Download PDF
J Reconstr Microsurg 2002; 18(2): 131-136
DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-19895
CLINICAL REVIEW

Copyright © 2002 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA. Tel.: +1(212) 584-4662

Comparison of Tensile Strength and Thrombus Formation between Mechanical Microvascular Anastomoses Using a Biodegradable Ring Device and Sutured Anastomoses

Makoto Ichikawa1 , Hiroshi Muneshige1 , Yoshikazu Ikuta1
  • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Faculty of Medicine Hiroshima University Japan
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
31 January 2002 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether early motion following mechanical anastomosis using a biodegradable ring device was possible or not, by measuring tensile strength and the rates of thrombus formation at anastomotic sites. Bilateral femoral arteries and veins of 24 rabbits were repaired by sutured anastomoses and biodegradable ring anastomoses. The tensile strength of the anastomotic site was measured by constant loading with a material-testing machine, using specimens excised at 24 hr, 72 hr, 1 week, and 2 weeks after anastomosis. The tensile strength of biodegradable ring arterial anastomoses was significantly stronger than sutured anastomoses at 24 hr, 72 hr, 1 week, and 2 weeks. No statistically significant differences were observed in venous anastomoses at any interval. In separate experiments, biodegradable ring anastomoses and sutured anastomoses of the bilateral femoral arteries of 18 rabbits were constructed, and early passive knee motion was carried out at 100 times once a day with maximum spreading of the hip joint for 24 hr, 72 hr, and 1 week. Thrombus formation at the anastomotic sites was evaluated by scanning electron microscope (SEM). SEM showed no thrombus formation in the biodegradable ring anastomoses at any interval; however, thrombi were observed in the sutured anastomoses (33∼50 percent).

KEYWORD

Microvascular anastomosis - biodegradable ring - early motion - tensile strength - thrombus formation

REFERENCES

  • 1 Ikuta Y. Microvascular double clamp, type A-II.  J Reconstr Microsurg . 1984;  1 41
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Nakayama K, Tamiya T, Yamamoto K, Akimoto S. A simple new apparatus for small vessel anastomosis.  Surgery . 1962;  52 918
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Östrup L T, Berggren A. The Unilink instrument system for fast and safe microvascular anastomosis.  Ann Plast Surg . 1986;  17 521
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Berggren A, Östrup L T, Ragnarsson R. Clinical experience with the Unilink/3M precise microvascular anastomotic device.  Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg . 1993;  27 35
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Berggren A, Östrup L T, Lidman D. Mechanical anastomosis of small arteries and veins with the Unilink apparatus: a histological and scanning electron microscopic study.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1987;  80 274
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Kimura H, Muneshige H, Ikuta Y. Evaluation of an absorbable ring for vascular anastomosis.  J Reconstr Microsurg . 1999;  15 331
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Qu W, Muneshige H, Ikuta Y. An absorbable pinned-ring device for microvascular anastomosis of vein grafts: experimental studies.  Microsurgery . 1999;  19 128
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Joji S, Muneshige H, Ikuta Y. Experimental study of mechanical microvascular anastomosis with new biodegradable ring device.  Br J Plast Surg . 1999;  52 559
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Hollinger J O, Battistone G C. Biodegradable bone repair materials: synthetic polymers and ceramics.  Clin Orthop . 1986;  207 290
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Kolb S, Wray C, Weeks P M. Bursting strength of microarterial repairs.  Surg Forum . 1979;  30 531
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Colen L B, Gonzales F P, Buncke H J. The relationship between the number of sutures and the strength of microvascular anastomoses.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1979;  64 325
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Lauritzen C, Bagge U. A technical and biomechanical comparison between two types of microvascular anastomoses.  Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg . 1979;  13 417
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Smitten K V. Breaking strength and suture holding capacity of syngenetic aortic vein grafts in the rat.  Acta Chir Scand . 1981;  147 545
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Pitt T TE, Humphries N LM. Microarterial anastomoses in the rat: the influence of different suture materials on patency, strength, and electron microscopic appearance of the vessels.  Br J Plast Surg . 1982;  35 150
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Davis C B, Smith B M, Haggen P, Urbaniak J R. The strength of microvascular anastomosis, an experimental evaluation in rats.  J Microsurg . 1982;  3 156
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Quigley M R, Bailes J E, Kwaan H C. Comparison of bursting strength between suture and laser anastomosed vessels.  Microsurgery . 1985;  6 229
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Gilbert R W, Ragnarsson R, Östrup L. Strength of microvascular anastomoses: comparison between the Unilink anastomotic system and sutures.  Microsurgery . 1988;  10 40
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Gentili F, Lougheed W M, Yoshijma S. A technique for rapid non-suture vascular anastomosis.  Can J Neurol Sci . 1987;  14 92
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar