Incorrect Vector after Calibration of Surgical Instruments for Image Guidance. The Problem and the Solution: Technical Note

Recently, the use of intra-operative image guidance has gained an increasing role in neurosurgery for both spinal and cerebral interventions. Some modern neuronavigation systems are able to register any surgical instrument and create a virtual pointer. A virtual elongation of the digitized instrument is frequently used for neuroendoscopic procedures and spinal instrumentation. The instrument is equipped with a universal instrument adapter clamp and digitized by touching the tip of the instrument into a calibration cone. An algorithm calculates the vector of the instrument using two points: the tip of the instrument, and the geometrical center of the instrument adapter geometry. If a virtual elongation of the calibrated instrument is performed, the neuronavigation software may calculate an incorrect virtual target point. We developed an instrument calibration matrix (ICM) that automatically calibrates the correct vector, tip, and diameter of the instrument used for image-guided surgery. The ICM is easy to handle and does not cause a time delay during surgery. Virtual elongation of the surgical instruments shows correct anatomic data, which are fundamental for planning ventricular tapping and spinal screw placement in particular. The instrument calibration matrix is essential if surgical instruments are digitized and used for neuronavigation. It helps to avoid mis-planning of surgical vectors and mis-placement of the used instruments.

Key words:

Neuronavigation - Vector - Calibration

References

• 1 Spetzger U, Laborde G, Gilsbach J M. Frameless neuronavigation in modern neurosurgery.  Minim Invas Neurosurg. 1995;  38 163-166
• 2 Gumprecht H K, Widenka D C, Lumenta C B. BrainLab Vectorvision neuronavigation system: technology and clinical experience in 131 cases.  Neurosurgery. 1999;  44 97-105
• 3 Golfinos J G, Fitzpatrick B C, Lawrence R S, Spetzler R F. Clinical use of a frameless stereotactic arm: results of 325 cases.  J Neurosurg. 1995;  83 197-205 ibid 88 656-662
• 4 Sipos E P, Tebo S A, Zinreich S J, Long D M, Brem H. In vivo accuracy testing and clinical experience with the ISG viewing wand.  Neurosurgery. 1996;  19 194-204
• 5 Watanabe E, Watanabe T, Manaka S, Mayanagi Y, Takakura K. Three-dimensional digitizer (neuronavigator): new equipment for CT-guided stereotaxic surgery.  Surg Neurol. 1987;  27 543-547
• 6 Dorward N L, Alberti O, Velani B, Gerritsen F A, Harkness W FJ, Kitchen N D, Thomas D GT. Postimaging brain distortion: magnitude, correlates, and impact on neuronavigation.  J Neurosurg. 1998;  88 656-662
• 7 Hill D LG, Hawkes D J, Crossman J E, Gleeson M J, Cox T CS, Bracey E EC, Strong A J, Graves P. Registration of MR and CT images for skull base surgery using point-like anatomical features.  Br J Radiol. 1991;  64 1030-1035
• 8 Maciunas R J. Intraoperative cranial navigation.  Clin Neurosurg. 1996;  43 353-381
• 9 Rohde V, Reinges M H, Krombach G A, Gilsbach J M. The combined use of image-guided frameless stereotaxy and neuroendoscopy for the surgical management of occlusive hydrocephalus and intracranial cysts.  Br J Neurosurg. 1998;  12 531-538
• 10 Roessler K, Ungersboeck K, Dietrich W, Aichholzer M, Hittmeir K, Matula C H. et al . Frameless stereotactic guided neurosurgery: clinical experience with a infrared based pointer device navigation system.  Acta Neurochir. 1997;  139 551-559
• 11 Zamorano L, Chavantes C, Dujovny M, Malik G, Ausman J. Stereotactic endoscopic interventions in cystic and intraventricular brain lesions.  Acta Neurochir. 1992;  119 68-73

Corresponding Author: