Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-2001-18639
Successful Use of Oral Contraceptives
Publication History
Publication Date:
29 November 2001 (online)
ABSTRACT
Typical failure rates for oral contraceptives remain much higher than ideal failure rates. Patients can cite the pill's perceived risks more readily than its benefits, and many women use oral contraceptives inconsistently or discontinue them entirely without a medical reason. Successful use of oral contraceptives mandates that we rethink our roles as providers. Medical barriers, such as mandatory pelvic examinations, impede clients' access to services and require reevaluation. Efforts must also focus on thorough, individualized counseling. Because compliance poses difficulties for many women and noncompliance results in reduced efficacy, counseling must address content points relevant to proper, consistent use. Additionally, as unexpected side effects often cause frustration and method discontinuation, counseling should anticipate their occurrence. Adolescents present additional challenges. However, with careful attention to concerns relevant to teenage women and consideration of obstacles to compliance, oral contraceptives can indeed be used successfully in this group. Regardless of age, all clients should receive information regarding emergency contraception, and instructions for pill use should be individualized to meet the needs of each patient.
KEYWORD
Oral contraceptives - patient compliance - counseling - practice guidelines
REFERENCES
- 1 Peterson L S, Oakley D, Potter L S, Darroch J E. Women's efforts to prevent pregnancy: consistency of oral contraceptive use. Fam Plann Perspect . 1998; 30 19-23
- 2 Rosenberg M J, Waugh M S. Oral contraceptive discontinuation: a prospective evaluation of frequency and reasons. Am J Obstet Gynecol . 1998; 179 577-582
- 3 Hatcher R A, Guillebaud J. The pill: combined oral contraceptives. In: Hatcher RA, Trussell J, Stewart F, et al, eds. Contraceptive Technology 17th revised ed. New York: Ardent Media 1998: 405-466
- 4 Jones E, Forrest J D. Contraceptive failure rates based on the 1988 NSFG. Fam Plann Perspect . 1992; 24 12-19
- 5 Potter L S. Oral contraceptive compliance and its role in the effectiveness of the method. In: Cramer JA, Spilker B, eds. Patient Compliance in Medical Practice and Clinical Trials New York: Raven Press 1991: 195-207
- 6 Nelson A L. The pill at 40: a new look at a familiar method. Whose pill is it anyway?. Fam Plann Perspect . 2000; 32 89-90
- 7 Murphy P, Kirkman A, Hale R W. A national survey of women's attitudes toward oral contraception and other forms of birth control. Women's Health Issues . 1995; 5 95-99
- 8 Peipert J F, Gutmann J. Oral contraceptive risk assessment: a survey of 247 educated women. Obstet Gynecol . 1993; 82 112-117
- 9 Shelton J D, Angle M A, Jacobstein R A. Medical barriers to access to family planning. Lancet . 1992; 340 1334-1336
- 10 Stewart F H, Harper C C, Ellertson C E, Grimes D A, Sawaya G F, Trussell J. Clinical breast and pelvic examination requirements for hormonal contraception. JAMA . 2001; 285 2232-2239
- 11 Hardee K, Janowitz B, Stanback J, Villinski M T. What have we learned from studying changes in service guidelines and practices?. International Fam Plann Perspect Available at: http://www.agi-usa.org/pubs/journals/2408498.html. Accessed March 20, 2001 1998 24
- 12 Millstein S G, Adler N E, Irwin Jr E C. Sources of anxiety about pelvic examinations among adolescent females. J Adolesc Health Care . 1984; 5 105-111
-
13 Technical Guidelines Working Group. Recommendations for Updating Selected Practices in Contraceptive Use
Vol. I. Washington, DC: Office of Population, USAID; 1994
- 14 Harper C, Balistreri E, Boggess J, Leon K, Darney P. Provision of hormonal contraceptives without a mandatory pelvic examination: the First Stop Demonstration Project. Fam Plann Perspect . 2001; 33 13-18
- 15 Armstrong K A, Stover M A. Smart Start: an option for adolescents to delay the pelvic examination and blood work in family planning clinics. J Adolesc Health . 1994; 15 389-395
-
16 World Health Organization. Improving Access to Quality Care in Family Planning: Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use
Geneva: World Health Organization; 1996
- 17 Westhoff C, Marks F, Rosenfield A. Residency training in contraception, sterilization, and abortion. Obstet Gynecol . 1993; 81 311-315
- 18 Pariani S, Heer D M, Van Arsdol Jr D M. Does choice make a difference to contraceptive use?. <~>Evidence from East Java. Stud Fam Plann . 1991; 22 384-390
- 19 Speroff L, Glass R H, Kase N G. Clinical Gynecologic Endocrinology and Infertility. 6th ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1999
- 20 Deijen J B, Kornaat H. The influence of type of information, somatization, and locus of control on attitude, knowledge, and compliance with respect to the triphasic oral contraceptive Tri-Minulet. Contraception . 1997; 56 31-41
- 21 Nelson A L. Perceived and actual side effects of oral contraception. Dialogues in Contraception . 2001; 6 1-4
- 22 Guillebaud J. Will the pill become obsolete in this century?. Fam Plann Perspect . 2000; 32 93-94
- 23 Tyden T, Bingefors K, Odlind V. Oral contraceptives and compliance: reactions to cardiovascular alarm among users. Adv Contracept . 1999; 15 133-139
- 24 Hillard P JA. Oral contraceptive noncompliance: the extent of the problem. Adv Contracept . 1992 (suppl 1); 8 (13-20)
- 25 Potter L S. How effective are contraceptives?. <~>The determination and measurement of pregnancy rates. Obstet Gynecol . 1996; 88(suppl) 13S-23S
- 26 Emans J, Grace E, Woods E R, Smith D E, Klein K, Merola J. Adolescents' compliance with the use of oral contraceptives. JAMA . 1987; 257 3377-3381
- 27 Rickert V I, Berenson A B, Williamson A J, Wiemann C M. Immediate recall of oral contraceptive instructions: implications for providers. Am J Obstet Gynecol . 1999; 180 1399-1406
- 28 Rosenberg M J, Burnhill M S, Waugh M S, Grimes D A, Hillard P JA. Compliance and oral contraceptives: a review. Contraception . 1995; 52 137-141
- 29 Oakley D, Potter L, de Leon-Wong E, Visness C. Oral contraceptive use and protective behavior after missed pills. Fam Plann Perspect . 1997; 29 277-279
-
30 National Center for Health Statistics. Fertility, family planning, and women's health: new data from the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth. Table 45. Vital & Health Statistics 1997, Series 23, No. 19
- 31 Rosenberg M J, Waugh M S, Burnhill M S. Compliance, counseling, and satisfaction with oral contraceptives: a prospective evaluation. Fam Plann Perspect . 1998; 30 89-92
- 32 Lipkin M. Physician-patient interaction in reproductive counseling. Obstet Gynecol . 1996; 88(suppl) 31S-40S
- 33 Cramer J A. Compliance with contraceptives and other treatments. Obstet Gynecol . 1996; 88(suppl) 4S-12S
- 34 Serfaty D. Oral contraceptive compliance during adolescence. Ann N Y Acad Sci . 1997; 816 422-431
- 35 Metson D. Lessons from an audit of unplanned pregnancies. BMJ . 1988; 297 904-906
- 36 Canto de Cetina E T, Canto P, Ordonez Luna M. Effect of counseling to improve compliance in Mexican women receiving depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate. Contraception . 2001; 63 143-146
- 37 Berland G K, Elliott M N, Morales L S. Health information on the Internet: accessibility, quality, and readability in English and Spanish. JAMA . 2001; 285 2612-2621
- 38 Piccinino L J, Mosher W D. Trends in contraceptive use in the United States: 1982-1995. Fam Plann Perspect . 1998; 30 4-10
- 39 Blumenthal P D, McIntosh N. Pocket guide for family planning service providers 1996-1998. 2nd ed. Baltimore: JHPIEGO Corporation; 1996
- 40 American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Adolescence. Contraception and adolescents. Pediatrics . 1999; 104 1161-1166
- 41 Jay M S, DuRant R H, Shofitt T, Linder C W, Litt I F. Effect of peer counselors on adolescent compliance in use of oral contraceptives. Pediatrics . 1984; 73 126-131
- 42 Glei D A. Measuring contraceptive use patterns among teenage and adult women. Fam Plann Perspect . 1999; 31 73-80
-
43 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Emergency Oral Contraception. ACOG Practice Patterns, No. 25, March 2001. Washington, DC. Available at: http://www.acog.com/publications/educational_bulletins/pb025.htm. Accessed May 15, 2001
- 44 Citizen's Petition to the Food and Drug Administration, February 14, 2001. New York: Center for Reproductive Law and Policy. Available at: www.crlp.org/pr_01_214ecpetition.html. Accessed April 12 2001
- 45 Urquhart J. How much compliance is enough?. Pharm Res . 1996; 13 10-11
- 46 Sulak P S, Scow R D, Preece C, Riggs M W, Huehl T J. Hormone withdrawal symptoms in oral contraceptive users. Obstet Gynecol . 2000; 95 261-266
- 47 Thomas A L, Ellertson C. Nuisance or natural and healthy: should monthly menstruation be optional for women?. Lancet . 2000; 355 922-924
- 48 Kaunitz A M. Menstruation: choosing whether <~>. . . and when. Contraception . 2000; 62 277-284
- 49 McGurgan P, O'Donovan P, Duffy S, Rogerson L. Should menstruation be optional for women [letter]?. Lancet . 2000; 355 1730