Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the validity of the simple measurements
of the muscle performance of the lower extremity, one legged hop testing for distance
and the measurement of the circumference of the thigh 15 cm proximal to the joint
line, by comparing them to the isokinetic strength testing 5 to 9 years after an ACL
reconstruction with a bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) autograft. The measurements
were performed on 86 patients on average 7 years after the surgery. The clinical evaluation
was performed using the standard knee ligament evaluation form of the International
Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and the Lysholm and the Marshall knee scores.
At seven years, the isokinetic mean strength deficit of knee extension at the 60°
per second was 10 % in the operated limb as compared to the contralateral limb (NS).
In the knee flexion, the differences were even smaller and statistically not significant
either. The strength deficit of the knee extension at all knee angle velocities (p
< 0.005), and flexion at 60 degrees per second (p < 0.05), correlated to the one legged
hop testing, so that the patients with the greatest strength deficit also had the
worst outcome in the one legged hop test. Also, the correlation between thigh atrophy
and the deficit in the isokinetic strength test was significant in knee extension
at all knee angle velocities (p < 0.001), and in knee flexion at 180° per second (p
< 0.005). In the final evaluation of the IKDC, 21 patients were rated as “normal”,
51 as “nearly normal”, 13 as “abnormal”, and one as “severely abnormal”. The mean
of the Lysholm score was 83, classified as good, and that of Marshall score 43, classified
as good. In conclusion, the one legged hop testing, as a functional muscle strength
testing after an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, seems to correlate well
with the isokinetic strength testing of the knee, especially in the knee extension.
Because the hop testing can be easily performed and without extra equipment, we recommend
its use for the evaluation of the functional muscle performance after an anterior
cruciate ligament reconstruction. The measurement of the thigh atrophy is also easy
to perform, and should be used beside the one legged hop testing, especially if the
isokinetic strength testing is not available.
Key words
ACL reconstruction · isokinetic testing · hop testing · muscle performance · thigh
atrophy
References
- 1
Antonopolous J, Gillquist J.
Anterior tibial translation related to isokinetic concentric quadriceps torques.
Isokinet Exer Sci.
1996;
6
145-151
- 2
Barber-Westin S D, Noyes F R, Andrews M.
A rigorous comparison between the sexes of results and complications after anterior
cruciate ligament reconstruction.
Am J Sports Med.
1997;
25
514-526
- 3
Clancy W G Jr, Smith L.
Arthroscopic anterior and posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction technique.
Ann Chir Gynaecol.
1991;
80
141-148
- 4
Daniel D M, Stone M L, Sachs R, Malcom L.
Instrumented measurement of anterior knee laxity in patients with acute anterior cruciate
ligament disruption.
Am J Sports Med.
1985;
13
401-407
- 5
Donatelli R, Cole S P, Greenfield B, Wooden M, Wilkes J S, Lackey C.
Open and closed kinetic chain strength training verse functional exercises to improve
performance in patients with ACL reconstructed knees: a prospective study.
Isokin Exer Sci.
1996;
6
7-13
- 6
Feiring D C, Ellenbecker T S.
Single versus multiple joint isokinetic testing with ACL reconstructed patients.
Isokin Exer Sci.
1996;
6
109-115
- 7
Fu F H, Bennett C H, Lattermann C, Ma C B.
Current trends in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Part I: Biology and biomechanics
of reconstruction.
Am J Sports Med.
1999;
27
821-830
- 8 Hefti F, Drobny T, Hackenbusch W, Kipfer W C, Holzach P, Jakob R P, Muller W e,
Staubli H U.
Evaluation of knee ligament injuries: the OAK and IKDCformsIn: Jakob RP, Staubli H-U
(eds). The Knee and the Cruciate Ligament. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York; Springer 1990:
134-139
- 9
Hogervorst T, Brand R A.
Mechanoreceptors in joint function. Current concepts review.
J Bone Joint Surg.
1998;
80
1365-1378
- 10
Holm I, Ludvigsen P, Steen H.
Isokinetic hamstrings/quadriceps ratios: Normal values and reproducibility in sport
students.
Isokin Exer Sci.
1994;
4
141-145
- 11
Holm I, Risberg M A, Aune A K, Tjomsland O, Steen H.
Muscle strength recovery following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A prospective
study of 151 patients with a two-year follow-up.
Isokin Exer Sci.
2000;
8
57-63
- 12
Johnson R J, Beynnon B D, Nichols C E, Renström P AFH.
The treatment of injuries of the anterior cruciate ligament. Current concepts review.
J Bone Joint Surg.
1992;
74
140-151
- 13
Juris P M, Phillips E M, Dalpe C, Edwards C, Gotlin R S, Kane D J.
A dynamic test of lower extremity function following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
and rehabilitation.
JOSPT.
1997;
26
184-191
- 14
Järvelä T, Kannus P, Järvinen M.
Anterior knee pain 7 years after an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with
a bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft.
Scand J Med Sci Sports.
2000;
10
221-227
- 15
Järvelä T, Paakkala T, Kannus P, Järvinen M.
The incidence of patellofemoral osteoarthritis and associated findings 7 years after
anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft.
Am J Sports Med.
2001;
29
18-24
- 16
Kannus P, Järvinen M, Latvala K.
Knee strength evaluation: A standardized test protocol and scoring scale for isokinetic
and isometric strength measurement of the knee joint for evaluation of long-term healing
results of various knee problems and their treatment procedures.
Scand J Sports Sci.
1987;
9
9-13
- 17
Li C K, Chan K M, Hsu S YC, Chien P, Wong W N.
A quantifiable approach in the comparison of isokinetic assessment data-new correlation
equations for the Johnson antishear device and standard shin pad in the isokinetic
assessment of the knee.
Br J Sports Med.
1995;
29
171-173
- 18
Lysholm J, Gillquist J.
Evaluation of knee ligament surgery results with special emphasis on use of scoring
scale.
Am J Sports Med.
1982;
10
150-154
- 19
Marshall J L, Fetto J F, Botero B M.
Knee ligament injuries. A standardized evaluation method.
Clin Orthop.
1977;
123
115-129
- 20 Moore K L.
The knee joint. In: Moore KL (eds) Clinically Oriented Anatomy. Baltimore, London, Los Angeles, Sydney;
Williams & Wilkins 1985 Second Edition: 523-41
- 21
Natri A, Järvinen M, Latvala K, Kannus P.
Isokinetic muscle performance after anterior cruciate ligament surgery. Long-term
results and outcome predicting factors after primary surgery and late-phase reconstruction.
Int J Sports Med.
1996;
17
223-238
- 22
Ohkoshi Y, Inoue C, Yamane S, Hashimoto T, Ishida R.
Changes in muscle strength properties caused by harvesting of autogenous semitendinosus
tendon for reconstruction of contralateral anterior cruciate ligament.
Arthroscopy.
1998;
14
580-584
- 23
Paterno M V, Greenberger H B.
The test-retest reliability of a one legged hop for distance in young adults with
and without ACL reconstruction.
Isokin Exer Sci.
1996;
6
1-6
- 24
Rosenberg T D, Franklin J L, Baldwin G N, Nelson K A.
Extensor mechanism function after patellar tendon graft harvest for anterior cruciate
ligament reconstruction.
Am J Sports Med.
1992;
20
519-525
- 25
Sachs R A, Daniel D M, Stone M L, Garfein R F.
Patellofemoral problems after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
Am J Sports Med.
1989;
17
760-765
- 26
Sekiya I, Muneta T, Ogiuchi T, Yagishita K, Yamamoto H.
Significance of the single-legged hop test to the anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed
knee in relation to muscle strength and anterior laxity.
Am J Sports Med.
1998;
26
384-388
- 27
Strauss G R, Bozikovic A J, Jones G L, Neale G C, Spittles M R, Boyle J JW.
Knee extensor strength 12 and 18 weeks post anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
Isokin Exer Sci.
1998;
7
19-26
- 28
Österås H, Augestad L B, Töndel S.
Isokinetic muscle strength after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
Scand J Med Sci Sports.
1998;
8
279-282
MD T. Järvelä
Division of Orthopaedics · Department of Surgery · Tampere University Hospital
PO Box 2000 · 33521 Tampere · Finland ·
Phone: +358 (3) 2476072
Fax: +358 (3) 2474358
Email: timo.jarvela@sci.fi