Download PDF
Endoscopy 2000; 32(2): 92-100
DOI: 10.1055/s-2000-140
State-of-the-Art Review
Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Premedication, Preparation, and Surveillance

G. D. Bell
  • Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Sunderland, Sunderland, United Kingdom
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
31 December 2000 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Once again the staggering variation in IV sedation practice between different countries is highlighted. This year the „to sedate or not sedate” debate focuses on colonoscopy. Several papers on the use of Propofol are reviewed. It remains this authors' opinion that propofol is an anaesthetic agent to be used by (or at least in the presence of) an anaesthetist. Informed consent and the question of what to do if a patient withdraws consent halfway through the procedure are discussed. Predictably further recent papers on the relative merits of midazolam and diazepam are presented plus another report on the use of flumazenil in the recovery period. The use of 3 % hydrogen peroxide solution to aid the visualization of acutely bleeding gastro-duodenal lesions is presented in two papers along with a discussion of its possible mode of action. The use of antispasmodics to aid colonoscopy is further discussed: this year concentrating on the use of hyoscyamine sulphate (as opposed to hyoscine butylbromide, the preferred agent in the UK). The patients receiving hyoscyamine sulphate had significantly shorter caecal intubation times, better sedation and easier colonic insertion. The „downside” was drug-induced tachycardia and the authors caution against the widespread use of this drug until this situation is further clarified. The subject of hypoxaemia at the time of gastroscopy, colonoscopy and ERCP was reviewed last year and further papers are presented in which the incidence of various levels of hypoxia are given. In anaesthetic circles it would be considered totally unacceptable to allow a patient's oxygen saturation to fall below 85 %, and yet we continue to have papers reporting its incidence. This level of desaturation is potential dangerous and the routine use of supplemental oxygen would greatly reduce this unneccessary risk to patients.

References (Key References are highlighted)

  • 1 Lazzaroni M, Bianco-Porro G. Premedication, preparation and surveillance [review].  Endoscopy. 1999;  31 2-8
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Whitwam JG, McCloy RF. Principles and practice of sedation. 2nd ed.  Oxford; Blackwell Science, 1998
  • 3 Freeman ML. Sedation and monitoring for gastrointestinal endoscopy. In: Yamada T, Alpers DH, Laine L, et al (eds). Textbook of gastroenterology. 3rd ed.  Philadelphia; Lippincott, 1999: 2655-2667
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Le Fanu J. The rise and fall of modern medicine.  London; Little Brown, 1999
  • 5 Zaman A, Hahn M, Hapke K, et al. A randomized trial of peroral versus transnasal unsedated endoscopy using an ultrathin videoendoscope.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;  49 279-284
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Dumortier J, Ponchon T, Scoazec JY, et al. Prospective evaluation of transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy: feasibility and study on performance and tolerance.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;  49 285-291
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Graig A, Hanlon J, Dent J, Schoeman M. A comparison of transnasal and transoral endoscopy with small-diameter endoscopes in unsedated patients.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;  49 292-296
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Saeian K, Townsend WF, Rochling FA, et al. Unsedated transnasal EGD: an alternative approach to conventional esophagoduodenoscopy for documenting Helicobacter pylori eradication.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;  49 297-301
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Sivak MV . The nose: is this the route to improving esophagoduodenoscopy? [editorial].  Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;  49 395-398
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Gopal DV, Zaman A, Katon RM. A role for transnasal esophagoduodenoscopy in patients intolerant to the oral route: report of two cases.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;  49 379-381
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Williams CB. Colonoscopy and flexible sigmoidoscopy. In: Cotton PB, Williams CB (eds). Practical gastrointestinal endoscopy.  Oxford; Blackwell Science, 1996: 187-274
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Waye JD, Williams CB. Colonoscopy and flexible sigmoidoscopy. In: Yamada T, Alpers DH, Laine L, et al (eds). Textbook of gastroenterology. 3rd ed.  Philadelphia; Lippincott, 1999: 2701-2717
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Greff M. Colorectal cancer screening in France: guidelines and professional reality.  Endoscopy. 1999;  31 471
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Eckardt VS , Kanzler G, Schmitt T, et al. Complications and adverse effects of colonoscopy with selective sedation.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;  49 560-565
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Ristikankare M , Hartikainen J, Heikkinen M, et al. Is routinely given conscious sedation of benefit during colonoscopy?.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;  49 566-572
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Rex DJ , Imperiale TF, Portish V. Patients willing to try colonoscopy without sedation: associated clinical factors and results of a randomized controlled trial.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;  49 554-559
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Ward B, Shah S, Kirwan P Mayberry JF. Issues of consent in colonoscopy: if a patient says “stop” should we continue ?.  J R Soc Med. 1999;  92 132-133
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Bell GD, Neale G, Wilkinson M, et al. Guidelines for informed consent for endoscopic procedures.  London [http://www.bsg.org.uk/guidelines/consent.html]; British Society of Gastroenterology, 1999: 132-133
  • 19 Neale G . Reducing risks in gastroenterological practice.  Gut. 1998;  42 139-142
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Bell GD. Premedication and i.v. sedation for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.  Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1990;  4 103-122
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Bell GD, Spickett GP, Reeve P, et al. Intravenous midazolam for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a study of 800 consecutive cases relating dose to age and sex of patient.  Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1987;  23 241-243
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Smith M, Bell GD, Quine A, et al. Small bolus injections of intravenous midazolam for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a study of 788 consecutive cases.  Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1993;  36 573-578
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Quine MA, Bell GD, McCloy RF, et al. Prospective audit of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in two regions of England: safety, staffing and sedation methods.  Gut. 1995;  36 462-467
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Zakko SF , Seifert HA, Gross JB. A comparison of midazolam and diazepam for conscious sedation during colonoscopy in a prospective double-blind study.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;  49 684-689
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Assy N , Rosser BG, Grahame GR, Minuk GY. The risk of sedation for upper GI endoscopy exacerbating subclinical hepatic encephalopathy in patients with cirrhosis.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;  49 690-634
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Chang AC, Solinger MA, Yang DT, Chen YK. Impact of flumazenil on recovery after outpatient endoscopy: a placebo-controlled trial.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;  49 573-579
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Graber RG. Propofol in the endoscopy suite: an anesthesiologist's perspective [editorial].  Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;  49 803-806
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Bell GD, Charlton JE. Colonoscopy: is sedation necessary and is there any role for i.v. propofol? [editorial].  Endoscopy . 2000;  32 [in press]
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Short TG, Chiu PG. Propofol and midazolam act synergistically in combination.  Br J Anaesth. 1992;  67 539-545
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Vinik HR. Propofol-alfentanil hypnotic interaction.  Anesth Analg. 1990;  71 65-69
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Carlsson U, Grattidge P. Sedation for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a comparative study of propofol and midazolam.  Endoscopy. 1995;  27 240-245
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Roseveare C, Seavell C, Patel P, et al. Patient-controlled sedation with propofol and alfentanil during colonoscopy: a pilot study.  Endoscopy. 1998;  30 482-483
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Roseveare C , Seavell C, Patel P, et al. Patient-controlled sedation and analgesia, using propofol and alfentanil, during colonoscopy: a prospective randomized controlled trial.  Endoscopy. 1998;  30 768-773
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Reimann FM , Samson U, Derad I, et al. Synergistic sedation with low-dose midazolam and propofol for colonoscopy.  Endoscopy. 2000;  32 [in press]
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Ben-Shlomo I, Abd-El-Khalim H, Ezry J, et al. Midazolam acts synergistically with fentanyl for induction of anaesthesia.  Br J Anaesth. 1990;  64 45-47
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Wehrmann T , Kokabpick S, Lembcke B, et al. Efficacy and safety of intravenous propofol sedation during routine ERCP: a prospective, controlled study.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;  49 677-683
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Saunders BP, Williams CB. Premedication with intravenous antispasmodic speeds up colonoscope insertion.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;  43 209-211
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Marshall JB , Patel M, Mahajan RJ, et al. Benefit of intravenous antispasmodic (hyoscyamine sulfate) as premedication for colonoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;  49 720-726
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Brandt LJ , Spinnell MK. Ability of naloxone to enhance the colonoscopic appearance of normal vasculature and colon vascular ectasias.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;  49 79-83
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Brandt LJ, Mukhopadhyay D. Masking of colon vascular ectasias by cold water lavage [letter].  Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;  49 141-142
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Baumann UA. Water intubation of the sigmoid colon: water instillation speeds up left-sided colonoscopy.  Endoscopy. 1999;  31 314-317
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Rizzo J , Bernstein D, Gress F. A randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial evaluating the cost-effectiveness of droperidol as a sedative premedication for EUS.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;  50 178-182
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Charlton JE. Monitoring and supplemental oxygen during endoscopy [editorial].  Br Med J. 1995;  310 886-887
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Bell GD, Bown NS, Morden A, et al. Prevention of hypoxaemia during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy using supplemental oxygen via nasal cannulae.  Lancet. 1987;  i 1022-1023
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Bell GD, Jones JG. Routine use of pulse oximetry and supplemental oxygen during endoscopic procedures under conscious sedation: British beef or common sense? [editorial].  Endoscopy. 1996;  28 718-721
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Allgayer H , Pohl C, Kruis W. Arterial oxygen desaturation during endoscopic ultrasonography combined with gastroscopy: a safety evaluation in outpatients.  Endoscopy. 1999;  31 447-451
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Marscall HU, Bartels F. Life-threatening complications of nasogastric administration of polyethylene glycol-electrolyte solutions (GoLytely) for bowel cleansing.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;  49 408-410
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Kallos AN , Canto MI, Wadwa KS, et al. Clinical usefulness of 3 % hydrogen peroxide in acute upper GI bleeding: a pilot study.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;  49 518-521
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Wu DC , Lu CY, Lu YC, et al. Endoscopic hydrogen peroxide spray may facilitate localization of the bleeding site in acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.  Endoscopy. 1999;  31 237-241
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Schwab D, Raithel M, Ell C, Hahn EG. Severe shock during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in a patient with severe systemic mastocytosis.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;  50 264-267
    PubMedGoogle Scholar

G. D. BellM.D. 

Endoscopy Unit

Sunderland Royal Hospital

Kayll Road

Sunderland SR4 7TP

United Kingdom

Phone: + 44-191-569-9204

Email: duncan_bell@compuserve.com