Skull Base 2001; 11(2): 109-120
DOI: 10.1055/s-2001-14435
ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Copyright © 2001 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA. Tel.: +1(212) 584-4662

Stereotactic Radiotherapy of Central Nervous System and Head and Neck Lesions, Using a Conformal Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy System (PeacockTM System)

Mario Ammirati1 , Antonio Bernardo1 , Nilam Ramsinghani2 , Richard Yakoob2 , Matthew Al-Ghazi2 , Jeffrey Kuo2 , Giuseppe Ammirati3
  • 1Division of Neurosurgery, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Camden, New Jersey
  • 2Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Irvine, California
  • 3University of California, Irvine
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
31 December 2001 (online)

ABSTRACT

The objective of this article is to evaluate single-fraction or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy of central nervous system (CNS) and head and neck lesions using intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with a commercially available system (PeacockTM, Nomos Corporation, Sewickley, PA). This system allows tomotherapeutic delivery of intensity-modulated radiation, that is, the slice-by-slice treatment of the volume of interest with an intensity-modulated beam, making the delivery of highly conformal radiation to the target possible in both single or multiple fractions mode. During an 18-month period, 43 (21 males and 22 females) patients were treated, using a removable cranial screw-fixation device. Ages ranged from 10 to 77 years (mean, 52.2; median, 53.5). Intra- and extra-axial lesions, including head and neck malignancies and spine metastases, were treated. Clinical target volume ranged from 0.77 to 195 cm3 (mean, 47.8; median, 29.90). The dose distribution was normalized to the maximum and was prescribed, in most cases, at the 80% or 90% isodose line (range, 65 to 96%; median, 85%; mean, 83.4%) and ranged from 14 to 80 Gy (mean, 48; median, 50). The number of fractions ranged from 1 to 40 (mean, 23; median, 25). In all but one patient, 90% of the prescription isodose line covered 100% of the clinical target volume. The heterogeneity index (the ratio between the maximum radiation dose and the prescribed dose) ranged between 1.0 and 1.50, whereas the conformity index (the ratio between the volume encompassed by the prescription isodose line and the clinical target volume) ranged between 1.0 and 4.5. There were no complications related to the radiation treatment. With a median follow-up of 6 months, more than 70% of our patients showed decreased lesion size. Stereotactic IMRT of CNS and head and neck lesions can be delivered safely and accurately. The Peacock system delivers stereotactic radiation in single or multiple fractions and has no volume limitations. It has been used to treat intracranial, head and neck, and spinal lesions. The option of fractionation, the lack of volume constraint, and the capability of treating intracranial, head and neck, and spinal pathology make stereotactic IMRT a valuable adjunct to established stereotactic radiotherapy systems delivering convergent-beam irradiation using the Linac or Gamma Knife. In a clinical setting that offers Linac, Gamma Knife radiosurgery, and conformal stereotactic radiotherapy, the latter may have advantages for treating large (> 25-cm3) and irregular lesions, especially when fractionation is considered useful.

REFERENCES

  • 1 Carol M P. IMRT: where we are today. In: Sternick ES, ed. The Theory and Practice of Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Madison, WI: Advanced Medical Publishing 1997: 17-36
  • 2 Emami B, Lyman J, Brown A. Tolerance of normal tissue to therapeutic irradiation.  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys . 1991;  21 109-122
  • 3 ICRU. New ICRU Dose specification report for external beam radiotherapy.  Technical Report 50. Bethesda, MD: International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements 1993
  • 4 Larson D A, Shrieve D C, Loeffler J S. Radiosurgery. In: Leibel SA, Phillips TL, eds. Textbook of Radiation Oncology Philadelphia: WB Saunders 1998: 391-393
  • 5 Nedzi L A, Kooy H, Alexander E. Variables associated with the development of complications from radiosurgery of intracranial tumors.  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys . 1991;  21 591-599
  • 6 Perez C A, Brady L W, Roti R oti. Overview. In: Perez CA, Brady LW, eds. Principles and Practice of Radiation Oncology 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1998: 13-14
  • 7 Perez C A, Brady L W, Roti Roti L J. Overview. In: Perez CA, Brady LW, eds. Principles and Practice of Radiation Oncology 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven 1998: 23-26
  • 8 Phillips M H, Stelzer K J, Griffin T W. Stereotactic radiosurgery: a review and comparison of methods.  J Clin Oncol . 1994;  12 1085-1099
  • 9 Shaw E, Klin R, Gillin M. Radiation Therapy Oncology Group: radiosurgery quality assurance guidelines.  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys . 1993;  27 1231-1239
  • 10 Shoshan Y, Suh J H, Barnett G H. Fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery. In: Germano IM, ed. Linac and Gamma Knife Radiosurgery Boston: American Association of Neurological Surgeons 2000: 57-70
  • 11 Wazer D E, Ling M, Kramer B. Clinical application of IMRT for malignant tumors of the CNS. In: Sternick ES, ed. The Theory and Practice of Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Madison, WI: Advanced Medical Publishing 1997: 177-193
  • 12 Woo S H, Grant W H, Bellezza D. A comparison of intensity modulated conformal therapy with a conventional external beam stereotactic radiosurgery system for the treatment of single and multiple intracranial lesions.  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys . 1996;  35 593-597
  • 13 Woo S H, Butler B E, Grant W H. Clinical experience: benign tumors of the CNS and head and neck tumors. In: Sternick ES, ed. The Theory and Practice of Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Madison, WI: Advanced Medical Publishing 1997: 195-198
    >