Background and Study Aims: Choledochocele has a potential for carcinogenesis, but no report has described malignant changes of the choledochocele in relation to pancreaticobiliary reflux because its anatomic form does not fit the criteria of pancreaticobiliary malunion (PBM). The aims of this study were to analyze the amylase level in bile in patients with choledochocele and to clarify whether the presence of a choledochocele predisposed to carcinoma.
Patients and Methods: Records of 2826 patients who had undergone endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography between 1995 and 1999 were reviewed for the presence of choledochocele and/or periampullary carcinoma. As an evidence of pancreaticobiliary reflux, amylase activity was examined in common duct bile obtained at surgery or by endoscopy. The prevalence of periampullary carcinoma was compared between patients with and without choledochocele.
Results: A total of 11 patients were diagnosed as having a choledochocele. The amylase level in bile was higher in patients with choledochocele (120 922 ± 62 269 IU/l; n = 4) than in previously examined patients with functioning gallbladders (15 ± 24 IU/l; n = 10, P = 0.005). The prevalence of periampullary carcinoma in patients with choledochocele (27 %, 3/11) was significantly higher than that in those without choledochocele (0.9 %, 26/2815; P < 0.0002).
Conclusion: The bile analysis of the present study presents one possible explanation for the predisposition to carcinoma in choledochocele as bile containing amylase may stagnate in the choledochocele and then carcinoma may develop in the inner epithelium of the choledochocele by the same mechanism as that leading to carcinogenesis in patients with PBM.
References
1
The Japanese Study Group on Pancreaticobiliary Maljunction (JSPBM), The Committee of JSPBM for Diagnostic Criteria .
Diagnostic criteria of pancreaticobiliary maljunction.
J Hepato Bil Pancreat Surg.
1994;
1
219-221
2
Todani T, Tabuchi K, Watanabe Y, et al.
Carcinoma arising in the wall of congenital bile duct cysts.
Cancer.
1979;
44
1134-1141
3
Todani T, Watanabe Y, Fujii T, et al.
Anomalous arrangement of pancreatobiliary ductal system in patients with choledochal cyst.
Am J Surg.
1984;
147
672-676
4
Kimura K, Ohto M, Saisho H, et al.
Association of gallbladder carcinoma and anomalous pancreaticobiliary ductal union.
Gastroenterology.
1985;
89
1258-1265
5
Shimada K, Yanagisawa J, Nakayama F.
Increased lysophosphatidylcholine and pancreatic enzyme content in bile of patients with anomalous pancreaticobiliary ductal junction.
Hepatology.
1991;
13
438-444
6
Scholz F J, Carrera G F, Larsen C R.
The choledochocele: correlation of radiological, clinical and pathological findings.
Radiology.
1976;
118
25-28
7
Sarris G E, Tsang D.
Choledochocele: case report, literature review, and a proposed classification.
Surgery.
1989;
105
408-413
8
Kagiyama S, Okazaki K, Yamamoto Y.
Anatomic variants of choledochocele and manometric measurements of pressure in the cele and the orifice zone.
Am J Gastroenterol.
1987;
82
641-649
9
Venu R P, Geenen J E, Hogan W J, et al.
Role of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis and treatment of choledochocele.
Gastroenterology.
1984;
87
1144-1149
10
Ghazi A, Slone E.
Endoscopic management of choledochocele. A case report and review of the English literature.
Surg Endosc.
1987;
1
151-154
11
Gerritsen J J, Janssens A R, Kroon H M.
Choledochocele: treatment by endoscopic sphincterotomy.
Br J Surg.
1988;
75
495-496
12
Martin R F, Biber B P, Bosco J J, Howell D A.
Symptomatic choledochoceles in adults. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography recognition and management.
Arch Surg.
1992;
127
536-539
13
Ozawa K, Yamada T, Matsumoto Y, Tobe R.
Carcinoma arising in a choledochocele.
Cancer.
1980;
45
195-197
14
Donald J J, Coral A, Lees W R.
Choledochocele complicated by carcinoma.
Clin Radiol.
1989;
40
101-103
15
Ladas S D, Katsogridakis I, Tassios P, et al.
Choledochocele, an overlooked diagnosis: report of 15 cases and review of 56 published reports from 1984 to 1992.
Endoscopy.
1995;
27
233-239
16
Chatila R, Andersen D K, Topazian M.
Endoscopic resection of a choledochocele.
Gastrointest Endosc.
1999;
50
578-580
17
Todani T, Watanabe Y, Narusue M.
Congenital choledochal cyst.
Am J Surg.
1977;
134
263-269
18
Tajiri H.
Choledochocele-containing stones.
Am J Gastroenterol.
1996;
91
1046-1048
19
Goldberg P B, Long W B, Oleaga L A, Mackie J A.
Choledochocele as a cause of recurrent pancreatitis.
Gastroenterology.
1980;
78
1041-1045
20
Schimpl G, Sauer H, Goriupp U, Beeker H.
Choledochocele: importance of histological evaluation.
J Pediatr Surg.
1993;
28
1562-1565
21
Sugiyama M, Atomi Y.
Does endoscopic sphincterotomy cause prolonged pancreatobiliary reflux?.
Am J Gastroenterol.
1999;
94
795-798
M. Tanaka,M.D.
Dept. of Surgery and Oncology Graduate School of Medical Sciences Kyushu University
Fukuoka 812-8582 Japan
Fax: Fax:+ 82-92-6425458
Email: E-mail:masaotan@surg1.med.kyushu-u.ac.jp