Ist nach tiefer anteriorer Rektumresektion eine kolonpouch-anale Anastomose empfehlenswert?

Zusammenfassung.

Einleitung: Eine komplette mesorektale Exzision beim Karzinom des mittleren und unteren Rektumdrittels macht eine komplette Entfernung des Rektumreservoirs notwendig. Die Anastomose kommt folglich als koloanale Anastomose unmittelbar suprasphinkter oder intersphinkter zu liegen. Die in dieser Weise operierten Patienten klagen häufig über eine hohe Stuhlfrequenz, imperativen Stuhldrang, Stuhlfragmentierung und Stuhlschmieren. Um diese Probleme zu lindern, wurde 1986 erstmals die koloanale Anastomose mit vorgeschaltetem Kolonpouch beschrieben. Methode: Alle relevanten Artikel bezogen auf das Thema Kolonpouch wurden ab dem Jahr 1986 herangezogen. Vorteile und Nachteile einer neorektalen Reservoirbildung wurden mit der geraden koloanalen Anastomosentechnik verglichen und bewertet. Ergebnisse: Die Konstruktion eines Kolonpouches nach tiefer anteriorer Rektumresektion reduziert die Stuhlfrequenz, die Häufigkeit der Stuhldrangepisoden und die Inzidenz an Inkontinenzproblemen. Die Pouchbildung kann jedoch zu Stuhlentleerungsstörungen führen und Einläufe oder Suppositorien notwendig machen. Die Wahl eines kurzen 5 - 7 cm langen Kolonpouchs minimiert die Evakuationsprobleme. Schlussfolgerung: Nach tiefer anteriorer Rektumresektion zeigen sich verglichen mit der koloanalen Anastomose übereinstimmend funktionelle Vorteile für die kolonpouch-anale Anastomose. Erste Langzeituntersuchungen zeigen die Vorteile des Kolonpouchs insbesondere im ersten postoperativen Jahr.

Is a colonpouch-anal anastomosis mandatory following low anterior resection?

Introduction: Total mesorectal excision (TME) in cancer of the middle and distal part of the rectum results in a complete resection of the rectal reservoir. The position of the anastomosis is close to the internal sphincter. Following this surgical procedure not few patients suffer on high stool frequency, urgency, stool fragmentation (clustering) and soiling in the postoperative period. In order to deminish this problems a colonic J pouch was introduced in 1986. Methods: All relevant articles identified in Medline databases were reviewed from 1986 to present. Functional results of the neorectal reservoir were reviewed and compared with the straight coloanal anastomotic technic. Results: The colonic J pouch has been shown to decrease stool frequency, urgency and continence problems. On the other hand a colonic pouch may increase the incidence of incomplete defecation. A small pouch design in the range of 5 - 7 cm minimizes evacuation problems. Conclusion: A colon pouch produces superior functional results compared with straight coloanal anastomosis following low anterior rectal excision. The functional superiority of the colon pouch was greatest at the first year postoperatively.

Rektumkarzinom - Kolonpouch - Operationstechnik - Funktion - Totale mesorektale Exzision (TME)

Rectal cancer - Colonic J Pouch - Total mesorectal excision (TME)

Literatur

• 1 Miles W E. A method of abdomino-perineal excision for carcinoma of the rectum and of the terminal portion of the pelvic colon.  Lancet. 1908;  ii 1812-132
• 2 Miles W E. The radical abdomino-perineal operation for cancer of the rectum and of the pelvic colon.  Br Med J. 1910;  2 941-942
• 3 Dukes C E. The spread of cancer of the rectum.  Br J Surg. 1930;  17 643-648
• 4 Dukes C E. The surgical pathology of rectal cancer.  Proc R Soc Med. 1943;  37 131
• 5 Westhues H. Über die Entstehung und Vermeidung des lokalen Rektumkarzinom-Rezidivs.  Arch Klin Chir. 1930;  161 582
• 6 Westhues H. Die pathologisch-anatomischen Grundlagen des Rektumkarzinoms. Thieme Verlag Leipzig 1934: 68
• 7 Goligher J C, Dukes C E, Bussey H JR. Lokal recurrences after sphincter saving excisions for carcinoma of the rectum and rectosigmoid.  Br J Surg. 1951;  39 199
• 8 Parks A G. Transanal technique in low rectal anastomosis.  J R Soc Med. 1972;  65 975-976
• 9 Goligher J C. Recent trends in the practice of sphincter saving excision for rectal cancer.  Ann Roy Coll Engl. 1979;  61 169
• 10 Pollett W G, Nicholls R J. The relationship between the extent of distal clearance and survival and local recurrence rates after curative anterior resection for carcinoma of the rectum.  Ann Surg. 1983;  198 159-163
• 11 Williams N S, Johnston D. Survival and recurrence after sphincter saving resection and abdominoperineal resection for carcinoma of the middle third of the rectum.  Br J Surg. 1984;  71 278-282
• 12 Shirouzu K, Isomoto H, Kakegawa T. Distal spread of rectal cancer and optimal distal margin of resection for sphincter-preserving surgery.  Cancer. 1995;  76 388-392
• 13 Fain S N, Patin S, Morganstern L. Use of mechanical apparatus in low colo-rectal anastomosis.  Arch Surg. 1975;  110 1079-1082
• 14 Quirke P, Durdey P, Dixon M F, Williams N S. Local recurrence of rectal adenocarcinoma due to inadequate surgical resection. Histopathological study of lateral tumour spread and surgical excision.  Lancet. 1986;  ii 996-999
• 15 Heald R J. The 'Holy Plane' of rectal surgery.  J R Soc Med. 1988;  81 503-508
• 16 MacFarlane J K, Ryall R DH, Heald R J. Mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.  Lancet. 1993;  341 457-460
• 17 Williams N S. The rationale for preservation of the anal sphincter in patients with low rectal cancer.  Br J Surg. 1984;  71 575-581
• 18 Thomas C, Madden F, Jehu D. Psychosocial morbidity in the first three months following stoma surgery.  J Psychosom Res. 1984;  28 251-257
• 19 Thomas C, Madden F, Jehu D. Psychsocial effects of stomas - Psychological morbidity one year after surgery.  J Psychosom Res. 1987;  31 311-316
• 20 Pedersen I K, Huit K, Christiansen J, Olsen J, Jensen P, Mortensen P E. Anorectal function after low anterior resection for carcinoma.  Ann Surg. 1986;  204 133-135
• 21 McDonalds P J, Heald R J. A survey of postoperative function after rectal anastomosis with circular stapling devices.  Br J Surg. 1983;  70 727-729
• 22 Lewis W G, Martin I G, Williamson M ER, Stephenson B M, Holdsworth P J, Finan P J. et al . Why do some patients experience poor functional results after anterior resection of the rectum for carcinoma?.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1995;  38 259-263
• 23 Miller S, Lewis W G, Williamson M ER, Holdsworth P J, Johnston D, Finan P J. Factors that influence the outcome after coloanal anastomosis for carcinoma of the rectum.  Br J Surg. 1995;  82 1327-1330
• 24 Williamson M ER, Lewis W G, Finan P J, Miller A S, Holdsworth P J, Johnston D. Recovery of physiologic and clinical function after low anterior resection of the rectum for carcinoma; myth or reality?.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1995;  38 411-418
• 25 Otto I C, Ito K, Ye C, Hibi K, Kasai Y, Akiyama S. et al . Causes of rectal incontinence after sphincter-preserving operations for rectal cancer.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;  39 1423-1427
• 26 Molloy R G, Moran K T, Coulter J, Waldron R, Kirwan W O. Mechanism of sphincter impairment following low anterior resection.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1992;  35 462-464
• 27 Havenga K, DeRuiter M C, Enker W W, Welvaart K. Anatomical basis of autonomic nerve-preserving total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.  Br J Surg. 1996;  83 384-388
• 28 Jehle E C, Haehnel T, Starlinger M J, Becker H D. Level of the anastomosis does not influence functional outcome after anterior resection for rectal cancer.  Am J Surg. 1995;  169 147-153
• 29 Parks A G, Nicholls R J, Belliveau P. Proctocolectomy with ileal reservoir and anal anastomosis.  Br J Surg. 1980;  67 533-538
• 30 Ursonimiya J, Iwama T, Imajo M, Matsuo S, Sawai S. et al . Total colectomy, mucosal proctectomy and ileoanal anastomosis.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1980;  23 459-466
• 31 Lazorthes F, Fages P, Chiotasso P, Lemozy J, Bloom E. Resection of the rectum with construction of a colonic reservoir and colo-anal anastomosis for carcinoma of the rectum.  Br J Surg. 1986;  73 136-138
• 32 Parc R, Tiret E, Frileux P, Moszkowski E, Loygue J. Resection and colo-anal anastomosis with colonic reservoir for rectal carcinoma.  Br J Surg. 1986;  73 139-141
• 33 Nicholls R J, Lubowski D Z, Donaldson D R. Comparison of colonic reservoir and straight colo-anal reconstruction after rectal excision.  Br J Surg. 1988;  75 318-320
• 34 Kusunoki M, Shoji Y, Yanagi H, Hatada T, Fujita S, Sakanoue Y. et al . Function after anoabdominal rectal resection and colonic pouch-anal anastomosis.  Br J Surg. 1991;  78 1434-1438
• 35 Mortensen N JM, Ramirez J M, Takeuchi N, Smilgin Humphreys M M. Colonic J pouch-anal anastomosis after rectal excision for carcinoma: functional outcome.  Br J Surg. 1995;  82 611-613
• 36 Ho Y H, Tan M, Seow-Choen F. Prospective randomized controlled study of clinical function and anorectal physiology after low anterior resection; comparison of straight and colonic J pouch anastomosis.  Br J Surg. 1996;  83 978-980
• 37 Berger A, Tiret E, Parc R, Frileux P, Hannoun L, Nordlinger B. et al . Excision of the rectum with colonic J pouch-anal anastomosis for adenocarcinoma of the low and mid rectum.  World J Surg. 1992;  16 470-477
• 38 Hida J, Yasutomi M, Fujimoto K, Okuno K, Leda S, Machidera N. et al . Functional outcome after low anterior resection with low anastomosis for rectal cancer using the colonic J-pouch.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;  39 986-991
• 39 Guillemot F, Leroy J, Boniface M. et al . Functional assessment of coloanal anastomosis with reservoir and excision of the transition zone.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1991;  34 967-972
• 40 Péllissier E P, Blum D, Bachour A, Bosset J F. Functional results of coloanal anastomosis with reservoir.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1992;  35 843-846
• 41 Cohen A M. Colon J-pouch rectal reconstruction after total or subtotal proctectomy.  World J Surg. 1993;  17 267-270
• 42 Ortiz H, Miguel M D, Armendariz P. et al . Coloanal anastomosis: are functional results better with a pouch.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1995;  38 375-377
• 43 Seow-Cheon F, Goh H S. Prospective randomized trial comparing J colonic pouch-anal anastomosis and straight coloanal reconstruction.  Br J Surg. 1995;  82 608-610
• 44 Hallböök O, Pahlman L, Krog M, Wexner S D, Sjödahl R. Randomized comparison of straight and colonic J pouch anastomosis after low anterior resection.  Ann Surg. 1996;  224 58-65
• 45 Ramirez J M, Mortensen N J, Takeuchi N, Smilgin Humphreys M M. Colonic J-pouch rectal reconstruction - is it really a neorectum?.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;  39 1286-1288
• 46 Romanos J, Stebbing J F, Humphreys M M. et al . Ambulatory manometric examination in patients with colonic J pouch and in normal controls.  Br J Surg. 1996;  83 1744-1746
• 47 Chew S-B, Tindal D S. Colonic J-pouch as a neorectum: functional assessment.  Aust N Z J Surg. 1997;  67 607-610
• 48 Hallböök O, Nyström P, Sjödahl R. Physiologic characteristics of straight and colonic J-pouch anastomoses after rectal excision for cancer.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1997;  40 332-338
• 49 Lazorthes F, Gamagami R, Chiotasso P. et al . Prospective, randomized study comparing clinical results between small and large colonic J-pouch following coloanal anastomosis.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1997;  40 1409-1413
• 50 Lazorthes F, Chiotasso P, Gamagami R A. et al . Late clinical outcome in a randomized prospective comparison of colonic J pouch and straight coloanal anastomosis.  Br J Surg. 1997;  84 1449-1451
• 51 Joo J S, Latulippe J F, Omer A, Weiss E G, Nogueras J J, Wexner S D. Long-term funktional evaluation of straight coloanal anastomosis and colonic J-pouch.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1998;  41 740-746
• 52 Fürst A, Burghofer K, Babl-Weisbarth M, Kümmel S, Tange S, Jauch K-W. Funktionelles Ergebnis und Lebensqualität nach coloanaler oder colonpouch-analer Anastomose - eine prospektiv randomisierte Studie.  Langenbecks Archiv, Forumsband. 1998;  Supplement I 621-624
• 53 Hildebrandt U, Lindemann W, Kreißler-Haag D, Feifel G. Die intersphinctere Rectumresektion mit colosphincterem Pouch.  Chirurg. 1995;  66 377-384
• 54 Huber F T, Herter B, Siewert J R. Colonic pouch vs. side-to-end anastomosis in low anterior resection.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1999;  42 896-902
• 55 Z'graggen K, Maurer C A, Mettler D, Stoupis C, Wildi S, Büchler M W. A novel colon pouch and its comparison with a straight coloanal and colon J-pouch-anal anastomosis: preliminary results in pigs.  Surgery. 1999;  125 105-112
• 56 Ruppert R, Staimmer D. Colonic „Coloplasty”-Pouch: A novel rechnique for low anterior resections.  Coloproctology. 1999;  21 232 (abstract)
• 57 Dennett E R, Parry B R. Misconceptions about the colonic J-pouch: what the accumulating data show.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1999;  42 804-811
• 58 Baker J W. Low end to side rectosigmoid anastomosis: description of technique.  Arch Surg. 1950;  61 143-145