Download PDF
Pharmacopsychiatry 2000; 33(6): 206-212
DOI: 10.1055/s-2000-8357
Original Paper
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Double-blind, Multicenter Comparative Study of Sertraline versus Amitriptyline in Outpatients with Major Depression

H.-J. Möller1 , K. Glaser2 , F. Leverkus3 , C. Göbel3
  • 1Psychiatric Department, University of Munich, Germany
  • 2lnstitute for Psychodiagnostics, Psychosomatics and Behavioral Medicine, Grevenbroich-Gustorf, Germany
  • 3Clinical Research Department, Pfizer Karlsruhe, Germany
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
31 December 2000 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of sertraline and amitriptyline in a German outpatient population. Methods: Patients with Major Depression (DSM-III-R) and HAM-D (21 items) ≥ 21 in 19 German centers received double-blind treatment with sertraline (initial dose 50 mg, titration up to 100 mg) or amitriptyline (75 mg, up to 150 mg) over 6 weeks. HAM-D (21 items), HAM-D Bech, CGI, DSI and SDS were evaluated for the efficacy analysis. FSUCL (Fischer Somatic and Undesired Effects Check List) and spontaneously reported adverse events were used for safety analysis. Results: Of the 240 patients enrolled in the study, 205 (100 sertraline; 105 amitriptyline) were evaluable for efficacy. No statistically significant differences were detected between the two groups in the ITT and ATP efficacy analyses. Response, defined as score 1 (very much improved) or 2 (much improved) of the CGI improvement score, was 76 % in the sertraline and 81 % in the amitriptyline group (efficacy evaluable patients = ATP population). In the structured FSUCL, the side-effect burden (FSUCL score > 2 for drug related symptoms) was significantly higher in the amitriptyline group at all follow up visits (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Both sertraline and amitriptyline are suitable for the treatment of Major Depression; sertraline is comparable to amitriptyline with regard to efficacy, and offers the additional benefit of a more favorable safety profile.

References

  • 1 Agosti V, Stewart J, Quitkin F. Life satisfaction and psychosocial functioning in chronic depression: effect of acute treatment with antidepressant.  J. Affect. Disord.. 1991;  23 35-41
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Aguglia E, Casacchia M, Cassano G B, Faravelli C, Ferrari G, Giordano P, Pancheri P, Ravizza L, Trabucchi M, Bolino F, Scarpato A, Berardi D, Provenzano G, Brugnoli R, Rozzini R. Double-blind study of the efficacy and safety of sertraline versus fluoxetine in major depression.  Int. Clin. Psychopharmacol.. 1993;  8 197-202
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Anderson I M, Tomenson B M. The efficacy of selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors in depression: a meta-analysis of studies against tricyclic anitdepressants.  J. Psychopharmacol.. 1994;  8 238-249
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Bech P, Gram L F, Dein E, Jacobsen O, Vitger J, Bolwig T G. Quantitative rating of depressive states.  Acta psychiat. scand.. 1975;  51 161-170
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Bennie E, Mullin J M, Martindale J J. A double-blind multicenter trial comparing sertraline and fluoxetine in outpatients with major depression.  J. Clin. Psychiatry. 1995;  56 229-237
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Bolden-Watson C, Richelson E. Blockade by newly-developed anti-depressants of biogenic amine uptake into rat brain synaptosomes.  Life Sciences. 1993;  52 1023-1029
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Brown H K, Kempton R A. The application of REML in clinical trials.  Statistics in Medicine. 1994;  13 1601-1617
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Cohn C K, Shrivastava R, Mendels J, Cohn J B, Fabre L F, Claghorn J L, Dessain E C, Itil T M, Lautin A. Double-blind, multicenter comparison of sertraline and amitriptyline in elderly depressed patients.  J. Clin. Psychiatry. 1990;  51 (suppl 12B) 28-33
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Davis C S, Koch G G. Some general methods for the analysis of categorical data in longitudinal studies.  Statistics in Medicine. 1988;  7 109-137
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Doogan D P, Langdon C J. A double-blind placebo-controlled comparison of sertraline and dothiepin in the treatment of major depression in general practice.  Int. Clin. Psychopharmacol.. 1994;  9 95-100
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Londborg P D, Wolkow R, Smith W T, DuBoff E, England D, Ferguson J, Rosenthal M, Weise C. Sertraline in the treatment of panic disorder: a multi-site, double-blind, placebo-controlled fixed-dose investigation.  Brit. J. Psychiatry. 1998;  173 54-60
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Fabre L F, Abuzzahab F S, Amin M, Claghorn J L, Mendels J, Petrie W M, Dube S, Small J G. Sertraline safety and efficacy in major depression: a double-blind fixed-dose comparison with placebo.  Biol. Psychiatry. 1995;  38 592-602
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Fawcett J. Morbidity of clinical depression.  Int. Clin. Psychopharmacol.. 1993;  8 217-220
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Fischer-Cornelssen K A. Multifokale Psychopharmakaprüfung (Multihospital Trial).  Drug Res.. 1974;  24 1706-1724
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Fournier J-P, Lane R M, Chouinard G, Watson D B, Amin M, Remick R A, Thorpe L U. A double-blind comparison of sertraline and imipramine in outpatients with major depression. Acute (8 weeks) and continuation (16 weeks) treatment.  Hum. Psychopharm.. 1997;  12 203-215
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Greist J, Chouniard G, DuBoff E, Halaris A, Kim S W, Koran L, Liebowitz M, Lydiard R B, Rasmussen S, White K. Double-blind parallel comparison of three dosages of sertraline and placebo in outpatients with obsessive-compulsive disorder.  Arch. Gen. Psychiatry. 1995;  52 289-295
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Hamilton M. A rating scale for depression.   J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 1960;  23 56-62
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Hyttel J. Comparative pharmacology of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs).  Nord. J. Psychiatry. 1993;  47 (suppl 30) 5-12
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Kiloh L, Andrews G, Neilson M. Long-term outcome of depressive illness.  Br. J. Psychiatry. 1988;  153 752-757
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Lydiard R B, Stahl M S, Hertzman M, Harrison W M. A double-blind, placebo-controlled study comparing the effects of sertraline versus amitriptyline in the treatment of Major Depression.  J. Clin. Psychiatry. 1997;  58 484-491
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Möller H J, Gallinat J, Hegerl U, Arató M, Janka Z, Pflug B, Bauer H. Double-blind, multicenter comparative study of sertraline and amitriptyline in hospitalized patients with Major Depression.  Pharmacopsychiatry. 1998;  31 170-177
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Montgomery S A, Baldwin D, Green M. Why do amitriptyline and dothiepin appear to be so dangerous in overdose?.  Acta Psychiatr. Scand.. 1989;  Suppl. 80 (suppl 354) 47-53
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 National Institute of Mental Health .12-CGI: Clinical Global Impressions. Guy W (ed) EDCEU Assessment in Psychopharmacology, Rev Ed,. Rockville, Maryland; 1970: 217-222
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 24 Olie J P, Gunn K P, Katz E. Sertraline: efficacy and toleration in major depression. Presented at XIXth Collegium Internationale Neuropsycho-pharmacologicum, Washington DC, USA, 27 June - 1 July 1994
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 25 Preskorn S H, Lane R M. Sertraline 50 mg daily: the optimal dose in the treatment of depression.  Int. Clin. Psychopharmacol.. 1995;  10 129-141
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Reimherr F W, Chouinard G, Cohn C K, Cole J O, LaPierre Y D, Masco H L, Mendels J. Antidepressant efficacy of sertraline: a double-blind, placebo and amitriptyline-controlled, multicenter comparison study in outpatients with major depression.  J. Clin. Psychiatry. 1990;  51 (suppl 12B) 18-27
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Salsburg D S. The use of restricted significance test in clinical trials. Springer Series in Statistics/Statistics in the Health Sciences 1992
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 28 Schatzberg A F. Dosing strategies for antidepressant agents.  J. Clin. Psychiatry. 1991;  52 Suppl 14-20
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Steinmeyer E M, Möller H J. Facet theroretic analysis of the Hamilton-D scale.   J. Affect. Disord.. 1992;  25 53-61
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Walczak D D, Apter J T, Halikas J A, Borison R L, Carman J S, Post G L, Patrick R, Cohn J B, Cunningham L A, Rittberg B, Preskorn S H, Kang J S, Wilcox Ch. The oral dose-effect relationship for fluvoxamine: a fixed-dose comparison against placebo in depressed outpatients.  Ann. Clin. Psychiatry. 1996;  8 139-151
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Zung W WK. 072 DSI. Depression status inventory. In: W. Guy (ed.) ECDEU Assessment Manual for Psychopharmacology. Rockville, Maryland; 1976: 333-336
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 32 Zung W WK. 073 SDS. Self-rating depression scale. In: W. Guy (ed.) ECDEU Assessment Manual for Psychopharmacology. Rockville, Maryland; 1976: 333-336
    Search in Google Scholar

Prof. Dr. med. H.-J. Möller

Direktor der Psychiatrischen Klinik und Poliklinik der Universität München Klinikum Innenstadt

Nußbaumstraße 7

80336 München

Germany