RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1800963
Understanding the ECMO, Recovery, and Outcome Experience of Pediatric Respiratory ECMO Survivors
Funding This study was supported in part by the Columbia University Department of Pediatrics Innovation Nucleation Fund. Dr. Geneslaw received support from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, through grant number: KL2TR001874.
Abstract
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is deployed to support children with severe respiratory failure. Unlike neonatal and cardiac ECMO populations, childhood respiratory ECMO survivors are rarely studied as a distinct population, leading to gaps in our understanding of their experiences. This study aimed to describe the family and patient experiences and functional outcomes of childhood respiratory ECMO survivors. Retrospective, mixed-methods, single center cohort study of children who required ECMO for respiratory failure in the pediatric intensive care unit and survived to discharge from May 2014 to December 2020. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with parents, and functional assessments of children were conducted via Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, 3rd edition (VABS-3). Of 22 respiratory ECMO survivors, 15 (68%) were successfully contacted and 12 (55%) completed interviews. Median age was 7 years (IQR: 1-16) at cannulation and 12 years (IQR: 5-16) at interview. Interviews revealed the need for greater preparation before ECMO, and practitioner-led guidance and education during ECMO. Only 50% had a medical home. The magnitude of physical and psychological recovery was unexpected, and mental health needs continued after discharge. VABS-3 was assessed in 92% of participants and varied widely (median, 85, IQR: 74-107). Despite wide ranging outcomes, families shared difficulties surrounding rehabilitation, centralized care, and the emotional toll of their child’s illness. Families desired additional support before, during, and after ECMO, particularly anticipatory guidance. Psychiatric needs were underestimated. Understanding the challenges faced by survivors and their parents will enable pediatric intensivists to better advise families through all phases of ECMO.
Keywords
extracorporeal membrane oxygenation - respiratory failure - follow-up - family-centered - outcomes - pediatricNote
This study was performed at NewYork-Presbyterian Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, United States. Claire M. Hennigan is now a faculty member at NYU Langone Medical Center.
Authors' Contributions
C.M.H. conceptualized and designed the study, designed the data collection instruments, collected data, performed data analysis, drafted the initial manuscript, and critically reviewed and revised the manuscript.
E.W.C. advised on the design of the study, curated data, and critically reviewed and revised the manuscript.
A.P.Z. advised on the selection of the data collection instruments, supervised interpretation of VABS-3 data, and critically reviewed and revised the manuscript.
D.G. advised on design of the study and critically reviewed and revised the manuscript.
M.C.M. designed the data collection instruments and supervised data collection, supervised qualitative data analysis, and critically reviewed and revised the manuscript for important intellectual content.
A.S.G. conceptualized and designed the study, supervised data collection and analysis, supervised the project, and critically reviewed and revised the manuscript for important intellectual content.
All authors approved the final manuscript as submitted and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
Publikationsverlauf
Eingereicht: 29. Mai 2024
Angenommen: 30. Oktober 2024
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
26. Dezember 2024
© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 ELSO Member Centers. ECLS Registry Report 2021: International Summary. April 2021. Accessed November 12, 2024 at: ELSO.org
- 2 Barbaro RP, Paden ML, Guner YS. et al; ELSO member centers. Pediatric Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry International Report 2016. ASAIO J 2017; 63 (04) 456-463
- 3 IJsselstijn H, Hunfeld M, Schiller RM. et al. Improving long-term outcomes after extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: from observational follow-up programs toward risk stratification. Front Pediatr 2018; 6: 177
- 4 Epps S, Nowak TA. Parental perception of neonatal extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Child Health Care 1998; 27 (04) 215-230
- 5 Curley MA, Meyer EC. Parental experience of highly technical therapy: survivors and nonsurvivors of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2003; 4 (02) 214-219
- 6 Lewis AR, Wray J, O'Callaghan M, Wroe AL. Parental symptoms of posttraumatic stress after pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation*. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2014; 15 (02) e80-e88
- 7 Ryerson LM, Guerra GG, Joffe AR. et al; Western Canadian Complex Pediatric Therapies Program Follow-Up Group. Survival and neurocognitive outcomes after cardiac extracorporeal life support in children less than 5 years of age: a ten-year cohort. Circ Heart Fail 2015; 8 (02) 312-321
- 8 Bembea MM, Felling RJ, Caprarola SD. et al. Neurologic outcomes in a two-center cohort of neonatal and pediatric patients supported on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. ASAIO J 2020; 66 (01) 79-88
- 9 Bennett CC, Johnson A, Field DJ, Elbourne D. UK Collaborative ECMO Trial Group. UK collaborative randomised trial of neonatal extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: follow-up to age 4 years. Lancet 2001; 357 (9262) 1094-1096
- 10 Taylor AK, Cousins R, Butt WW. The long-term outcome of children managed with extracorporeal life support: an institutional experience. Crit Care Resusc 2007; 9 (02) 172-177
- 11 Bernbaum JC. Follow-up care of the graduate from neonatal intensive care. In: McInerny TK, Adam HM, Campbell DE, DeWitt TG, Foy JM, Kamat DM. eds. American Academy of Pediatrics Textbook of Pediatric Care. 2nd ed.. Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics; 2017
- 12 Marino BS, Lipkin PH, Newburger JW. et al; American Heart Association Congenital Heart Defects Committee, Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young, Council on Cardiovascular Nursing, and Stroke Council. Neurodevelopmental outcomes in children with congenital heart disease: evaluation and management: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2012; 126 (09) 1143-1172
- 13 Ijsselstijn H, Schiller RM, Holder C, Shappley RKH, Wray J, Hoskote A. Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) guidelines for follow-up after neonatal and pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. ASAIO J 2021; 67 (09) 955-963
- 14 Wray J, Kakat S, Brown K, O'Callaghan M, Thiruchelvam T, Hoskote A. Childhood extracorporeal membrane oxygenation survivors: parents highlight need for structured follow-up and support after hospital discharge. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2020; 21 (05) 461-468
- 15 Fiser DH. Assessing the outcome of pediatric intensive care. J Pediatr 1992; 121 (01) 68-74
- 16 Pollack MM, Holubkov R, Glass P. et al; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Collaborative Pediatric Critical Care Research Network. Functional status scale: new pediatric outcome measure. Pediatrics 2009; 124 (01) e18-e28
- 17 Sparrow SS, Cicchetti DV, Saulnier CA. Vineland-3: Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales. Bloomington, MN: Psychcorp; 2016
- 18 Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 2006; 3 (02) 77-101
- 19 QSR International Pty Ltd. 2018. NVivo (Version 12). Accessed November 12, 2024 at: https://www.qsrinternational.com/nvivo-qualitative-data-analysis-software/home
- 20 Sia C, Tonniges TF, Osterhus E, Taba S. History of the medical home concept. Pediatrics 2004; 113 (5, Suppl): 1473-1478
- 21 Moynihan KM, Purol N, Alexander PMA, Wolfe J, October TW. A communication guide for pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2021; 22 (09) 832-841
- 22 MacLaren G, Fortenberry J, Tibboel D, Laussen PC. Universal follow-up after extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: baby steps toward establishing an international standard of care. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2017; 18 (11) 1070-1072
- 23 Barbaro RP, Brodie D, MacLaren G. Bridging the gap between intensivists and primary care clinicians in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for respiratory failure in children: a review. JAMA Pediatr 2021; 175 (05) 510-517
- 24 Geneslaw AS, Lu Y, Miles CH. et al. Long-term increases in mental disorder diagnoses after invasive mechanical ventilation for severe childhood respiratory disease: a propensity matched observational cohort study. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2021; 22 (12) 1013-1025
- 25 Fernando SM, Scott M, Talarico R. et al. Association of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation with new mental health diagnoses in adult survivors of critical illness. JAMA 2022; 328 (18) 1827-1836
- 26 McDonald MD, Sandsmark DK, Palakshappa JA, Mikkelsen ME, Anderson BJ, Gutsche JT. Long-term outcomes after extracorporeal life support for acute respiratory failure. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2019; 33 (01) 72-79
- 27 Baum RA, Berman BD, Fussell JJ. et al. Child health needs and the developmental-behavioral pediatrics workforce supply: 2020-2040. Pediatrics 2024; 153 (Suppl. 02) e2023063678H
- 28 Chandler HK, Teppa B, Johnson KA, McCracken C, Fortenberry JD, Paden ML. Determining comorbidities and quality of life among pediatric survivors of extracorporeal life support. J Crit Care 2015; 30 (05) 1085-1089
- 29 Dante SA, Carroll MK, Ng DK. et al; Pediatric ECMO (PediECMO) subgroup of the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury and Sepsis Investigators (PALISI) Network and the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO). Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation outcomes in children with preexisting neurologic disorders or neurofunctional disability. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2022; 23 (11) 881-892
- 30 Michel A, Vedrenne-Cloquet M, Kossorotoff M. et al. Neurologic outcomes and quality of life in children after extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2024; 25 (03) e158-e167
- 31 Chrysostomou C, Maul T, Callahan PM. et al. Neurodevelopmental outcomes after pediatric cardiac ECMO support. Front Pediatr 2013; 1: 47
- 32 Joffe AR, Lequier L, Robertson CM. Pediatric outcomes after extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for cardiac disease and for cardiac arrest: a review. ASAIO J 2012; 58 (04) 297-310
- 33 Bone MF, Feinglass JM, Goodman DM. Risk factors for acquiring functional and cognitive disabilities during admission to a PICU*. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2014; 15 (07) 640-648
- 34 U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs, Annual Report to Congress on the Implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, selected years, 1992 through 2006; and Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) database, retrieved February 25, 2022, from https://data.ed.gov/dataset/idea-section-618-data-products . National Center for Education Statistics, Common Core of Data (CCD), “State Nonfiscal Survey of Public Elementary/Secondary Education,” 2020–21 Preliminary. Table prepared February 2022. Accessed November 12, 2024 at: https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d21/tables/dt21_204.70.asp
- 35 Manning JC, Pinto NP, Rennick JE, Colville G, Curley MAQ. Conceptualizing post intensive care syndrome in children-the PICS-p framework. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2018; 19 (04) 298-300
- 36 Heneghan JA, Akande M, Goodman DM, Ramgopal S. High-frequency utilization of the PICU. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2022; 23 (05) e230-e239
- 37 Keim G, Hsu JY, Pinto NP. et al. Readmission rates after acute respiratory distress syndrome in children. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6 (09) e2330774
- 38 Watson RS, Asaro LA, Hutchins L. et al. Risk factors for functional decline and impaired quality of life after pediatric respiratory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2019; 200 (07) 900-909
- 39 Feudtner C, Villareale NL, Morray B, Sharp V, Hays RM, Neff JM. Technology-dependency among patients discharged from a children's hospital: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Pediatr 2005; 5 (01) 8