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018; 97 (29) e11567
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Welker JA, Henshaw RM, Jelinek J, Shmookler BM, Malawer MM. The percutaneous needle biopsy is safe and recommended in the diagnosis of musculoskeletal masses. Cancer 2000; 89 (12) 2677-2686
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Clayer M, Duncan W. Importance of biopsy of new bone lesions in patients with previous carcinoma. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006; 451 (451) 208-211
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Morris R, Shepherd K, Cribb G, Singh J, Tyrrell P, Cool P. Bone biopsy results in patients with a history of malignancy: a case series of 378 patients. Skeletal Radiol 2021; 50 (06) 1111-1116
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Tam AL, Lim HJ, Wistuba II. et al. Image-guided biopsy in the era of personalized cancer care: proceedings from the society of interventional radiology research consensus panel. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2016; 27 (01) 8-19
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Basta YL, Bolle S, Fockens P, Tytgat KMAJ. The value of multidisciplinary team meetings for patients with gastrointestinal malignancies: a systematic review. Ann Surg Oncol 2017; 24 (09) 2669-2678
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Siegel GW, Biermann JS, Chugh R. et al. The multidisciplinary management of bone and soft tissue sarcoma: an essential organizational framework. J Multidiscip Healthc 2015; 8: 109-115
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Cimadamore A, Rescigno P, Conteduca V. et al; Italian Society for Uro-Oncology (SIUrO). SIUrO best practice recommendations to optimize BRCA 1/2 gene testing from DNA extracted from bone biopsy in mCRPC patients (BRCA optimal bone biopsy procedure: BOP). Virchows Arch 2023; 483 (05) 579-589
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Practice Guidelines for Moderate Procedural Sedation and Analgesia. Practice guidelines for moderate procedural sedation and analgesia 2018: A Report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Moderate Procedural Sedation and Analgesia, the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, American College of Radiology, American Dental Association, American Society of Dentist Anesthesiologists, and Society of Interventional Radiology. Anesthesiology 2018; 128 (03) 437-479
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Patel IJ, Rahim S, Davidson JC. et al. Society of Interventional Radiology Consensus Guidelines for the periprocedural management of thrombotic and bleeding risk in patients undergoing percutaneous image-guided interventions - Part II: Recommendations: endorsed by the Canadian Association for Interventional Radiology and the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2019; 30 (08) 1168-1184.e1
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Bick RL. Cancer-associated thrombosis. N Engl J Med 2003; 349 (02) 109-111
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Hornor MA, Duane TM, Ehlers AP. et al. American College of Surgeons' Guidelines for the perioperative management of antithrombotic medication. J Am Coll Surg 2018; 227 (05) 521-536.e1
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Fu T, Plecha D, Sommer J. System-driven longitudinal follow-up of incidental imaging findings. Br J Radiol 2023; 96 (1142) 20220573
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Hegde G, Azzopardi C, Patel A, Davies AM, James SL, Botchu R. “Do-not-touch” lesions of bone revisited. Clin Radiol 2022; 77 (03) 179-187
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Costelloe CM, Madewell JE. Radiography in the initial diagnosis of primary bone tumors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013; 200 (01) 3-7
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Ponti F, Arioli A, Longo C. et al. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous bone biopsy: feasibility, diagnostic yield and technical notes. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13 (10) 1773
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Li Y, Du Y, Luo TY. et al. Factors influencing diagnostic yield of CT-guided percutaneous core needle biopsy for bone lesions. Clin Radiol 2014; 69 (01) e43-e47
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Rimondi E, Rossi G, Bartalena T. et al. Percutaneous CT-guided biopsy of the musculoskeletal system: results of 2027 cases. Eur J Radiol 2011; 77 (01) 34-42
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Jelinek JS, Murphey MD, Welker JA. et al. Diagnosis of primary bone tumors with image-guided percutaneous biopsy: experience with 110 tumors. Radiology 2002; 223 (03) 731-737
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Hillen TJ, Talbert RJ, Friedman MV. et al. Biopsy of CT-occult bone lesions using anatomic landmarks for CT guidance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2017; 209 (01) 214-221
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Gil-Sánchez S, Marco-Doménech SF, Irurzun-López J, Fernández-García P, de la Iglesia-Cardeña P, Ambit-Capdevila S. Ultrasound-guided skeletal biopsies. Skeletal Radiol 2001; 30 (11) 615-619
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Garnon J, Koch G, Tsoumakidou G. et al. Ultrasound-guided biopsies of bone lesions without cortical disruption using fusion imaging and needle tracking: proof of concept. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2017; 40 (08) 1267-1273
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Saifuddin A, Mitchell R, Burnett SJ, Sandison A, Pringle JA. Ultrasound-guided needle biopsy of primary bone tumours. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2000; 82 (01) 50-54
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Chira RI, Chira A, Manzat-Saplacan RM. et al. Ultrasound-guided bone lesions biopsies - a systematic review. Med Ultrason 2017; 19 (03) 302-309
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Ahmad S, Jhaveri MD, Mossa-Basha M, Oztek M, Hartman J, Gaddikeri S. A comparison of CT-guided bone biopsy and fluoroscopic-guided disc aspiration as diagnostic methods in the management of spondylodiscitis. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2022; 51 (05) 728-732
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Shellikeri S, Setser RM, Hwang TJ. et al. Real-time fluoroscopic needle guidance in the interventional radiology suite using navigational software for percutaneous bone biopsies in children. Pediatr Radiol 2017; 47 (08) 963-973
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Carrino JA, Khurana B, Ready JE, Silverman SG, Winalski CS. Magnetic resonance imaging-guided percutaneous biopsy of musculoskeletal lesions. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89 (10) 2179-2187
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Kumar N, Tan WLB, Wei W, Vellayappan BA. An overview of the tumors affecting the spine-inside to out. Neurooncol Pract 2020; 7 (Suppl. 01) i10-i17
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Ariizumi T, Kawashima H, Yamagishi T. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of fine needle aspiration cytology and core needle biopsy in bone and soft tissue tumor: a comparative study of the image-guided and blindly performed procedure. Ann Diagn Pathol 2022; 59: 151936
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Kaur I, Handa U, Kundu R, Garg SK, Mohan H. Role of fine-needle aspiration cytology and core needle biopsy in diagnosing musculoskeletal neoplasms. J Cytol 2016; 33 (01) 7-12
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 35 Chambers M, O'Hern K, Kerr DA. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy for the diagnosis of bone and soft tissue lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Soc Cytopathol 2020; 9 (05) 429-441
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 36 Lima PM, Oliveira MP, da Silva HJ, de Mello RJ. The role of cytology in the diagnosis of musculoskeletal neoplasms: systematic review. Acta Ortop Bras 2012; 20 (01) 48-52
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 37 Domanski HA, Akerman M, Carlén B. et al. Core-needle biopsy performed by the cytopathologist: a technique to complement fine-needle aspiration of soft tissue and bone lesions. Cancer 2005; 105 (04) 229-239
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 38 Wu JS, Goldsmith JD, Horwich PJ, Shetty SK, Hochman MG. Bone and soft-tissue lesions: what factors affect diagnostic yield of image-guided core-needle biopsy?. Radiology 2008; 248 (03) 962-970
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 39 Exner GU, Kurrer MO, Mamisch-Saupe N, Cannon SR. The tactics and technique of musculoskeletal biopsy. EFORT Open Rev 2017; 2 (02) 51-57
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 40 Lalita S, Harikrishnan T, Azariah ED, Chandrasekaran D. Tru-Cut needle biopsy: a novel approach in the diagnosis of solid oral pathologies. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol 2023; 27 (Suppl. 01) S85-S90
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 41 Joshi A, Magar SR, Chand P, Panth R, Khatri Chhetri BR. Tru-cut biopsy as the initial method of tissue diagnosis in bone tumors with soft tissue extension. Indian J Orthop 2013; 47 (02) 195-199
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 42 Woodcock NP, Glaves I, Morgan DR, MacFie J. Ultrasound-guided Tru-Cut biopsy of the breast. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1998; 80 (04) 253-256
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 43 Kovalik EC, Schwab SJ, Gunnells JC, Bowie D, Smith SR. No change in complication rate using spring-loaded gun compared to traditional percutaneous renal allograft biopsy techniques. Clin Nephrol 1996; 45 (06) 383-385
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 44 Puri A, Shingade VU, Agarwal MG. et al. CT-guided percutaneous core needle biopsy in deep seated musculoskeletal lesions: a prospective study of 128 cases. Skeletal Radiol 2006; 35 (03) 138-143
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 45 Shaltot A, Michell PA, Betts JA, Darby AJ, Gishen P. Jamshidi needle biopsy of bone lesions. Clin Radiol 1982; 33 (02) 193-196
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 46 Fotiadis N, De Paepe KN, Bonne L. et al. Comparison of a coaxial versus non-coaxial liver biopsy technique in an oncological setting: diagnostic yield, complications and seeding risk. Eur Radiol 2020; 30 (12) 6702-6708
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 47 Wilkins BS, Clark DM. Making the most of bone marrow trephine biopsy. Histopathology 2009; 55 (06) 631-640
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 48 Giovannini M, Ren H, Cao J, Ehmann K. Study on design and cutting parameters of rotating needles for core biopsy. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2018; 86: 43-54
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 49 Singh DK, Boruah T, Sharma A, Khanna G, Krishna LG, Kumar N. Comparative analysis of CT guided vertebral biopsy by a conventional bone biopsy needle versus bone biopsy needle with acquisition cradle. J Clin Orthop Trauma 2021; 19: 231-236
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 50 Huh EH, Yi PH, Ray DM, Hsu LCH, Hui FK, Khan M. Comparison of powered drill & manual bone biopsy systems: Does the diagnostic yield justify the cost?. J Clin Neurosci 2020; 73: 125-129
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 51 Masood S, Mallinson PI, Sheikh A, Ouellette H, Munk PL. Percutaneous bone biopsy. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 2022; 25 (01) 100800
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 52 Bierry G, Buy X, Guth S, Guermazi A, Gangi A. Percutaneous bone biopsy. In: Gangi A, Guth S, Guermazi A. eds. Imaging in Percutaneous Musculoskeletal Interventions. Springer Berlin Heidelberg;; 2009: 37-72
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 53 Hjortholm N, Jaddini E, Hałaburda K, Snarski E. Strategies of pain reduction during the bone marrow biopsy. Ann Hematol 2013; 92 (02) 145-149
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 54 Veltri A, Bargellini I, Giorgi L, Almeida PAMS, Akhan O. CIRSE guidelines on percutaneous needle biopsy (PNB). Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2017; 40 (10) 1501-1513
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 55 Spirin DS, Kobyakov GL, Cherekaev VA. et al. [Epidemiology, diagnosis, clinical symptoms, and classification of malignant primary skull base tumors]. Vopr Neirokhir 2016; 80 (03) 106-113
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 56 Shah MV, Haines SJ. Pediatric skull, skull base, and meningeal tumors. Neurosurg Clin N Am 1992; 3 (04) 893-924
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 57 Tomasian A, Hillen TJ, Jennings JW. Percutaneous CT-Guided Skull Biopsy: Feasibility, Safety, and Diagnostic Yield. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2019; 40 (02) 309-312
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 58 Gupta S, Wallace MJ, Cardella JF, Kundu S, Miller DL, Rose SC. Society of Interventional Radiology Standards of Practice Committee. Quality improvement guidelines for percutaneous needle biopsy. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2010; 21 (07) 969-975
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 59 Sundararajan SH, Cox M, Sedora-Roman N, Ranganathan S, Hurst R, Pukenas B. Image-guided percutaneous calvarial biopsy with low-dose CT-fluoroscopy: technique, safety, and utility in 12 patients. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2022; 45 (01) 134-136
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 60 Saththianathan M, Mallinson PI, Munk PL, Heran MKS. Percutaneous spine biopsy: reaching those hard-to-reach places. Skeletal Radiol 2023; 52 (10) 1803-1814
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 61 Peh W. CT-guided percutaneous biopsy of spinal lesions. Biij 2006; 2 (03) e25
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 62 Pierot L, Boulin A. Percutaneous biopsy of the thoracic and lumbar spine: transpedicular approach under fluoroscopic guidance. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999; 20 (01) 23-25
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 63 Singh DK, Kumar N, Nayak BK. et al. Approach-based techniques of CT-guided percutaneous vertebral biopsy. Diagn Interv Radiol 2020; 26 (02) 143-146
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 64 Oñate Miranda M, Moser TP. A practical guide for planning pelvic bone percutaneous interventions (biopsy, tumour ablation and cementoplasty). Insights Imaging 2018; 9 (03) 275-285
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 65 Nourbakhsh A, Grady JJ, Garges KJ. Percutaneous spine biopsy: a meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008; 90 (08) 1722-1725
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 66 Jakanani GC, Saifuddin A. Percutaneous image-guided needle biopsy of rib lesions: a retrospective study of diagnostic outcome in 51 cases. Skeletal Radiol 2013; 42 (01) 85-90
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 67 Huang JW, Souza C, Jibri Z, Rakhra KS. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous rib biopsy: a safe procedure with high diagnostic yield. Clin Radiol 2019; 74 (08) 650.e1-650.e6
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 68 Botchu R, Nischal N, Botchu B, Iyengar KP. Piggyback technique - a safe way of performing rib biopsy. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2023; 33 (04) 541-542
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 69 Ortiz AO, Brooks MK. Rib Biopsy. Image-Guided Percutaneous Spine Biopsy. Springer International Publishing;; 2017: 185-202
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 70 Baffour FI, Moynagh MR, Eiken PW. et al. Effectiveness and safety of percutaneous CT-guided rib biopsy. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2019; 30 (01) 82-86
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 71 Meek RD, Mills MK, Hanrahan CJ. et al. Pearls and pitfalls for soft-tissue and bone biopsies: a cross-institutional review. Radiographics 2020; 40 (01) 266-290
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 72 Li NP, Wingfield MA, Mills MK, Beckett BR, Hansford BG. Percutaneous image-guided sternal biopsy: a cross-institutional retrospective review of diagnostic yield and safety in 50 cases. Skeletal Radiol 2021; 50 (03) 495-504
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 73 Song Y, Kwon JW. Percutaneous CT-guided sternal biopsy: factors affecting the diagnostic yield. Acta Radiol 2017; 58 (07) 825-833
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 74 Espinosa LA, Jamadar DA, Jacobson JA. et al. CT-guided biopsy of bone: a radiologist's perspective. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008; 190 (05) W283-W289
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 75 Liu PT, Valadez SD, Chivers FS, Roberts CC, Beauchamp CP. Anatomically based guidelines for core needle biopsy of bone tumors: implications for limb-sparing surgery. Radiographics 2007; 27 (01) 189-205 , discussion 206
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 76 Anderson MW, Temple HT, Dussault RG, Kaplan PA. Compartmental anatomy: relevance to staging and biopsy of musculoskeletal tumors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999; 173 (06) 1663-1671
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 77 Gupta S, Nguyen HL, Morello Jr FA. et al. Various approaches for CT-guided percutaneous biopsy of deep pelvic lesions: anatomic and technical considerations. Radiographics 2004; 24 (01) 175-189
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 78 Gandbhir VN, Dussa K, Kakadiya G, Nischay KK, Parekh A. Retrieval of broken bone biopsy needle from the sacroiliac joint - a case report and review of literature. Trauma Case Rep 2021; 31: 100395
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 79 Filippiadis DK, Charalampopoulos G, Mazioti A, Keramida K, Kelekis A. Bone and soft-tissue biopsies: what you need to know. Semin Intervent Radiol 2018; 35 (04) 215-220
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar