Virtual Endoscopy - Comparison with Colonoscopy in the Detection of Space-Occupying Lesions of the Colon
C. L. Kay 1
, D. Kulling 2
, R. H. Hawes 2
, J. W. R. Young 1
, P. B. Cotton 2
1Department of Radiology and Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Digestive Disease Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
2Department of Medicine, Digestive Disease Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
Background and Study Aims: A new technique has been described which combines abdominal helical computed tomography (CT) scanning and virtual reality computer technology, known as virtual colonoscopy (VC); the reconstructed images provide a simulation of the interior of the colon as viewed by endoscopy. We compared VC with conventional colonoscopy in patients with suspected or known colonic neoplasia.
Patients and Methods: A total of 38 patients, in whom there was a high likelihood of colonic polyps or cancer, underwent a noncontrast helical CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis after regular colonoscopy bowel preparation.The images were reconstructed into a VC presentation and compared with the subsequent conventional colonoscopy in a blinded manner.
Results: Conventional colonoscopy identified a total of 24 polyps 5 mm or greater. VC correctly identified five of 13 polyps 5 - 9 mm in size, and ten of 11 lesions greater than or equal to 10 mm in diameter. The reasons for four missed lesions were identified as being secondary to a collapsed rectum in two patients and stool in the right colon in two patients. The sensitivity and specificity per patient of VC for lesions greater than or equal to 5 mm were 66.7 % and 75.0 % respectively, and for lesions greater than 1 cm were 90.0 % and 82.1 %, respectively.
Conclusions: Virtual colonoscopy is feasible, well tolerated, and capable of detecting most lesions greater than 10 mm in diameter. This technique is continuing to be developed and warrants further evaluation as a diagnostic and screening tool in colorectal neoplasia.
References
1
Wingo P A, Tong T, Bolden B.
Cancer Statistics, 1995.
Cancer Journal Clinics.
1995;
45
8-13
3
Hardcastle J D, Thomas W M, Chamberlain J, et al.
Randomized controlled trial of fecal occult blood screening for colorectal cancer: results for first 107 349 subjects.
Lancet.
1989;
111
60-64
4
Kewenter R J, Bjork S, Haglind E, et al.
Screening and rescreening for colorectal cancer: a controlled trial of fecal occult blood testing in 27 700 subjects.
Cancer.
1988;
62
645-651
7
Hara A K, Johnson C D, Reed J E, et al.
Detection of colorectal polyps by computed tomographic colography: feasibility of a novel technique.
Gastroenterology.
1996;
110
284-290
8 Vining D J, Gelfand D W. Non-invasive colonoscopy using helical CT scanning, 3D reconstruction, and virtual reality. Presented at the Society of Gastrointestinal Radiologists' Annual Meeting. Maui, HI; February 1994
11 Teigen E, Vining D J, McCorquodale D. Improving virtual colonoscopy with a fecal contrast agent. Presented at the Society of Gastrointestinal Radiologists' Annual Meeting. Cancun, Mexico; March 1997
12
Royster A P, Fenlon H M, Clarke P D, et al.
CT colonoscopy of colorectal neoplasms: two-dimensional and three-dimensional virtual-reality techniques with colonoscopic correlation.
Am J Roentgenol.
1997;
169
1237-1242
14
Rex D K, Cutler C S, Lemmel G T, et al.
Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies.
Gastroenterology.
1997;
112
24-28
15
Morales T G, Sampliner R E, Garewal H S, et al.
The difference in colon polyp size before and after removal.
Gastrointest Endosc.
1996;
43 (1)
25-28
16
Gopalswamy N, Shenoy V N, Choudrhry U, et al.
Is in vivo measurement of polyps during colonoscopy accurate?.
Gastrointest Endosc.
1997;
46 (6)
497-502
20
American Cancer Society guidelines for screening and surveillance for early detection of colorectal cancer and polyps.
Update 1997.
Cancer.
1997;
47
154-160
23
Hofstad B, Vatn M H, Andersen I, et al.
Growth of colorectal polyps: redetection and evaluation of unresected polyps for a period of three years.
Gut.
1996;
39
449-456
24
Kay C L, Aabakken L, Evangelou H, et al.
Virtual colonoscopy - a pig model for optimization of study parameters (abstract).
Am J Gastroenterol.
1996;
91
349
26
Luboldt W, Bauerfeind D P, Steiner P, Fried M, et al.
Preliminary assessment of three dimensional magnetic resonance imaging for various colonic disorders.
Lancet.
1997;
349
1288-1291
27
Schoenenberger A W, Bauerfeind D P, Krestin G, Debatin G F.
Virtual colonoscopy with magnetic resonance imaging: in vitro evaluation of a new concept.
Gastroenterology.
1997;
112
1863-1870
29
Morrin M M, Kruskal J B, Farrell R J, et al.
Endoluminal CT colonography after an incomplete endoscopic colonoscopy.
Am J Roentgenol.
1999;
172
913-918